Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:07:43.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Effective Components of Parenting Programmes for Children’s Conduct Problems

from Part I - Theoretical Perspectives on Family-Based Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2021

By
Patty Leijten
Edited by
Jennifer L. Allen ,
David J. Hawes  and
Cecilia A. Essau
Jennifer L. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Bath
David J. Hawes
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Cecilia A. Essau
Affiliation:
Roehampton University, London
Get access

Summary

Parenting programs for children’s conduct problems are among the more ‘mature’ family-based interventions – more than 150 randomized trials and dozens of meta-analyses confirm their ability to reduce observed and parent-reported conduct problems. However, few programs are actually taken to scale, especially in times of health-care budget cuts and lower resource settings because many programs are complex and costly to implement. Recent developments to identify the effective components of parenting programs hold promise to fill the gap between existing complex evidence-based programs and the need for effective low-cost and easy-to-implement programs. This chapter provides an overview of these developments and their main findings.

Keywords

conduct problemsparenting programeffective componentscore ingredients
Type
Chapter
Information
Family-Based Intervention for Child and Adolescent Mental Health
A Core Competencies Approach
 , pp. 40 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 2013.Google Scholar
Moffitt, TE, Scott, S. Conduct disorders of childhood and adolescence. In: Rutter, M, Bishop, D, Pine, D, et al. (eds.), Rutter’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2008, pp. 543–64.Google Scholar
Campbell, SB, Shaw, DS, Gilliom, M. Early externalizing behavior problems: Toddlers and preschoolers at risk for later maladjustment. Developmental Psychopatholgy 2000; 12:467–88.Google Scholar
Odgers, CL, Moffitt, TE, Broadbent, JM, et al. Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Developmental Psychopathology 2008; 20:673–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, PJ, Morris, AS. Temperament and developmental pathways to conduct problems. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2004; 33:54–68.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, JM, Stewart, AL, Chan, RC, Shum, DH. Neuropsychological measures of executive function and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Criminology 2011; 49:1063–107.Google Scholar
Stormshak, EA, Bierman, KL, McMahon, RJ, Lengua, LJ. Parenting practices and child disruptive behavior problems in early elementary school. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 2000: 29;17–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingoldsby, EM, Shaw, DS. Neighborhood contextual factors and early-starting antisocial pathways. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2002: 5:21–55.Google Scholar
Mesman, J, Stoel, R, Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, et al. Predicting growth curves of early childhood externalizing problems: Differential susceptibility of children with difficult temperament. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2009; 37:625–36.Google Scholar
Sulik, MJ, Blair, C, Mills‐Koonce, R, et al. Early parenting and the development of externalizing behavior problems: Longitudinal mediation through children’s executive function. Child Development 2015; 86:1588–603.Google Scholar
Crick, NR, Dodge, KA. Social information‐processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development 1996: 67:993–1002.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss: Separation, Anxiety and Anger, Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I, Munholland, KA. Internal working models in attachment relationships: Elaborating a central construct in attachment theory. In: Cassidy, J, Shaver, PR (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. New York: Guilford Press, 2008, pp. 102–27.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977; 84:191–215.Google Scholar
Jones, TL, Prinz, RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychological Review 2005; 25:341–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, GR. Coercive Family Process. Eugene, OR: Castalia, 1982.Google Scholar
Skinner, BF. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review 1950; 57:193–216.Google Scholar
Bandura, A, Walters, RH. Social Learning and Personality Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
Smith, JD, Dishion, TJ, Shaw, DS, et al. Coercive family process and early-onset conduct problems from age 2 to school entry. Development and Psychopathology 2014; 26:917–32.Google Scholar
Weisz, JR, Kazdin, AE. Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents. New York: Guildford Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J, Shaver, PR. Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Maccoby, EE, Martin, JA. Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In: Mussen, PH, Hetherington, EM (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 4: Socialization, Personality, and Social Development. New York: Wiley, 1983, pp. 1–101.Google Scholar
Hanf, C. A collaborative treatment procedure for altering the interpersonal, environmental, and attitudinal contingencies that maintain problem behaviors in parent-child interaction. Working paper, University of Oregon Medical School, Portland, 1969.Google Scholar
Kaehler, LA, Jacobs, M, Jones, DJ. Distilling common history and practice elements to inform dissemination: Hanf-model BPT programmes as an example. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2016; 19:236–58.Google Scholar
Abraham, C, Michie, S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology 2008; 27:379–87.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Gardner, F, Melendez-Torres, GJ, et al. Meta-analyses: Key parenting programme components for disruptive child behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2019; 58:180–90.Google Scholar
Menting, AT, Orobio de Castro, BO, Matthys, W. Effectiveness of the Incredible Years parent training to modify disruptive and prosocial child behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychological Review 2013; 33:901–13.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Melendez-Torres, GJ, Knerr, W, Gardner, F. Transported versus homegrown parenting interventions for reducing disruptive child behavior: A multilevel meta-regression study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2016; 55:610–17.Google Scholar
Van Aar, J, Leijten, P, Orobio de Castro, B, Overbeek, G. Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A multilevel meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior. Clinical Psychological Review 2017; 51:153–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merikangas, KR, He, JP, Brody, D, et al. Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among US children in the 2001–2004 NHANES. Pediatrics 2010; 125:75–81.Google Scholar
Embry, DD, Biglan, A. Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2008; 11:75–113.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. Psychosocial Interventions for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Framework for Establishing Evidence-Based Standards. Washington, DC:National Academies Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17226/19013.Google Scholar
Kaminski, JW, Valle, LA, Filene, JH, Boyle, CL. A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training programme effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2008; 36:567–89.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Dishion, TJ, Thomaes, S, et al. Bringing parenting interventions back to the future: How randomized controlled microtrials may benefit parenting intervention efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2015; 22:47–57.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Gardner, F, Melendez-Torres, GJ, et al. Parenting behaviors that shape child compliance: A multilevel meta-analysis. PloS One 2018; 13:e0204929.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Pidgeon, AM, Gravestock, F, et al. Does parental attributional retraining and anger management enhance the effects of the Triple P – Positive Parenting Programme with parents at risk of child maltreatment?. Behavioral Therapy 2004; 35:513–35.Google Scholar
Lipsey, MW. Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2003; 587:69–81.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P, Cristea, IA, Karyotaki, E, et al. Component studies of psychological treatments of adult depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research 2019; 29:15–29.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Weisz, JR, Gardner, F. Discerning active ingredients of psychological therapy: A scoping review. Clinical Psychological Science. In press.Google Scholar
Garland, AF, Hawley, KM, Brookman-Frazee, L, Hurlburt, MS. Identifying common elements of evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children’s disruptive behavior problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2008; 47:505–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirby, JN. The role of mindfulness and compassion in enhancing nurturing family environments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2016; 23:142–57.Google Scholar
Havighurst, SS, Wilson, KR, Harley, AE, et al. Tuning in to kids: Improving emotion socialization practices in parents of preschool children – Findings from a community trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2010; 51:1342–50.Google Scholar
Ogden, T, Hagen, KA. Treatment effectiveness of parent management training in Norway: A randomized controlled trial of children with conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2008; 76:607–21.Google Scholar
Mouton, B, Loop, L, Stiévenart, M, Roskam, I. Confident parents for easier children: A parental self-efficacy programme to improve young children’s behavior. Education Sciences 2018; 8:134–52.Google Scholar
Lundahl, B, Risser, HJ, Lovejoy, MC. A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychological Review 2006; 26:86–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouton, B, Loop, L, Stievenart, M, Roskam, I. Parenting programmes to reduce young children’s externalizing behavior: A meta-analytic review of their behavioral or cognitive orientation. Child and Family Behavior Therapy 2018; 40:115–47.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Melendez-Torres, GJ, Gardner, F, et al. Are relationship enhancement and behavior management the ‘Golden Couple’ for reducing disruptive child behavior? Two meta-analyses. Child Development 2018; 89:1970–82.Google Scholar
Pinsker, M, Geoffroy, K. A comparison of parent effectiveness training and behavior modification parent training. Family Relations 1981; 30:61–8.Google Scholar
Stattin, H, Enebrink, P, Özdemir, M, Giannotta, F. A national evaluation of parenting programmes in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2015; 83:1069–84.Google Scholar
Högström, J, Olofsson, V, Özdemir, M, et al. Two-year findings from a national effectiveness trial: Effectiveness of behavioral and non-behavioral parenting programmes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2017; 45:527–42.Google Scholar
Jordans, MJ, Tol, WA, Ndayisaba, A, Komproe, IH. A controlled evaluation of a brief parenting psychoeducation intervention in Burundi. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2013; 48:1851–59.Google Scholar
Sumargi, A, Sofronoff, K, Morawska, A. A randomized-controlled trial of the Triple P – Positive Parenting Programme seminar series with Indonesian parents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 2015; 46:749–61.Google Scholar
Forgatch, MS, Bullock, BM, Patterson, GR, Steiner, H. From theory to practice: Increasing effective parenting through role play. The Oregon Model of Parent Management Training (PMTO). In: Steiner, H, Chang, K, Lock, J, Wilson, J (eds.), Handbook of Mental Health Interventions in Children and Adolescents: An Integrated Development Approach. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass, 2004, pp. 782–813.Google Scholar
Leijten, P, Thomaes, S, Orobio de Castro, B, et al. What good is labeling what’s good? A field experimental investigation of parental labeled praise and disruptive child behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2016; 83:134–41.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, AJ, Forehand, R. The effects of labeled and unlabeled praise upon lower and middle class children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1975; 19:536–43.Google Scholar
Owen, DJ, Slep, AM, Heyman, RE. The effect of praise, positive nonverbal response, reprimand, and negative nonverbal response on child compliance: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2012;15:364–85.Google Scholar
Kamins, ML, Dweck, CS. Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology 1999; 35:835–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderlong, J, Lepper, MR. The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 2002; 128:774–95.Google Scholar
Brummelman, E, Thomaes, S, Orobio de Castro, B, et al. ‘That’s not just beautiful – that’s incredibly beautiful!’ The adverse impact of inflated praise on children with low self-esteem. Psychological Science 2014; 25:728–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepper, MR, Greene, D, Nisbett, RE. Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the ‘overjustification’ hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973; 28:129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warneken, F, Tomasello, M. Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology 2008; 44:1785–8.Google Scholar
Brummelman, E (ed.). Psychological Perspectives on Praise. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
MacDonough, TS, Forehand, R. Response-contingent time-out: Important parameters in behavior modification with children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1973; 4:231–6.Google Scholar
Joshi, PT, Capozzoli, JA, Coyle, JT. Use of a quiet room on an inpatient unit. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1988; 27:642–4.Google Scholar
Olson, RL, Roberts, MW. Alternative treatments for sibling aggression. Behavioral Therapy 1987; 18:243–50.Google Scholar
Gardner, HL, Forehand, R, Roberts, M. Time-out with children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1976; 4:277–88.Google Scholar
Roberts, MW. Enforcing chair timeouts with room timeouts. Behavior Modification 1988; 12:353–70.Google Scholar
Bean, AW, Roberts, MW. The effect of time-out release contingencies on changes in child noncompliance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1981; 9:95–105.Google Scholar
Hamilton, SB, MacQuiddy, SL. Self‐administered behavioral parent training: Enhancement of treatment efficacy using a time‐out signal seat. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 1984; 13:61–9.Google Scholar
Reid, MJ, Walter, AL, O’leary, SG. Treatment of young children’s bedtime refusal and nighttime wakings: A comparison of ‘standard’ and graduated ignoring procedures. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1999; 27:5–16.Google Scholar
Siegel, D, Bryson, TP. ‘Time-outs’ are hurting your child. Time (September 23, 2014). Available at http://time.com/3404701/disciplinetime-out-is-not-good.Google Scholar
Quetsch, L, Wallace, N, Herschell, A, McNeil, C. Weighing in on the time-out controversy: An empirical perspective. Clinical Psychology 2015; 68:4–19.Google Scholar
Riley, AR, Wagner, DV, Tudor, ME, et al. A survey of parents’ perceptions and use of time-out compared to empirical evidence. Academic Pediatrics 2017; 17:168–75.Google Scholar
Dadds, MR, Tully, LA. What is it to discipline a child: What should it be? A reanalysis of time-out from the perspective of child mental health, attachment, and trauma. American Psychologist 2019; 74(7):794–808.Google Scholar
Kalb, LM, Loeber, R. Child disobedience and noncompliance: A review. Pediatrics 2003; 111:641–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, MW, McMahon, RJ, Forehand, R, Humphreys, L. The effect of parental instruction-giving on child compliance. Behavioral Therapy 1978; 9:793–8.Google Scholar
Elrod, MM. Children’s understanding of indirect requests. Journal of General Psychology 1987; 148:63–70.Google Scholar
Parpal, M, Maccoby, EE. Maternal responsiveness and subsequent child compliance. Child Development 1985; 56:1326–34.Google Scholar
Wahler, RG, Meginnis, KL. Strengthening child compliance through positive parenting practices: What works?. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1997; 26:433–40.Google Scholar
Kotler, JS, McMahon, RJ. Compliance and noncompliance in anxious, aggressive, and socially competent children: The impact of the child’s game on child and maternal behavior. Behavioral Therapy 2004; 35:495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, TH, Eyberg, S, McNeil, CB, et al. Parent-child interaction therapy with behavior problem children: Relative effectiveness of two stages and overall treatment outcome. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1993; 22:42–51.Google Scholar
Hinshaw, SP. Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychology Bulletin 1992; 111:127–55.Google Scholar
Clark, C, Prior, M, Kinsella, G. The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalising behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2002; 43:785–96.Google Scholar
Abraham, C, Michie, S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology 2008; 27:379–87.Google Scholar
Hattie, J, Biggs, J, Purdie, N. Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 1996; 66:99–136.Google Scholar
Zisser, A, Eyberg, S. Parent-child interaction therapy and the treatment of disruptive behaviors. In: Weisz, J, Kazdin, A (eds.), Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents. New York: Guilford Press, 2010, pp. 179–93.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development 1999; 18:57–75.Google Scholar
O’Dell, SL, Krug, WW, Patterson, JN, Faustman, WO. An assessment of methods for training parents in the use of time-out. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1980; 11:21–25.Google Scholar
Knapp, PA, Deluty, RH. Relative effectiveness of two behavioral parent training programmes. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1989; 18:314–22.Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C, Reid, M. The Incredible Years parents, teachers, and children training series: A multifacted treatment approach for children with conduct disorders. In: Weisz, J, Kazdin, A (eds.), Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents. New York: Guilford Press, 2010, pp. 194–210.Google Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, Van IJzendoorn, MH, Mesman, J, et al. Effects of an attachment-based intervention on daily cortisol moderated by dopamine receptor D4: A randomized control trial on 1- to 3-year-olds screened for externalizing behavior. Development and Psychopathology 2008; 20:805–20.Google Scholar
Flanagan, S, Adams, HE, Forehand, R. A comparison of four instructional techniques for teaching parents to use time-out. Behavioral Therapy 1979; 10:94–102.Google Scholar
O’Dell, SL, Mahoney, ND, Horton, WG, Turner, PE. Media-assisted parent training: Alternative models. Behavioral Therapy 1979; 10:103–10.Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C, Kolpacoff, M, Hollinsworth, T. Self-administered videotape therapy for families with conduct-problem children: Comparison with two cost-effective treatments and a control group. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1988; 56:558–66.Google Scholar
Phaneuf, L, McIntyre, LL. Effects of individualized video feedback combined with group parent training on inappropriate maternal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2007; 40:737–41.Google Scholar
Clarke, AT, Marshall, SA, Mautone, JA, et al. Parent attendance and homework adherence predict response to a family-school intervention for children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2015; 44:58–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Högström, J, Enebrink, P, Melin, B, Ghaderi, A. Eighteen-month follow-up of internet-based parent management training for children with conduct problems and the relation of homework compliance to outcome. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 2015; 46:577–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, Van IJzendoorn, MH, Juffer, F. Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychology Bulletin 2003; 129:195–215.Google Scholar
Van der Put, CE, Assink, M, Gubbels, J, van Solinge, NFB. Identifying effective components of child maltreatment interventions: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2018; 21:171–202.Google Scholar
Fukkink, RG. Video feedback in widescreen: A meta-analysis of family programmes. Clinical Psychological Review 2008; 28:904–16.Google Scholar
Tully, LA, Hunt, C. Brief parenting interventions for children at risk of externalizing behavior problems: A systematic review. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2016; 25:705–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijten, P, Raaijmakers, MAJ, Wijngaards, L, et al. Understanding who benefits from parenting interventions for children’s conduct problems: An integrative data analysis. Prevention Science 2018; 19:579–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nixon, RD, Sweeney, L, Erickson, DB, Touyz, SW. Parent–child interaction therapy: One-and two-year follow-up of standard and abbreviated treatments for oppositional preschoolers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2004; 32:263–71.Google Scholar
Berkovits, MD, O’Brien, KA, Carter, CG, Eyberg, SM. Early identification and intervention for behavior problems in primary care: A comparison of two abbreviated versions of parent-child interaction therapy. Behavioral Therapy 2010; 41:375–87.Google Scholar
Eyberg, SM, Matarazzo, RG. Training parents as therapists: A comparison between individual parent‐child interaction training and parent group didactic training. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1980; 36:492–9.Google Scholar
Niec, LN, Barnett, ML, Prewett, M, Shanley Chatham, JR. Group parent-child interaction therapy: A randomized control trial for the treatment of conduct problems in young children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2016; 84:682–98.Google Scholar
Sutton, C. Training parents to manage difficult children: A comparison of methods. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 1992; 20:115–39.Google Scholar
Dretzke, J, Davenport, C, Frew, E, et al. The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2009; 3:7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster-Stratton, C. Long-term follow-up of families with young conduct problem children: From preschool to grade school. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1990; 19:144–9.Google Scholar
Pevsner, R. Group parent training versus individual family therapy: An outcome study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1982; 13:119–22.Google Scholar
Thongseiratch, T, Leijten, P, Melendez-Torres, GJ. Online parent programmes for children’s behavioral problems: A meta-analytic review. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01472-0Google Scholar
MacDonell, KW, Prinz, RJ. A review of technology-based youth and family–focused interventions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2017; 20:185–200.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Markie-Dadds, C, Tully, LA, Bor, W. The Triple P – Positive Parenting Programme: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68:624–40.Google Scholar
Morawska, A, Sanders, MR. Self-administered behavioral family intervention for parents of toddlers: I. Efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2006; 74:10–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kling, Å, Forster, M, Sundell, K, Melin, L. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behavioral Therapy 2010; 41:530–42.Google Scholar
Stein, MA. Editorial: Is less parent training ‘not inferior’ to more? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2019; 58:565–6.Google Scholar
Fisher, RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1925.Google Scholar
Schlam, TR, Fiore, MC, Smith, SS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of intervention components for producing long‐term abstinence from smoking: A factorial screening experiment. Addiction 2016; 111:142–55.Google Scholar
Messer, SB, Wampold, BE. Let’s face facts: Common factors are more potent than specific therapy ingredients. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2002; 9:21–5.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×