Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T15:31:35.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 50 - Strategies to Repair Defects in the Fetal Membrane

from Fetal Stem Cell Transplantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Get access

Summary

The fetal membranes (FM) are comprised of the amniotic membrane (AM), chorionic membrane (CM), and underlying maternal decidua. Together they provide a barrier towards ascending infection and enable amniotic fluid (AF) homeostasis. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) can occur spontaneously and complicates around 2% of all pregnancies, leading to preterm birth, chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis, limb position defects, respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary hypoplasia, and chronic lung disease. Membrane separation is a common finding after open fetal surgery that leads to iatrogenic PPROM (iPPROM) and intrauterine infection, complicating over 30% of fetal surgeries. The subsequent associated preterm birth compromises the outcome of treatment, reducing the clinical effectiveness of fetal surgery [1]. Spontaneous healing of the membranes does not occur after fetoscopic surgery, leaving a visible defect in the FM (Figure 50.1) that is prone to AF leakage and subsequent iPPROM [2]. To date, there are no clinical solutions to improve healing of the FM after they rupture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 520 - 531
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deprest, JA, Lerut, TE, Vandenberghe, K. Operative fetoscopy: new perspective in fetal therapy? Prenat Diagn. 1997; 17: 1247–60.Google Scholar
Gratacós, E, Sanin-Blair, J, Lewi, L, et al. A histological study of fetoscopic membrane defects to document membrane healing. Placenta. 2006; 27: 452–6.Google Scholar
Crowley, AE, Grivell, RM, Dodd, JM. Sealing procedures for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7: CD010218.Google ScholarPubMed
Theoret, C. Physiology of wound healing. In Theoret, C, Schumacher, J, eds., Equine Wound Management. Ames: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2017, 113.Google Scholar
Devlieger, D, Millar, LK, Bryant-Greenwood, G, Lewi, L, Deprest, JA. Fetal membrane healing after spontaneous and iatrogenic membrane rupture: a review of current evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1512–20.Google Scholar
Sopher, D. The response of rat fetal membranes to injury. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1972; 51: 240–9.Google Scholar
Devlieger, R, Riley, SC, Verbist, L, Leask, R, Pijnenborg, R, Deprest, JA. Matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 and their endogenous tissue inhibitors in tissue remodeling after sealing of the fetal membranes in a sheep model of fetoscopic surgery. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2002; 9: 137–45.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Tseng, SC, et al. Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane and a bioinspired underwater adhesive to seal and promote healing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defect sites. Placenta. 2015; 36: 888–94.Google Scholar
Mogami, H, Hari Kishore, A, Akgul, Y, Word, RA. Healing of preterm ruptured fetal membranes. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 13139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Moise, KJ, et al. Histologic changes of the fetal membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2015; 78: 247–55.Google Scholar
Carvalho, S, Moron, AF, Menon, R, et al. Histological evidence of reparative activity in chorioamniotic membrane following open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Exp Ther Med. 2017; 14: 3732–6.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Bauters, D, Rynkevic, R, et al. Thrombin generation by fetoscopic trauma to the fetal membranes: an in vivo and in vitro Study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 39: 261–8.Google Scholar
Bilic, G, Ochsenbein-Kolble, N, Hall, H, Huch, R, Zimmermann, R. In vitro lesion repair by human amnion epithelial and mesenchymal cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 8792.Google Scholar
Ochsenbein-Kölble, N, Bilic, G, Hall, H, Huch, R, Zimmermann, R. Inducing proliferation of human amnion epithelial and mesenchymal cells for prospective engineering of membrane repair. J Perinat Med. 2003; 31: 287.Google Scholar
Lim, R, Chan, ST, Tan, JL, Mockler, JC, Murphy, SV, Wallace, EM. Preterm human amnion epithelial cells have limited reparative potential. Placenta. 2013; 34: 486–92.Google Scholar
Barrett, DW, David, AL, Thrasivoulou, C, Mata, A, Becker, DL, Engels, AC, et al. Connexin 43 is overexpressed in human fetal membrane defects after fetoscopic surgery. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 36: 942–52.Google Scholar
Barrett, DW, Keethes, A, Thrasivoulou, C, et al. Trauma induces overexpression of Cx43 in human fetal membrane defects. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37: 899906.Google Scholar
Genz, HG. Treatment of premature rupture of the fetal membranes by means of fibrin adhesion. Med Welt. 1979; 30: 1557–9.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, K, Moser, S. The technique of fibrin adhesion for premature rupture of the membranes during pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 1986; 14: 43–9.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, M, Bornick, PW, Arroyo, J, LeParc, G. Treatment of iatrogenic previable premature rupture of membranes with intra-amniotic injection of platelets and cryoprecipitate (amniopatch): preliminary experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 744–9.Google Scholar
Reddy, UM, Shah, SS, Nemiroff, RL, et al. In vitro sealing of punctured fetal membranes: potential treatment for midtrimester premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1090–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmanli, OH, Wapner, RJ, Lontz, JF. Efficacy of fibrin glue for in vitro sealing of human chorioamniotic membranes. J Reprod Med. 1998; 43: 986–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, BK, Roman, AS, MacKenzie, AP, et al. The closure of iatrogenic membrane defects after amniocentesis and endoscopic intrauterine procedures. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19: 296300.Google Scholar
Sciscione, AC, Manley, JS, Pollock, M, et al. Intracervical fibrin sealants: a potential treatment for early preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 368–73.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA. New horizons in the treatment of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Clin Perinatol. 2001; 28: 861–75.Google Scholar
Chmait, RH, Kontopoulos, EV, Chon, AH, Korst, LM, Llanes, A, Quintero, RA. Amniopatch treatment of iatrogenic preterm premature rupture of membranes (iPPROM) after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 1349–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, JH, Kuk, JY, Cha, HH, et al. Amniopatch treatment for preterm premature rupture of membranes before 23 weeks’ gestation and factors associated with its success. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 56: 599605.Google Scholar
Luks, FI, Deprest, JA, Peers, KH, Steegers, EA, van Der Wildt, B. Gelatin sponge plug to seal fetoscopy port sites: technique in ovine and primate models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 995–6.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Bornick, PW, Allen, M, Garabelis, N. Surgical treatment of spontaneous rupture of membranes: the amniograft – first experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 155–7.Google Scholar
O’Brien, JM, Barton, JR, Milligan, DA. An aggressive interventional protocol for early midtrimester premature rupture of the membranes using gelatin sponge for cervical plugging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 1143–6.Google Scholar
O’Brien, JM, Mercer, BM, Barton, JR, Milligan, DA. An in vitro model and case report that used gelatin sponge to restore amniotic fluid volume after spontaneous premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1094–7.Google Scholar
Deprest, JA, Papadopulos, NA, Decaluw, H, Yamamoto, H, Lerut, TE, Gratacós, E. Closure techniques for fetoscopic access sites in the rabbit at mid-gestation. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1730–4.Google Scholar
Liekens, D, Lewi, L, Jani, J, et al. Enrichment of collagen plugs with platelets and amniotic fluid cells increases cell proliferation in sealed iatrogenic membrane defects in the fetal rabbit model. Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28: 503–7.Google Scholar
Papadopulos, NA, Kyriakidis, DI, Schillinger, U, Totis, A, Henke, J, Kovacs, L, et al. Successful anatomic repair of fetoscopic access sites in the mid-gestational rabbit model using amnion cell engineering. In Vivo. 2010; 24: 745–50.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Hoylaerts, MF, Endo, M, et al. In vitro sealing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defects by a collagen plug imbued with fibrinogen and plasma. Prenat Diagn. 2013: 33: 162–7.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Moise, KY, Johnson, A, Moise, KJ. Absorbable gelatin plug does not prevent iatrogenic preterm premature rupture of membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 456–60.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Molina, S, Moise, KY, Moise, KJ Jr., Johnson, A. Chorioamnion plugging and the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes after laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35: 337–43.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Van Calster, B, Richter, J, et al. Collagen plug sealing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defects after fetoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 54–9.Google Scholar
Mallik, AS, Fichter, MA, Rieder, S, et al. Fetoscopic closure of punctured fetal membranes with acellular human amnion plugs in a rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1121–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlieger, R, Ardon, H, Verbist, L, Gratacós, E, Pijnenborg, R, Deprest, JA. Increased polymorphonuclear infiltration and iatrogenic amniotic band after closure of fetoscopic access sites with a bioactive membrane in the rabbit at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 844–8.Google Scholar
Ochsenbein-Kolble, N, Jani, J, Lewi, L, et al. Enhancing sealing of fetal membrane defects using tissue engineered native amniotic scaffolds in the rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 263. e1–7.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Joyeux, L, Van der Merwe, J, Jimenez, J, Prapanus, S, Barrett, DW, et al. Tissuepatch is biocompatible and seals iatrogenic membrane defects in a rabbit model. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 99105.Google Scholar
Kivelio, A, Dekoninck, P, Perrini, M, et al. Mussel mimetic tissue adhesive for fetal membrane repair: initial in vivo investigation in rabbits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med. 2013; 171: 240–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haller, CM, Buerzle, W, Brubaker, CE, et al. Mussel-mimetic tissue adhesive for fetal membrane repair: a standardized ex vivo evaluation using elastomeric membranes. Prenat Diagn. 2011; 31: 654–60.Google Scholar
Mann, LK, Papanna, R, Moise, KJ Jr., et al. Fetal membrane patch and biomimetic adhesive coacervates as a sealant for fetoscopic defects. Acta Biomater. 2012; 8: 2160–5.Google Scholar
Bilic, G, Brubaker, C, Messersmith, PB, et al. Injectable candidate sealants for fetal membrane repair: bonding and toxicity in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 85. e1–9.Google Scholar
Parolini, O, Alviano, F, Bagnara, GP, et al. Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the First International Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 300–11.Google Scholar
Miki, T, Lehmann, T, Cai, H, Stolz, DB, Strom, SC. Stem cell characteristics of amniotic epithelial cells. Stem Cells. 2005; 23: 1549–59.Google Scholar
Mi, S, David, AL, Chowdhury, B, Jones, RR, Hamley, IW, Squires, AM, Connon, CJ. Tissue engineering a fetal membrane.Tissue Eng Part A. 2012; 18: 373–81.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Fletcher, S, Moise, KJ Jr., et al. Cryopreserved human umbilical cord patch for in-utero spina bifida repair. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 168–76.Google Scholar
Roman, S, Bullock, AJ, Anumba, DO, MacNeil, S. Development of an implantable synthetic membrane for the treatment of preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes. J Biomater Appl. 2016; 30: 9951003.Google Scholar
Perrini, M, Mauri, A, Ehret, AE, et al. Mechanical and microstructural investigation of the cyclic behavior of human amnion. J Biomech Eng. 2015; 137: 061010.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, B, David, AL, Thrasivoulou, C, Becker, DL, Bader, DL, Chowdhury, TT. Tensile strain increased COX-2 expression and PGE2 release leading to weakening of the human amniotic membrane. Placenta. 2014; 35: 1057–64.Google Scholar
Sooranna, SR, Lee, Y, Kim, LU, Mohan, AR, Bennett, PR, Johnson, MR. Mechanical stretch activates type 2 cyclooxygenase via activator protein-1 transcription factor in human myometrial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004; 10: 109–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams Waldorf, KM. Uterine overdistention induces preterm labor mediated by inflammation: observations in pregnant women and nonhuman primates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 830. e1–830. e19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauri, A, Perrini, M, Mateos, JM, et al. Second harmonic generation microscopy of fetal membranes under deformation: normal and altered morphology. Placenta. 2013; 34: 1020–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, D, Moore, RM, Nash, A, et al. Decidual GM-CSF is a critical common intermediate necessary for thrombin and TNF induced in-vitro fetal membrane weakening. Placenta. 2014; 35: 1049–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, SG, Gibbons, KS. The impact of entry technique and access diameter on prelabour rupture of membranes following primary fetoscopic laser treatment for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 40: 100–9.Google Scholar
Beck, V, Lewi, P, Gucciardo, L, Devlieger, R. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and fetal survival after minimally invasive fetal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012; 31: 19.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×