Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T10:03:05.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Wind energy

from Part 3 - Renewable energy sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Alan Wright
Affiliation:
NREL's National Wind Technology Center, Golden, CO, USA
David S. Ginley
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado
David Cahen
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
Get access

Summary

Focus

During the last 30 years, wind energy technology has emerged as the leading renewable alternative to electrical power production from fossil fuels. Commercial development and deployment, driven by lower capital costs, technical innovations, and international standards, continue to facilitate installed capacity growth at a rate of 30%–40% per year worldwide [1]. Utility-class machines exceed 2 MW, with robust designs providing 95%–98% availability. Future technology advances will focus on lowering the cost of land-based systems and evolving next-generation technology for ocean deployments in both shallow and deep water.

Synopsis

Wind energy technology is poised to play a major role in delivering carbon-free electrical power worldwide. Advanced technology and manufacturing innovations have helped the cost of wind energy drop from $0.45 per kW·h 30 years ago to $0.05–$0.06 per kW·h, thus positioning wind energy to be directly competitive with fossil-fuel power generation. In 2009, wind technology accounted for 39% of all new electrical generation in the USA [2]. Worldwide, wind deployment continues to penetrate new markets, with power-plant installations spanning months instead of years. In the European Union, cumulative wind power capacity increased by an average of 32% per year between 1995 and 2005, reaching 74,767 MW by the end of 2009 [3]. The USA leads the world in total installed capacity, while India and China are emerging as major potential markets. Wind energy can no longer be considered European-centric and has become an international alternative to fossil-fuel power generation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BTM Consult ApS 2010 World Market Update 2009, Forecast 2010–2014RingkøbingBTM Consult ApSGoogle Scholar
American Wind Energy Association 2009 http://www.awea.org/learnabout/publications/reports/AWEA-US-Wind-Industry-Market-Reports.cfm
European Renewable Energy Council (EREC)http://www.erec.org/renewable-energy/wind-energy.html
Spera, D. 2009 Wind Turbine Technology – Fundamental Concepts of Wind Turbine EngineeringNew YorkASMECrossRef
Spera, D. 2009 Wind Turbine Technology – Fundamental Concepts of Wind Turbine EngineeringNew YorkASMECrossRef
Tangler, J.Somers, D. 2000 Evolution of Blade and Rotor DesignGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Timmer, W.van Rooij, R. 2003
Fuglsang, P.Bak, C.Antoniou, I. 2004 “Design and verification of the Risø-B1 airfoil family for wind turbines,”J. Solar Energy Eng 126 1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. O. L.Sørensen, J. N.Voutsinas, S.Sørensen, N. N.Madsen, H.Aa. 2006 “State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity,”Prog. Aerospace Sci 42 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreck, S.Robinson, M. 2007 “Horizontal axis wind turbine blade aerodynamics in experiments and modeling,”IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion 22 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D. 2001 WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 1 – Composite Blades for 80- to 120-Meter RotorGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergey, K. 1979 “The Lanchester–Betz limit,”J. Energy 3 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. 2001 WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 2: Turbine, Rotor and Blade LogisticsGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaNier, M. 2005 LWST Phase I Project Conceptual Design Study: Evaluation of Design and Construction Approaches for Economical Hybrid Steel/Concrete Wind Turbine TowersGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. 2006 Low Wind Speed Technology Phase II: Design and Demonstration of On-Site Fabrication of Fluted-Steel Towers Using LITS-Form(TM) ProcessGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Anon 2001 WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 3 – Self-Erecting Tower and Nacelle FeasibilityGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Anon 2002 Addendum to WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 3 – Self-Erecting Tower and Nacelle FeasibilityGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Bossanyi, E. A. 2000 “The design of closed loop controllers for wind turbines,”Wind Energy 3 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossanyi, E. A. 2004 486
International Energy Agency (IEA) 2008 The Application of Smart Structures for Large Wind Turbine Rotor Blades, Preliminary Proceedings of the 56th IEA Topical Expert Meeting, Organized by Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
Kwakernaak, H.Sivan, R. 1972 Linear Optimal Control SystemsNew YorkWiley InterscienceGoogle Scholar
Balas, M. J.Lee, Y. J.Kendall, L. 1998 “Disturbance tracking control theory with application to horizontal axis wind turbines,”Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Wind Energy SymposiumReno, NV95Google Scholar
Stol, K.Balas, M. 2003 “Periodic disturbance accommodating control for blade load mitigation in wind turbines,”ASME J. Solar Energy Eng 125 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A.Fingersh, L.Stol, K. 2010 “Testing further controls to mitigate loads in the controls advanced research turbine,”29th ASME Wind Energy ConferenceOrlando, FLGoogle Scholar
Krann, I.Bongers, P. M. 1993 “Control of a wind turbine using several linear robust controllers,”Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Decision and ControlSan Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
Bossanyi, E. A. 1987 “Adaptive pitch control for a 250 kW wind turbine,”Proceedings of the 9th BWEA Wind Energy ConferenceEdinburgh85Google Scholar
Johnson, K. E.Fingersh, L.Balas, M.Pao, L. Y. 2004 “Methods for increasing region 2 power capture on a variable-speed HAWT,”ASME J. Solar Energy Eng 126 1092−1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, S. A.Balas, M. J.Wright, A. D. 2009 “Direct adaptive control of a utility-scale wind turbine for speed regulation,”Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 19 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, N. D.Jonkman, B. J.Scott, G. N.Pichugina, Y. L. 2007 Comparing Pulsed Doppler LIDAR with SODAR and Direct Measurements for Wind AssessmentGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Harris, M.Hand, M.Wright, A. 2006 Lidar for Turbine ControlGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Laks, J.Pao, L.Wright, A.Kelley, N.Jonkman, B. 2010 “Blade pitch control with preview wind measurements,”29th ASME Wind Energy ConferenceOrlando, FLGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. 2007
Tindal, A. 2007
Johnson, C. 2008
White, E. 2009
Kelley, N. D.Osgood, R. M.Bialasiewicz, J. T.Jakubowski, A.“Using wavelet analysis to assess turbulence/rotor interactions,”Wind Energy 3 121CrossRef
Kelley, N. D.Jonkman, B. J.Scott, G. N. 2005 The Impact of Coherent Turbulence on Wind Turbine Aeroelastic Response and Its SimulationGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Banta, R. M.Pichugina, Y. L.Kelley, N. D.Jonkman, B.Brewer, W. A. 2008 “Doppler lidar measurements of the Great Plains low-level jet: applications to wind energy,”IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environmental Sci 1Google Scholar
Kelley, N. D.Jonkman, B. J. 2007 Overview of the TurbSim Stochastic Inflow Turbulence Simulator: Version 1.21Golden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonkman, B. J. 2009 TurbSim User's Guide: Version 1.50Golden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon 2005
Corten, G. P.Schaak, P. 2004 “More power and less loads in wind farms,”“Heat and Flux,” the European Wind Energy ConferenceLondonGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, J. F. 1988 “Calculating the flow field in the wake of wind turbines,”J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics 27 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N. O. 1983 A Note on Wind Generator InteractionRoskildeRisø National LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. 2008
Musial, W.Butterfield, S.McNiff, B. 2007
Hassan, U.Taylor, G. J.Garrad, A. D. 1988 “The dynamic response of wind turbines operating in a wake flow,”J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynamics 27 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L. E. 2007 “Analysis of array efficiency at Horns Rev and the effect of atmospheric stability,”MilanGoogle Scholar
Schlez, W.Neubert, A. 2009
Ayotte, K.Daby, R.Coppin, R. 2001 “A simple temporal and spatial analysis of flow in complex terrain in the context of wind energy modeling,”Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Energy 2008 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity SupplyWashington, DCUS Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
Baidya Roy, S.Pacala, S. W.Walko, R. L. 2004 “Can large wind farms affect local meteorology?,”J. Geophys. Res 109 D19101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, D. W.DeCarolis, J. F.Denkenberger, D. C. 2004 “The influence of large-scale wind-power on global climate,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci 101 16115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, S. C.Barthelmie, R. J.Kjellström, E. 2005 “Analyses of the potential climate change impact on wind energy resources in northern Europe using output from a regional climate model,”Climate Dynamics 25 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreck, S.Lundquist, J.Shaw, W. 2008 U.S. Department Of Energy Workshop Report: Research Needs for Wind Resource CharacterizationGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
Anon 2009 IEA Wind Energy Annual Report 2008ParisInternational Energy Agency46http://www.ieawind.org/AnnualReports_PDF/2009.htmlGoogle Scholar
Anon 2005 Offshore Wind ExperiencesParisIEA Publicationshttp://www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2005/offshore.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schreck, S.Laxson, A. 2005 Low Wind Speed Technologies Annual Turbine Technology Update (ATTU) Process for Land-Based Utility-Class TechnologiesGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, K.Schweizer, T. 2008 Primer: The DOE Wind Energy Program's Approach to Calculating Cost of EnergyGolden, CONational Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×