Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T15:26:59.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Ethical issues in human genomic databases in addiction research

from Section 2 - Research ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Audrey Chapman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Advances in computing, information technology, automated DNA extraction, sequencing, and genotyping have made it possible for researchers to move beyond studying a single gene (or genetic marker) in small populations to studying thousands of genes or even entire genomes in large populations. Genomic databases are playing an increasingly important role in many types of biomedical research involving human participants, ranging from physiological and behavioral studies to epidemiology and clinical trials. To create a genomic database, investigators extract DNA from biological samples such as blood, cheek scrapings, hair, or sputum. The DNA is then sequenced, and the data (e. g., AUGGAGCCU, etc.) is stored in a computer database. Once digitalized, the information can be easily shared with other investigators (Weir and Olick, 2004). The biological samples that serve as the basis for genomic data are usually stored in centralized sites known as biobanks (Weir and Olick, 2004). As biobanks are closely connected to genomic databases, this chapter will also address biobank issues.

Genomic databases may contain information about genes, genetic markers, or common genetic variants or whole genomes (Weir and Olick, 2004). Genomic information can be linked to other types of information pertaining to RNA, proteins, receptors, cellular structures, drugs, and diseases, to study statistical associations. In the last decade, there has been a tremendous increase in the quantity and variety of genomic databases. There are databases for specific populations, nationalities, and diseases, as well general databases. There are public non-profit databases as well as private, for-profit ones. Genomic databases may contain information from a few individuals to hundreds of thousands (Weir and Olick, 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Genetic Research on Addiction
Ethics, the Law, and Public Health
, pp. 108 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Cancer Society 2006 www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_statistics_for_penile_cancer_35.asp?sitearea=
Annas, G. 2000 Rules for research on human genetic variation – lessons from IcelandNew England Journal of Medicine 342 1830CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, E. 2005 Informed consent and biobanksJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health and Human Services 2009 www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/index.html
Dressler, L. 2009 Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: State of the scienceClinical Cancer Research 15 4270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulcher, J.Stefánnson, K. 2000 The Iceland Healthcare Database and informed consentNew England Journal of Medicine 342 1827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurwitz, D.Fortier, I.Lunshof, J. 2009 Children and population biobanksScience 325 818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodge, J.Gostin, L. 2008 Emanuel, E.Grady, C.Crouch, R.The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research EthicsNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Holtzman, N. 1999 Promoting safe and effective genetic tests in the United States: Work of the Task Force on Genetic TestingClinical Chemistry 45 732Google ScholarPubMed
Homer, N.Szelinger, S.Redman, M. 2008 Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarraysPLoS Genetics 4 e1000167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphries, S.Ridker, P.Talmud, P. 2004 Genetic testing for cardiovascular disease susceptibility: A useful clinical management tool or possible misinformation?Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 24 628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoppers, B. 2000 Population genetics and benefit sharingCommunity Genetics 3 212Google ScholarPubMed
Knoppers, B. 2010 Consent to “personal” genomics and privacyEmbo Reports 11 416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachman, H.Fann, C.Bartzis, M. 2007 Genomewide suggestive linkage of opioid dependence to chromosome 14qHuman Molecular Genetics 16 1327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J.Jung, M.Lee, J. 2010 5-HT2C receptor modulators: a patent surveyExpert Opinion in Therapeutic Patents 20 1429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levran, O.Londono, D.O’Hara, K. 2008 Genetic susceptibility to heroin addiction: A candidate gene association studyGenes, Brain, and Behavior 7 720CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C. Y.Mao, X.Wei, L. 2008 Genes and (common) pathways underlying drug addictionPLoS Computational Biology 4 e2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, Z.Owen, A.Altman, R. 2004 Genomic research and human subject privacyScience 305 183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowrance, W.Collins, F. 2007 Identifiability in genomic researchScience 317 600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunshof, J.Chadwick, R.Vorhaus, D. 2008 From genetic privacy to open consentNature Reviews Genetics 9 406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macklin, R. 2003 Bioethics, vulnerability, and protectionBioethics 17 472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, E. 2001 Bermuda rules: Community spirit, with teethScience 291 1192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, E. 2010 Cancer gene patents ruled invalidScience 328 153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, A.Gibbs, R. 2006 No longer de-identifiedScience 312 370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mello, M.Wolf, L. 2010 The Havasupai Indian tribe case – lessons for research involving stored biologic samplesNew England Journal of Medicine 363 204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merz, J.McGee, G.Sankar, P. 2004 “Iceland Inc.”? On the ethics of commercial population geneticsSocial Science and Medicine 58 1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bioethics Advisory Commitee 1999 Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy GuidanceRockville, MDNational Bioethics Advisory CommitteeGoogle Scholar
National Cancer Institute 2010 www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA
NIH 2010 http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07–088.html
Personal Genome Project 2010 www.personalgenomes.org/
Petrini, C. 2010 Broad” consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purposeSocial Science and Medicine 70 217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollack, A. 2011 Ruling upholds gene patent in cancer testNew York TimesA1Google Scholar
Ravitsky, V.Wilfond, B. 2006 Disclosing individual results to research participantsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 6 8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renegar, G.Webster, C.Stuerzebecher, S. 2006 Returning genetic research results to individuals: Points-to-considerBioethics 20 24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnik, D. 2003 Owning the GenomeAlbany, NYState University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Resnik, D. 2010 Genomic research data: Open vs. restricted accessIRB 32 1Google ScholarPubMed
Resnik, D.Sharp, R. 2006 Protecting third parties in human subjects researchIRB 28 1Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenstein, D.Miller, F. 2008 Emanuel, E.Grady, C.Crouch, R.The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research EthicsNew YorkOxford University Press437Google Scholar
Saccone, S.Bierut, L.Chesler, E. 2009 Supplementing high-density SNP microarrays for additional coverage of disease-related genes: addiction as a paradigmPLoS ONE 4 e5225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvaterra, E.Lecchi, LGiovanelli, S. 2008 Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobankingEMBO Reports 9 307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, D. 2007 Benefit sharing: It’s time for a definitionJournal of Medical Ethics 33 205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalowitz, D.Miller, F. 2005 Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participantsJournal of the American Medical Association 294 737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalowitz, D.Miller, F. 2008 Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: Attitudes, practices, and future directionsPLoS Medicine 5 e91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shamoo, A.Resnik, D. 2009 Responsible Conduct of ResearchNew YorkOxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, R.Olick, R. 2004 The Stored Tissue IssueNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wendler, D. 2006 One-time general consent for research on biological samplesBritish Medical Journal 332 544CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, S.Lawrenz, F.Nelson, C. 2008 Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendation. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Medical Association 2008 www.wma.net/en/20activities/10ethics/10helsinki

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×