Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T20:08:00.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Ethical issues related to receiving research funding from the alcohol industry and other commercial interests

from Section 2 - Research ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Audrey Chapman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Using terms of justification such as “corporate social responsibility” and “partnerships with the public health community,” the alcohol, tobacco, and gambling industries (mainly large producers, trade associations, interest groups, and social aspects organizations) fund a variety of scientific activities that involve addiction scientists or overlap with their work. In addition, the pharmaceutical industry funds clinical trials and supports other activities related to scientific research, such as the preparation of manuscripts and the sponsorship of lectures by speakers who investigate their products. The aim of this chapter is to evaluate the ethical challenges that have emerged from industry involvement in addiction science, particularly in relation to genetic research.

At the center of the ethical challenges are issues of trust, credibility, and conflict of interest. Trust in the addiction research world can be affected when commercial interests are perceived to outweigh health considerations. The credibility of scientific findings may be affected when evidence emerges that industry-sponsored research is flawed, biased, or methodologically weak. Conflict of interest is a situation in which the researcher has a personal or financial interest that may be put above the integrity of the research being conducted. After reviewing the extent of industry involvement in addiction research, we discuss the moral hazards of research funding from commercial interests, and offer ways in which individual investigators as well as professional organizations can work to minimize these risks.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genetic Research on Addiction
Ethics, the Law, and Public Health
, pp. 139 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABMRF 2011 www.abmrf.org/about_us.asp
ABMRF 2011 www.abmrf.org/unique_partnership.asp
ABMRF 2011 www.abmrf.org/grants2.asp
ABMRF 2011 www.abmrf.org/medical_advisory_council.asp
ABMRF 2011 www.abmrf.org/board_of_trustees.asp
Adams, P. J. 2007 Assessing whether to receive funding support from tobacco, alcohol, gambling and other dangerous consumption industriesAddiction 102 1027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Als-Nielsen, B.Chen, W.Gluud, C.Kjaergard, L. L. 2003 Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: A reflection of treatment effect or adverse eventsJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 290 921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babor, T. F. 2006 Diageo, University College Dublin and the integrity of alcohol science: It’s time to draw the line between public health and public relationsAddiction 101 1375Google ScholarPubMed
Babor, T. F. 2009 Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: Issues, concerns and conflicts of interestAddiction 104 34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babor, T.Miller, P.Edwards, G. 2010 Vested interests, addiction research and public policyAddiction 105 4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakke, ØEndal, D. 2010 Alcohol policies out of context: Drinks industry supplanting government role in alcohol policies in Sub-Saharan AfricaAddiction 105 22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D. E.Bero, L. A. 1998 Why review articles on the effects of passive smoking reach different conclusionsJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 279 1566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekelman, J. E.Li, Y.Gross, C. P. 2003 Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic reviewJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 289 454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bero, L. A. 2005 Tobacco industry manipulation of researchPublic Health Reports 120 200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bero, L. A.Rennie, D. 1996 Influences on the quality of published drug studiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 12 209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bero, L. A.Glantz, S.Hong, M. K. 2005 The limits of competing interest disclosuresTobacco Control 14 118Google ScholarPubMed
Bero, L. A.Oostvogel, F.Bacchetti, P.Lee, K. 2007 Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: Why some statins appear more efficacious than othersPLoS Medicine 4 184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhandari, M.Busse, J.Jackowski, D. 2004 Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trialsCanadian Medical Association Journal 170 477Google ScholarPubMed
Bion, J. 2009 Financial and intellectual conflicts of interest: Confusion and clarityCurrent Opinion in Critical Care 15 583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bitton, A.Neuman, M.Barnoya, J.Glantz, S. 2005 The p53 tumour suppressor gene and the tobacco industry: research, debate, and conflict of interestLancet 365 531Google ScholarPubMed
Bond, L.Daube, M.Chikritzhs, T. 2010 Selling addictions: Similarities in approaches between Big Tobacco and Big BoozeAustralasian Medical Journal 3 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston University School of Medicine Institute on Lifestyle and Health 2011 www.bu.edu/alcohol-forum
Boston University School of Medicine Institute on Lifestyle and Health 2011 www.bu.edu/alcohol-forum/archives-april-2010-april-2011
Brant, A. 2010 A not-so-slippery slopeAcademe 96 25Google Scholar
Cain, D.Detsky, A. 2008 Everyone’s a little bit biased (even physicians)JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 299 2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, L.Karkariz, K.Raffin, T. A.Swan, G.Koenig, B. A. 2005 Nicotine addiction through a neurogenomic prism: Ethics, public health, and smokingNicotine and Tobacco Research 7 181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, A.Hall, W. 2012 Addiction Neuroethics: The Promises and Perils of Neuroscience Research on AddictionNew YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Clarion Declaration 2008 Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 25 316
Dana, J.Loewenstein, G. 2003 A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industryJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 290 252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, R. A. 1986 Source of funding and outcome of clinical trialsJournal of General Internal Medicine 1 155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeAngelis, C.Fontanarosa, P. 2008 Impugning the integrity of medical science: The adverse effects of industry influenceJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 299 1833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dench, S.Iphofen, R.Huws, U. 2004 An EU Code of Ethics for Socio-Economic ResearchBrighton, UKInstitute for Employment Studieswww.respectproject.org/ethics/412ethics.pdfGoogle Scholar
Diethelm, P.Rielle, J. C.McKee, M. 2005 Links with the tobacco industryLancet 365 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djulbegovic, B.Lacevic, M.Cantor, A. 2000 The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored researchLancet 356 635CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doward, J. 2004
Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center 2011 www.galloresearch.org/about.htm
Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center 2011 www.galloresearch.org/board.htm
ERAB 2011 www.erab.org/asp2/about_erab/index.asp?doc_id=428
ERAB 2011 www.erab.org/asp2/about_erab/board_of_directors.asp
ERAB 2011 www.erab.org/asp2/about_erab/advisory_board.asp
ERAB 2011 www.erab.org/documents/research_grants/Research_funded_03_-_10.pdf
Etter, J. F.Burri, M.Stapleton, J. 2007 The impact of pharmaceutical company funding on results of randomized trials of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A meta-analysisAddiction 102 815CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmington Consensus 1997 The Farmington ConsensusAddiction 92 1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FASEB 2007 http://opa.faseb.org/pages/Advocacy/coi/Toolkit.htm
Friedberg, M.Saffran, B.Stinson, T. J.Nelson, W.Bennett, C. L. 1999 Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncologyJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 282 1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L. S.Richter, E. D. 2004 Relationship between conflicts of interest and research resultsJournal of General Internal Medicine 19 51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GeneWatch UK 2004 www.genewatch.org/pub-507666
Gmel, G. 2010 The good, the bad and the uglyAddiction 105 203Google ScholarPubMed
Gold, A.Appelbaum, P. S. 2011 Unconscious conflict of interest: A Jewish perspectiveJournal of Medical Ethics 37 402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goozner, M.Caplan, A.Moreno, J. 2009 A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journalsAddiction 104 1779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gundle, K.Dingel, M.Koenig, B. 2010 To prove this is the industry’s best hope: Big tobacco’s support of research on the genetics of nicotine addictionAddiction 105 974CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, W. 2006 Avoiding potential misuses of addiction brain scienceAddiction 101 1529Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, W.Madden, P.Lynskey, M. 2002 The genetics of tobacco use: Methods, findings and policy implicationsTobacco Control 11 119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, W.Mathews, R.Morley, K. I. 2010 Being more realistic about the public health impact of genomic medicinePLoS Medicine 7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann-La Roche, Incwww.roche.com/sci-genetictesting.pdf 2012
ICAP 2001 www.icap.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=jMev%2FS7JOa4%3D&tabid=75
Jagsi, R.Sheets, N.Jankovic, A. 2009 Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer researchCancer 115 2783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jernigan, D. H. 2012 Global alcohol producers, science, and policy: The case of the International Center for Alcohol PoliciesAmerican Journal of Public Health 102 80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, D.Caplan, A. L.Merz, J. F. 2003 All gifts large and small: Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-givingAmerican Journal of Bioethics 3 39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaergard, L. L.Als-Nielsen, B. 2002 Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: Epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJBritish Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 325 249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhar, M. J. 2009 Blacklisting among scientistsSynapse 63 539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lexchin, J.Bero, L. A.Djulbegovic, B.Clark, O. 2003 Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic reviewBritish Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 326 1167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGovern, T.Babor, T. F.Stenius, K. 2008 Babor, T. F.Stenius, K.Savva, S.O’Reilly, J.Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the PerplexedLondon, UKMulti-Science Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Melander, H.Ahlqvist-Rastad, J.Meijer, G.Beermann, B. 2003 Evidence b(i)ased medicine – selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applicationsBritish Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 326 1171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, P.Carter, A.De Groot, F. 2011 Carter, A.Hall, W.Illes, J.Addiction Neuroethics: The Ethics of Addiction Neuroscience Research and TreatmentChennai, IndiaAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, P.Babor, T. F.McGovern, T.Büringher, G. 2008 Babor, T. F.Stenius, K.Savva, S.O’Reilly, J.Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the PerplexedLondon, UKMulti-Science Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R. 2004 www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/11/06/gambling_industry_link_to_harvard_draws_questions/ 2012
Montgomery, J.Byerly, M.Carmody, T. 2004 An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophreniaControlled Clinical Trials 25 598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, D.Loewenstein, G. 2004 Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interestSocial Justice Research 17 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NCRG 2011 www.ncrg.org/about-ncrg
Nieto, A.Mazon, A.Pamies, R. 2007 Adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in funded and nonfunded studiesArchives of Internal Medicine 167 2047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paddock, R. C. 2007 Tobacco funding of research reviewedLos Angeles TimesGoogle Scholar
Peele, S. 2010 Civil war in alcohol policy: Northern versus southern EuropeAddiction Research and Theory 18 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlis, R. H.Perlis, C. S.Wu, Y. 2005 Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatryAmerican Journal of Psychiatry 162 1957CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Library of Science in the United States 2009 www.plosmedicine.org/static/competing.action
Rossow, I.Romelsjö, A. 2006 The extent of the “prevention paradox” in alcohol problems as a function of population drinking patternsAddiction 101 84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sismondo, S. 2008 How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: causal structures and responsesSocial Science and Medicine 66 1909CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sismondo, S. 2008 Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: a qualitative systematic reviewContemporary Clinical Trials 29 109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenius, K.Babor, T. F. 2010 The alcohol industry and public interest scienc. Addiction 105 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, E. 2008 Gambling with scienceSalon NewsGoogle Scholar
Tesler, L. E.Malone, R. E. 2008 Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policyAmerican Journal of Public Health 98 2123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tungaraza, T.Poole, R. 2007 Influence of drug company authorship and sponsorship on drug trial outcomesBritish Journal of Psychiatry 191 82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yank, V.Rennie, D.Bero, L. A. 2007 Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort studyBritish Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 335 1202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaphe, J.Edman, R.Knishkowy, B.Herman, J. 2001 The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trialsFamily Practice 18 565CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, H. 2009 Big tobacco and the human genome: Driving the scientific bandwagon?Genomics, Society and Policy 5 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×