Book contents
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Reviews
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Figure Credits
- Part I Introduction, Dynamic Systems, and Change
- Part II People
- Part III Climates
- Part IV Landforms
- Part V Biodiversity
- Part VI Water
- 17 Hydrologic Cycle
- 18 Annual Hydrographs and Water Use
- 19 Managing and Mitigating Hydrologic Systems
- Part VII Agriculture
- Part VIII Energy
- Part IX Minerals
- Part X Forests
- Part XI Perspective
- Book part
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
17 - Hydrologic Cycle
from Part VI - Water
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2018
Book contents
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Reviews
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Figure Credits
- Part I Introduction, Dynamic Systems, and Change
- Part II People
- Part III Climates
- Part IV Landforms
- Part V Biodiversity
- Part VI Water
- 17 Hydrologic Cycle
- 18 Annual Hydrographs and Water Use
- 19 Managing and Mitigating Hydrologic Systems
- Part VII Agriculture
- Part VIII Energy
- Part IX Minerals
- Part X Forests
- Part XI Perspective
- Book part
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
Summary
Water has thermal, chemical, and physical properties that make it versatile and necessary for nearly all life. Its high specific heat, high latent heat, and turbulent and conductive thermal properties make it capable of stabilizing temperatures and transporting energy efficiently. Its polarized nature allows many ionic substances to dissolve in it. It’s physical expansion when freezing enables it to weather rocks and float as ice, so it melts faster when weather warms. Water circulates among oceans, the atmosphere, land, plants and animals, soil, aquifers, rivers, and glaciers in a “hydrologic cycle.” Over 96% of the water is salty in oceans, and another 2% is ice. The remaining 2% is fresh water. A concern is the cleanliness and volume of water. Aquifers can be drawn down, polluted, or made salty and usable without care. Surface water travels between countries and agreements are needed on who uses the water. Forests help prevent flash floods by maintaining soil infiltration with their roots, and may reduce or increase total stream flow, depending on many factors. When water doesn’t infiltrate soils, it flows rapidly overland, scours stream channels, and lowers the water table.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Resources and the Environment , pp. 265 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Shiklomanov, I. A., Rodda, J. C.. World Water Resources at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century. (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Ludwig, D., Brock, W. A.. Management of Eutrophication for Lakes Subject to Potentially Irreversible Change. Ecological Applications. 1999;9(3):751–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashbolt, N. J.. Microbial Contamination of Drinking Water and Disease Outcomes in Developing Regions. Toxicology. 2004;198(1):229–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeChevallier, M. W., Norton, W. D., Lee, R. G.. Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in Surface Water Supplies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1991;57(9):2610–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Nordstrom, D. K.. Worldwide Occurrences of Arsenic in Ground Water. Science. 2002;296(5576):2143–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bruin, R. H., Lyman, R. M.. Coalbed Methane in Wyoming. In Coalbed Methane and the Tertiary Geology of the Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana, 50th Annual Field Conference Guidebook. (American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1999): pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
McArthur, J., Ravenscroft, P., Safiulla, S., Thirlwall, M.. Arsenic in Groundwater: Testing Pollution Mechanisms for Sedimentary Aquifers in Bangladesh. Water Resources Research. 2001;37(1):109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickson, R., McArthur, J., Burgess, W., et al. Arsenic Poisoning of Bangladesh Groundwater. Nature. 1998;395(6700):338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. F., Benoit, G.. Legacy Sources of Mercury in an Urbanised Watershed. Environmental Chemistry. 2009;6(3):235–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riera, J. L., Schindler, J. E., Kratz, T. K.. Seasonal Dynamics of Carbon Dioxide and Methane in Two Clear-Water Lakes and Two Bog Lakes in Northern Wisconsin, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 1999;56(2):265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. R., Vaughan, D. J., Skinner, B. J.. Resources of the Earth: Origin, Use, and Environmental Impacts, fourth edition. (Prentice Hall, 2011).Google Scholar
Hamblin, W. K., Christiansen, E. H.. The Earth’s Dynamic Systems, tenth edition. (Prentice Hall, 2001).Google Scholar
Huddart, D., Stott, T.. Earth Environments: Present, Past, and Future. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).Google Scholar
Hornberger, G. M., Wiberg, P. L., Raffensperger, J. P., D’Odorico, P.. Elements of Physical Hydrology. (JHU Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, M., Matter, A.. Turbidites and Varves in Lake Brienz (Switzerland): Deposition of Clastic Detritus by Density Currents. (Wiley Online Library, 1978).Google Scholar
Plummer, C. C., McGeary, D., Carlson, D. H.. Physical Geology, ninth edition. (McGraw-Hill, 2003).Google Scholar
Brinson, M. M.. Changes in the Functioning of Wetlands Along Environmental Gradients. Wetlands. 1993;13(2):65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. What Is a Wetland? 2016 (Accessed November 22, 2016). Available from: www.epa.gov/wetlands/what-wetland.Google Scholar
Engstrom, P., Brauman, K.. Global Aquifers Map. (Ensia, 2013 [Accessed July 6, 2016]). Available from: www.ensia.com/features/groundwater-wake-up.Google Scholar
Struckmeier, W., Richts, A., Philipp, U., Richts, A., cartographers. Groundwater Resources of the World. (UNESCO, BGR, IAEA, IAH, 2008).Google Scholar
Richts, A., Struckmeier, W. F., Zaepke, M.. Whymap and the Groundwater Resources Map of the World 1: 25,000,000. In Sustaining Groundwater Resources. (Springer, 2011): pp. 159–73.Google Scholar
UNESCO-IHP. Atlas of Transboundary Aquifers: Global Maps, Regional Cooperation and Local Inventories. (UNESCO, ISARM Programme, 2009).Google Scholar
Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F., van Beek, L. P.. Water Balance of Global Aquifers Revealed by Groundwater Footprint. Nature. 2012;488(7410):197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Department of Energy. Groundwater Contamination Illustration, Hanford. (US DOE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2004).Google Scholar
Peterson, R. E., Connelly, M. P.. Water Movement in the Zone of Interaction between Groundwater and the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2004;42(S1):53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, R. P.. Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Black Rock Groundwater Could Affect Movement of Radioactive Contamination under Hanford. (Columbia Institute for Water Policy, 2007 [Accessed March 25, 2016]). Available from: columbia-institute.org/blackrock/Issues/Hanford.html.Google Scholar
Barten, P. K., Jones, J. A., Achterman, G. L., et al. Hydrologic Effects of a Changing Forest Landscape. (National Research Council of the National Academies of Science, USA, 2008).Google Scholar
Custodio, E.. Aquifer Overexploitation: What Does It Mean? Hydrogeology Journal. 2002;10(2):254–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Runoff Data Center, cartographer. Major River Basins of the World. (Federal Institute of Hydrology [BfG], 2007).Google Scholar
BGR, UNESCO. Global Groundwater Maps: (BGR, 2016 [Accessed August 4, 2016]). Available from: www.whymap.org/whymap/EN/Downloads/Global_maps/globalmaps_node_en.html.Google Scholar
van Weert, F., van der Gun, J., Reckman, J.. Global Overview of Saline Groundwater Occurrence and Genesis. (International Groundwater Resource Assessment Centre [IGRAC], 2009).Google Scholar
UN FAO. AQUASTAT Main Database. (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization; 2016 [Accessed April 11, 2016]). Available from: www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en.Google Scholar
Waterloo, M., Beekman, F., Bruijnzeel, L., Frumau, K.. The Impact of Converting Grassland to Pine Forest on Water Yield in International Association of Hydrological Sciences Special Publication, 1993:149–.Google Scholar
Marsh, G. P.. Man and Nature, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. (Charles Scribner, 1865).Google Scholar
Kutzleb, C. R.. Rain Follows the Plow: The History of an Idea. (University of Colorado, 1968).Google Scholar
Betts, R., Cox, P., Collins, M., et al. The Role of Ecosystem-Atmosphere Interactions in Simulated Amazonian Precipitation Decrease and Forest Dieback under Global Climate Warming. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2004;78(1–3):157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, D., Futter, M. N, Bishop, K.. On the Forest Cover–Water Yield Debate: From Demand‐to Supply‐Side Thinking. Global Change Biology. 2012;18(3):806–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morello, L.. Cutting Down Rainforests Also Cuts Down on Rainfall. (Scientific American, 2012 (Accessed May 21, 2015). Available from: www.scientificamerican.com/article/cutting-down-rainforests/.Google Scholar
Spracklen, D., Arnold, S., Taylor, C.. Corrigendum: Observations of Increased Tropical Rainfall Preceded by Air Passage over Forests. Nature. 2013;494(7437):390–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragao, L. E.. The Rainforest’s Water Pump: An Investigation of Naturally Occurring Water Recycling in Rainforests Finally Marries the Results of Global Climate Models with Observations. Nature. 2012;489(7415):217–9.Google Scholar
Ferrill, M. J.. Rainfall Follows the Plow. (University of Nebraska, 2011 [Accessed July 28, 2017]). Available from: http://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.ii.049.Google Scholar
Lee, X., Goulden, M. L., Hollinger, D. Y., et al. Observed Increase in Local Cooling Effect of Deforestation at Higher Latitudes. Nature. 2011;479(7373):384–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, M. D.. Where Has All the White Oak Gone? BioScience. 2003;53(10):927–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. A., Post, D. A.. Seasonal and Successional Streamflow Response to Forest Cutting and Regrowth in the Northwest and Eastern United States. Water Resources Research. 2004;40(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veny, E. S.. Forest Harvesting and Water: The Lake States Experience 1. (Wiley Online Library, 1986).Google Scholar
Liu, W. J., Zhang, Y. P., Li, H. M., Liu, Y. H.. Fog Drip and Its Relation to Groundwater in the Tropical Seasonal Rain Forest of Xishuangbanna, Southwest China: A Preliminary Study. Water Research. 2005;39(5):787–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavelier, J., Goldstein, G.. Mist and Fog Interception in Elfin Cloud Forests in Colombia and Venezuela. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 1989;5(03):309–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogelmann, H.. Fog Precipitation in the Cloud Forests of Eastern Mexico. BioScience. 1973;23(2):96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, T. E.. Fog in the California Redwood Forest: Ecosystem Inputs and Use by Plants. Oecologia. 1998;117(4):476–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, J. P., Groffman, P. M., Fitzhugh, R. D., et al. Snow Depth Manipulation and Its Influence on Soil Frost and Water Dynamics in a Northern Hardwood Forest. Biogeochemistry. 2001;56(2):151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittredge, J.. Influences of Forests on Snow in the Ponderosa, Sugar Pine, Fir Zone of the Central Sierra Nevada. (University of California, 1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfan, A., Pomeroy, J., Kuchment, L.. Modeling Forest Cover Influences on Snow Accumulation, Sublimation, and Melt. Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2004;5(5):785–803.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar