Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T06:52:18.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Leopold–Maddock (LM) Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2022

Vijay P. Singh
Vijay P. Singh
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

The average river-channel system tends toward an approximate equilibrium between the channel and water and sediment it transports. Both discharge and sediment load principally depend on the drainage basin. Under equilibrium, the stream channel depth, width, velocity, and suspended sediment load at a given cross-section can be expressed as power functions of discharge and these functions constitute the at-a-station hydraulic geometry (AHG). In a similar vein, stream channel depth, width, flow velocity, and suspended load along the river vary with discharge as simple power functions under the condition that the frequency of discharge at all cross-sections is equal. These functions are similar even for rivers having very different physiography and constitute the theory of downstream hydraulic geometry (DHG). The power functions for both types of hydraulic geometry-at-a-station and downstream-form the Leopold and Maddock (LM) (1953) theory which is discussed in this chapter. The discussion is divided according to the type of geometry. For the same discharge frequency along the river, depth, width, and velocity of flow increase with discharge downstream.

Keywords

Drainage basin charcateristicssediment loadchannel morphologyflow duration curveat-a-station hydraulic geometrydownstream hydraulic geometey
Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Hydraulic Geometry
Theories and Advances
 , pp. 110 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, E. D. (1980). Effective and bankfull discharges of streams in the Yampa River basin, Colorado and Wyoming. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 46, pp. 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerklie, D. B., Moller, D., Smith, L. C., and Dingman, S. L. (2005). Estimating discharge in rivers using remotely sensed hydraulic information. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 309, pp. 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, L. M (1961). Drainage basins, channels, and flow characteristics of selected streams in Central Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-F, pp. 145–181, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Castro, J. M. and Jackson, P. I. (2001). Bankfull discharge recurrence intervals and regional hydraulic geometry relationship patterns in Pacific Northwest, USA. Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 1249–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H. H. (1988). Fluvial Processes in River Engineering. Krieger Publication Company, Melbourne, FL.Google Scholar
Devdariani, A. (1967). The profile of equilibrium and a regular regime. Soviet Geology Review and Translation, March 1967, pp. 168–183 (from Voprosy Geograffi, Quantitative Methods in Geomorphology, No. 63, 1963, pp. 33–48).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingman, S. L. (1984). Fluvial Hydrology. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Dingman, S. L. (2007). Analytical derivation of at-a-station hydraulic geometry relations. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 334, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
Dingman, S. L. and Afshari, S. (2018). Field verification of analytical hydraulic geometry relations. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 564, pp. 850–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dury, G. H. (1976). Discharge prediction, present and future, from channel dimensions. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 30, pp. 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dury, G. H. (1981). Magnitude-frequency analysis and channel morphometry. In: Fluvial Geomorphology, edited by Morisawa, M., Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar
Dury, G. H., Hails, J. H., and Robbie, M. B. (1963). Bankfull discharge and the magnitude-frequency series. Australian Journal of Science, Vol. 26, pp. 123–124.Google Scholar
Emmett, W. W. (1975). The channels and waters of the Upper Salmon River area, Idaho. (hydrologic evaluation of the Upper Salmon River area). Geological Survey Professional Paper 870-A, U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp. 116.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. I. (1973). Channel pattern and sediment type. Area, Vol. 5, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. I. (1986). Hydraulics and hydraulic geometry. Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 10, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, P. (2004). Analytical solutions for estimating effective discharge. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 8, pp. 729–738.Google Scholar
Gordon, N. D., McMahon, T. A., and Finlayson, B. L. (1992). Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. pp. 526, Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G. A. (1980). Hydraulic geometry relationships of some New Zealand gravel-bed rivers. N.Z. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 19, pp. 106–118.Google Scholar
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open Channel Flow. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. and Ibbitt, R. (1996). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: field work in a sub-alpine basin on the West Coast, South Island. Water Atmosphere, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. A. and Heil, T. M. (1996). Uncertainty in estimating bankfull conditions. Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1283–1291.Google Scholar
Jowett, I. G. (1998). Hydraulic geometry of New Zealand rivers and its use in as a preliminary methods of habitat assessment. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, Vol. 14, pp. 451–466.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1981). Drainage area and the variation of channel geometry downstream. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, Vol. 6, pp. 589–593.Google Scholar
Knighton, A. D. (1974). Variation in width-discharge relation and some implications for hydraulic geometry, Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 85, pp. 1069–1076.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knighton, A. D. (1975). Variation of at-a-station hydraulic geometry. American Journal of Science, Vol. 275, pp. 186–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolberg, F. J. and Howard, A. D. (1995). Active channel geometry and discharge relations of U. S. piedmont and midwestern streams: The variable exponent model revisited, Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 2353–2365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, G. (1930). Stable channels in alluvium. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 119, pp. 281–290.Google Scholar
Lacey, G. (1939). Regime Flow in Incoherent Alluvium. Central Board of Irrigation (India), Publication 20, Simla, India.Google Scholar
Lane, E. W. (1937). Stable channels in erodible channels. Transactions of the ASCE, Vol. 102, pp. 1236–1260.Google Scholar
Langbein, W. B. (1942). Hydraulic criteria for sand waves. Transactions of American Geophysical Union, Part 2, pp. 615–618.Google Scholar
Langbein, W. B. and Leopold, L. B. (1964). Quasi-equilibrium states in channel morphology. American Journal of Science, Vol. 262, pp. 782–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B. (1994). A View of the River. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Leopold, L. B. and Langbein, W. B. (1962). The concept of entropy in landscape evolution. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 500-A, pp. 20, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B. and Maddock, T. (1953). The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. Geological Survey Professional Paper 252, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B. and Skibitzke, H. E. (1967). Observations on unmeasured rivers. Geografiska Annales, Vol. 49A, pp. 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., and Miller, J. F. (1964). Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., and Miller, J. P. (1995). Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Lewis, L. A. (1966). The adjustment of some hydraulic variables at discharges less than one cfs. Professional Geographer, Vol. 18, pp. 230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley, E. S. (1919). Regime channels. Proceedings of the Punjab Engineering Congress, Vol. 7, pp. 63–74.Google Scholar
Lowham, H. W. (1982). Streamflow and channels of the Green River basin, Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 81-71, pp. 73, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Merigliano, M. F. (1997). Hydraulic geometry and stream channel behavior: an uncertain link. Journal of American Water Resourcs Association, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1327–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, D. B. (1994). Effective sediment transporting discharge from magnitude frequency analysis. Journal of Geology, Vol. 101, pp. 79–95.Google Scholar
Nixon, M. (1959). A study of bankfull discharges of rivers in England and Wales. Proceedings of Institution of Engineers, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 157–174.Google Scholar
Park, C. C. (1977). World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 33, pp. 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, F. and Pauquet, A. (1997). Bankfull discharge recurrence interval in gravel-bed rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 22, 685–693.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. J. and Harlin, J. M. (1984). Spatial dependency of hydraulic geometry exponents in a subalpine stream. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 71, pp. 277–283.Google Scholar
Pickup, G. and Warner, R. F. (1976). Effects of hydrologic regime on magnitude and frequency of dominant discharge. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 29, pp. 51–76.Google Scholar
Rhoads, B. L. (1991). A continuously varying parameter model of downstream hydraulic geometry. Water Resources Research, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 1865–1872.Google Scholar
Rhodes, D. D. (1977). The b-f-m diagram: Graphical representation and interpretation of at-a-station hydraulic geometry. American Journal of Science, Vol. 277, pp. 73–96.Google Scholar
Rhodes, D. D. (1978). Worldwide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations: Comments. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 33, pp. 133–146.Google Scholar
Richards, K. S. (1973). Hydraulic geometry and channel roughness: A nonlinear system. American Journal of Science, Vol. 273, pp. 877–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, K. S. (1976). Complex width–discharge relations in natural river sections. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 87, pp. 199–206.Google Scholar
Schoklitsch, A. (1937). Hydraulic Structures: A Text and Handbook. Translated by Shulits, Samuel, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
Schumm, S. A. (1960). The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type. Professional Paper 352B, pp. 17-30, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumm, S. A. (1971). Fluvial geomorphology: The historical perspective. In: River Mechanics, Vol. 1, edited by Shen, H. W., pp. 4.1–4.30, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
Simons, D. B. and Albertson, M. L. (1963). Uniform water conveyance channels in alluvial material. Transactions, ASCE, Vol. 128, pp. 65–107.Google Scholar
Singh, V. P. Yang, C. T., and Deng, Z. Q. (2003). Downstream hydraulic geometry relations: II. Calibration and Testing. Water Resources Research, Vol. 3, No. 12, 1337, doi:10.1029/2003WR002484.Google Scholar
Stewardson, M. (2005). Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 306, pp. 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, W. F. (1971). The river profile. Journal of Geology, Vol. 79, pp. 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. R. (1946). Slope formulae for rivers and canals. Journal of Central Board of Irrigation (India), Vol. 3. No. 1, pp. 40–49.Google Scholar
Vanoni, V. A. (1941). Some experiments on the transportation of suspended load. Transactions of American Geophysical Union, Part 3, pp. 608–620.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. N. (1971). Investigation into the relation between bed load transport and channel shape. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 82, pp. 2159–2176.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, G. V. (2008). Improved bankfull discharge prediction using 2-year recurrence-period discharge. Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 44, No.1, pp. 243–258.Google Scholar
Williams, G. P. (1978). Bankfull discharge of rivers. Water Resources Research, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 1141–1154.Google Scholar
Wolman, M. G. (1955). The natural channel of Brandywine Creek, Pennsylvania. Geological Survey Professional Paper 271, pp. 1–56, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wolman, M. G. and Brush, L. M. (1961). Factors controlling the size and shape of stream channels in coarse noncohesive sands. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-G, pp. 183–210, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wolman, M. G. and Miller, J. P. (1960). Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. Journal of Geology, Vol. 68, pp. 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×