Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T17:46:55.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Multitemporal and multisensor image registration

from PART IV - Applications and Operational Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

By
Jacqueline Le Moigne ,
Arlene A. Cole-Rhodes ,
Roger D. Eastman ,
Nathan S. Netanyahu ,
Harold S. Stone ,
Ilya Zavorin  and
Jeffrey T. Morisette
Edited by
Jacqueline Le Moigne ,
Nathan S. Netanyahu  and
Roger D. Eastman
Jacqueline Le Moigne
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Maryland
Arlene A. Cole-Rhodes
Affiliation:
Morgan State University, Maryland
Roger D. Eastman
Affiliation:
Loyola University, Maryland
Nathan S. Netanyahu
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Maryland
Harold S. Stone
Affiliation:
NEC Research Laboratory Retiree, New Jersey
Ilya Zavorin
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Maryland
Jeffrey T. Morisette
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Maryland
Jacqueline Le Moigne
Affiliation:
NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center
Nathan S. Netanyahu
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University, Israel and University of Maryland, College Park
Roger D. Eastman
Affiliation:
Loyola University Maryland
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Registration of multiple source imagery is one of the most important issues when dealing with Earth science remote sensing data where information from multiple sensors exhibiting various resolutions must be integrated. Issues ranging from different sensor geometries, different spectral responses, to various illumination conditions, various seasons and various amounts of noise, need to be dealt with when designing a new image registration algorithm. This chapter represents a first attempt at characterizing a framework that addresses these issues, in which possible choices for the three components of any registration algorithm are validated and combined to provide different registration algorithms. A few of these algorithms were tested on three different types of datasets – synthetic, multitemporal and multispectral. This chapter presents the results of these experiments and introduces a prototype registration toolbox.

Introduction

In Chapter 1, we showed how the analysis of Earth science data for applications, such as the study of global environmental changes, involves the comparison, fusion, and integration of multiple types of remotely sensed data at various temporal, spectral, and spatial resolutions. For such applications, the first required step is fast and automatic image registration which can provide precision correction of satellite imagery, band-to-band calibration, and data reduction for ease of transmission. Furthermore, future decision support systems, intelligent sensors and adaptive constellations will rely on real- or near-real-time interpretation of Earth observation data, performed both onboard and at ground-based stations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Image Registration for Remote Sensing , pp. 293 - 338
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, L. G. (1992). A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys, 24(4), 325–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole-Rhodes, A. A., Johnson, K. L., Moigne, J., and Zavorin, I. (2003). Multiresolution registration of remote sensing imagery by optimization of mutual information using a stochastic gradient. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 12(2), 1495–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daubechies, I. (1992). Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).CrossRef
Eastman, R. and Moigne, J. (2001). Gradient-descent techniques for multi-temporal and multi-sensor image registration of remotely sensed imagery. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image Fusion, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Foroosh, H., Zerubia, J. B., and Berthod, M. (2002). Extension of phase correlation to subpixel registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 11(3), 188–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irani, M. and Peleg, S. (1991). Improving resolution by image registration, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 53(3), 231–239.Google Scholar
Moigne, J., Campbell, W. J., and Cromp, R. F. (2002a). An automated parallel image registration technique based on the correlation of wavelet features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(8), 1849–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moigne, J., Cole-Rhodes, A., Eastman, R., Johnson, K., Morisette, J., Netanyahu, N., Stone, H., and Zavorin, I. (2002b). Multisensor image registration for on-the-ground or on-board science data processing. In Proceedings of the Science Data Workshop, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
Moigne, J., Cole-Rhodes, A., Eastman, R., Johnson, K., Morisette, J. T., Netanyahu, N. S., Stone, H. S., and Zavorin, I. (2001). Multisensor registration of Earth remotely sensed imagery. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing VII, Toulouse, France, Vol. 4541, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Moigne, J., Cole-Rhodes, A., Eastman, R., Johnson, K., Morisette, J., Netanyahu, N. S., Stone, H., and Zavorin, I. (2003). Earth science imagery registration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toulouse, France, Vol. I, pp. 161–163.Google Scholar
Moigne, J., Cole-Rhodes, A., Eastman, R., Johnson, K., Morisette, J., Netanyahu, N. S., Stone, H., Zavorin, I., and Jain, P. (2004). A study of the sensitivity of automatic image registration algorithms to initial conditions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Anchorage, AK, Vol. 2, pp. 1390–1393.Google Scholar
Moigne, J., El-Saleous, N., and Vermote, E. (1997). Iterative edge- and wavelet-based registration of AVHRR and GOES satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the Image Registration Workshop, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, pp. 137–146.Google Scholar
Moigne, J., Xia, W., El-Ghazawi, T., Mareboyana, M., Netanyahu, N., Tilton, J. C., Campbell, W. J., and Cromp, R. F. (1998). First evaluation of automatic image registration methods. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Seattle, WA, Vol. 1, pp. 315–317.Google Scholar
Lyon, R. G., Dorband, J. E., and Hollis, J. M. (1997). Hubble space telescope faint object camera calculated point-spread functions. Applied Optics, 36(8), 1752–1765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., and Suetens, P. (1997). Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(2), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morisette, J. T., Privette, J. L., and Justice, C. O. (2002). A framework for the validation of MODIS land products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, D. M., Netanyahu, N. S., and Moigne, J. (1999). Efficient algorithms for robust feature matching. Special Issue of Pattern Recognition on Image Registration, 32(1), 17–38.Google Scholar
,National Imagery and Mapping Agency (2000). Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984: Its Definition and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems. Technical Report 8350.2, 3rd edn.
Netanyahu, N. S., Moigne, J., and Masek, J. G. (2004). Georegistration of Landsat data via robust matching of multiresolution features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(7), 1586–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, H. S., Moigne, J., and McGuire, M. (1999). The translation sensitivity of wavelet-based registration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(10), 1074–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, H. S., Orchard, M. T., Cheng, E.-C., and Martucci, S. A. (2001). A fast direct Fourier-based algorithm for subpixel registration of images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(10), 2235–2243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thévenaz, P., Ruttimann, U. E., and Unser, M. (1998). A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unser, M., Aldroubi, A., and Murry, E. (1993). The L2 polynomial spline pyramid. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(4), 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavorin, I. and Moigne, J. (2005). Use of multiresolution wavelets feature pyramids. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14(6), 770–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×