State Sovereignty as an Obstacle to International Criminal Law

Kristen Hessler

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511642265.003

2 - State Sovereignty as an Obstacle to International Criminal Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2010

Kristen Hessler

Edited by

Larry May and

Zachary Hoskins

Show author details

Larry May: Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Zachary Hoskins: Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Much argument about the sovereignty of states is made hopelessly simplistic by its generality. Should we recognize state sovereignty or not? Do states have too much sovereignty or just about the right amount? And so forth. In order to get a firm grasp, we must examine specific matters over which states could be permitted or denied sovereignty of specific kinds one at a time. Sovereignty is not some mystical cloud that either envelops the state entirely or dissipates completely; there are bits and pieces of asserted sovereignty. These assertions can be granted or contested one by one and accepted in this era and rejected in the next, or vice versa. Sovereignty should, I would think, be treated more like a (crazy) quilt that can be left to cover some things but pulled off of others.

INTRODUCTION

By now, many theorists have endorsed the notion that state sovereignty does not constitute an impenetrable barrier to international criminal proceedings, which may be justifiable if the situation within a state becomes sufficiently dismal. Focusing on the arguments of Larry May and his critics, Andrew Altman and Christopher Wellman, I argue that their reasons for concluding that state sovereignty may be overridden in cases in which states fail to protect their citizens' human rights also count against the broad presumption in favor of nonintervention for states that these theorists endorse.

Type: Chapter
Information: International Criminal Law and Philosophy , pp. 39 - 57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642265.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shue, Henry, “Eroding Sovereignty: The Advance of Principle,” in McKim, Robert and McMahan, Jeff (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 340Google Scholar

May, Larry, Crimes Against Humanity: A Normative Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 9Google Scholar

May, Larry, “Symposium: Crimes Against Humanity,” 20(3) Ethics & International Affairs (2006), 350CrossRef Google Scholar

Altman, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher, “A Defense of International Criminal Law,” 115 Ethics (2004), 42CrossRef Google Scholar

Luban, David, “Beyond Moral Minimalism: Response to Crimes Against Humanity,” 20(3) Ethics & International Affairs (2006), 353–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Rodman, Kenneth, “Compromising Justice: Why the Bush Administration and the NGOs Are Both Wrong about the ICC,” 20 Ethics & International Affairs (2006), 26CrossRef Google Scholar

Jackson, John H., “Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept,” 97 American Journal of International Law (2003), 786CrossRef Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), 20Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, “Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World,” 115 Ethics (2004), 35–67Google Scholar

Jackson, John H., “Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept,” 97 The American Journal of International Law (2003), 786CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, “Recognitional Legitimacy and the State System,” 28 Philosophy & Public Affairs (1999), 46–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Reisman, Michael, “Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law,” 84 American Journal of International Law (1990), 876CrossRef Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, International Law: Politics and Values (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995), 9–10Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: The World Publishing Company, 1958), 297Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, “Agents of Justice,” 32 Metaphilosophy (2001), 198CrossRef Google Scholar

Hessler, Kristen, “Resolving Interpretive Conflicts in International Human Rights Law,” 13 Journal of Political Philosophy (2005), 46–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “The Real New World Order,” 76 Foreign Affairs (1997), 184CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilkins, Burleigh, “International Human Rights and National Discretion,” 6 Journal of Ethics (2002), 374Google Scholar

Mayerfeld, Jamie, “Who Shall Be Judge?: The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Global Enforcement of Human Rights,” 25 Human Rights Quarterly (2003), 98CrossRef Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry, “The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction: Risking Judicial Tyranny,” 80 Foreign Affairs (July/August 2001)CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

2 - State Sovereignty as an Obstacle to International Criminal Law

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive