Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T06:53:26.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter XI - Limits to the Jurisdiction of the Court of Strasbourg?

from A - Some Specific Human Rights Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

Get access

Summary

At the opening of the judicial year 2007 of the European Court of Human Rights, Judge Françoise Tulkens (later Vice-President of the Court) made a presentation in which she formulated the following relevant questions:

“Can international treaties be interpreted in such a way as to impose more obligations on States than they are prepared to accept? More specifically, to what extent does the sovereignty principle admit of an interpretation that goes beyond the original intention of the treaty and modifies the substance of the obligations to which the States initially committed themselves?”

At the seminar organised on the occasion of the opening of the judicial year 2011 of the Court, Judge Tulkens repeated the same questions and one of the speakers at that seminar, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Justice at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, tried to reply.

A. “THERE MUST BE SOME LIMITS”

In another speech, delivered at the Barnard's Inn Reading on 16 June 2011, Baroness Hale of Richmond, referring to Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, §31 (“the Convention is a living instrument which […] must be interpreted in the light of present day conditions”), observed:

“A tree has a life of its own, but it can only grow and develop within its natural limits [273]. It is not an unstoppable beanstalk grown from a magic bean. At a time when many are worried about how far the ECHR may develop beyond the original expectations of its framers, it seems reasonable to ask whether there are any natural limits to its growth and what those might be”.274

She believes that some things are better left to Parliament because (a) courts cannot engage in empirical research or conduct opinion polls, (b) courts cannot devise whole new legislative schemes and (c) some things ought to be decided by a democratically elected Parliament rather than by the courts. As far as the interpretation of statutes is concerned, she recognises that:

“trying to divine what Parliament really meant […] is mostly an illusion, because on most points […] Parliament did not have any intention at all. It had never been thought of”.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Human Rights Protection
Balanced, Critical, Realistic
, pp. 127 - 136
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×