Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T22:27:52.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - FORMATION: WRITING REQUIREMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Larry A. DiMatteo
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Lucien Dhooge
Affiliation:
University of the Pacific, California
Stephanie Greene
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
Virginia Maurer
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Marisa Pagnattaro
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

The CISG embodies a modern approach to contract formation, recognizing that contracts are often concluded quickly and without a formal writing. The CISG provisions dealing with contract formation are found in Part II of the convention, which contains the rules of formality and offer-acceptance. The rules of formality refer to the writing requirements, definiteness of terms, and types of admissible evidence. Offer-acceptance rules include issues dealing with the mechanics of formation, the battle of the forms scenario, and the firm offer rule. Article 29, found in Part III of the CISG, is concurrently analyzed for contract modification requirements. Before discussing the specific contract formation rules of the CISG, the first section of this chapter will briefly focus on the issue of precontractual liability. The CISG does not expressly cover the issue of precontractual liability. Nonetheless, the possibility for such liability is an important issue and will be examined first.

PRECONTRACTUAL LIABILITY

The subject of precontractual liability can be divided into two areas: first, the liability for the bad faith breaking off of negotiations; second, the enforceability of representations or informal writings given during the precontract or negotiation stage. According to American and English common law, a negotiating party owes no duty of good faith to the other party. One may terminate negotiations in bad faith without liability for the other parties' expenses. One major exception to this freedom of negotiation without liability is promissory estoppel or reliance theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Sales Law
A Critical Analysis of CISG Jurisprudence
, pp. 32 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×