Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T19:32:39.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - American Exceptionalism and Comparative Political Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Clair Brown
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Barry J. Eichengreen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Michael Reich
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

More than any other individual in my academic career, Lloyd Ulman shaped my interests in and intellectual approach to comparative political economy. He has had a profound – even dominating – influence on the development of comparative industrial relations. Although there has been much rich work on institutions and much economic modeling of unions and labor markets, Ulman put these divergent approaches together. What comes through insistently in his work is the need to both understand carefully how institutions in fact function (“Don't be taken in by their propaganda”) and to apply economic models to explain their behavior.

Ulman has been preoccupied throughout his career by the divergences and similarities between Europe and the United States, especially in the field of industrial relations and redistribution; previously, his interest was in understanding the history of American labor relations. These interests are fused in his typically analytical presidential address to the 1986 Industrial Relations Research Association (IRRA) annual meeting – from which I draw for this chapter – in which he attempts to understand why different industrial-relations systems developed differently (Ulman 1986). Indeed, his paper played a significant part in sparking a revisionist retake on the original debate on the exceptionalism of the American working class – Why no class-consciousness? Why no major socialist party? – that Sombart (1906) and Perlman (1928) had dominated in the early twentieth century and that can be traced back to Engels.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Robin (2008). Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Autor, David H., Katz, Lawrence F., and Kearney, Melissa S. (2005). “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Re-Assessing the Revisionists.” NBER Working Paper Series 11627.
Boggess, Scott, and Bound, John (1997). “Did Criminal Activity Increase during the 1980s? Comparisons across Data Sources.” Social Science Quarterly 78, 3: 725–739.Google Scholar
Brady, David (1993). “Workplace Contractualism in Comparative Perspective.” In Industrial Democracy in America: The Ambiguous Promise, Lichtenstein, N. and Harris, H. J. (eds.) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavadino, Mick, and Dignan, James (2005). Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin (1993). Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David (2007). “Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 101, 3: 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Estavez-Abe, Margarita, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David (2001). “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In Varieties of Capitalism, Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farber, H. S., and Western, Bruce (2002). “Accounting for the Decline of Unions in the Public Sector.” In The Future of Private Unionism in the United States, Bennett, J. T. and Kaufman, B. E. (eds.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard (1996). “Why Do So Many Young American Men Commit Crimes?Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 1: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Carola (2007). Employment Research and State Traditions: A Comparative History of the United States, Great Britain, and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Larry G. (1997). “Shifting Perspectives on American Exceptionalism: Recent Literature on American Labor Relations and Labor Politics.” Journal of American Studies 31, 2: 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gospel, Howard (1992). Markets, Firms and the Management of Labor in Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter (2003). “The Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation.” Yale Law Journal 112, 7: 1829–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., and Soskice, David (eds.) (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Hartz, Louis (1955). The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Holt, James (1977). “Trade Unionism in the British and U.S. Steel Industries, 1890–1914: A Comparative Study.” Labor History 18 (Winter) 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Chris (2005). Trade Unions and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John (2001). “Welfare State and Production Regimes in the Era of Retrenchment.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, Pierson, Paul (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben (2005). Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David (2001). “An Asset Theory of Social Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95, 4: 875–893.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David (2006). “Electoral Institutions, Parties and the Politics of Class: Why Some Democracies Distribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100, 2: 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David (2009). “Distribution and Redistribution in Advanced Economies: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61, 3: 438–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford (1991). “American Exceptionalism Revisited: The Importance of Management.” In Masters to Managers: Historical and Comparative Perspectives on American Employers, Jacoby, S. (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (2006). “Collective Group Interests and Distributive Outcomes: Competing Claims about the Evolution of the Welfare State.” Labor History 47, 3: 411–20.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola (2008). The Prisoners' Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengle, James, Owen, Diana, and Sommer, Molly (1995). “Divisive Nominating Mechanisms and Democratic Party Electoral Prospects.” Journal of Politics 57, 2: 370–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arnold (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in 21 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Gary (1989). Unions in Politics: Britain, Germany and the United States in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLelan, Ian and Nou, Jennifer (2006). “Why Should We Be Beggars with the Ballot in Our Hand? Veto Players and the Failure of Land Value Taxation in the United Kingdom, 1909–14.” British Journal of Political Science 36:4:575–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,OECD and Statistics Canada (2000). Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Perlman, Selig (1928). A Theory of the Labor Movement. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. (1991). Parties and Leaders in the Post-Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sombart, Werner (1906). Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Stephens, John (2006). “Partisan Government, Employers' Interests and the Welfare State: A Critical Review of Torben Iversen's Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare.” Labor History 47, 3: 420–429.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter (2002). Labor Markets and Welfare States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulman, Lloyd (1986). “Presidential Address: Who Wanted Collective Bargaining in the First Place?” Annual Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association (39th).
Visser, Jelle (2006). “Union Membership Statistics in 24 Countries.” Monthly Labor Review, January: 38–49.Google Scholar
Voss, Kim (1993). The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael (1999). “Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 43, 3: 649–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, Bruce (2007). Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×