Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T21:00:20.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - An Economic Analysis of the Effect of Land Use on Terrestrial Carbon Storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Daniel G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek T. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Nancy H. F. French
Affiliation:
Michigan Technological University
Bradley C. Reed
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Markets have altered the global forest landscape to create cropland and pasture. Of the original 5 billion hectares of forest in 1850 (see Chapter 3), the forest has shrunk to 3.6 billion hectares today (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations [FAO] 2010a). A great deal of this conversion was to cropland (Ramunkutty and Foley 1999). At the same time, the forestry sector harvested most of the world's primary forests, replacing it with younger secondary forests (Berck and Bentley 1997). Both of these market activities led to substantial carbon (C) emissions to the atmosphere by reducing the amount of C stored in global primary forests (see Chapter 3).

In addition to these historic activities, several authors claim that market activities continue to lead to substantial C emissions to the atmosphere. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) argues that land use is still responsible for 20 percent of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. In the 1990s alone, deforestation contributed 5.8 Gt CO2e (gigaton carbon dioxide equivalent) (IPCC 2007a). The remaining 80 percent of emissions came largely from burning fossil fuels. In addition, agriculture was responsible for methane emissions equal to 3.3 Gt CO2·yr−1 and nitrogen dioxide emissions equal to 2.8 Gt CO2·yr−1 (IPCC 2007b). Although we will not examine these other gases, they do contribute to climate change (IPCC 2007a).

Type
Chapter
Information
Land Use and the Carbon Cycle
Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy
, pp. 77 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.M., McCarl, B.A., Segerson, K., Rosenweig, C., Bryant, K.J., Dixon, B.J.,…Ojima, D. 1999. Economic effects of climate change on US agriculture. In The impact of climate change on the United States economy, ed. Mendelsohn, R. and Neumann, J. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, R.M., Rosenzweig, C., Peart, R., Ritchie, J., McCarl, B., Glyer, J.,…Allen, L. 1990. Global climate change and U.S. agriculture. Nature, 345:219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., and Hardin, R. 2008. Changing governance of the world's forests. Science, 320(5882):1460–1462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berck, P. 1979. The economics of timber: A renewable resource in the long run. Bell Journal Economics, 10:447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berck, P., and Bentley, W. 1997. Hotelling's theory, enhancement, and the taking of the Redwood National Park. American Journal Agricultural Economics, 79:287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacho, O., Hean, R., and Wise, R. 2003. Carbon accounting methods and reforestation incentives. Australia Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47:153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, R. 2004. Effects of greenhouse gas emissions on world agriculture, food consumption, and economic welfare. Climatic Change, 86:191–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenson, R.E., and Gollin, D. 2003. Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO. 2010a. Global Forest Resources Assessment, Rome, Italy.
FAO. 2010b. FAO food price index. .
Farmdoc. 2012. Marketing and outlook.
Fischer, G., Frohberg, K., Keyzer, M.A., and Parikh, K.S. 1988. Linked national models: A tool for international food policy analysis. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Friedl, M.A., McIver, D.K., Hodges, J.C.F., Zhang, X.Y., Muchoney, D., Strahler, A.H.,…Schaff, C. 2002. Global land cover from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83:287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162:1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Hertel, T., Rose, S., and Tol, R. 2009. Economic analysis of land use in global climate change policy. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. 1931. The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy, 39:137–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC. 2007a. The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2007b. Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. 2006. The world economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayaux, P., Bartholome, E., Fritz, S., and Belward, A. 2003. A land-cover map of Africa. Ispra, Italy: European Commission Joint Research Center.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, R., and Dinar, A. 2009. Land use and climate change interactions. Annual Review Resource of Economics, 1:309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. 1991. To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Economics Journal, 101:920–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Garcia, J., Joyce, L.A., McGuire, A.D., and Xiao, X. 2002. Impacts of climate change on the global forest sector. Climatic Change, 54:439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13:997–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, K., and Stokes, C. 2004. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: A dozen years of research. Climatic Change, 63:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathaye, J.A., and Andrasko, K. 2007. Special issue on estimation of baselines and leakage in carbon mitigation forestry projects. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(6):963–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathaye, J., Makundi, W., Dale, L., and Chan, P. 2007. GHG mitigation potential, costs and benefits in global forests: A dynamic partial equilibrium approach. Energy Journal, 3:127–172.Google Scholar
Sohngen, B., and Brown, S. 2008. The cost and quantity of carbon sequestration by extending the forest rotation age. Climate Policy, 8:435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., and Mendelsohn, R. 1998. Valuing the market impact of large-scale ecological change: The effect of climate change on US timber. American Economic Review, 88:686–710.Google Scholar
Sohngen, B., and Mendelsohn, R. 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85:448–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., Mendelsohn, R., and Sedjo, R. 1999. Forest management, conservation and global timber markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., Mendelsohn, R., and Sedjo, R. 2002. A global model of climate change impacts on timber markets. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics, 26:326–343.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2004. World population to 2300. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2011. 2010 revision of world population prospects. .
WRI. 2011. Earth trends. .
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2011. Trends in U.S. agriculture. .

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×