Ackerman, Robert E. 1992 Earliest stone industries on the North Pacific coast of North America. Arctic Anthropology 29:18–27.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Robert E. 1994 Early cultural complexes in southwestern Alaska. Current Research in the Pleistocene 11:109–11.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Robert E.1996 Early maritime culture complexes of the northern northwest coast. In Early Human Occupation in British Columbia, ed. Carlson, R. L. and Bona, L. Dalla, pp. 123–37. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Adams, William Y., and Adams, Ernest W. 1991 Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahler, Stanley A. 1971 Projectile Point Form and Function at Roger's Shelter, Missouri. Columbia: College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri-Columbia and the Missouri Archaeological Society.Google Scholar

Ahler, Stanley A.1989 Mass analysis of flaking debris: studying the forest rather than the trees. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, ed. Donald O. Henry and George H. Odell, pp. 85–118. Archaeological Papers 1. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Ahler, Stanley A., and Julian VanNest 1985 Temporal change in Knife River flint reduction strategies. In Lithic Resource Procurement: Proceedings from the Second Conference on Prehistoric Chert Exploitation, ed. Susan C. Vehik, pp. 183–98. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Papers 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.

Aigner, Jean S. 1970 The unifacial, core and blade site on Anangula Island, Aleutians. Arctic Anthropology 7:59–88.Google Scholar

Aikens, C. Melvin 1993 Archaeology of Oregon. Portland: Bureau of Land Management, US Department of Interior.Google Scholar

Akridge, D. Glen, and Benoit, Paul H. 2001 Luminescence properties of chert and some archaeological applications. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ames, Kenneth M., Don E. Dumond, Jerry R. Galm, and Rick Minor 1998 Prehistory of the Southern Plateau. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau, ed. Walker, Deward E. (volume editor), pp. 103–119. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Amick, Daniel S., and Mauldin, Raymond P. (eds.) 1989a Experiments in Lithic Technology. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Amick, Daniel S., and Mauldin, Raymond P. 1989b Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's “Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation.”American Antiquity 54:166–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amick, Daniel S., and Mauldin, Raymond P. 1997 Effects of raw material on flake breakage patterns. Lithic Technology 22:18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amick, Daniel S., Mauldin, Raymond P., and Tomka, Steven A. 1988 An evaluation of debitage produced by experimental bifacial core reduction of a Georgetown chert nodule. Lithic Technology 17:26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ammerman, Albert J. 1979 A study of obsidian exchange networks in Calabria. World Archaeology 19:95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ammerman, Albert J., and William Andrefsky, Jr. 1982 Reduction sequences and the exchange of obsidian in Neolithic Calabria. In Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, ed. Ericson, J., and Earle, T., pp. 149–72. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ammerman, Albert J., and Feldman, M. W. 1974 On the “making” of an assemblage of stone tools. American Antiquity 39:610–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ammerman, Albert J., and Feldman, M. W. 1978 Replicated collection of site surfaces. American Antiquity 43:734–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, D. D. 1970 Microblade traditions in Northwest Alaska. Arctic Anthropology 7:2–16.Google Scholar

Anderson, P. C. 1980 A testimony of prehistoric tasks: diagnostic residues on stone tool working edges. World Archaeology 12:181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson-Gerfaud, P. 1988 Using prehistoric stone tools to harvest cultivated wild cereals: preliminary observations of traces and impact. In Industries lithiques: tracéologie et technologie, ed. Beyries, S., pp. 175–95. BAR International Series 411. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William 1983 Experimental archaeology and lithic assemblage analysis. In Proceedings of the 1983 Middle Atlantic Archaeological Conference, ed. Evans, J.. Rehoboth Beach, Delaware.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William1984 Late Archaic prehistory in the Upper Delaware Valley: a study of classification, chronology and interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton.

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1986a A consideration of blade and flake curvature. Lithic Technology 15:48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1986b Numerical types and inspectional types: evaluating shape characterization procedures. North American Archaeologist 7:95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William1987 Diffusion and innovation from the perspective of wedge shaped cores in Alaska and Japan. In The Organization of Core Technology, ed. Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C. A., pp. 13–44. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1991 Inferring trends in prehistoric settlement behavior from lithic production technology in the Southern Plains. North American Archaeologist 12:129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William1993 Temporal variability in stone tool production from Cedar Falls. In The Archaeology of Chester Morse Lake: Long Term Human Utilization of the Foothills in the Washington Cascade Range, ed. S. Samuels, pp. 9.1–9.14. Center for Northwest Anthropology Project Report 21. Pullman: Washington State University.

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1994a Raw material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity 59:21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1994b The geological occurrence of lithic material and stone tool production strategies. Geoarchaeology. An International Journal 9:345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1995 Cascade Phase lithic technology: an example for the Lower Snake River. North American Archaeologist 16:95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William1997a Dynamic morphological processes and stone tool typology in Americanist archaeology. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Nashville, Tennessee.

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1997b Thoughts on stone tool shape and inferred function. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 13:125–44.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, William Jr. 2001a Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William2001b Emerging directions in debitage analysis. In Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, ed. Andrefsky, Wm. Jr., pp. 2–14. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William2004a Partitioning the aggregate: mass analysis and debitage assemblages. In Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, ed. Hall, Christopher T. and Larson, Mary Lou, pp. 201–210. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William2004b Materials and contexts for a culture history of the Columbia Plateau. In Complex Hunter-Gatherers: Evolution and Organization of Prehistoric Communities on the Plateau of Northwestern North America. ed. Prentiss, Wm. C. and Kuijt, I., pp. 35–62. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr., William(in press a) Lithic studies. In Handbook of Methods in Archaeology, ed. Maschner, H. D. G. and Chippindale, C., pp. 713–70. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

Andrefsky, Jr., William(in press b) Revisiting the type concept in archaeology: a cobble artifact example. In Tools or Cores: The Identification and Study of Alternative Core Technology in Lithic Assemblages, ed. McPherron, S. B.. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Andrefsky, Jr., W. (ed.) 1990 An Introduction to the Archaeology of Piñon Canyon, Southeastern Colorado. Laramie, Wyoming: Larson-Tibesar and Associates. Submitted to National Park Service, Denver, Colorado, Contract No. CX 1200–7–B054. Copies available from NPS, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, Denver, Colorado.

Andrefsky, Jr., William, and Marilyn J. Bender (eds.) 1988 The Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site Manual for the Conduct of Laboratory and Analytical Studies and Handling of Materials. Prepared for NPS, Rocky Mountain Region and US Department of Army, Ft Carson.

Andrefsky, William Jr., Centola, Lisa, Cowan, Jason, and Wallace, Erin (eds.) 2003 An Introduction to the Birch Creek Site: Six Seasons of Washington State University Archaeological Study. Center for Northwest Anthropology. Contributions in Cultural Resource Management No. 69. Pullman, Washington: Washington State University.Google Scholar

Andrefsky, Jr. William, Elizabeth G. Wilmerding, and Steven R. Samuels 1994a Archaeological Testing at Three Sites along the North Umpqua Drainage, Douglas County, Oregon. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Project Report 23. Pullman: Washington State University.

Andrefsky, Jr. William, Elizabeth G. Wilmerding, and Steven R. Samuels1994b Archaeological Testing at Three Sites along the South Umpqua Drainage, Douglas County, Oregon. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Project Report 24. Pullman: Washington State University.

Annegarn, H. J., and Bauman, S. 1990 Geological and mineralogical applications of PIXIE: a review. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B49:264–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, Nick, and Mark White 2003 Bifaces and raw materials: flexible flaking in the British Early Paleolithic. In Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, ed. Soressi, M. and Dibble, H. L., pp. 109–24, University Museum Monograph 115. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar

Atchison, Jennifer E., and Richard Fullagar 1998 Starch residues on pounding implements from Jinmium rock-shelter. In A Closer Look: Recent Australian Studies of Stone Tools, ed. Fullagar, R., pp. 109–25, Archaeological Methods Series 6. Sydney: Sydney University.Google Scholar

Aubry, Thierry, Miguel Almeida, Maria Joao Neves, and Bertrand Walter 2003 Solutrean laurel leaf point production and raw material procurement during the last glacial maximum in southern Europe: two examples from Central France and Portugal. In Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, ed. Soressi, M. and Dibble, H. L., pp. 165–182, University Museum Monograph 115. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar

Austin, Robert J. 1986 The experimental reproduction and archaeological occurrence of biface notching flakes. Lithic Technology 15:96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Robert J. 1999 Technological characterization of lithic waste-flake assemblages: multivariate analysis of experimental and archaeological data. Lithic Technology 24:53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, W. S 1977 Projectile point typology: the basic base. Archaeology of Eastern North America 5:107–21.Google Scholar

Bamforth, Douglas B. 1986 Technological efficiency and tool curation. American Antiquity 51:38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamforth, Douglas B. 1988 Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests: the Institute results in context. Journal of Archaeological Science 15:11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamforth, Douglas B. 1990 Settlement, raw material, and lithic procurement in the Central Mojave Desert. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9:70–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamforth, Douglas B. 1991 Technological organization and hunter-gatherer land use: a California example. American Antiquity 56:216–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, C. Michael 1988 Lithic Variability and Middle Paleolithic Behavior. BAR International Series 408. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Barut, Sibel 1994 Middle and later Stone Age lithic technology and land use in East African savannas. The African Archaeological Review 12:43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar-Yosef, Ofer 1991 Raw material exploitation in the Levantine Epi-Paleolithic. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 235–50. Publications in Anthropology 19. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Baumler, Mark F. 1988 Core reduction, flake production, and the Middle Paleolithic industry of Zobiste (Yugoslavia). In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 255–74. University Museum Monograph 54. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Baumler, Mark F.1995 Principals and properties of lithic core reduction: implications for Levallois technology. In The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Bar-Yosef, O., pp. 11–24. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 23. Madison: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar

Baumler, Mark F., and Davis, Leslie B. 2000 Upon closer examination: Paleoindian behavioral inferences from a Folsom feature lithic assemblage at the Indian Creek Occupation Site, West-Central Montana Rockies. Archaeology in Montana 41:17–62.Google Scholar

Baumler, Mark F., and Christian E. Downum 1989 Between micro and macro: a study in the interpretation of small-sized lithic debitage. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, Daniel S. and Mauldin, Raymond P., pp. 101–16. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Behm, Jeff A. 1983 Flake concentrations: distinguishing between flintworking areas and secondary deposits. Lithic Technology 12:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benfer, R. A. 1967 A design for the study of archaeological characteristics. American Antiquity 69:719–30.Google Scholar

Benfer, R. A., and Benfer, A. N. 1981 Automatic classification of inspectional categories: multivariate theories of archaeological data. American Antiquity 46:381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettinger, Robert L., and Eerkens, Jelmer 1999 Point typologies, cultural transmission, and the spread of bow-and-arrow technology in the Prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity 64:231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyries, Sylvie 1988 Functional variability of lithic sets in the Middle Paleolithic. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 213–24. University Museum Monograph 54. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Bienenfeld, Paula 1995 Duplicating archaeological microwear polishes with epoxy casts. Lithic Technology 20:29–39.Google Scholar

Bienenfeld, Paula, and William Andrefsky, Jr. 1984 Projectile Point Life Cycles and Use-Resharpening Analysis. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland.

Binford, Lewis R. 1963 A proposed attribute list for the description and classification of projectile points. In Miscellaneous Studies in Typology and Classification, ed. A. M. White et al., pp. 193–221. Anthropological Papers 19. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.

Binford, Lewis R.1972 Model-building paradigms, and the current state of Paleolithic research. In An Archaeological Perspective, ed. Binford, L. R., pp. 244–94. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Binford, Lewis R.1977 Forty-seven trips. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, ed. Wright, R. S. V., pp. 24–36. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Binford, Lewis R. 1978 Dimensional analysis of behavior and site structure: learning from an Eskimo hunting stand. American Antiquity 43:330–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binford, Lewis R. 1979 Organization and formation processes: looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35:255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binford, Lewis R. 1980 Willow smoke and dogs' tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity 45:4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binford, Lewis R. 2001 Where do research problems come from?American Antiquity 66:669–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binford, Lewis R., and Binford, Sally R. 1966 A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. American Anthropologist 68:238–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binford, Lewis R., and Quimby, George I. 1972 Indian sites and chipped stone materials in the Northern Lake Michigan region. Fieldiana: Anthropology 36:277–307.Google Scholar

Blacking, John 1953 Edward Simpson, alias “Flint Jack”: a Victorian craftsman. Antiquity 27:207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blades, Brooke S. 2001 Aurignacian Lithic Economy: Ecological Perspectives from Southwestern France. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Blades, Brooke S. 2003 End scraper reduction and hunter-gatherer mobility. American Antiquity 68:141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleed, Peter 1986 The optimal design of hunting weapons: maintainability or reliability. American Antiquity 51:737–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleed, Peter 1996 Risk and cost in Japanese microblade technology. Lithic Technology 21:95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleed, Peter2002 Cheap, regular, and reliable: implications of design variation in Late Pleistocene Japanese microblade technology. In Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, ed. Robert G. Elston and Steven L. Kuhn, pp. 95–102. Archaeological Papers 12. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Organization.

Boeda, E. 1986 Approche technologique du concept levallois et évaluation de son champ d'application: étude de trois gisements saaliens et weichseliens de la France septentrionale. Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris X.Google Scholar

Boeda, E.1988 Le concept levallois et évaluation de son champ d'application. In L'Homme de Néanderthal, vol. 4: La Technique, ed. Otte, Marcel, pp. 13–26. Etudes et recherches archéologiques de l'Université de Liège.Google Scholar

Boeda, E. 1993 Le débitage discoide et le débitage levallois récurrente centripète. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 90:392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordes, François 1961 Typologie du paléolithique ancien et moyen. Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux, Mémoire 1, Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Bordes, François 1968 The Old Stone Age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Bordes, François 1979 Comment. Current Anthropology 20:10–11.Google Scholar

Bordes, François 1980 Le débitage levallois et ses variantes. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 77:45–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordes, François, and Crabtree, Don E. 1969 The Corbiac blade technique and other experiments. Tebiwa 12:1–21.Google Scholar

Bordes, F., and Sonneville-Bordes, D. 1970 The significance of variability in Paleolithic assemblages. World Archaeology 2:61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouey, P. D. 1991 Recognizing the limits of archaeological applications of non-destructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of obsidians. In Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, ed. Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J., and Wheeler, G. S., pp. 309–20. Pittsburg: Materials Research Society.Google Scholar

Boydston, Roger A. 1989 A cost benefit study of functionally similar tools. In Time, Energy and Stone Tools, ed. Torrence, Robin, pp. 67–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bradbury, Andrew P., and Carr, Philip J. 1999 Examining stage and continuum models of flake debris analysis: an experimental approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradbury, Andrew P., and Franklin, Jay D. 2000 Material variability, package size and mass analysis. Lithic Technology 25:42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Bruce A. 1974 Comments on the lithic technology of the Casper Site materials. In The Casper Site, ed. Frison, G., pp. 191–7. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bradley, Bruce A. 1977 Experimental lithic technology with special reference to the Middle Paleolithic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bradley, Bruce A. 1978 Hard hammer – soft hammer: an alternative explanation. Flintknapper's Exchange 1:8–10.Google Scholar

Bradley, Bruce A., and Giria, Yevgeny 1996 Concepts of the technological analysis of flaked stone: a case study from the High Arctic. Lithic Technology 21:23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Bruce A., and C. Garth Sampson 1986 Analysis by replication of two Acheulian artefact assemblages from Caddington, England. In Stone Age Prehistory: Studies in Memory of Charles McBurney, ed. Bailey, G. N. and Callow, P., pp. 29–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brainerd, George W. 1951 The place of chronological ordering in archaeological analysis. American Antiquity 16:301–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brantingham, P. Jeffrey 2003 A neutral model of stone raw material procurement. American Antiquity 68:487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broyles, Bettye J. 1971 Second Preliminary Report: The St. Albans Site, Kanawha County, West Virginia. Report of Archaeological Investigations 3. Morgantown: West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey.

Burkitt, Miles C. 1925 Prehistory: A Study of Early Cultures in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cahen, D., Keeley, L. H., and Noten, F. L. 1979 Stone tools, toolkits, and human behavior in prehistory. Current Anthropology 20:661–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callahan, Errett 1974 Experimental Archaeology Papers, No. 3. Richmond: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Virginia Commonwealth University.Google Scholar

Callahan, Errett 1976 Experimental Archaeology Papers, No. 4. Richmond: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Virginia Commonwealth University.Google Scholar

Callahan, Errett (ed.) 1979 The basics of biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition: a manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America 7:1–180.Google Scholar

Calvert, S. E. 1983 Sedimentary geochemistry of silicon. In Silicon Geochemistry and Biogeochemistry, ed. Aston, R. R., pp. 143–86. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, Roy L. 1996 Introduction to early human occupation in British Columbia. In Early Human Occupation in British Columbia, ed. Carlson, R. L. and Bona, L. Dalla, pp. 3–10. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Carr, Philip J. 1994 Technological organization and prehistoric hunter-gatherer mobility: examination of the Hayes Site. In The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, ed. Carr, P. J., pp. 35–44. Archaeological Series 7. Ann Arbor, Michigan: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar

Carr, Philip J., and Andrew P. Bradbury 2001 Flake debris analysis, levels of production, and the organization of technology. In Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, ed. Andrefsky, Wm. Jr., pp. 126–46. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Cashdan, E. A. 1985 Coping with risk reciprocity among the Basara of Northern Botswana. Man 20:222–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattaneo, C., Gelsthorpe, K., Phillips, P., and Sokol, R. J. 1993 Blood residues on stone tools: indoor and outdoor experiments. World Archaeology 25:29–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Centola, Lisa 2004 Deconstructing lithic technology: a study from the Birch Creek Site (35ML181), southeastern Oregon. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.

Chang, K. C. 1967 Rethinking Archaeology. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Chatters, James C. 1987 Hunter-gatherer adaptations and assemblage structure. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6:336–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Childe, V. Gordon 1925 The Dawn of European Civilization. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Christenson, Andrew L. 1986 Projectile point size and projectile aerodynamics: an exploratory study. Plains Anthropologist 31:109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christenson, Andrew L., and Read, Dwight D. 1977 Numerical taxonomy, R-mode factor analysis and archaeological classification. American Antiquity 42:163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chun, Chen, and Wang, Xiang-Quian 1989 Upper Paleolithic microblade industries in North China and their relationships with Northeast Asia and North America. Arctic Anthropology 26:127–56.Google Scholar

Church, Tim 1994 Lithic Resource Studies: A Sourcebook for Archaeologists. Special Publication 3. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Lithic Technology.Google Scholar

Churchill, Steven E. 1993 Weapon technology, prey size selection, and hunting methods in modern hunter-gatherers: implications for hunting in the Paleolithic and Mesolithic. In Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia, ed. Gail Larson Peterkin, Harvey M. Bricker, and Paul Mellars, pp. 11–24. Archaeological Papers 4. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Clark, J., Phillips, J. L., and Staley, P. S. 1974 Interpretations of prehistoric technology from Ancient Egyptian and other sources. Part 1: Ancient Egyptian bows and arrows and their relevance for African prehistory. Paléorient 2:323–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, J. D. 1958 Certain industries of notched and strangulated scrapers in Rhodesia, their time range and possible use. The South African Archaeological Bulletin 13:50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, John E. 1982 Manufacture of Mesoamerican prismatic blades, an alternative technique. American Antiquity 42:355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, John E. 1984 Counterflaking and the manufacture of Mesoamerican prismatic blades. Lithic Technology 13:52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, John E. 1985 Platforms, bits, punches, and vises: a potpourri of Mesoamerican blade technology. Lithic Technology 14:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, John E.1991 Flintknapping and debitage disposal among the Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. In The Ethnoarchaeology of Refuse Disposal, ed. Edward Staski and L. D. Sutro, pp. 63–78. Anthropological Research Papers No. 42. Tempe: Arizona State University.

Clark, J. G. D. 1932 The Mesolithic Age in Great Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, J. G. D. 1969 World Prehistory: A New Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, David L. 1978 Analytical Archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Clarkson, Chris 2002 An index of invasiveness for the measurement of unifacial and bifacial retouch: a theoretical, experimental and archaeological verification. Journal of Archaeological Science 29:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Close, Angela E. 1978 The identification of style in lithic artifacts. World Archaeology 10:223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Close, Angela E.1989 Identifying style in stone artefacts: a case study from the Nile Valley. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, ed. Donald O. Henry and George H. Odell, pp. 3–26. Archaeological Papers 1. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Cochrane, Grant W. G. 2003 On the measurement and analysis of platform angles. Lithic Technology 28:13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coe, Joffere L. 1964 The formative culture of the Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffey, Brian P. 1994 The chemical alteration of microwear polishes: an evaluation of the Plisson and Mauger findings through replicative experimentation. Lithic Technology 19:88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Mary B., and William Andrefsky, Jr. 1995 Archaeological Collections Inventory and Assessment of Marmes Rockshelter (45FR50) and Palus Sites (45FR36A, B, C). Center for Northwest Anthropology Project Report 28. Pullman: Washington State University.

Conkey, Margaret W. 1978 Style and information in cultural evolution: toward a predictive model for the Paleolithic. In Social Archaeology, ed. Redman, C. L.et al., pp. 61–85. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Conkey, Margaret W. 1980 The identification of prehistoric hunter-gatherer aggregation sites: the case of Altamira. Current Anthropology 21:609–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copeland, L. 1983 Levallois/non-Levallois determinations in the early Levant Mousterian: problems and questions for 1983. Paléorient 14:95–105.Google Scholar

Corliss, D. W. 1972 Neck Width of Projectile Points: An Index of Cultural Change and Continuity. Occasional Papers 29. Pocatello: Idaho State University Museum.

Cormack, R. M. 1971 A review of classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 134:321–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterell, Brian, and Johan Kamminga 1979 The mechanics of flaking. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, B., pp. 97–112. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cotterell, Brian, and Kamminga, Johan 1986 Finials on stone flakes. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:451–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterell, Brian, and Kamminga, Johan 1987 The formation of flakes. American Antiquity 52:675–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterell, Brian, and Kamminga, Johan 1990 Mechanics of pre-industrial technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cotterell, Brian, Kamminga, Johan, and Dickson, F. P. 1985 The essential mechanics of conchoidal flaking. International Journal of Fracture 20:205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowgill, George L. 1982 Clusters of objects and associations between variables: two approaches to archaeological classification. In Essays in Archaeological Typology, ed. Whallon, R. and Brown, J. A., pp. 30–55. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar

Cox, S. L. 1986 A re-analysis of the Shoop Site. Archaeology of Eastern North America 14:101–70.Google Scholar

Crabtree, Don E. 1966 A stoneworker's approach to analyzing and replicating the Lindenmeier Folsom. Tebiwa 9:3–39.Google Scholar

Crabtree, Don E. 1967 Notes on experiments in flintknapping: 3, The flintknapper's raw materials. Tebiwa 10:8–24.Google Scholar

Crabtree, Don E. 1968 Mesoamerican polyhedral cores and prismatic blades. American Antiquity 33:446–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crabtree, Don E. 1970 Flaking stone with wooden implements. Science 169:146–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crabtree, Don E.1972 An Introduction to Flintworking. Occasional Papers 28. Pocatello: Idaho State Museum.

Crabtree, Don E., and Swanson, Earl H. 1968 Edge-ground cobbles and blade-making in the Northwest. Tebiwa 11:50–4.Google Scholar

Crawford, O. G. S. 1935 A primitive threshing machine. Antiquity 9:335–9.Google Scholar

Curwin, Cecil 1930 Prehistoric flint sickles. Antiquity 4:179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curwin, Cecil 1935 Agriculture and the flint sickle in Palestine. Antiquity 9:62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushing, Frank H. 1895 The arrow. American Anthropologist 8:307–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dag, Doron, and Goren-Inbar, Naama 2001 An actualistic study of dorsally plain flakes: a technological note. Lithic Technology 26:105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniel, I. Randolph Jr., 2001 Stone raw material availability and early archaic settlement in the southeastern United States. American Antiquity 66:237–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daugherty, Richard D., Flenniken, J. Jeffrey, and Welch, Jeanne M. 1987 A Data Recovery Study of Judd Peak Rockshelter (45–LE–222) in Lewis County, Washington. Studies in Cultural Resource Management 8. Portland, Oregon: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.Google Scholar

Davis, Zachary J., and Shea, John J. 1998 Quantifying lithic curation: an experimental test of Dibble and Pelcin's original flake-tool mass predictor. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deacon, J. 1984 Later Stone Age people and their descendants in Southern Africa. In Southern African Prehistory and Paleoenvironments, ed. Klein, Richard, pp. 221–328. Boston: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar

Dibble, Harold L. 1988 Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 181–97. University Museum Monograph 54. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Dibble, Harold L.1991 Local raw material exploitation and its effects on Lower and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 33–48. Lawrence: University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology 19.Google Scholar

Dibble, Harold L. 1997 Platform variability and flake morphology: a comparison of experimental and archeological data and implications for interpreting prehistoric lithic technological strategies. Lithic Technology 22:150–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, Harold L., and Pelcin, Andrew 1995 The effect of hammer mass and velocity on flake mass. Journal of Archaeological Science 22:429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, Harold L., and Whittaker, John C. 1981 New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation. Journal of Archaeological Science 6:283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Didier, Mary E. 1975 The argillite problem revisited: an archaeological and geological approach to a classical archaeological problem. Archaeology of Eastern North America 3:90–101.Google Scholar

Dobosi, Viola T. 1991 Economy and raw material: a case study of three Upper Paleolithic sites in Hungary. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 197–204. Lawrence: University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology 19.Google Scholar

Doran, James E., and Hodson, Roy F. 1975 Mathematics and Computers in Archaeology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Downs, Elinor F., and Lowenstein, Jerold M. 1995 Identification and archaeological blood proteins: a cautionary note. Journal of Archaeological Science 22:11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Draper, John A., and Gordon A. Lothson 1990 Test Excavations at 10NP143 and 10NP292, Lower Clearwater River, West-Central Idaho. Project Report 12. Pullman: Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University.

Drennan, Robert D. 1996 Statistics for Archaeologists: A Commonsense Approach. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, J. W. 1983 An interim report of the Star Carr microwear study. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2:127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunnell, Robert C. 1971 Systematics in Prehistory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dunnell, Robert C. 1978 Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity 43:192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Stephen W. 2000 Flaked stone basalt technology in the Northern Sierra Nevada of California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 22:361–74.Google Scholar

Elder, J. 1984 The impact of subsistence change on mobility and settlement pattern in a tropical forest foraging economy: some implications for archaeology. American Anthropologist 86:837–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisele, J., Fowler, D. D., and Lewis, R. A. 1995 Survival and detection of blood residues on stone tools. Antiquity 69:36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellen, Roy F. 1979 Introductory essay. In Classifications and Their Social Contexts, ed. Ellen, R. F. and Reason, D., pp. 1–32. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, Christopher J. 1997 Factors influencing the use of stone projectile tips: an ethnographic perspective. In Projectile Technology, ed. Knecht, Heidi, pp. 37–78. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, H. Holmes 1939 Flint-Working Techniques of the American Indians: An Experimental Study. Columbus: Ohio Historical Society.Google Scholar

Elston, Robert G., and Steven L. Kuhn (eds.) 2002 Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, Anthropological Papers 12. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Organization.

Ensor, H. Blaine, and Roemer, Erwin Jr. 1989 Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 54:175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, John 1872 The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments of Great Britain. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar

Faulkner, Aleric 1972 Mechanical Principles of Flint Working. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar

Feder, Kenneth L. 1996 The Past in Perspective. Mountain View, California: Mayfield.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Jeffrey R. 2003 An experimental test of the conservation of raw material in flintknapping skill acquisition. Lithic Technology 28:113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiedel, Stuart J. 1996 Blood from stones? Some methodological and interpretive problems in blood residue analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 23:139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, P. R. 1981 Beyond tools: Middle Paleolithic debitage analysis and cultural inference. Journal of Anthropological Research 37:374–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fladmark, Knut R. 1982 Microdebitage analysis: initial considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9:205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flenniken, J. Jeffery 1978 Reevaluation of the Lindenmeier Folsom: a replication experiment in lithic technology. American Antiquity 43:473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flenniken, J. Jeffery1981 Replicative Systems Analysis: A Model Applied to the Vein Quartz Artifacts from the Hoko River Site. Reports of Investigations 59. Pullman: Washington State University, Laboratory of Anthropology.

Flenniken, J. Jeffery, and Haggarty, J. 1979 Trampling as an agency in the formation of edge damage: an experiment in lithic technology. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 13:208–14.Google Scholar

Flenniken, J. Jeffery, and Raymond, Anan W. 1986 Morphological projectile point typology: replication experimentation and technological analysis. American Antiquity 51:603–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flenniken, J. Jeffery, and Wilke, Philip J. 1989 Typology, technology, and chronology of Great Basin dart points. American Anthropologist 91:149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, James A. 1954 The type concept revisited. American Anthropologist 56:42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frison, George C. 1968 A functional analysis of certain chipped stone tools. American Antiquity 33:149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frison, George C. 1989 Experimental use of clovis weaponry and tools on African elephants. American Antiquity 54:766–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frison, George C. 1991 Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains (2nd edition). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Frison, George C., and Bradley, Bruce 1980 Folsom Tools and Technology of the Hanson Site, Wyoming. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Frison, George C., and Bradley, Bruce 1981 Fluting of Folsom points: archaeological evidence. Lithic Technology 10:13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frison, George C., and Todd, Lawrence C. 1987 The Horner Site: The Type Site of the Cody Cultural Complex. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fullagar, Richard L. K. 1991 The role of silica in polish formation. Journal of Archaeological Science 18:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fullagar, Richard L. K., Furby, Judith, and Hardy, Bruce 1996 Residues on stone artefacts: state of a scientific art. Antiquity 70:740–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, J. P. 1977 Contemporary stone tools in Ethiopia: implications for archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology 4:407–14.Google Scholar

Garrod, D. A. E., and Bate, D. M. A. 1937 The Stone Age of Mount Carmel, Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gendel, Peter A. 1984 Mesolithic Social Territories in Northwest Europe. BAR International Series 218. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Géneste, Jean-Michel 1985 Analyse lithique d'industries moustériennes du Périgord: une approche technologique du comportement des groups humains au paléolithique moyen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bordeaux I.Google Scholar

Géneste, Jean-Michel, and Serge Maury 1997 Contributions of multidisciplinary experimentation to the study of Upper Paleolithic projectile points. In Projectile Technology, ed. Knecht, Heide, pp. 165–190. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gero, Joan M. 1989 Assessing social information in material objects: how well do lithics measure up? In Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, ed. Torrence, Robin, pp. 92–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gifford-Gonzales, Diane P., Damrosch, David B., Damrosch, Debra R., et al. 1985 The third dimension in site structure: an experiment in trampling and vertical dispersal. American Antiquity 50:803–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilreath, Amy 1984 Stages of Bifacial Manufacture: Learning from Experiments. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland, Oregon.

Gnaden, Denis, and Holdaway, Simon 1998 Understanding observer variation when recording stone artifacts. American Antiquity 65:739–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goebel, Ted 2002 The “microblade adaptation” and recolonization of Siberia during the Late Upper Pleistocene. In Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, ed. Robert G. Elston and Steven L. Kuhn, pp. 117–32. Archaeological Papers 12. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Organization.

Goodyear, Albert C. 1974 The Brand Site: A Techno-Functional Study of a Dalton Site in Northeast Arkansas. Publications on Archaeology, Research Series 7. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.Google Scholar

Goodyear, Albert C. 1979 A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Material among Paleo-Indian Groups of North America. Research Manuscript Series 156. Columbia: Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar

Goodyear, Albert C. 1993 Tool kit entropy and bipolar reduction: a study of interassemblage lithic variability among Paleo-Indian sites in the northeastern United States. North American Archaeologist 14:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, Richard A. 1968 Living archaeology: the Ngatatjara of Western Australia. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 24:101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, Richard A. 1980 Living Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, Richard A., Koster, Dorothy A., and Sontz, Ann H. L. 1971 The lithic assemblage of the Western Desert aborigines of Australia. American Antiquity 36:149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grace, Roger 1989 Interpreting the Function of Stone Tools. BAR International Series 474. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Grace, R., K. Ataman, R. Fabregas, and C. M. B. Haggren 1988 A multivariate approach to the functional analysis of stone tools. In Industries lithiques, vol. 2: Aspects méthodologiques, ed. Beyries, Sylvie, pp. 217–30, BAR International Series 411 (ii). Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Gramly, , , R. Michael 1980 Raw material source areas and “curated” tool assemblages. American Antiquity 45:823–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gramly, R. Michael, and Rutledge, Kerry 1981 A new Paleo-Indian site in the State of Maine. American Antiquity 46:354–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greaves, Russel D. 1997 Hunting and multifunctional use of bows and arrows: ethnoarchaeology of technological organization among Pumé hunters of Venezuela. In Projectile Technology, ed. Knecht, Heidi, pp. 287–320. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greiser, Sally T. 1977 Micro-analysis of wear patterns on projectile points and knives from the Jurgens Site, Kersey, Colorado. Plains Anthropologist 22:107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, James B. 1943 The Fort Ancient Aspect: Its Cultural and Chronological Position in Mississippi Valley Archaeology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Gunn, Joel 1981 Response to Benfer and Benfer. American Antiquity 46:397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunn, Joel, and Prewitt, Elton R. 1975 Automatic classification: projectile points from West Texas. Plains Anthropologist 20:139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Christopher T. 1998 The organization of prehistoric economies: an example from the Beehive Site, Wyoming. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming: Laramie.

Hall, Christopher T., and Larson, Mary Lou (eds.) 2004 The Current State of Aggregate Analyses. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Hamblin, W. K., and Howard, J. D. 1971 Physical Geology Laboratory Manual. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Hardy, Bruce L., and Garufi, Gary T. 1998 Identification of woodworking on stone tools through residue and use-wear analysis: experimental results. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, Bruce L., Raff, Rudolf A., and Raman, Venu 1997 Recovery of mammalian DNA from Middle Paleolithic stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:601–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harold, Francis B. 1993 Variability and function among gravette points from southwestern France. In Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia, ed. Gail Larson Peterkin, Harvey M. Bricker, and Paul Mellars, pp. 69–82. Archaeological Papers 4. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Hayden, Brian 1977 Stone tool functions in the Western Desert. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution, and Complexity, ed. Wright, R. V. S., pp. 178–88. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Hayden, Brian1979a Snap, shatter, and superfractures: usewear of stone skin scrapers. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, B., pp. 207–30. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hayden, Brian 1979b Paleolithic Reflections: Lithic Technology and Ethnographic Excavation among Australian Aborigines. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, and New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Hayden, Brian 1980 Confusion in the bipolar world: bashed pebbles and splintered pieces. Lithic Technology 9:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayden, Brian 1982 Interaction parameters and the demise of Paleo-Indian craftsmanship. Plains Anthropologist 27:109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayden, Brian 1986 Use and misuse: the analysis of endscrapers. Lithic Technology 15:65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayden, , , Brian (ed.) 1979c Lithic Usewear Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hayden, Brian, and W. Karl Hutchings 1989 Whither the billet flake? In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, D. S. and Mauldin, R. P., pp. 235–58. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Hayden, Brian, and Kamminga, Johan 1973 Gould, Koster, and Sontz on “Microwear”: a critical review. Newsletter of Lithic Technology 2:3–14.Google Scholar

Hayden, Brian, Nora Franco, and Jim Spafford 1996 Evaluating lithic strategies and design criteria. In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, ed. Odell, G. H., pp. 9–50. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healan, Dan M. 1995 Identifying lithic reduction loci with size-graded macrodebitage: a multivariate approach. American Antiquity 60:689–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heider, Karl G. 1967 Archaeological assumptions and ethnographic facts: a cautionary tale from New Guinea. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 23:52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Donald O. 1989 Correlations between reduction strategies and settlement patterns. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, ed. Henry, D. O. and Odell, G. H., pp. 139–212. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. O., Haynes, C. V., and Bradley, B. 1976 Quantitative variations in flaked stone debitage. Plains Anthropologist 21:57–61.Google Scholar

Hester, Thomas R. 1993 Lithic typology: background, goals, and a personal perspective. Lithic Technology 18:36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hester, Thomas R., and , Robert F.Heizer, 1972 Problems in functional interpretation: scraper-planes from the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Contributions of the University of California Research Faculty, 14:107–23.Google Scholar

Hester, , , Thomas R., and Shafer, Harry J. 1975 An initial study of blade technology on the central and southern Texas coast. Plains Anthropologist 16:175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, J., and R. Evans 1972 A model for classification and typology. In Models in Archaeology, ed. Clarke, D. L., pp. 231–73. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Hiraguchi, Tetsuo 1992 Catching dolphins at Mawaki Site, Central Japan, and its contribution to Jomon society. In Pacific Northwest Asia in Prehistory: Hunter-Fisher-Farmers, and Sociopolitical Elites, ed. Aikens, C. M. and Rhee, S. N., pp. 35–46. Pullman: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar

Hiscock, , , Peter 1994 Technological responses to risk in Holocene Australia. Journal of World Prehistory 8:267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiscock, Peter2002 Pattern and context in the Holocene proliferation of backed artifacts in Australia. In Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, ed. Robert G. Elston, and Steven L. Kuhn, pp. 163–78. Archaeological Papers 12. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Organization.

Hodson, Roy F. 1982 Some aspects of archaeological classification. In Essays on Archaeological Classification, ed. Whallon, R. and Brown, J. A., pp. 21–9. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar

Hofman, Jack L. 1981 The refitting of chipped-stone artifacts as an analytical and interpretive tool. Current Anthropology 22:35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofman, Jack L.2003 Tethered to stone or freedom to move: Folsom biface technology in regional perspective. In Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, ed. Soressi, M. and Dibble, H. L., pp. 229–50, University Museum Monograph 115. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar

Hofman, , , Jack L., and Enloe, James (eds.) 1991 Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology. BAR International Series. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Holmes, , , William H. 1891 Manufacture of stone arrow-points. American Anthropologist 4:49–58.Google Scholar

Holmes, William H.1894 Natural history of flaked stone implements. In Memoirs of the International Congress of Anthropology, ed. Wake, C. S., pp. 120–39. Chicago: Schulte.Google Scholar

Honea, , , Kenneth H. 1965 The bipolar flaking technique in Texas and New Mexico. Texas Archaeological Society Bulletin 36:259–67.Google Scholar

Hull, , , Kathleen L. 1987 Identification of cultural site formation processes through microdebitage analysis. American Antiquity 52:772–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurcombe, L. 1988 Some criticisms and suggestions in response to Newcomer et al. (1986). Journal of Archaeological Science 15:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobi, R. M. 1976 Britain inside and outside Mesolithic Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 42:67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobi, R. M.1978 Northern England in the eighth millennium BC: an essay. In The Early Postglacial Settlement of Northern Europe, ed. Mellars, Paul, pp. 295–332. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Jacobi, R. M.1980 The Early Holocene settlement of Wales. In Culture and Environment in Prehistoric Wales, ed. Taylor, J. A. and Bowens, R., pp. 131–206. BAR British Series 76. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Jarvis, K. E. 1988 Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a new technique for the rapid or ultra-trace level determination of the rare-earth elements in geological materials. Chemical Geology 68:31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jelinek, , , Arthur J. 1965 Lithic Technology Conference, Les Eyzies, France. American Antiquity 31:277–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jelinek, Arthur J.1976 Form, function, and style in lithic artifacts. In Culture Change and Continuity, ed. Cleland, C. E., pp. 19–33. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jelinek, Arthur J.1991 Observations on reduction patterns and raw materials in some Middle Paleolithic industries in the Perigord. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 7–32. Lawrence: University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology 19.Google Scholar

Jeske, , , Robert J. 1992 Energy efficiency and lithic technology: an Upper Mississippi example. American Antiquity 57:467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jodry, M. A. 1998 The possible design of Folsom ultrathin bifaces as fillet knives for jerky production. Current Research in the Pleistocene 15:75–77.Google Scholar

Johnson, Jay K. 1987 Cahokia core technology in Mississippi: the view from the South. In The Organization of Core Technology, ed. Johnson, Jay K. and Morrow, Carrol A., pp. 187–206. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Jay K.1989 The utility of production trajectory modeling as a framework for regional analysis. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, ed. Donald O. Henry and George H. Odell, pp. 119–38. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 1.

Jensen, Juel H. 1989 Plant harvesting and processing with flint implements in the Danish Stone Age. Acta Archaeologica 59:131–42.Google Scholar

Kalin, Jeffrey 1981 Stem point manufacture and debitage recovery. Archaeology of Eastern North America 9:134–75.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Johan 1978 Journey into the microcosms: a functional analysis of certain Australian prehistoric stone tools. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Johan1979 The nature of use of polish and abrasive smoothing on stone tools. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, B., pp. 143–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Johan1982 Over the Edge: Functional Analysis of Australian Stone Tools. Occasional Papers in Anthropology 12. Brisbane: Anthropology Museum, Queensland University.

Katz, Paul R. 1976 A Technological Analysis of the Kansas City Hopewell Chipped Stone Industry. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar

Kealhofer, Lisa, Torrence, Robin, and Fullagar, Richard 1999 Integrating phytoliths within use-wear/residue studies of stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, Keeley H. 1974 Technique and methodology in microwear studies: a critical review. World Archaeology 5:323–36.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Keeley H. 1977 An experimental study of microwear traces on selected British Paleolithic implements. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Keeley H. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Keeley H. 1982 Hafting and retooling: effects on the archaeological record. American Antiquity 47:798–809.Google Scholar

Keeley, Lawrence H., and Newcomer, M. H. 1977 Microwear analysis of experimental flint tools: a test case. Journal of Archaeological Science 4:29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Robert L. 1983 Hunter-gatherer mobility strategies. Journal of Anthropological Research 39:277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Robert L. 1988 The three sides of a biface. American Antiquity 53:717–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Robert L. 1995 The Foraging Spectrum. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Kempe, D. R. C., and J. A. Templeman 1983 Techniques. In The Petrology of Archaeological Artefacts, ed. Kempe, D. R. C. and Harvey, Anthony P., pp. 26–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kendall, M. G., and Stuart, A. 1969 The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 1, Distribution Theory. London: Griffin.Google Scholar

Kidder, Alfred V. 1924 An Introduction to the Study of Southwestern Archaeology. Papers of the Southwestern Expedition 1. Andover, Mass.: Philips Academy.

Kinsey, W. Fred 1972 Archaeology of the Upper Delaware Valley. Anthropological Series 2. Harrisburg: The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.Google Scholar

Knecht, Heidi 1997 Projectile points of bone, antler, and stone: experimental explorations of manufacture and use. In Projectile Technology, ed. Knecht, Heidi, pp. 191–212. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knell, Edward 1999 Late Paleoindian Cody Period mobility patterns: an example from the locality V Cody Complex at the Hell Gap Site. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming: Laramie.

Knudson, Ruthann 1978 Experimental lithocology: method and theory. Lithic Technology 5:44–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knudson, Ruthann1979 Inference and imposition in lithic analysis. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, B., pp. 269–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Knutsson, Kjel 1988 Patterns of Tool Use. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Uppsaliensis.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, T. 1970 Microblade industries in the Japanese archipelago. Arctic Anthropology 7:38–58.Google Scholar

Kooyman, Brian P. 1985 Moa and moa hunting: an archaeological analysis of big game hunting in New Zealand. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Otago, Dunedin.

Kooyman, Brian P. 2000 Understanding Stone Tools and Archaeological Sites. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar

Kooyman, Brian P., Newman, Margaret E., and Ceri, Howard 1992 Verifying the reliability of blood residue analysis on archaeological tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 19:265–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraft, Herbert C. 1970 The Miller Field Site, Warren County, N.J. South Orange, New Jersey: Seton Hall University Press.Google Scholar

Kraft, Herbert C. 1975 The Archaeology of Tocks Island Area. South Orange, New Jersey: Archaeological Research Center, Seton Hall University.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Steven L. 1990 A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 17:585–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Steven L. 1991 “Unpacking” reduction: lithic raw material economy in the Mousterian of West-Central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10:76–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Steven L. 1992 Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity 57:115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Steven L. 1995 Mousterian Lithic Technology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Mary Lou 1990 Early Plains archaic technological organization: the Laddie Creek example. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California at Santa Barbara.

Larson, Mary Lou1994 Toward a holistic analysis of chipped stone assemblages. In The Organization of North American Stone Tool Technology, ed. Carr, Philip J., pp. 57–69. Archaeological Series 7. Ann Arbor, Michigan: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar

Larson, Mary Lou, and Judson B. Finley 2004 Seeing the forest but missing the trees: production sequences and multiple linear regression. In Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, ed. Hall, Christopher and Larson, Mary Lou, pp. 95–111. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Larson, Mary Lou, and Kornfeld, Marcel 1997 Chipped stone nodules: theory, method, and examples. Lithic Technology 22:4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Thomas K., Dori Penny, Ross G. Hilman, and Paul H. Sanders 1988 A Data Recovery Program for Sites within the Dome Unit, Santa Fe National Forest. Report prepared by Larson-Tibesar Associates, Laramie, Wyoming for USDA, Forest Service, Santa Fe National Forest, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Latham, T. S., Sutton, P. A., and Verosub, K. L. 1992 Non-destructive XRF characterization of basaltic artifacts from Trukee, California. Geoarchaeology 7:81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, Robert A. 1979 Experimental evidence for the significance of attributes used in edge-damage analysis. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, Brian, pp. 113–21. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Leakey, L. S. B. 1954 Working stone, bone, and wood. In A History of Technology, vol. 1, ed. Singer, C., Holmyard, E. J., and Hall, A. R., pp. 128–43. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Leonard, Robert D., and Jones, George T. 1989 Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964 Le Geste et la Parole, vol. 1: Technique et Langage. Paris: Albin Michel.

Lévi-Sala, Irene 1986 Usewear and post-depositional surface modification: a note of caution. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévi-Sala, Irene 1996 A Study of Microscopic Polish on Flint Implements. BAR International Series 629. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Levitt, Jeff 1979 A review of experimental traceological research in the USSR. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, Brian, pp. 27–38. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lewenstein, S. M. 1987 Stone Tool Use at Cerros: The Ethnoarchaeological and Use-Wear Evidence. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Lothrop, Jonathan C. 1989 The organization of Paleoindian lithic technology at the Potts Site. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, ed. Ellis, C. J. and Lothrop, J. C., pp. 99–138. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Lothrop, Jonathan C., and Gramly, R. Michael 1982 Pieces esquillées from the Vail Site. Archaeology of Eastern North America 10:1–22.Google Scholar

Loy, Thomas H. 1994 Methods in the analysis of starch residues on prehistoric stone tools. In Tropical Archaeobotany: Applications and New Directions, ed. Hather, J., pp. 86–114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Loy, Thomas H., and Dixon, E. James 1998 Blood residues on fluted points from Eastern Beringia. American Antiquity 63:21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luedtke, Barbara E. 1992 An Archaeologist's Guide to Chert and Flint. Archaeological Research Tools 7. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.Google Scholar

Lyons, William H. 1994 Lithic technology at the Hall Creek Site (35GR420B), Silvies Valley, Grant County, Oregon. M.A. thesis, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar

Lyons, William H., Glascock, Michael D., and Mehringer, Pete 2003 Silica from sources to sites: ultraviolet fluorescence and trace elements identify cherts from lost dunes, southeastern Oregon, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science 30:1139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Douglas H. 1994 Lithic technological organization at the Hunting Camp Spring Site (35WA96), Blue Mountains, Oregon. M.A. thesis, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar

MacDonald, G. F. 1968 Debert: A Paleo-Indian Site in Central Nova Scotia. Anthropological Papers 16. Ottawa: National Museum of Man.

MacDonald, G. F., and Sanger, D. 1968 Some aspects of microscope analysis and photomicrography of lithic artifacts. American Antiquity 33:237–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Kevin, and Allsworth-Jones, P. 1994 A reconsideration of the West African macrolithic conundrum: new factory sites and an associated settlement in the Vallée du Serpent, Mali. The African Archaeological Review 12:73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Mary M. A. 1991 Technological organization and sedentism in the Epipalaeolithic of Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt. The African Archaeological Review 9:81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKern, W. C. 1939 The Midwest taxonomic method as an aid to archaeological culture study. American Antiquity 4:301–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, R. J. W. 1977 Atomic absorption spectroscopy. In Physical Methods in Determinative Mineralogy, ed. Zussman, J., pp. 371–89. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

McNerney, Michael J. 1987 Crab Orchard core technology at the Consol Site, Jackson County, Illinois. In The Organization of Core Technology, ed. Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C. A., pp. 63–86. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Magne, Martin P. 1985 Lithics and Livelihood: Stone Tool Technologies of Central and Southern Interior British Columbia. Archaeological Survey of Canada Paper No. 133. Ottawa: National Museum of Man. Mercury Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magne, Martin p.1989 Lithic reduction stages and assemblage formation processes. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, D. S. and Mauldin, R. P., pp. 15–31. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Magne, Martin p.1996 Comparative analysis of microblade cores from Haida Gwaii. In Early Human Occupation in British Columbia, ed. Carlson, R. L. and Bona, L. D., pp. 151–8. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Magne, Martin P., and Pokotylo, David 1981 A pilot study in bifacial lithic reduction sequences. Lithic Technology 10:34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansur-Franchomme, M. E. 1983 Scanning electron microscopy of dry hide working tool: the role of abrasives and humidity in microwear polish formation. Journal of Archaeological Science 10:223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, Anthony E. 1988 The curation of stone tools during the Upper Pleistocene: a view from the Central Negev, Israel. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 275–86. University Museum Monograph 54. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Marks, Anthony E., J. Shokler, and João Zilhão 1991 Raw material usage in the Paleolithic: the effects of local availability on selection and economy. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 127–40. Publications in Anthropology 19. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Mauldin, Raymond P., and Daniel S. Amick 1989 Investigating patterning in debitage from experimental bifacial core reduction. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, D. S. and Mauldin, R. P., pp. 67–88. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Meeks, N. D., Sieveking, G., Tite, M. S., and Cook, J. 1982 Gloss and usewear traces on flint sickles and similar phenomena. Journal of Archaeological Science 9:317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mellars, Paul 1974 The Paleolithic and Mesolithic. In British Prehistory: A New Outline, ed. Renfrew, C., pp. 41–99. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Mellars, Paul1976 Settlement patterns and industrial variability in the British Mesolithic. In Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology, ed. Sieveking, G. de G., Longworth, I. H., and Wilson, K. E., pp. 375–99. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Mellars, Paul 1996 The Neanderthal Legacy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mellars, Paul, and S. C. Reinhardt 1978 Patterns of Mesolithic land-use in southern England: a geological perspective. In The Early Postglacial Settlement of Northern Europe, ed. Mellars, Paul, pp. 243–94. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Meltzer, David J. 1981 A study of style and function in a class of tools. Journal of Field Archaeology 8:313–26.Google Scholar

Meltzer, David J. 1984 On stone procurement and settlement mobility in eastern fluted point groups. North American Archaeologist 6:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meltzer, David J., Leonard, Robert D., and Stratton, Susan K. 1992 The relationship between sample size and diversity in archaeological assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 19:375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meschel, S. V. 1978 Chemistry and archaeology: a creative bond. In Archaeological Chemistry, Vol. II, ed. Carter, G. F., pp. 3–24. Advances in Chemistry Series 171. Washington DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar

Mierendorf, Robert R., and Sheila J. Bobalik 1983 Lithic analysis. In Cultural Resources of the Rocky Reach of the Columbia River, Vol. II, ed. Randall F. Schalk and Robert R. Mierendorf. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Project Report 1. Pullman: Washington State University.

Mobley, Charles E. 1984 A Report to the Alaska Historical Commission for the Campus Site Restudy Project. MS on file. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Museum.Google Scholar

Mobley, Charles E. 1991 The Campus Site: A Prehistoric Camp at Fairbanks, Alaska. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar

Montet-White, Anta 1988 Raw material economy among medium-sized Late Paleolithic campsites of Central Europe. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 361–74. University Museum Monograph 54. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Montet-White, Anta1991 Lithic acquisition, settlements and territory in the Epigravettian of Central Europe. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 205–20. Publications in Anthropology 19. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Morlan, Richard E. 1970 Wedge-shaped core technology in northern North America. Arctic Anthropology 7:17–37.Google Scholar

Morrow, Carol A. 1984 A biface production model for gravel-based chipped stone industries. Lithic Technology 13:20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrow, Carol A., and Richard W. Jefferies 1989 Trade or embedded procurement? A test case from southern Illinois. In Time, Energy and Stone Tools, ed. Torrence, R., pp. 27–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morrow, Toby A. 1997 A chip off the old block: alternative approaches to debitage analysis. Lithic Technology 22:51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, E. H. 1987 A review of “Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests”. Journal of Archaeological Science 14:473–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, E. H., and M. H. Newcomer 1982 Reconstruction of tool use at Pincevent: microwear and experiments. Tailler! Pourquoi faire: préhistoire et technologie lithique 2. Recent Progress in Microwear Studies. Studia Prehistorica Belgica 2, ed. Cahen, D, pp. 289–312. Tervenuren: Musée Royale de l'Afrique Central.Google Scholar

Murata, K. J., Friedman, I., and Gleason, J. D. 1977 Oxygen isotope relations between diagenetic silica minerals in Monterey Shale, Temblor Range, California. American Journal of Science 277:259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murdoch, J. 1892 Ethnological Results of the Point Barrow Expedition. U.S. Bureau of American Ethnology, Ninth Annual Report. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muto, Guy R. 1971 A technological analysis of the early stages in the manufacture of chipped stone implements. M.A. thesis, Idaho State University.

Myers, Andrew 1989 Reliable and maintainable technological strategies in the Mesolithic of mainland Britain. In Time, Energy and Stone Tools, ed. Torrence, R., pp. 78–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nadel, Dani 2000 Indoor/outdoor flint knapping and minute debitage remains: the evidence from the Ohalo II Submerged Camp (19.5 KY, Jordan Valley). Lithic Technology 26:118–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nance, Jack D. 1971 Functional interpretations from microscopic analysis. American Antiquity 36:361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nance, Jack D. 1977 Numerical taxonomy studies of microwear on the Los Tapiales artifacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 121:264–73.Google Scholar

Nelson, E. W. 1899 The Eskimo about Bering Strait. U.S. Bureau of American Ethnology, Eighteenth Annual Report. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Nelson, Nels C. 1916 Chronology of the Tano Ruins, New Mexico. American Anthropologist 18:159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, T. M., and Johnson, E. 1979 Patrow Site lithic analysisMidcontinental Journal of Archaeology 4:79–111.Google Scholar

Newcomer, M. H., and C. Karlin 1987 Flint chips from Pincevent. In The Human Uses of Flint and Chert, ed. Newcomer, M. H. and Sieveking, G. de G., pp. 33–6. Proceedings of the Fourth International Flint Symposium held at Brighton Polytechnic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Newcomer, M. H., Grace, R., and Unger-Hamilton, R. 1986 Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, Margaret E., Ceri, Howard, and Kooyman, Brian 1996 The use of immunological techniques in the analysis of archaeological materials:-a response to Eisele; with report of studies at Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump. Antiquity 70:677–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, Margaret E., Yohe, Robert M. II, Kooyman, Brian, and Ceri, Howard 1997 “Blood” from stones? Probably: a response to Fiedel. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:1023–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissen, Karen, and Dittemore, Margaret 1974 Ethnographic data and wear pattern analysis: a study of socketed Eskimo scrapers. Tebiwa 17:67–88.Google Scholar

Noll, Michael P., and Michael D. Petraglia 2003 Acheulean bifaces and early human behavioral patterns in East Africa and South India. In Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, ed. Soressi, M. and Dibble, H. L., pp. 229–50, University Museum Monograph 115. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar

Oakley, Kenneth P. 1949 Man the Tool Maker. London: British Museum.Google Scholar

Oakley, Kenneth P. 1957 Man the Tool Maker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

O'Brien, Michael J., Darwent, John, and Lyman, R. Lee 2001 Cladistics is useful for reconstructing archaeological phylogenies: Palaeoindian points from the southeastern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:1115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connell, James F. 1977 Aspects of variation in central Australian lithic assemblages. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution and Complexity, ed. Wright, R. V. S., pp. 269–81. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Odell, George H. 1975 Micro-wear in perspective: a sympathetic response to Lawrence H. Keeley. World Archaeology 7:226–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odell, George H. 1977 The Application of Micro-Wear Analysis to the Lithic Component of an Entire Prehistoric Settlement: Methods, Problems, and Functional Reconstructions. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar

Odell, George H. 1980 Toward a more behavioral approach to lithic concentrations. American Antiquity 45:404–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odell, George H. 1981 The morphological express at Function Junction: searching for meaning in lithic tool types. Journal of Anthropological Research 37:319–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odell, George H1985 Microwear analysis of Middle Woodland lithics. In Smiling Dan: Structure and Function at a Middle Woodland Settlement in the Illinois Valley, ed. Stafford, B. and Sant, M. B., pp. 298–326. Research Series 2. Kampsville, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology.Google Scholar

Odell, George H1989 Experiments in lithic reduction. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, D. S. and Mauldin, R. P., pp. 163–98. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Odell, George H. 1994 The role of stone bladelets in Middle Woodland society. American Antiquity 59:102–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odell, George H. 2004 Lithic Analysis. New York: Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odell, George H., and Odell-Vereecken, F. 1980 Verifying the reliability of lithic usewear assessments by “blind tests”: the low-power approach. Journal of Field Archaeology 7:87–120.Google Scholar

Odum, Eugene P. 1971 Fundamentals of Ecology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Oetting, Albert C. 1994 Chronology and time markers in the Northern Great Basin: the Chewaucan Basin cultural chronology. In Archaeological Researches in the Northern Great Basin: Fort Rock Archaeology Since Cressman, ed. C. M. Aikens and D. L. Jenkins, pp. 41–62. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers 50. Eugene: University of Oregon.

Olausson, Deborah 1998 Different strokes for different folks, possible reasons for variation in quality of knapping. Lithic Technology 23:90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olszewski, Deborah I. 1993 Zarian microliths from Warwasi Rockshelter, Iran: scalene triangles as arrow components. In Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia, ed. Gail Larson Peterkin, Harvey M. Bricker, and Paul Mellars, pp. 199–206. Archaeological Papers 4. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Otte, Marcel 1995 The nature of Levallois. In The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, pp. 117–24, edDibble, Harold L. and Bar-Yosef, Ofer. Monographs in World Archaeology 23. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar

Parkes, P. A. 1986 Current Scientific Techniques in Archaeology. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Parry, William J. 1987 Technological change: temporal and functional variability in chipped stone debitage. In Prehistoric Stone Technology on Northern Black Mesa, Arizona, ed. Parry, William J. and Christenson, Andrew L., pp. 199–256. Occasional Paper 12. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar

Parry, William J., and Robert L. Kelly 1987 Expedient core technology and sedentism. In The Organization of Core Technology, ed. Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C. A., pp. 285–304. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Patterson, Leland W. 1979 Quantitative characteristics of debitage from heat treated chert. Plains Anthropologist 24:255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Leland W. 1982 Replication and classification of large size lithic debitage. Lithic Technology 11:50–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Leland W. 1985 Distinguishing between arrow and spear points on the Upper Texas Coast. Lithic Technology 14:81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Leland W. 1990 Characteristics of bifacial-reduction flake-size distribution. American Antiquity 55:550–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Leland W., and Sollberger, J. B. 1978 Replication and classification of small size lithic debitage. Plains Anthropologist 23:103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearsall, Deborah M. 1982 Phytolith analysis: applications of a new paleoethnological technique in archaeology. American Anthropologist 84:862–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearsall, Deborah M. 2000 Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures. Second edition. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pelcin, Andrew W. 1997 The effect of core surface morphology on flake attributes: evidence from a controlled experiment. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:749–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterkin, Gail Larson 1993 Lithic and organic hunting technology in the French Upper Paleolithic. In Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia, ed. Gail Larson Peterkin, Harvey M. Bricker, and Paul Mellars, pp. 49–68. Archaeological Papers 4. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Pettijohn, F. J. 1975 Sedimentary Rocks. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Piperno, Dolores R. 1988 Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pitblado, Bonnie L. 2003 Late Paleoindian Occupation of the Southern Rocky Mountains: Early Holocene Projectile Points and Land Use in the High Country. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar

Plastino, Brooke 1994 Prehistoric artifacts. In Data Recovery Excavations from Site 45PC101 Pacific County, Washington, ed. DePuydt, Raymond, pp. 75–118. Reports in Archaeology and History 100–79. Cheney, Washington: Eastern Washington University.Google Scholar

Pokotylo, David 1978 Lithic technology and settlement patterns in Upper Hat Creek Valley, B.C. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.

Pond, Alonzo W. 1930 Primitive methods of working stone: based on experiments of Halvor L. Skavlem. Logan Museum Bulletin 2:1–143.Google Scholar

Pope, Melody K. 1994 Mississippian micro tools and Uruk blades: a comparative study of chipped stone production, use, and economic organization. Lithic Technology 19:128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prentiss, William C., and Eugene J. Romanski 1989 Experimental evaluation of Sullivan and Rozen's debitage typology. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, D. S. and Mauldin, R. P., pp. 89–100. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Price, T. Douglas 1978 Mesolithic settlement systems in the Netherlands. In The Early Postglacial Settlement of Northern Europe, ed. Mellars, Paul, pp. 81–114. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Raab, , , L. Mark, Cande, R. F., and Stahle, D. W. 1979 Debitage graphs and archaic settlement patterns in the Arkansas Ozarks. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 4:167–82.Google Scholar

Radley, J., Switsur, V. R., and Tallis, J. H. 1974 The excavation of three “Narrow Blade” Mesolithic Sites in the southern Pennines, England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 40:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasic, Jeffery C. 2004 Debitage taphonomy. In Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, ed. Hall, Chris and Larson, Mary Lou, pp. 112–38. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Rasic, Jeffery C., and William Andrefsky, Jr. 2001 Alaskan blade cores as specialized components of mobile toolkits: assessing design parameters and toolkit organization through debitage analysis. In Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, ed. Andrefsky, Wm. Jr., pp. 61–79. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Rau, C. 1869 A deposit of agricultural flint implements in southern Illinois. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, 1868, pp. 401–7. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Read, Dwight D. 1974 Some comments on the use of mathematical models in archaeology. American Antiquity 39:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redman, Kimberly L. 1998 An experiment-based evaluation of the debitage attributes associated with “hard” and “soft” hammer percussion. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.

Reeves, R. D., and Brooks, R. R. 1978 Trace Element Analysis of Geological Materials. New York: Interscience Publishers, Wiley.Google Scholar

Reher, Charles A. 1991 Large scale quarries and regional transport systems on the High Plains of Eastern Wyoming. Spanish diggings revisited. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 251–84, Publications in Anthropology 19. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Reher, Charles A., and George C. Frison 1991 Rarity, clarity, symmetry: quartz crystal utilization in hunter-gatherer stone tool assemblages. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 375–98. Publications in Anthropology 19. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Rhode, David 1988 Measurement of archaeological diversity and the sample-size effect. American Antiquity 53:708–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, William A. 1944 The Pre-Iroquoian Occupation of New York State. Memoir 1. Rochester, New York: Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar

Ritchie, William A. 1965 The Archaeology of New York State. Garden City, New Jersey: Natural History Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, W. S. 1951 A method of chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. American Antiquity 40:22–38.Google Scholar

Rogers, Richard A. 1986 Spurred end scrapers as diagnostic Paleoindian artifacts: a distributional analysis on stream terraces. American Antiquity 51:338–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolland, Nicolas 1981 The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability. Man 16:15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolland, Nicolas1988 Observations on some Middle Paleolithic time series in southern France. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, ed. Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 161–79. University Museum Monograph 54. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Rolland, Nicolas1995 Levallois technique emergence: single or multiple? A review of the Euro-African record. In The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, pp. 333–60, ed. Dibble, Harold L. and Bar-Yosef, Ofer. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 23. Madison: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar

Rolland, Nicolas, and Dibble, Harold L. 1990 A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity 55:480–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rondeau, Michael F. 1996 When is an elko? In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights Into Human Prehistory, ed. Odell, G. H., pp. 229–44. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Root, Matthew J. 1992 The Knife River Flint Quarries: The Organization of Stone Tool Production. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar

Root Matthew J.2004 Technological analysis of flake debris and the limitations of size-grade techniques. In Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, ed. Hall, Christopher and Larson, Mary Lou, pp. 65–94. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, Steven A. 1997 Lithics After the Stone Age: A Handbook of Stone Tools from the Levant. Walnut Creek, California: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Rots, Veerle 2004 Prehensile wear on flint tools. Lithic Technology 29:7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rovner, Irwin 1971 Potential of opal phytoliths for use in paleoecological reconstruction. Quaternary Research 1:343–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rule P., and J. Evans 1985 The relationship of morphological variation to hafting techniques among Paleoindian endscrapers at the Shawnee Minisink Site. In Shawnee Minisink: A Stratified Paleoindian-Archaic Site in the Upper Delaware Valley of Pennsylvania, ed. McNett, C., pp. 211–20. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sackett, James R. 1977 The meaning of style in archaeology. American Antiquity 42:369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sackett, James R. 1982 Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sackett, James R. 1986 Isochrestism and style: a clarification. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5:266–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sackett, James R.1990 Style and ethnicity in archaeology: the case for isochrestism. In The Uses of Style in Archaeology, ed. Conkey, M. W. and Hastorf, C. A., pp. 105–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sanders, Paul H. 1992 Archaeological Investigations along the Pend Oreille River: Site 45PO149. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Project Report 18. Pullman: Washington State University.

Sappington, Robert L. 1991 Archaeological Investigations at the Clearwater Fish Hatchery Site (10CW4), North Fork of the Clearwater River, North Central Idaho. Anthropological Reports 91. Moscow: University of Idaho.Google Scholar

Sappington, , , Robert Lee, and Carley, Caroline 1984 Archaeological Test Excavation and Evaluation of Three Prehistoric Sites at Swift Bar, on the Lower Snake River, Southeastern Washington. Anthropological Research Manuscript Series 81. Moscow: University of Idaho.Google Scholar

Sassaman, Kenneth E. 1994 Changing strategies of biface production in the South Carolina coastal plain. In The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, ed. Carr, P. J., pp. 99–117. Archaeological Series 7. Ann Arbor, Michigan: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar

Schmeller, Erica L. 1999 Lithic artifact scatter variability among six sites in the vicinity of the Lower Powder River, Oregon. Unpublished M.A. thesis in Anthropology. Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.

Schroth, Adella, and Yohe, Robert M. II 2001 Obsidian use and technological change in Rose Valley: conclusions based on the analysis of debitage from two sites. Lithic Technology 26:50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seeman, Mark F. 1994 Intercluster lithic patterning at Nobles Pond: a case for “disembedded” procurement among early Paleoindian societies. American Antiquity 59:273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellet, Frederic 1993 Chaîne opératoire: the concept and its applications. Lithic Technology 18:106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellet, Frederic1999 A dynamic view of Paleoindian assemblages at the Hell Gap Site, Wyoming: reconstructing lithic technological systems. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.

Semenov, Sergei A. 1964 Prehistoric Technology, trans. M. W. Thompson. London: Cory, Adams and MacKay.Google Scholar

Serizawa, Chosuki 1976 The Stone Age of Japan. Asian Perspectives 19:1–14.Google Scholar

Shackley, M. Steven 1990 Early hunter-gatherer procurement ranges and mobility in the American Southwest: evidence from obsidian geochemistry and lithic technology. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.

Shackley, Myra L. 1974 Stream abrasion of flint implements. Nature 248:501–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shafer, Harry J., and Richard G. Holloway 1979 Organic residue analysis in determining stone tool function. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, ed. Hayden, B., pp. 385–99, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sharrock, F. W. 1966 Prehistoric Occupation Patterns in S. W. Wyoming and Cultural Relationships with the Great Basin and Plains Areas. Anthropology Papers 77. Department of Anthropology. Salt Lake: University of Utah.

Shea, John J. 1988 Spear points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology 15:441–50.Google Scholar

Shea, John J.1993 Lithic usewear evidence for hunting by Neanderthals and early modern humans from the Levantine Mousterian. In Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia, ed. Gail Larson Peterkin, Harvey M. Bricker, and Paul Mellars, pp. 189–98. Archaeological Papers 4. Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

Shen, Chen, and Wang, Shejiang 2000 A preliminary study of the anvil-chipping technique: experiments and evaluations. Lithic Technology 25:81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shott, Michael J. 1986 Settlement mobility and technological organization: an ethnographic examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 42:15–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shott, Michael J. 1989 Bipolar industries: ethnographic evidence and archaeological implications. North American Archaeologist 10:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shott, Michael J. 1993 The Leavitt Site: A Parkhill Phase Paleo-Indian Occupation in Central Michigan. Memoirs 25. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.Google Scholar

Shott, Michael J. 1994 Size and form in the analysis of flake debris: review and recent approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1:69–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shott, Michael J. 1995 How much is a scraper? Curation, use rates, and the formation of scraper assemblages. Lithic Technology 20:53–72.Google Scholar

Shott, Michael J.1996 Innovation and selection in prehistory: a case study from the American Bottom. In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, ed. Odell, G. H., pp. 279–314. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shott, Michael J., Bradbury, Andrew P., Carr, Philip J., and Odell, George H. 2000 Flake size from platform attributes: predictive and empirical approaches. Journal of Archaeological Science 27:877–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, Peter E. 1984 Functional variability within an assemblage of endscrapers. Lithic Technology 13:35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sieveking, A. 1958 The Paleolithic industry of Kota Tampan, Perak, Northwest Malaya. Asian Perspectives 2:91–102.Google Scholar

Siever, R., Beck, K. C., and Berner, R. A. 1965 Composition of interstitial waters of modern sediments. Journal of Geology 73:39–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sievert, April K. 1992 Maya Ceremonial Specialization: Lithic Tools from the Sacred Cenote at Chicken Itza, Yucatan. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar

Singer, C. A. 1984 The 63-kilometer fit. In Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production, ed. Ericson, J. E. and Purdy, B. A., pp. 35–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skertchly, Sydney B. J. 1879 On the Manufacture of Gun-Flints, the Methods of Excavating for Flint, the Age of Paleolithic Man, and the Connection between Neolithic Art and Gun-Flint Trade. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of England and Wales, London.Google Scholar

Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, Robert R. 1973 Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar

Sollberger, J. B. 1971 A technological study of beveled knives. Plains Anthropologist 16:209–18.Google Scholar

Sonnenfeld, J. 1962 Interpreting the function of primitive implements. American Antiquity 28:56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spaulding, Albert C. 1953 Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity 18:305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Speth, John D. 1972 Mechanical basis of percussion flaking. American Antiquity 37:34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Speth, John D. 1974 Experimental investigations of hard-hammer percussion flaking. Tebiwa 17:7–36.Google Scholar

Speth, John D. 1975 Miscellaneous studies in hard-hammer percussion flaking: the effects of oblique impact. American Antiquity 40:203–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Speth, John D. 1981 The role of platform angle and core size in hard-hammer percussion flaking. Lithic Technology 10:16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spurrell, R. C. J. 1892 Notes on early sickles. Archaeological Journal 49:53–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stafford, Barbara 1980 Prehistoric manufacture and utilization of lithics from Corduroy Creek. In Studies in the Prehistory of the Forestdale Region, Arizona, ed. Stafford, C. Russell and Rice, Glen E., pp. 251–97. Anthropological Field Studies 1. Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar

Stahle, David W., and Dunn, James E. 1982 An analysis and application of the size distribution of waste flakes from the manufacture of bifacial tools. World Archaeology 14:84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanford, Dennis J. 1973 The origins of Thule culture. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Steel, Robert G. D., and Torrie, James H. 1960 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Stiner, Mary C., and Kuhn, Steven L. 1992 Subsistence, technology, and adaptive variation in Middle Paleolithic Italy. American Anthropologist 94:306–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Straus, Lawrence G., and Geoffery A. Clark 1986 Stone Age Hunter-Gatherer Adaptations in Northern Spain. Anthropological Research Papers 36. Tempe: Arizona State University.

Sullivan, Alan P. III, and Rozen, Kenneth C. 1985 Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 50:755–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sussman, C. 1988 A Microscopic Analysis of Usewear and Polish Formation on Experimental Quartz Tools. BAR International Series 398. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Tankersley, Kenneth B., and Juliet E. Morrow 1994 Clovis procurement and land use patterns in the confluence region of the Mississippi, Missouri, and Illinois rivers. In Highways to the Past: Essays in Honor of C. J. Bareis, ed. Emerson, T., Fortier, A., and McElrath, D., pp. 119–29. Champaign: Illinois Archaeological Survey.Google Scholar

Thacker, Paul T. 1996 Hunter-gatherer lithic economy and settlement systems: understanding regional assemblage variability in the Upper Paleolithic of Portuguese Estremadura. In Stone Tools, ed. Odell, G. H., pp. 101–24. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, David H. 1976 Figuring Anthropology: First Principles of Probability and Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Thomas, David H. 1986 Points on points: a reply to Flenniken and Raymond. American Antiquity 51:619–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, David H. 1989 Archaeology. Ft Worth, Texas: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Thompson, M., P. R. Bush, and J. Ferguson 1986 The analysis of flint by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, as a method of source determination. In The Scientific Study of Flint and Chert, ed. Sieveking, G. de G. and Hart, M. B., pp. 243–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Titmus, Gene 1985 Some aspects of stone tool notching. In Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, ed. Plew, Marc G. and Pavesic, Max G., pp. 243–64. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Titmus, Gene, and Woods, James C. 1986 An experimental study of projectile point fracture patterns. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 8:37–49.Google Scholar

Tixier, Jacques 1963 Typologie de l'épipaléolithique du Maghreb. Mémoires du Centre de Recherches Anthropologiques, Préhistoriques et Ethnographiques 2. Paris: Arts et Métiers Graphiques.Google Scholar

Tixier, Jacques 1974 Glossary for the description of stone tools. Newsletter of Lithic Technology: Special Publication 1. Pullman: Washington State University.Google Scholar

Tomka, Steven A. 1989 Differentiating lithic reduction techniques: an experimental approach. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, ed. Amick, D. S. and Mauldin, R. P., pp. 137–62. BAR International Series 528. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar

Tomka, Steven A.2001 The effect of processing requirements on reduction strategies and tool form: a new perspective. In Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, ed. Andrefsky, Wm. Jr., pp. 207–24. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Torrence, Robin 1983 Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology. In Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory, ed. Bailey, G., pp. 11–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Torrence, Robin1984 Monopoly or direct access? Industrial organization at the Melos Obsidian quarries. In Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production, ed. Ericson, Jonathon E. and Purdy, Barbara A., pp. 49–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrence, Robin 1989 Time, Energy and Stone Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Towner, Ronald H., and Warburton, Miranda 1990 Projectile point rejuvenation: a technological analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:311–21.Google Scholar

Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., et al. 1974 Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: a new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1:171–96.Google Scholar

Truncer, James J. 1990 Perkiomen points: a study in variability. In Experiments and Observations on the Terminal Archaic of the Middle Atlantic Region, ed. Moeller, R. W., pp. 1–62. Bethlehem, Connecticut: Archaeological Services.Google Scholar

Tsirk, Are 1979 Regarding fracture initiations. In Lithic Usewear Analysis, ed. Hayden, Brian, pp. 83–96. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Unger-Hamilton, R. 1985 Microscopic striations on flint sickle-blades as an indication of plant cultivation: preliminary results. World Archaeology 17:121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unrath, G., R. L. Owen, A. van Gijn, et al. 1986 An evaluation of usewear studies: a multi-analysis approach. In Technical Aspects of Microwear Studies on Stone Tools. Early Man News 9/10/11, ed. Owen, L. R. and Unrath, G., pp. 117–76. Tubingen: Archaeologica Venatoria.Google Scholar

Peer, Philip 1991 Interassemblage variability and Levallois styles: the case of the Northern African Middle Paleolithic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10:107–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar