Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T02:35:07.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Formalization

from PART I - REFINING THE NOTION OF CATEGORICITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2018

John T. Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Suppose we want to clarify the fundamental notions and methods of an area of mathematics and choose to formalize the topic. Our notion of a formalization of a mathematical topic involves not only the usual components of a formal system, specification of ground vocabulary, wellformed formulas, and proof but also a semantics. From a model theoretic standpoint the semantic aspect has priority over the proof aspect. The topic could be all mathematics via e.g. a set theoretic formalization. But our interest is more in the local foundations of, say, plane geometry or differential fields.We set the stage for developing Thesis 1, by focusing on a specific vocabulary, designed for the topic, rather than a global framework. In any case, a mathematical topic is a collection of concepts and the relations between them. There are course other less restrictive notions of axiomatization, and often such a ‘formalism’ deliberately omits the semantic aspect. But we want the wider notion here as it reflects the model theoretic perspective.

It is not accidental that ‘formalization’ rather than ‘formal system’ is being defined. The relation between intuitive conceptions about some area of mathematics (geometry, arithmetic, Diophantine equations, set theory) and a formal system describing this area is central to our concerns. The first step in a formalization is to list the intuitive concepts which are the subject of the formalization. The second is to list the key relations the investigator finds among them. In stipulating this view of formalization, we are not claiming to fix the only meaning of the term but only the meaning most suitable for the discussion here.

Definition 1.0.1A full formalization involves the following components.

(1) Vocabulary: specification of primitive notions.

(2) Logic:

  • (a) Specify a class of well-formed formulas.

  • (b) Specify truth of a formula from this class in a structure.

  • (c) Specify the notion of a formal deduction for these sentences.

  • (3) Axioms: specify the basic properties of the situation in question by sentences of the logic.

    We think of the specification in Definition 1.0.1 as given in informal set theory; the usual mathematicians’ remark ‘could formalize in ZFC’ applies.

    Type
    Chapter
    Information
    Model Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice
    Formalization without Foundationalism
    , pp. 31 - 50
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2018

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    • Formalization
    • John T. Baldwin, University of Illinois, Chicago
    • Book: Model Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice
    • Online publication: 19 January 2018
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987216.004
    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    • Formalization
    • John T. Baldwin, University of Illinois, Chicago
    • Book: Model Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice
    • Online publication: 19 January 2018
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987216.004
    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    • Formalization
    • John T. Baldwin, University of Illinois, Chicago
    • Book: Model Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice
    • Online publication: 19 January 2018
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987216.004
    Available formats
    ×