Book contents
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Expanding the Debate on Moral and Political Approaches to the Philosophy of Human Rights
- Part I
- 1 Theory, Politics, and Practice
- 2 The Point of the Practice of Human Rights
- 3 Rawls’s Relational Conception of Human Rights
- 4 Theories of Human Rights
- 5 Mediating the Theory and Practice of Human Rights in Morality and Law
- 6 Kantian Human Rights or How the Individual Has Come to Matter in International Law
- Part II
- Index
- References
3 - Rawls’s Relational Conception of Human Rights
from Part I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Expanding the Debate on Moral and Political Approaches to the Philosophy of Human Rights
- Part I
- 1 Theory, Politics, and Practice
- 2 The Point of the Practice of Human Rights
- 3 Rawls’s Relational Conception of Human Rights
- 4 Theories of Human Rights
- 5 Mediating the Theory and Practice of Human Rights in Morality and Law
- 6 Kantian Human Rights or How the Individual Has Come to Matter in International Law
- Part II
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human RightsImplications for Theory and Practice, pp. 58 - 76Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Altman, A. and Wellman, C. H. (2009) A Liberal Theory of International Justice, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. (2000) “Rawls’s Law of Peoples,” Ethics, vol. 110 no. 4, pp. 669–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, G. (2014) “Human Rights,” in Mandle, J. and Reidy, D. A. (eds.), A Companion to Rawls, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2000) “Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World,” Ethics, vol. 110 no. 4, pp. 697–721.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2004) Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2010) “The Egalitarianism of Human Rights,” Ethics, vol. 120 no. 4, pp. 679–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S, (2002) “Survey Article: Cosmopolitanism and the Law of Peoples,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etinson, A. and Liao, M. S. (2012) “Political and Naturalistic Conceptions of Human Rights: A False Polemic?,” Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 327–352.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. (2006) “The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice,” Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 23 no. 1, pp. 29–68.Google Scholar
Gilabert, P. (2011) “Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights,” Political Theory, vol. 39 no. 4, pp. 439–67.Google Scholar
Hinsch, W. and Stepanians, M. (2006) “Human Rights as Moral Claim Rights,” in Reidy, D. A. and Martin, R. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples, A Realistic Utopia?, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ladwig, B. (2014) “Menschenrechte, Institutionen und moralische Arbeitsteilung,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 55 no. 3, pp. 472–492.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. (1996) “Constructing the Law of Peoples,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 77 no. 2, pp. 132–154.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. W. (2006) “Are Human Rights Mainly Implemented by Intervention?,” in Reidy, D. A. and Martin, R. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples. A Realistic Utopia?, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. W. (2014) “Human Rights,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Edward, N. Zalta (ed.), [Electronic]: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/rights-human/Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1980) “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 77 no. 9, pp. 515–72.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples, with: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (2010) “Human Rights without Foundations,” in Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reidy, D. A. (2006) “Political Authority and Human Rights,” in Reidy, D. A. and Martin, R. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples. A Realistic Utopia?, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2009) Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J. (2009) “Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention?,” Philosophy Compass, vol. 4 no. 6, pp. 938–50.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J. (2012) “The Moral Reality of Human Rights,” in Pogge, T. (ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right. Who Owes What to the Very Poor? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2012) “In What Sense Are Human Rights Political?,” Political Studies, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 180–94.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2004) “The Unity of Rawls’s Work,” The Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 1 no. 3, pp. 265–75.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by