Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T13:30:02.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Trust and Demographics

Age and Gender Differences in Trust and Reciprocity Behavior

from Part III - Neurocharacteristic Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

Frank Krueger
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Trust is present from a very young age, but its expression in social interactions shows important changes over the lifetime. This chapter summarizes the research on age differences in trust, and explores the differences between males and females. Trust behavior can be measured using the trust game, which simulates a social interaction. Research shows that at a young age, trust is present at the start of the interaction but it is yet unclear whether this increases throughout development. Studies indicated an increase in the ability to adapt trust behavior, as well as an increase of reciprocity behavior throughout adolescence. Relatedly, an increase of activity in mentalizing-related areas and a decrease of activity in areas related to reward and conflict monitoring during adolescence and young adulthood is found. Often, males show more trust behavior than females although these differences are small. Sex differences in reciprocity behavior are found less often. Neuroimaging studies showed males have more activity in mentalizing-related areas while females show more activity in areas associated with reward and learning processes. Future studies may examine individual differences in the neural mechanisms of trust in relation with social context factors, such as cultural orientation or socioeconomic status.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alós-Ferrer, C., & Farolfi, F. (2019). Trust games and beyond. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00887CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, P. E., & Leon, T. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of age-related differences in trust. Psychology and Aging, 34(5), 674685. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000368Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017). Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 12331248. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, L. R., & Rotenberg, K. J. (2008). A social relations analysis of children’s trust in their peers across the early years of school. Social Development, 17(4), 10391055. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00479.xGoogle Scholar
Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., Petrocchi, S., et al. (2014). An investigation of children’s peer trust across culture: Is the composition of peer trust universal? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(1), 3341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413505248Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.-J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267277. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2353Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.-J. (2012). Development of the social brain in adolescence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(3), 111116. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110221Google Scholar
Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., & Tirassa, M. (2014). A broad assessment of theory of mind in adolescence: The complexity of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 8497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.003Google Scholar
Chan, D., Hamamura, T., Li, L. M. W., & Zhang, X. (2017). Is trusting others related to better health? An investigation of older adults across six non-western countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(8), 12881301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117722632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., Paichayontvijit, T., & Shen, L. (2013). Gender differences in trust and trustworthiness: Individuals, single sex and mixed sex groups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 181194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.013Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., & Sbai, E. (2011). Gender differences in trust and reciprocity in repeated gift exchange games. New Zealand Economic Papers, 45(1–2), 8195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2011.556072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, J.-C. (2014). Young children’s trust beliefs in peers: Relations to social competence and interactive behaviors in a peer group. Early Education and Development, 25(5), 601618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2013.836698Google Scholar
Corriveau, K. H., Harris, P. L., Meins, E., et al. (2009). Young children’s trust in their mother’s claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child Development, 80(3), 750761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01295.xGoogle Scholar
Crone, E. A., Poldrack, R. A., & Durston, S. (2010). Challenges and methods in developmental neuroimaging. Human Brain Mapping, 31(6), 835837. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21053Google Scholar
Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 16111618. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1575Google Scholar
Derks, J., Lee, N. C., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Adolescent trust and trustworthiness: Role of gender and social value orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 13791386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.014Google Scholar
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.xGoogle Scholar
Erdley, C. A., & Day, H. J. (2017). Friendship in childhood and adolescence. In Hojjat, M. & Moyer, A. (Eds.), The psychology of friendship (pp. 319). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190222024.001.0001Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783657768387_048Google Scholar
Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2009). The psychology (and economics) of trust. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 10031017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00232.xGoogle Scholar
Fett, A.-K. J., Gromann, P. M., Giampietro, V., Shergill, S. S., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Default distrust? An fMRI investigation of the neural development of trust and cooperation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(4), 395402. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss144Google Scholar
Fett, A.-K. J., Shergill, S. S., Gromann, P. M., et al. (2014). Trust and social reciprocity in adolescence: A matter of perspective-taking. Journal of Adolescence, 37(2), 175184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.011Google Scholar
Garbarino, E., & Slonim, R. (2009). The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous U.S. population. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3), 226240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.010Google Scholar
Güroğlu, B., Van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2014). Sharing and giving across adolescence: An experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00291Google Scholar
Haselhuhn, M. P., Kennedy, J. A., Kray, L. J., Van Zant, A. B., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2015). Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. A., & O’Hara, E. A. (2006). A cognitive theory of trust. Washington University Law Review, 84, 17171796. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869423Google Scholar
Holm, H., & Nystedt, P. (2005). Intra-generational trust: A semi-experimental study of trust among different generations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(3), 403419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.013Google Scholar
Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007Google Scholar
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 7883. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108062Google Scholar
Kocher, M. G. (2017). How trust in social dilemmas evolves with age. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Rockenbach, B., & Yamagishi, T. (Eds.), Trust in social dilemmas (pp. 101118). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190630782.003.0006Google Scholar
Krueger, F., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2019). Toward a model of interpersonal trust drawn from neuroscience, psychology, and economics. Trends in neurosciences, 42(2), 92101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In Kagel, J. & Roth, A. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111194). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzsmff5Google Scholar
Lee, N. C., Jolles, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2016). Social information influences trust behaviour in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 6675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.021Google Scholar
Lemmers-Jansen, I. L., Fett, A.-K. J., Shergill, S. S., Van Kesteren, M. T., & Krabbendam, L. (2019). Girls-boys: An investigation of gender differences in the behavioral and neural mechanisms of trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00257Google Scholar
Lemmers-Jansen, I. L., Krabbendam, L., Veltman, D. J., & Fett, A.-K. J. (2017). Boys vs. girls: Gender differences in the neural development of trust and reciprocity depend on social context. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 235245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.02.001Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967985. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/63.4.967Google Scholar
Li, T., & Fung, H. H. (2013). Age differences in trust: An investigation across 38 countries. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 347355. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs072Google Scholar
Luna, B., Velanova, K., & Geier, C. F. (2010). Methodological approaches in developmental neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(6), 863871. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21073Google Scholar
Malti, T., Averdijk, M., Zuffianò, A., et al. (2016). Children’s trust and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(3), 262270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415584628Google Scholar
Murtin, F., Fleischer, L., Siegerink, V., et al. (2018). Trust and its determinants: Evidence from the Trustlab experiment. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2018/02. https://doi.org/10.1787/869ef2ec-enGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, J. H., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2012). Adolescent social cognitive and affective neuroscience: Past, present, and future. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, M. J., & Haase, C. M. (2015). Growing to trust: Evidence that trust increases and sustains well-being across the life span. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 614621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615574301Google Scholar
Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner’s dilemma. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E. C., & Gutchess, A. (2019). Can’t read my broker face: Learning about trustworthiness with age. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(1), 8286. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby012Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Petrocchi, S., Lecciso, F., & Marchetti, A. (2013). Children’s trust beliefs in others and trusting behavior in peer interaction. Child Development Research, 2013, 18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/806597Google Scholar
Saunders, M. N., Dietz, G., & Thornhill, A. (2014). Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing? Human Relations, 67(6), 639665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713500831Google Scholar
Schiffer, A.-M., & Schubotz, R. I. (2011). Caudate nucleus signals for breaches of expectation in a movement observation paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00038Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002Google Scholar
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2007). Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 59(2), 364382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2006.07.006Google Scholar
Takahashi, H., Shen, J., & Ogawa, K. (2020). Gender-specific reference-dependent preferences in the experimental trust game. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 17, 2538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844–019-00155-zGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (2008). Early attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 348365). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21730Google Scholar
Tzieropoulos, H. (2013). The trust game in neuroscience: A short review. Social Neuroscience, 8(5), 407416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.832375CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Groep, S., Meuwese, R., Zanolie, K., Güroğlu, B., & Crone, E. A. (2018). Developmental changes and individual differences in trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 192208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12459Google Scholar
Van den Akker, O., Van Vugt, M., Van Assen, M. A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018). Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game. Pre-print on PsyArXiv.Google Scholar
Van den Bos, W., Van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Learning whom to trust in repeated social interactions: A developmental perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 243256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211418698Google Scholar
Van den Bos, W., Van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives: The neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychological Science, 22(1), 6070. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610391102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Bos, W., Westenberg, M., Van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 90102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.07.004Google Scholar
Van Hoorn, J., Shablack, H., Lindquist, K. A., & Telzer, E. H. (2019). Incorporating the social context into neurocognitive models of adolescent decision making: A neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 129145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.024Google Scholar
Vandevivere, E., Bosmans, G., Roels, S., Dujardin, A., & Braet, C. (2018). State trust in middle childhood: An experimental manipulation of maternal support. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(4), 12521263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826–017-0954-7Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Hall, A. S., Siehl, S., Grafman, J., & Krueger, F. (2020). Neural signatures of gender differences in interpersonal trust. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00225Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×