Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T08:27:56.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Trust and Learning

Neurocomputational Signatures of Learning to Trust

from Part II - Neuropsychological Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

Frank Krueger
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Learning to trust the right partner is pivotal to survival. But what information matters to decide whom to trust? In this chapter, we review evidence suggesting that different character traits play a role in the formation of trustworthiness impressions and beliefs that guide trust decisions. Learning of these traits depends on available information about the other person, previous knowledge, and contextual circumstances. Interestingly, when these factors favor the learning of particular traits, the resulting beliefs are harder to revise and lead to behavioral patterns that suggest a learning impairment. Computational models indicate an asymmetry in feedback valuation that is not due to the type of feedback (e.g., positive or negative) but rather to previous knowledge and contextual factors (e.g., the reputation of the other person). Neuroimaging studies highlight the role of mentalizing brain regions in building adequate mental models of others. Specifically, the orbitofrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction are central to the formation and updating of trustworthiness beliefs. Further, the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex and lateral frontoparietal regions likely underpin information integration processes for behavior change in face of untrustworthiness. We finally call for collaborative efforts in future scientific enterprises to develop a still lacking neurocomputational theory of social learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelstein, J. S., Shehzad, Z., Mennes, M., et al. (2011). Personality is reflected in the brain’s intrinsic functional architecture. PLoS ONE, 6(11), Article e27633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027633Google Scholar
Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32(3), 537551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3Google Scholar
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2013). Harnessing the benefits of betrayal aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.02.001Google Scholar
Alves, P. N., Foulon, C., Karolis, V., et al. (2019). An improved neuroanatomical model of the default-mode network reconciles previous neuroimaging and neuropathological findings. Communication Biology, 2, Article 370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0611-3Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 193208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9122-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., et al. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356Google Scholar
Becker, J., Brackbill, D., & Centola, D. (2017). Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(26), E5070E5076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615978114Google Scholar
Behrens, T. E., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W., & Rushworth, M. F. (2008). Associative learning of social value. Nature, 456(7219), 245249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07538Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017). Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 12331248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23451Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., Hahn, T., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F. (2019). Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(1), 165176. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., Molter, F., & Park, S. Q. (2019). Neural representations of honesty predict future trust behavior. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 5184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13261-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellucci, G., Münte, T. F., & Park, S. Q. (2020). Effects of a dopamine agonist on trusting behaviors in females. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 237(6), 16711680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05488-xGoogle Scholar
Bellucci, G., Münte, T. F., & Park, S. Q. (in press). Value computations under social uncertainty and serotonin.Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., & Park, S. Q. (2020). Honesty biases trustworthiness impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 15671586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000730Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., & Park, S. Q. (in press). Neurocomputational mechanisms of cognitive biases in impression formation.Google Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027Google Scholar
Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2009). Computational models for the combination of advice and individual learning. Cognitive Science, 33(2), 206242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01010.xGoogle Scholar
Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., Krugel, L. K., & Heekeren, H. R. (2011). The neural basis of following advice. PLoS Biology, 9(6), Article e1001089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001089Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 467484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011Google Scholar
Burnham, T., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (2000). Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 5773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00108-6Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7(3), 255292.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 225231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00094-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, L. J., Doll, B. B., Van’t Wout, M., Frank, M. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 87105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.03.001Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., & Gangadharan, L. (2007). An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness. Southern Economic Journal, 73(4), 959985. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111937Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., Sopher, B., & Strand, P. (2002). Cooperation in social dilemmas, trust and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(2), 231249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(02)00065-xGoogle Scholar
Cheong, J. H., Jolly, E., Sul, S., & Chang, L. J. (2017). Computational models in social neuroscience. In Moustafa, A. A. (Ed.), Computational models of brain and behavior (1st ed., pp. 229244). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Csukás, C., Fracalanza, P., Kovács, T., & Willinger, M. (2008). The determinants of trusting and reciprocal behaviour: Evidence from an intercultural experiment. Journal of Economic Development, 33(1), 7195. http://dx.doi.org/10.35866/caujed.2008.33.1.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491512. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926623Google Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222004Google Scholar
Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 16111618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1575Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265279.Google Scholar
Diaconescu, A. O., Mathys, C., Weber, L. A. E., Kasper, L., Mauer, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2017). Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and septum during social learning. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(4), 618634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw171Google Scholar
Dosenbach, N. U., Fair, D. A., Miezin, F. M., et al. (2007). Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(26), 1107311078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704320104Google Scholar
Dosenbach, N. U., Nardos, B., Cohen, A. L., et al. (2010). Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science, 329(5997), 13581361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1194144Google Scholar
Dreher, J. C., Kohn, P., & Berman, K. F. (2006). Neural coding of distinct statistical properties of reward information in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 16(4), 561573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj004Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlosser, T., Ehlebracht, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 122141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036673Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2019). Why people trust: Solved puzzles and open mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 366371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255Google Scholar
Ekerdt, C. E. M., Kuhn, C., Anwander, A., Brauer, J., & Friederici, A. D. (2020). Word learning reveals white matter plasticity in preschool children. Brain Structure and Function, 225(2), 607619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02024-7Google Scholar
Everett, J. A., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 772787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000165Google Scholar
Fairley, K., Sanfey, A. G., Vyrastekova, J., & Weitzel, U. (2016). Trust and risk revisited. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 7485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.10.001Google Scholar
Fareri, D. S., Chang, L. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2012). Effects of direct social experience on trust decisions and neural reward circuitry. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, Article 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00148Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02043Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.007Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151Google Scholar
Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2009). Do people trust too much or too little? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 263276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.04.006Google Scholar
Finkl, T., Hahne, A., Friederici, A. D., Gerber, J., Murbe, D., & Anwander, A. (2020). Language without speech: Segregating distinct circuits in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 30(2), 812823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz128Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. C., Happe, F., Frith, U., et al. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57(2), 109128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-RGoogle Scholar
Fouragnan, E., Chierchia, G., Greiner, S., Neveu, R., Avesani, P., & Coricelli, G. (2013). Reputational priors magnify striatal responses to violations of trust. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(8), 36023611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/Jneurosci.3086-12.2013Google Scholar
Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., & Maughan, M. R. (1978). Some correlates of trust. Journal of Psychology, 99(1st Half), 103108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature, 75(1949), 450451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/075450a0Google Scholar
Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2017). Reinforcement learning and episodic memory in humans and animals: An integrative framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 101128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, R., & Spears, K. (2012). You don’t act like you trust me: Dissociations between behavioural and explicit measures of source credibility judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 121134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.591534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottfried, J. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Human orbitofrontal cortex mediates extinction learning while accessing conditioned representations of value. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 11441152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grèzes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2001). Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? NeuroImage, 13(5), 775785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0740Google Scholar
Gromann, P. M., Heslenfeld, D. J., Fett, A. K., Joyce, D. W., Shergill, S. S., & Krabbendam, L. (2013). Trust versus paranoia: Abnormal response to social reward in psychotic illness. Brain, 136(Pt 6), 19681975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt076Google Scholar
Gromann, P. M., Shergill, S. S., de Haan, L., et al. (2014). Reduced brain reward response during cooperation in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis: An fMRI study. Psychological Medicine, 44(16), 34453454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000737Google Scholar
Hahn, T., Notebaert, K., Anderl, C., Reicherts, P., et al. (2015). Reliance on functional resting-state network for stable task control predicts behavioral tendency for cooperation. NeuroImage, 118, 231236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.093Google Scholar
Hahn, T., Notebaert, K., Anderl, C., Teckentrup, V., Kassecker, A., & Windmann, S. (2015). How to trust a perfect stranger: Predicting initial trust behavior from resting-state brain-electrical connectivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(6), 809813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu122Google Scholar
Hampton, A. N., Bossaerts, P., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2008). Neural correlates of mentalizing-related computations during strategic interactions in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(18), 67416746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711099105Google Scholar
Hertz, U., Palminteri, S., Brunetti, S., Olesen, C., Frith, C. D., & Bahrami, B. (2017). Neural computations underpinning the strategic management of influence in advice giving. Nature Communications, 8(1), Article 2191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02314-5Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, H., Sebastian, C., & Blakemore, S. J. (2011). Experimentally induced social inclusion influences behavior on trust games. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 2733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2010.515020Google Scholar
Ho, T. H., & Weigelt, K. (2005). Trust building among strangers. Management Science, 51(4), 519530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0350Google Scholar
Hollerman, J. R., & Schultz, W. (1998). Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 1(4), 304309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1124Google Scholar
Howard, J. D., & Kahnt, T. (2018). Identity prediction errors in the human midbrain update reward-identity expectations in the orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 1611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04055-5Google Scholar
Hula, A., Montague, P. R., & Dayan, P. (2015). Monte Carlo planning method estimates planning horizons during interactive social exchange. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(6), Article e1004254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004254Google Scholar
Hula, A., Vilares, I., Lohrenz, T., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2018). A model of risk and mental state shifts during social interaction. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(2), Article e1005935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005935Google Scholar
Ingvar, D. H. (1974). Patterns of brain activity revealed by measurements of regional cerebral blood flow. Paper presented at the Alfred Benzon Symposium VIII, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Joiner, J., Piva, M., Turrin, C., & Chang, S. W. C. (2017). Social learning through prediction error in the brain. NPJ Science of Learning, 2, Article 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0009-2Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263291.Google Scholar
Khalvati, K., Park, S. A., Mirbagheri, S., et al. (2019). Modeling other minds: Bayesian inference explains human choices in group decision making. Science Advances, 5(11), Article eaax8783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax8783Google Scholar
King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321(5890), 806810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1156902Google Scholar
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 7883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1108062Google Scholar
Koster-Hale, J., Richardson, H., Velez, N., Asaba, M., Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2017). Mentalizing regions represent distributed, continuous, and abstract dimensions of others’ beliefs. NeuroImage, 161, 918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.026Google Scholar
Krueger, F., Grafman, J., & McCabe, K. (2008). Neural correlates of economic game playing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 38593874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0165Google Scholar
Krueger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50), 2008420089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710103104Google Scholar
Kunisato, Y., Okamoto, Y., Okada, G., et al. (2011). Personality traits and the amplitude of spontaneous low-frequency oscillations during resting state. Neuroscience Letters, 492(2), 109113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.067Google Scholar
Lamba, A., Frank, M. J., & FeldmanHall, O. (2020). Anxiety impedes adaptive social learning under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 31(5), 592603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620910993Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967985. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2578601Google Scholar
Li, Y., Vanni-Mercier, G., Isnard, J., Mauguiere, F., & Dreher, J. C. (2016). The neural dynamics of reward value and risk coding in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Brain, 139(Pt 4), 12951309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv409Google Scholar
Ligneul, R., Obeso, I., Ruff, C. C., & Dreher, J. C. (2016). Dynamical representation of dominance relationships in the human rostromedial prefrontal cortex. Current Biology, 26(23), 31073115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.015Google Scholar
Lis, S., Baer, N., Franzen, N., et al. (2016). Social interaction behavior in ADHD in adults in a virtual trust game. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(4), 335345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054713482581Google Scholar
Lockwood, P. L., Apps, M. A., Valton, V., Viding, E., & Roiser, J. P. (2016). Neurocomputational mechanisms of prosocial learning and links to empathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(35), 97639768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603198113Google Scholar
Lu, X., Li, T., Xia, Z., et al. (2019). Connectome-based model predicts individual differences in propensity to trust. Human Brain Mapping, 40(6), 19421954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24503Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust: A mechanism for the reduction of social complexity. In Luhmann, N. (Ed.), Trust and power (pp. 4103). Wiley.Google Scholar
Ma, I., Sanfey, A. G., & Ma, W. J. (2020). The social cost of gathering information for trust decisions. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 14073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598–020-69766-6Google Scholar
Mahmoodi, A., Bahrami, B., & Mehring, C. (2018). Reciprocity of social influence. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 2474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04925-yGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, D. (2004). Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(2), 6173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.001Google Scholar
Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 534559. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3094850Google Scholar
Maurer, C., Chambon, V., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Leboyer, M., & Zalla, T. (2018). The influence of prior reputation and reciprocity on dynamic trust-building in adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. Cognition, 172, 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.007Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709734.Google Scholar
McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L. (2003). Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), 267275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00003-9Google Scholar
McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(3), 467472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728063023Google Scholar
Mellers, B., Ungar, L., Baron, J., et al. (2014). Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psychological Science, 25(5), 11061115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524255Google Scholar
Meshi, D., Biele, G., Korn, C. W., & Heekeren, H. R. (2012). How expert advice influences decision making. PLoS ONE, 7(11), Article e49748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049748Google Scholar
Metereau, E., & Dreher, J. C. (2015). The medial orbitofrontal cortex encodes a general unsigned value signal during anticipation of both appetitive and aversive events. Cortex, 63, 4254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.012Google Scholar
Montague, P. R., Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(5), 19361947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-05-01936.1996Google Scholar
Na, S., Chung, D., Hula, A., et al. (2019). Humans use forward thinking to exert social control. bioRxiv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/737353Google Scholar
O’Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science, 304(5669), 452454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1094285Google Scholar
O’Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 147155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00145-8Google Scholar
Park, S. A., Sestito, M., Boorman, E. D., & Dreher, J. C. (2019). Neural computations underlying strategic social decision making in groups. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 5287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12937-5Google Scholar
Pegors, T. K., Kable, J. W., Chatterjee, A., & Epstein, R. A. (2015). Common and unique representations in pFC for face and place attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 959973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00777Google Scholar
Phan, K. L., Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., & McCabe, K. (2010). Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(29), 1309913104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008137107Google Scholar
Pillutla, M. M., Malhotra, D., & Keith Murnighan, J. (2003). Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 448455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00015-5Google Scholar
Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A. (2008). Risky business: The neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 398403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn2062Google Scholar
Preuschoff, K., Bossaerts, P., & Quartz, S. R. (2006). Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structures. Neuron, 51(3), 381390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024Google Scholar
Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62(2), 816847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062Google Scholar
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2), 676682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.676Google Scholar
Reichelt, J., Sievert, J., & Jacob, F. (2013). How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1–2), 6581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.797758Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Current Research and Theory, 64–99, Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. D., Finn, E. S., Scheinost, D., et al. (2016). A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 165171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.4179Google Scholar
Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (1986). On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 131142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.131Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393404. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617Google Scholar
Rudebeck, P. H., & Murray, E. A. (2014). The orbitofrontal oracle: Cortical mechanisms for the prediction and evaluation of specific behavioral outcomes. Neuron, 84(6), 11431156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.049Google Scholar
Rudebeck, P. H., Saunders, R. C., Prescott, A. T., Chau, L. S., & Murray, E. A. (2013). Prefrontal mechanisms of behavioral flexibility, emotion regulation and value updating. Nature Neuroscience, 16(8), 11401145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3440Google Scholar
Sánchez-Pagés, S., & Vorsatz, M. (2007). An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender–receiver game. Games and Economic Behavior, 61(1), 86112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2006.10.014Google Scholar
Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.” NeuroImage, 19(4), 18351842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1Google Scholar
Schultz, W. (2000). Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(3), 199207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35044563Google Scholar
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 15931599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593Google Scholar
Siegel, J. Z., Estrada, S., Crockett, M. J., & Baskin-Sommers, A. (2019). Exposure to violence affects the development of moral impressions and trust behavior in incarcerated males. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 1942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09962-9Google Scholar
Siegel, J. Z., Mathys, C., Rutledge, R. B., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). Beliefs about bad people are volatile. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 750756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0425-1Google Scholar
Sjöberg, L. (2009). Are all crowds equally wise? A comparison of political election forecasts by experts and the public. Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/for.1083Google Scholar
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.xGoogle Scholar
Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (2001). Do you trust? Whom do you trust? When do you trust? Advances in Group Processes, 18, 129160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(01)18006-9Google Scholar
Sperber, D. A. N., Clément, F., Heintz, C., et al. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.xGoogle Scholar
Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., Banks, S., Nathan, P. J., Liberzon, I., & Phan, K. L. (2009). Functional neuroimaging of mentalizing during the trust game in social anxiety disorder. Neuroreport, 20(11), 984989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832d0a67Google Scholar
Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21(3), 349354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647Google Scholar
Strickland, L. H. (1958). Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality, 26(2), 200215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1958.tb01580.xGoogle Scholar
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). The traits one can trust: Dissecting reciprocity and kindness as determinants of trustworthy behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(11), 15231536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167215600530Google Scholar
Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813Google Scholar
Toelch, U., Bach, D. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). The neural underpinnings of an optimal exploitation of social information under uncertainty. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 17461753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst173Google Scholar
Tsuchida, A., Doll, B. B., & Fellows, L. K. (2010). Beyond reversal: A critical role for human orbitofrontal cortex in flexible learning from probabilistic feedback. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(50), 1686816875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1958-10.2010Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf00122574Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48(3), 564584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009Google Scholar
Vanni-Mercier, G., Mauguiere, F., Isnard, J., & Dreher, J. C. (2009). The hippocampus codes the uncertainty of cue-outcome associations: An intracranial electrophysiological study in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(16), 52875294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5298-08.2009Google Scholar
Wardle, M. C., Fitzgerald, D. A., Angstadt, M., Sripada, C. S., McCabe, K., & Phan, K. L. (2013). The caudate signals bad reputation during trust decisions. PLoS ONE, 8(6), Article e68884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068884Google Scholar
Weiner, J. L., & Mowen, J. C. (1986). Source credibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 306310.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 189202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202Google Scholar
Winston, J. S., O’Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 195206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009Google Scholar
Wu, H., Liu, X., Hagan, C. C., & Mobbs, D. (2020). Mentalizing during social interaction: A four component model. Cortex, 126, 242252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.031Google Scholar
Xiang, T., Ray, D., Lohrenz, T., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2012). Computational phenotyping of two-person interactions reveals differential neural response to depth-of-thought. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(12), Article e1002841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002841Google Scholar
Yaniv, I. (2006). The benefit of additional opinions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 7578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00278.xGoogle Scholar
Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 260281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2909Google Scholar
Zatorre, R. J. (2013). Predispositions and plasticity in music and speech learning: Neural correlates and implications. Science, 342(6158), 585589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1238414Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×