Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T09:56:25.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - Emergency Delivery for Fetal Distress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

By
Ruth E. Murphy  and
Stephen Michael Kinsella
Edited by
Tauqeer Husain ,
Roshan Fernando  and
Scott Segal
Tauqeer Husain
Affiliation:
Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey
Roshan Fernando
Affiliation:
Womens Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Scott Segal
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesiology
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
 , pp. 128 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Panni, MK, Segal, S. Local anesthetic requirements are greater in dystocia than in normal labor. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:957–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, JM, Sharma, SK, McIntire, DD, et al. Intensity of labor pain and cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:1524–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean delivery: a continuum of risk. GP11, 2010. Available at www.rcog.org.uk/classification-of-urgency-of-caesarean-section-good-practice-11 (accessed August 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Thurlow, JA, Kinsella, SM. Intrauterine resuscitation: active management of fetal distress. Int J Obstet Anesth 2002; 11:105–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth, CG190, 2014. Available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 (accessed August 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Russell, IF. Epidural top-ups for Category I/II emergency caesarean section should be given only in the operating theatre. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13:259–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, P. Epidural top-ups for Category I/II emergency caesarean section should be given only in the operating theatre. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13:257–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnelly, K, Stonley, F, Patel, K, et al. Epidural catheter migration during patient controlled epidural analgesia: two cases. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(Suppl 4):26.Google Scholar
Gardner, IC, Kinsella, SM. Obstetric epidural test doses: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14:96–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scrutton, M, Kinsella, SM. Obstetrics, in Allman, K., McIndoe, A., Wilson, I., eds., Emergencies in Anaesthesia, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009, pp. 145–78.Google Scholar
Hillyard, SG, Bate, TE, Corcoran, TB, Paech, MJ, O’Sullivan, G. Extending epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107:668–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, DTC, Ngan Kee, WD, Khaw, KS. Extension of epidural blockade in labour for emergency caesarean section using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and fentanyl, with or without alkalinisation. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:790–94.Google Scholar
Kinsella, SM, Girgirah, K, Scrutton, MJL. Rapid sequence spinal for Category I urgency caesarean section: a case series. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:664–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kathirgamanathan, A, Douglas, MJ, Tyler, J, et al. Speed of spinal vs general anaesthesia for Category I caesarean section: a simulation and clinical observation‐based study. Anaesthesia 2013; 68:753–59.Google Scholar
Stocks, GM. Opposer: When using spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section after the epidural has failed, the normal dose of spinal anaesthetic should be used. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14:55–57.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×