Bavister, B. D. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1(2):91–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leese, H. J. Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1:63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Punt–van der Zalm, J. P. E. M., Hendriks, J. C. M., Westphal, J. R., et al. Toxicity testing of human assisted reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay. Repro Biomed Online 2009; 18(4):529–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lane, M. and Gardner, D. K. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 109:153–64.Google ScholarPubMed

Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. and Paulson, R. Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, P. M., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S., et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standard quality control assays. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mestres, E., Garcia-Jiménez, M., Faes, L., et al. Parameters of the mouse embryo assay that affect detection of peroxides in mineral oil. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:547–55.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, A. J., Fredrickson, J. R. and Morbeck, D.E. Improved detection of mineral oil toxicity using an extended mouse embryo assay. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017; 34:391–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scott, L. F., Sundaram, S. G. and Smith, S. The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morbeck, D.E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. L. Washing mineral oil reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Suzuki, O., Asano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Takano, K. and Koura, M. Development in vitro of preimplantation embryos from 55 mouse strains. Reprod Fertil Dev 1996; 8:975–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Khan, Z., Morbeck, D. E., Walker, D. L. et al. Mouse embryos and in vitro stress: does mouse strain matter? Fertil Steril 2010; 94:S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, D. K., Reed, L., Linck, D., Sheehan, C. and Lane, M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med 2005; 23(4):319–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolff, H. S., Fredrickson, J. R., Walker, D. L. and Morbeck, D. E. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(7):1776–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carrell, D. T. and Cartmill, D. A brief review of current and proposed federal government regulation of assisted reproduction laboratories in the United States. J Androl 2002; 23:611–17.Google Scholar

Gorrill, M. J., Rinehart, J. S., Tamhane, A. C. and Gerrity, M. Comparison of the hamster sperm motility assay to the mouse one-cell and two-cell embryo bioassays as quality control tests for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(2):345–54.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. J., Centola, G. M. Reed, M. L., et al. Andrology lab corner: human sperm survival assay as a bioassay for the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory. J Androl 2003; 24:16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavister, B. and Andrews, J. C. A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality control testing of water and culture media. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1988; 5(2):67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rinehart, J. S., Bavister, B. D. and Gerrity, M. Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: comparison of bioassay systems for water quality. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1988; 5(6):335–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. A. and Paulson, R. J. Mouse embryo culture as a quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claasens, O. E., Wehr, J. B. and Harrison, K. L. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(7):1586–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Critchlow, J. D., Matson, P. L., Newman, M. C., et al. Quality control in an in vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod 1989; 4(5):545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wikland, M. and Sjoblom, C. The application of quality systems in ART programs. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 166:3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brinster, R. L. In vitro cultivation of mammalian ova. Adv Biosci 1969; 4:199–233.Google Scholar

Almeida, P. A. and Bolton, V. N. The effect of temperature fluctuations on the cytoskeletal organization and chromosomal constitution of the human oocyte. Zygote 1995; 3(4):357–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Higdon, H. L., 3rd, Blackhurst, D. W. and Boone, W. R. Incubator managements in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 2008; 89(3):703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swain, J. E. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21:6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swain, J. E. and Pool, T. B. New pH-buffering system for media utilized during gamete and embryo manipulations for assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed Online 2009; 18:799–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koustas, G. and Sjoblom, C. Epigenetic consequences of pH stress in mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:i78.Google Scholar

Fitzharris, G. and Baltz, J. Regulation of intracellular pH during oocyte growth and maturation in mammals. Reproduction 2009; 138:619–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Squirrell, J. M., Lane, M. and Bavister, B. D. Altering intracellular pH disrupts development and cellular organization in preimplantation hamster embryos. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1845–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swain, J. E. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in clinical IVF? Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18(3):333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quinn, P. and Cooke, S. Equivalency of culture media for human in vitro fertilization formulated to have the same pH under an atmosphere containing 5% or 6% carbon dioxide. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1502–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graves, C. N. and Biggers, J. D. Carbon dioxide fixation by mouse embryos prior to implantation. Science 1970; 167:1506–8.Google Scholar

Peng, H., Shi, W., Zhang, W., et al. Better quality and more usable embryos obtained on day 3 cultured in 5% than 20% oxygen: a controlled and randomized study using the sibling oocytes. Reprod Sci 2015; pii:1933719115602761.Google Scholar

Morbeck, D. E. Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32(7):1019–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boone, W. R., Johnson, J. E., Locke, A. J., Crane, M. M., 4th and Price, T. M. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 1999; 71(1):150–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Directive 2003/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union, L 102, 7.4.2004, pp. 48–58, available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/oj/.Google Scholar

Alikani, A., Go, K. J., McCaffrey, C. and McCulloh, D. H. Comprehensive evaluation of contemporary assisted reproduction technology laboratory operations to determine staffing levels that promote patient safety and quality care. Fertil Steril 2014; 102:1350–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised guidelines for human embryology and andrology laboratories. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(Suppl. 3):S45–59.Google Scholar

Lundin, K. and Ahlström, A. Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability marker. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 31(4):459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, M. P., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S. B. A., et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standards quality control assays. J Assist Reprod. Genet 2010; 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morbeck, D. E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. Washing mineral reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed