Abel, K. (1955) Die Plautusprologe. Mülheim-Ruhr.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (eds.) (1999) Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford.

Ahl, F. (1985) Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Andersen, Ø. and Haarberg, J. (eds.) (2001) Making Sense of Aristotle: Essays in Poetics. London.

Anderson, W. S. (1993) Barbarian Play: Plautus' Roman Comedy. Toronto.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (2002) ‘Resistance to recognition and “privileged recognition” in Terence’, CJ 98: 1–8.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (2003–4) ‘Terence and the Roman rhetorical use of the Andria’, LICS 3, 2. www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/200304/20030402.pdfGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (2004) ‘The invention of Sosia for Terence's first comedy, The Andria’, Ramus 33: 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, N. E. (2004) ‘Tragic re-presentation and the semantics of space in Plautus’ Casina', Mnemosyne 57: 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1972) ‘Targets, techniques and tradition in Plautus’ Stichus', BICS 19: 54–79.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1985) ‘Terence's prologues’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 1–7.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1992) ‘Ancora sulle scene di apertura della commedia’, Aevum(ant) 5: 115–27.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1995) ‘The opening of Plautus’ Curculio: comic business and mime', in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995): 185–92.

Arnott, W. G. (1996) Menander. Volume II (edn and tr.). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (2001) ‘Plautus’ Epidicus and Greek comedy', in Auhagen (2001a): 71–90.

Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. E. (1992) ‘Curbing the comedians: Cleon versus Aristophanes and Syracosius’ Decree', CQ 42: 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auhagen, U. (1999) ‘Elemente des Stegreifspiels im Amphitruo-Prolog’, in Baier (1999): 111–29.

Auhagen, U. (2001a) Studien zu Plautus' Epidicus (ScriptOralia 125). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Auhagen, U. (2001b) ‘Epidicus im Dialog mit sich: zur Selbstanrede bei Plautus und Menander am Beispiel des Epidicus’, in Auhagen (2001a): 205–18.

Auhagen, U. (2004) ‘Das Hetärenfrühstück (Cist. i 1) – Griechisches und Römisches bei Plautus’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004): 187–210.

Baier, T. (ed.) (1999) Studien zu Plautus' Amphitruo (ScriptOralia 116). Tübingen.

Bain, D. (1977) Actors and Audience: A Study of Asides and Related Conventions in Greek Drama. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barns, J. W. B. and Lloyd-Jones, H. (1964) ‘A fragment of New Comedy: P.Antinoop.15’, JHS 84: 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barsby, J. A. (ed.) (1986) Plautus: Bacchides (with tr. and comm.). Warminster.

Barsby, J. A. (1990) ‘The characterisation of Parmeno in the opening scene of Terence's Eunuch’, Prudentia 22: 4–12.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. A. (1993) ‘Problems of adaptation in the Eunuchus of Terence’, in Slater and Zimmermann (1993): 160–79.

Barsby, J. A. (1995) ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus as improvisatory drama', in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995): 55–70.

Barsby, J. A. (ed.) (1999a) Terence: Eunuchus (with comm.). Cambridge.CrossRef

Barsby, J. A. (1999b) ‘Love in Terence’, in Amor Roma: Essays Presented to E. J. Kenney on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Braund, S. M. and Mayer, R.. Cambridge: 5–29.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. A. (2000) ‘Donatus on Terence: the Eunuchus commentary’, in Stärk and Vogt-Spira (2000): 491–513.

Barsby, J. A. (2001) Terence. Volume I (edn and tr.). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. A. (2002) ‘Terence and his Greek models’, in Questa and Raffaelli (2002): 251–77.

Baske, J. A. (1884) De alliterationis usu Plautino particula prior (inaugural dissertation). Königsberg.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (1991) The Roman Theatre and its Audience. London.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (2001) ‘Playing around with Plautus, or “how can I be expected to act in front of these people”’, Didaskalia 5:1. www.didaskalia.net/issues/vol5no1/beacham.htmlGoogle Scholar

Beard, M. (1990) ‘Priesthood in the Roman republic’, in Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, ed. Beard, M. and North, J.. London: 17–48.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2003) ‘The triumph of the absurd: Roman street theatre’, in Rome the Cosmopolis, ed. Edwards, C. and Woolf, G.. Cambridge: 21–43.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome. Volume I: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beare, W. (1934) ‘The date of the Casina’, CR 48: 123–4.Google Scholar

Beare, W. (1959) ‘Contaminatio’, CR, n.s. 9: 7–11.Google Scholar

Beare, W. (1964) The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic, 3rd rev. edn (1st edn 1950). London.Google Scholar

Bearn, G. C. F. (2000) ‘Differentiating Derrida and Deleuze’, Continental Philosophy Review 33: 441–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benz, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.) (1998) Maccus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität der Captivi des Plautus (ScriptOralia 74). Tübingen.

Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) (1995) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels: Festgabe für Eckard Lefèvre zum 60 Geburtstag (ScriptOralia 75). Tübingen.

Bergson, H. L. (1900) ‘Le rire’, La Revue de Paris. 1894. Janv.-févr.: 512–44, 759–90; Mars-avr.: 146–79.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. L. (1913) Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (authorised tr. Brereton, C. and Rothwell, F.). New York. (This translation originally published 1911, London.)Google Scholar

Bermel, A. (1990) Farce: A History from Aristophanes to Woody Allen, repr. with new preface. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL. (Originally published 1982, New York.)Google Scholar

Bertini, F. (1981) ‘Anfitrione e il suo doppio: da Plauto a Guilherme Figueiredo’, in Ferroni (1981a): 307–36.

Bertini, F. (1983) ‘Les ressources comiques du double dans le théâter de Plaute (Amphitryon, Bacchides, Ménechmes)’, LEC 51: 307–18.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (1982) ‘Verso un'antropologia dell'intreccio: le strutture semplici della trama nelle commedie di Plauto’, MD 7: 39–101.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (1991) ‘Sosia e il suo sosia: pensare il doppio a Roma’, in Plauto: Anfitrione, ed. Oniga, R.. Padua: 9–51.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2002) ‘I Witz di Gelasimus’, in Questa and Raffaelli (2002): 227–49.

Bispham, E. and Smith, C. (eds.) (2000) Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome and Italy: Evidence and Experience. Edinburgh.

Blänsdorf, J. (1978) ‘Die Organisation des Theaterwesens’, in Das römische Drama, ed. Lefèvre, E.. Darmstadt: 112–25.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1982) ‘Die Komödienintrige als Spiel im Spiel’, A&A 28: 131–54.Google Scholar

Bond, R. P. (1999) ‘Plautus’ Amphitryo as tragi-comedy', G&R 46: 203–20.Google Scholar

Bourque, N. (2000) ‘An anthropologist's view of ritual’, in Bispham and Smith (2000): 19–33.

Boyle, A. J. (2004) ‘Introduction: Terence's mirror stage’, Ramus 33: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (2006) Roman Tragedy. London.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1971) Horace on Poetry: The Ars Poetica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brothers, A. J. (1980) ‘The construction of Terence's Heautontimorumenos’, CQ, n.s. 30: 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brothers, A. J. (ed.) (2000) Terence: The Eunuch (with tr. and comm.). Warminster.

Brotherton, B. (1978) The Vocabulary of Intrigue in Roman Comedy. New York.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1990) ‘The Bodmer Codex of Menander and the endings of Terence's Eunuchus and other Roman comedies’, in Relire Ménandre, ed. Handley, E. and Hurst, A.. Geneva: 37–61.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1992) ‘Menander, Fragments 745 and 746 K–T, Menander's Kolax, and parasites and flatterers in Greek comedy’, ZPE 92: 91–107.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1993) ‘Love and marriage in Greek New Comedy’, CQ, n.s. 43: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. (2002) ‘Actors and actor-managers at Rome’, in Easterling and Hall (2002): 225–37.

Brown, P. (2006) Terence: The Comedies (tr., intr. and notes). Oxford.Google Scholar

Buck, C. H., Jr (1940) A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Calderan, R. (ed.) (1982) Vidularia: Introduzione, testo critico e commento. Palermo.

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2003) Pliny's Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (1988) Recognitions: A Study in Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Charney, M. (1987) Comedy High and Low: An Introduction to the Experience of Comedy. New York. (Originally published 1978, Oxford and New York.)Google Scholar

Chiarini, G. (1983) La recita: Plauto, la farsa, la festa, 2nd edn with addenda (1st edn 1979). Bologna.Google Scholar

Chiaro, D. (1992) The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (ed.) (2000) Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge.

Cohee, P. (1994) ‘Instauratio sacrorum’, Hermes 122: 451–68.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1999) ‘Poetic diction and poetic register’, in Adams and Mayer (1999): 21–93.

Connors, C. (2004) ‘Monkey business: imitation, authenticity and identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’, ClAnt 23: 179–207.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon, tr. Fantham, Elaine. Berkeley, CA and London.Google Scholar

Cooper, L. (1922) An Aristotelian Theory of Comedy: With an Adaptation of The Poetics, and a Translation of The Tractatus Coislinianus. New York.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1999) Archaic Latin Prose. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (2000) ‘From Aristophanes to Menander? Genre transformation in Greek comedy’, in Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons and Society, ed. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, MA: 115–33.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. and Slater, W. J. (1995) The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damen, M. L. (1992) ‘Translating scenes: Plautus’ adaptation of Menander's Dis Exapaton', Phoenix 46: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damen, M. L. (1995) ‘“By the gods, boy…Stop bothering me! Can't you tell Menander from Plautus?” or how Dis Exapaton does not help us understand Bacchides’, Antichthon 29: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damon, C. (1997) The Mask of the Parasite: A Pathology of Roman Patronage. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Danese, R. M. (1997) ‘Alta cucina e cibo “mortuale”. La polemica culinaria nello Pseudolus: un problema socio-poetico’, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 9: 499–533.Google Scholar

Danese, R. M. (2002) ‘Modelli letterari e modelli culturali del teatro plautino’, in Questa and Raffaelli (2002): 133–53.

D'Angour, A. (2006) ‘Conquering love: Sappho 31 and Catullus 51’, CQ 56: 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawe, R. D. (2006) Sophocles: Oedipus Rex, rev. edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Del Corno, D. (2002) ‘Raccontare il “fuoriscena”’, in Questa and Raffaelli (2002): 121–32.

Meo, C. (1983) Lingue tecniche del latino. Bologna.Google Scholar

Dentith, S. (2000) Parody (New Critical Idioms). London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dér, K. (1987) ‘Vidularia: outlines of a reconstruction’, CQ 37: 432–43.Google Scholar

Dér, K. (1989) ‘Terence and Luscius Lanuvinus’, AAntHung 32: 283–97.Google Scholar

Dessen, C. S. (1977) ‘Plautus’ satiric comedy: the Truculentus', PhQ 56: 145–68.Google Scholar

Dessen, C. S. (1995) ‘The figure of the eunuch in Terence's Eunuchus’, Helios 22: 123–39.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. (2002) Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobrov, G. W. (ed.) (1995a) Beyond Aristophanes: Transition and Diversity in Greek Comedy. Atlanta, GA.

Dobrov, G. W. (1995b) ‘The poet's voice in the evolution of dramatic dialogism’, in Dobrov (1995a): 47–97.

Douglas, M. (1999) Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology. London and New York.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1972) Aristophanic Comedy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

DuBois, P. (1995) Sappho is Burning. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. (ed.) (1940) T. Macci Plauti Epidicus (with app. crit. and comm.). Princeton, NJ.CrossRef

Duckworth, G. E. (1943) Review of C. H. Buck, Jr, A chronology of the plays of Plautus, AJPh 64: 348–52.

Duckworth, G. E. (1994) The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment, 2nd edn (with foreword and bibliographical appendix by R. Hunter). Norman, OK. (1st edn 1952, Princeton, NJ.)

Duncan, A. (2006) Performance and Identity in the Classical World. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, F. M. (1996) Tragedy's End: Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Dunsch, B. (1999) ‘Some notes on the understanding of Terence, Heauton Timorumenos 6: comoedia duplex, argumentum simplex and Hellenistic scholarship’, C&M 50: 97–131.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (1976) ‘Signification théâtrale du double dans l’Amphitryon de Plaute', REL 54: 129–41.Google Scholar

Dutsch, D. (2008) Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) (2002) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge.

Ebrard, W. (1882) Die Allitteration in der lateinischen Sprache. Bayreuth.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (2005) ‘Innovation and repetition: between modern and postmodern aesthetics’, Daedalus 134: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrman, R. K. (1985) ‘Terentian prologues and the parabases of Old Comedy’, Latomus 44: 370–6.Google Scholar

Else, G. F. (1957) Aristotle's Poetics: The Argument. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elsner, J. (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Enck, J. J., Forter, E. T. and Whitley, A. (eds.) (1960) The Comic in Theory and Practice. New York.

Enk, P. J. (ed.) (1953) Plauti Truculentus: cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentario exegetico (2 vols.). Leiden.

Erasmo, M. (2004) Roman Tragedy: Theatre to Theatricality. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Evans, W. J. (1921) Allitteratio Latina, or Alliteration in Latin Verse Reduced to Rule. London.Google Scholar

Faller, S. (2001) ‘Soldaten aus Euböa und Rhodos’, in Auhagen (2001a): 249–57.

Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1981) ‘Plautus in miniature: compression and distortion in the Epidicus’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3: 1–28.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1984) ‘Roman experience of Menander in the late republic and early empire’, TAPhA 114: 299–309.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2001) ‘Roman tragedy and the teaching of Aristotle's Poetics’, in Andersen and Haarberg (2001): 109–25.

Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Orator and/et actor’, in Easterling and Hall (2002): 362–76.

Fantham, E. (2004) ‘Terence and the familiarisation of comedy’, Ramus 33: 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge. (Originally published in Italian 2002, Rome.)Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2000) ‘Il remedium amoris, fra commedia ed elegia’, in Stärk and Vogt-Spira (2000): 251–66.

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1993) ‘Epilogue: towards an account of the ancient world's concepts of fictive belief’, in Gill and Wiseman (1993): 230–44.

Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar's Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Ferroni, G. (ed.) (1981a) La semiotica e il doppio teatrale. Naples.

Ferroni, G. (1981b) ‘Il sistema comico della gemellarità’, in Ferroni (1981a): 353–64.

Fitzgerald, W. (2000) Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flaucher, S. (2003) Studien zum Parasiten in der römischen Komödie. Mannheim.Google Scholar

Flickinger, R. C. (1931) ‘Terence and Menander’, CJ 26: 676–94.Google Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2004) ‘Agnus κουριῶν (Plautus Aulularia 561–64)’, CPh 99: 147–53.Google Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2006) ‘Sicilicissitat (Plautus, Menaechmi 12) and early geminate writing in Latin (with an appendix on Men. 13)’, Mnemosyne 59: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2007) ‘Freudian slips in Plautus: two case studies’, AJPh 128: 209–37.Google Scholar

Fortier, M. (2002) Theory/Theatre: An Introduction (1st edn 1997). London.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1942) ‘The stars in the prologue of the Rudens’, CQ 36: 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1960) Elementi plautini in Plauto, tr. Munari, F.. Florence. (Originally published in German as Plautinisches im Plautus, 1922, Berlin; English tr. T. Drevikovsky and F. Muecke, Plautine Elements in Plautus, Oxford, 2007.)Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1961) ‘Two poems of Catullus’, JRS 51: 46–53.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. A. (1993) ‘Modes of metatheatre: theatricalisation and detheatricalisation in Terence, Eunuchus’, LCM 18: 146–51.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. A. (1994a) ‘The soldier as a storyteller in Terence's Eunuchus’, Mnemosyne 47: 586–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. A. (1994b) ‘Performance and improvisation in Terence's Eunuchus’, QUCC 48: 121–30.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. A. (1996a) ‘Food and poetics in Plautus’ Captivi', AC 65: 225–30.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. A. (1996b) ‘A prologue-within-a-prologue: Plautus, Miles Gloriosus 145–153’, Latomus 55: 568–70.Google Scholar

Franko, G. F. (1995) ‘Fides, Aetolia and Plautus’ Captivi', TAPhA 125: 155–76.Google Scholar

Franko, G. F. (1999) ‘Imagery and names in Plautus’ Casina', CJ 95: 1–17.Google Scholar

Franko, G. F. (2004) ‘Ensemble scenes in Plautus’, AJPh 125: 27–59.Google Scholar

Frédéric, M. (1985) La répétition: étude linguistique et rhétorique. Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freud, S. (1960) Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, tr. Strachey, J.. London. (Originally published in German 1905, Vienna.)Google Scholar

Frost, K. B. (1988) Exits and Entrances in Menander. Oxford.Google Scholar

Frye, N. (1957) The Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. (1970) ‘Die plautinischen Bacchides und Menanders Dis Exapaton’, Philologus 114: 54–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garton, C. (1971) ‘The Thesaurus: a comedy of Luscius Lanuvinus’, AJPh 92: 17–37.Google Scholar

Garton, C. (1972) Personal Aspects of the Roman Theatre. Toronto.Google Scholar

Gelhaus, H. (1972) Die Prologe des Terenz: Eine Erklärung nach den Lehren von der inventio und dispositio. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Gentili, B. (1979) Theatrical Performances in the Ancient World: Hellenistic and Early Roman Theatre. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Gerick, Th. (1998) ‘Der trochäische Septenar in den Captivi’, in Benz and Lefèvre (1998): 127–50.

Gill, C. (1993) ‘Plato on falsehood – not fiction’, in Gill and Wiseman (1993): 38–87.

Gill, C. (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.) (1993) Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter.CrossRef

Gilula, D. (1978) ‘Where did the audience go?’, SCI 4: 45–9.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1979–80) ‘Terence's Hecyra: a delicate balance of suspense and dramatic irony’, SCI 5: 137–57.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1980), ‘The concept of the bona meretrix: a study of Terence's courtesans’, RFIC 108: 142–65.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1989) ‘The first realistic roles in European theatre: Terence's prologues’, QUCC 33: 95–106.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1991) ‘Plots are not stories: the so-called “duality method” of Terence’, in Reading Plays: Interpretation and Reception, ed. Scolnicov, H. and Holland, P.. Cambridge: 81–93.Google Scholar

Glasgow, R. D. V. (1995) Madness, Masks and Laughter: An Essay on Comedy. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Gold, B. (1998) ‘“Vested interests” in Plautus’ Casina: cross-dressing in Roman comedy', in James (1998a): 17–29.

Goldberg, S. M. (1978) ‘Plautus’ Epidicus and the case of the missing original', TAPhA 108: 81–91.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1981–2) ‘The dramatic balance of Terence's Andria’, C&M 33: 135–43.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1983) ‘Terence, Cato and the rhetorical prologue’, CPh 78: 198–211.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1986) Understanding Terence. Guildford and Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1995) ‘Improvisation, plot and Plautus’ Curculio', in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995): 33–41.

Goldberg, S. M. (1998) ‘Plautus on the Palatine’, JRS 88: 1–20.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2000) ‘Catullus 42 and the comic legacy’, in Stärk and Vogt-Spira (2000): 475–89.

Goldberg, S. M. (2004) ‘Plautus and his alternatives: textual doublets in Cistellaria’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004): 385–98.

Goldberg, S. M. (2005a) ‘The early republic: the beginnings to 90 bc’, in A Companion to Latin Literature (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World), ed. Harrison, S.. Oxford: 15–30.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2005b) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, L. (1992) Aristotle on Tragic and Comic Mimesis. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1997) Representations and Contradictions: Ambivalence Towards Images, Theatre, Fiction, Relics and Sexuality. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2004) ‘The plot thickens: hidden outlines in Terence's prologues’, Ramus 33: 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1982) ‘Drama’, in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature Volume II, Part I: The Early Republic, ed. Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V.. Cambridge: 77–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (ed.) (1987) Terence: Adelphi (with tr. and comm.) (2nd edn 2000). Warminster.

Gratwick, A. S. (ed.) (1993a) Plautus: Menaechmi (with comm.). Cambridge.

Gratwick, A. S. (1993b) ‘The “true” Plautus?’ (review of Zwierlein 1990), CR, n.s. 43: 36–40.Google Scholar

Green, W. M. (1932–3) ‘The ritual validity of the ludi scaenici’, Classical Weekly 26: 156–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, E. (ed.) (1996) Re-reading Sappho: Reception and Transmission. Berkeley, CA and London.

Greene, E. (1999) ‘Re-figuring the feminine voice: Catullus translating Sappho’, Arethusa 32: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Cornell, NY.Google Scholar

Guggenheimer, E. H. (1972) Rhyme Effects and Rhyming Figures: A Comparative Study of Sound Repetitions in the Classics with Emphasis on Latin Poetry. Paris.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (2005) The World of Roman Song: From Ritualised Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Halkin, L. (1948) ‘La parodie d'une demande de triumphe dans L’Amphitryon de Plaute', AC 17: 297–304.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1991) ‘Comic satire and freedom of speech in Classical Athens’, JHS 111: 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2001) ‘Aristotelian mimesis and human understanding’, in Andersen and Haarberg (2001): 87–107.

Halliwell, S. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Halporn, J. (1993) ‘Roman comedy and Greek models’, in Scodel (1993): 191–213.

Handley, E. W. (1968) Menander and Plautus: A Study in Comparison (an inaugural lecture delivered at University College, London, 5 February 1968). London.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (1975) ‘Plautus and his public: some thoughts on New Comedy in Latin’, Dioniso 46: 117–32.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (1985) ‘Comedy’, in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Volume I: Greek Literature, ed. Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W.. Cambridge: 355–425.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (2002) ‘Theme and variations’, in Questa and Raffaelli (2002): 105–20.

Hardie, P. R. (1991) ‘The Janus episode in Ovid's Fasti’, MD 26: 47–64.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2002) Ovid's Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. S. (2005) ‘The Parasite's daughter: metatheatrical costuming in Plautus’ Persa', CW 99: 25–33.Google Scholar

Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) (2004) Studien zu Plautus' Cistellaria (Script Oralia 128). Tübingen.

Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.) (2000) The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. London.

Heath, M. (1990) ‘Aristophanes and his rivals’, G&R 37: 143–58.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. G. W. (1998) Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. G. W. (1999) Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. G. W. (2004) ‘Terence's Selbstaussöhnung: payback time for the Self (Hautontimorumenus)’, Ramus 33: 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. G. W. (2006) Plautus Asinaria: The One About the Asses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Hesk, J. (2000) Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Highet, G. (1942) ‘The shipwrecked slaver’, AJPh 63: 462–6.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (2002) Stilistica Latina, tr. Neri, C., ed. Traina, A.et al. (originally published in German as part of Leumann, Hofmann and Szantyr 1971, 1st edn 1965). Bologna.Google Scholar

Hofmann, W. (1995) ‘Die körpersprache der Schauspieler als Mittel des Komischen’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995): 205–18.

Hokenson, J. (2006) The Idea of Comedy: History, Theory, Critique. Madison, NJ.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (1991) The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Huizinga, J. (1949) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. London.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1981) ‘The Aulularia of Plautus and its Greek original’, PCPhS 27: 37–49.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1985) The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurka, F. (2004) ‘Die beiden προλογίζοντες der Cistellaria’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004): 29–49.

Isager, J. (1991) Pliny on Art and Society: The Elder Pliny's Chapters on the History of Art. London and New York.Google Scholar

James, H. (1934) The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces (with intr. by R. P. Blackmur). New York and London.Google Scholar

James, S. L. (ed.) (1998a) Gender and Genre in Roman Comedy and Elegy. Helios 25: 1 (special edn).

James, S. L. (1998b) ‘Introduction: constructions of gender and genre in Roman comedy and elegy’, in James (1998a): 3–16.

James, S. L. (1998c) ‘From boys to men: rape and developing masculinity in Terence's Hecyra and Eunuchus’, in James (1998a): 31–47.

Janko, R. (1984) Aristotle on Comedy: Towards a Reconstruction of Poetics II. London.Google Scholar

Jenkins, T. E. (2005) ‘At play with writing: letters and readers in Plautus’, TAPhA 135: 359–92.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1966) ‘Plautus: Rudens 83–88’, CR, n.s. 16: 148.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1967) The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments (with comm.). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1969a) ‘Imperator Histricus’, YClS 21: 97–123.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1969b) ‘Chrysalus and the fall of Troy (Plautus, Bacchides 925–978)’, HSPh 73: 135–52.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (2001) ‘Gods, cult and cultic language in Plautus’ Epidicus', in Auhagen (2001a): 261–96.

Johnston, M. (1933) Exits and Entrances in Roman Comedy (Plautus and Terence). Geneva.Google Scholar

Karakasis, E. (2005) Terence and the Language of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kermode, F. (1967) The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction (2nd edn 2000). Oxford.Google Scholar

Kern, E. (1980) The Absolute Comic. New York.Google Scholar

Ketterer, R. C. (1986) ‘Stage properties in Plautine comedy ii’, Semiotica 59: 93–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knapp, C. (1919) ‘References to literature in Plautus and Terence’, AJPh 40: 231–61.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1976) ‘Plautus’ Captivi and the ideology of the ancient City-State', Ramus 5: 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konstan, D. (1983) Roman Comedy. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1986) ‘Love in Terence's Eunuch: the origins of erotic subjectivity’, AJPh 107: 369–93.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1995) Greek Comedy and Ideology. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Kris, E. and Kurz, O. (1979) Legend, Myth and Magic in the Image of the Artist: A Historical Experiment, tr. Laing, A., rev. L. M. Newman. New Haven, CT and London.Google Scholar

Kruschwitz, P. (2002) ‘Ist Geld die “Wurzel allen Übels”? Zur Interpretation von Plautus’ Aulularia', Hermes 130: 146–63.Google Scholar

Kruschwitz, P. (2004) Terenz. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Kujore, O. (1974) ‘A note on contaminatio in Terence’, CPh 69: 39–42.Google Scholar

Kümmel, M. J. (2004) ‘Zu einigen seltene Wörtern in der Cistellaria’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004): 347–62.

Lada-Richards, I. (2004) ‘Authorial voice and theatrical self-definition in Terence and beyond: the Hecyra prologues in ancient and modern contexts’, G&R 51: 55–82.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (1999) ‘The language of poetry and the language of science: the Latin poets and “medical Latin”’, in Adams and Mayer (1999): 183–225.

Langslow, D. R. (2005) ‘“Langues réduites au lexique”? The languages of Latin technical prose’, in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose (Proceedings of the British Academy 129), ed. Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N.. Oxford: 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lape, S. (2004) ‘The Terentian marriage-plot: reproducing fathers and sons’, Ramus 33: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1969a) ‘Ergasilus and the ironies of the Captivi’, C&M 30: 263–96.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1969b) ‘De exemplo meo ipse aedificato: an organizing idea in the Mostellaria’, Hermes 97: 318–32.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1974) ‘Plautus Rudens: Venus born from a shell’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language 15: 915–31.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers (2 vols.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1969) Die Expositionstechnik in den Komödien des Terenz. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1978a) ‘Plautus-Studien ii: die Brief-Intrige in Menanders Dis exapaton und ihre Verdoppelung in den Bacchides’, Hermes 106: 518–38.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1978b) Der Phormio des Terenz und der Epidikazomenos des Apollodor von Karystos. Munich.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1984) ‘Plautus-Studien iv: die Umformung des Ἀλαζών der Doppel-Komödie des Miles gloriosus’, Hermes 112: 30–53.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1995) Plautus und Philemon (ScriptOralia 73). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1997) Plautus Pseudolus (ScriptOralia 101). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1998) ‘L’Anfitrione di Plauto e la tragedia', in Amphitruo (Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates i), ed. R. Raffaelli and A. Tontini. Urbino: 13–30.

Lefèvre, E. (1999a) Terenz' und Apollodors Hecyra (Zetemata 101). Munich.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1999b) ‘Plautus Amphitruo zwischen Tragodie’, in Baier (1999): 11–50.

Lefèvre, E. (2001) Plautus Aulularia (ScriptOralia 122). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2004) ‘Plautus’ Cistellaria zwischen Menanders Synaristosai und italischem Stegreifspiel', in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004): 51–88.

Lefèvre, E., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (1991) Plautus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität des Plautus (ScriptOralia 25). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. G. L. (2004a) ‘The Pro Caelio and comedy’, CPh 99: 300–35.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. G. L. (2004b) Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leo, F. (1912) Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar

Leumann, M., Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1972) Lateinische Grammatik: Syntax und Stilistik (1st edn 1965). Munich.Google Scholar

Levin, R. (1967) ‘The double plots of Terence’, CJ 62: 301–5.Google Scholar

Lloyd, R. B. (1963) ‘Two prologues: Menander and Plautus’, AJPh 84: 146–61.Google Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (1983) ‘The Eunuchus: Terence and Menander’, CQ 33: 428–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (1985a) ‘Plautine innovations in Mostellaria 529–857’, Phoenix 39: 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (1985b) ‘The cook scene of Plautus’ Pseudolus', CQ 35: 411–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (1988) ‘Plautus Poenulusi.2’, BICS 35: 101–10.Google Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (1989) ‘The virgo callida of Plautus, Persa’, CQ 39: 390–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (1999) ‘Pseudolus’ intrigue against Simo', Maia 51: 1–15.Google Scholar

Lowe, J. C. B. (2001) ‘Greek and Roman elements in Epidicus’ intrigue', in Auhagen (2001a): 57–70.

Lowe, J. C. B. (2007) ‘Some problems of dramatic space in Plautus’, CQ 57: 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowe, N. J. (1987) ‘Tragic space and comic timing in Menander's Dyskolos’, BICS 34: 126–38.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. J. (2000) ‘Comic plots and the invention of fiction’, in Harvey and Wilkins (2000): 259–72.

Luppe, W. (2000) ‘The rivalry between Aristophanes and Kratinos’, in Harvey and Wilkins (2000): 15–21.

MacCary, W. T. (1969) ‘Menander's slaves: their names, roles and masks’, TAPhA 100: 277–94.Google Scholar

MacCary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (eds.) (1976) Plautus: Casina. Cambridge.

MacDowell, D. M. (1995) Aristophanes and Athens: An Introduction to the Plays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mahoney, A. (2001) ‘Alliteration in Saturnian Latin verse’, NECJ 28: 78–82.Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1946) Traité de stylistique latine. Paris.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2006) The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, F. (1928) Plautus: Rudens (with comm.). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mattingly, H. B. (1959) ‘The Terentian didascaliae’, Athenaeum 37: 148–73.Google Scholar

Mattingly, H. B. (1960) ‘The first period of Plautine revival’, Latomus 19: 231–5.Google Scholar

Maurach, G. (1988) Der Poenulus des Plautus. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Maurach, G. (2005) Kleine Geschichte der antiken Komödie. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Mauron, C. (1964) Psychocritique du genre comique. Paris.Google Scholar

McCarthy, K. (2000) Slaves, Masters and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

McCarthy, K. (2004) ‘The joker in the pack: slaves in Terence’, Ramus 33: 100–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McElduff, S. (2004) ‘More than Menander's acolyte: Terence as translator’, Ramus 33: 120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, M. (2007) How Plays Work: Reading and Performance. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milnor, K. (2002) ‘Playing house: stage, space and domesticity in Plautus’ Mostellaria', Helios 29: 3–25.Google Scholar

Moi, T. (ed.) (1986) The Kristeva Reader. New York.

Moore, T. J. (1991) ‘Palliata togata: Plautus, Curculio 462–86’, AJPh 112: 343–62.Google Scholar

Moore, T. J. (1994) ‘Seats and social status in the Plautine theatre’, CJ 90: 113–23.Google Scholar

Moore, T. J. (1998a) The Theatre of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Moore, T. J. (1998b) ‘Music and structure in Roman comedy’, AJPh 119: 245–73.Google Scholar

Moore, T. J. (2001) ‘Music in Epidicus’, in Auhagen (2001a): 313–34.

Moore, T. J. (2005) ‘“Pessuli, heus pessuli”: la porta nel Curculio’, in Raffaelli and Tontini (2005): 11–36.

Morales, H. L. (1996) ‘The torturer's apprentice: Parrhasius and the limits of art’, in Art and Text in Roman Culture, ed. Elsner, J.. Cambridge: 182–209.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2003) ‘Child's play: Ovid and his critics’, JRS 93: 66–91.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. G. (1990) ‘Politics, religion and the games in Rome, 200–150 bc’, Philologus 134: 14–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Most, G. W. (1996) ‘Reflecting Sappho’, in Greene (1996): 11–35.

Muecke, F. (1982) ‘A portrait of the artist as a young woman’, CQ 32: 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muecke, F. (1986) ‘Plautus and the theatre of disguise’, ClAnt 5: 216–29.Google Scholar

Murray, G. (1943) ‘Ritual elements in the New Comedy’, CQ 37: 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, T. G. A. (1990) Comedy: An Introduction to Comedy in Literature, Drama and Cinema. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (1995) ‘Myth, parody and comic plots: the birth of gods and Middle Comedy’, in Dobrov (1995a): 1–27.

Newsom, R. (1988) A Likely Story: Probability and Play in Fiction. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar

Norwood, G. (1923) The Art of Terence. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nuttall, A. D. (1992) Openings: Narrative Beginnings from the Epic to the Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar

O'Bryhim, S. (1989) ‘The originality of Plautus’ Casina', AJPh 110: 81–103.Google Scholar

O'Bryhim, S. (2001) ‘Dance, Old Man, Dance! The torture of Knemon in Menander's Dyskolos’, in Greek and Roman Comedy: Translations and Interpretations of Four Representative Plays, ed. O'Bryhim, S.. Austin, TX: 96–109.Google Scholar

Olson, E. (1968) The Theory of Comedy. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar

Oniga, R. (2002) ‘I modelli dell’Anfitrione di Plauto', in Questa and Raffaelli (2002): 199–225.

Orr, L. (1996) ‘Narrative repetition, repetitive narration: a taxonomy’, Neohelicon 23, 2: 203–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otto, A. (1890) Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Owens, W. M. (2000) ‘Plautus’ Stichus and the political crisis of 200 bc', AJPh 121: 385–407.Google Scholar

Palmer, L. R. (1954) The Latin Language. London.Google Scholar

Parker, H. N. (1989) ‘Crucially funny or Tranio on the couch: the servus callidus and jokes about torture’, TAPhA 119: 233–46.Google Scholar

Parker, H. N. (1996) ‘Plautus vs. Terence: audience and popularity re-examined’, AJPh 117: 585–617.Google Scholar

Pearson, J. H. (1997) The Prefaces of Henry James: Framing the Modern Reader. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Penwill, J. L. (2004) ‘The unlovely lover of Terence's Hecyra’, Ramus 33: 130–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, H. (1973) Plautus: Stichus, Einleitung, Text, Kommentar. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Petrone, G. (1983) Teatro antico e inganno: finzioni plautine. Palermo.Google Scholar

Petrone, G. (2001) ‘Il rischio della punizione: scherzi e drammaturgia nell’Epidicus', in Auhagen (2001a): 179–90.

Philippides, K. (1995) ‘Terence's Eunuchus: elements of the marriage ritual in the rape scene’, Mnemosyne 48: 272–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1956) ‘Der Prolog des Terenz’, SIFC 27/8: 434–53.Google Scholar

Purdie, S. (1993) Comedy: The Mastery of Discourse. Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar

Questa, C. (1995) Titi Macci Plauti Cantica. Urbino.Google Scholar

Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (1984) Maschere prologhi naufragi nella commedia plautina. Bari.Google Scholar

Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) (2002) Due seminari plautini: la tradizione del testo; i modelli. Urbino.

Rabinowitz, P. (1998) Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Columbus, OH. (1st edn 1987, Ithaca, NY.)Google Scholar

Radice, B. (1976) Terence: The Comedies (with tr. and intr.). Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Raffaelli, R. (1984a) ‘Narratore e narrazione nei prologhi di Plauto’, in Questa and Raffaelli (1984): 69–83.

Raffaelli, R. (1984b) ‘Animum advortite: Aspetti della communicazione nei prologhi di Plauto (e di Terenzio)’, in Questa and Raffaelli (1984): 101–20.

Raffaelli, R. (2000) ‘C’è del comico in quella follia', in Raffaelli and Tontini (2000): 49–65.

Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2000) Aulularia (Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates III). Urbino.

Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2005) Curculio (Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates VIII). Urbino.

Rawson, E. (1993) ‘Freedmen in Roman comedy’, in Scodel (1993): 215–33.

Reeve, M. D. (1983) ‘Terence’, in Reynolds (1983): 412–20.

Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) (1983) Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.

Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) (1997) Classical Closure. Princeton, NJ.

Rogers, R. (1987) ‘Freud and the semiotics of repetition’, Poetics Today 8: 579–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, R. M. (1997) ‘Performance and textuality in Aristophanes’ Clouds', YJC 10: 397–421.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, T. G. (2002) ‘“Metatheatre”: an essay on overload’, Arion 10: 87–119.Google Scholar

Ruffell, I. (2002) ‘A total write-off: Aristophanes, Cratinus and the rhetoric of comic competition’, CQ 52: 138–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1979) ‘De imitatione’, in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, ed. West, D. and Woodman, A.. Cambridge: 1–16.Google Scholar

Said, E. W. (1975) Beginnings: Intention and Method. New York. (2nd edn 1998, London.)Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1982) ‘How Terence's Hecyra failed’, CQ, n.s. 32: 134–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scafoglio, G. (2005) ‘Plautus and Ennius: a note on Plautus, Bacchides 962–5’, CQ 55: 632–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlegel, C. (1999) ‘Horace Satires 1.7: satire as conflict irresolution’, Arethusa 32: 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitz, T. A. (1999) ‘“I hate all common things”: the reader's role in Callimachus’ Aetia prologue', HSPh 99: 151–78.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (ed.) (1993) Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor, MI.

Scullard, H. H. (1981) Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar

Seaford, R. (ed.) (1996) Euripides: Bacchae (with tr., intr. and comm.). Warminster.

Sedgwick, W. B. (1927) ‘Parody in Plavtvs [Parody in Plautus]’, CQ 21: 88–9.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1997) Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides' Bacchae, expanded edn (1st edn 1982). Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Segal, E. (1987) Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus, 2nd edn. Oxford. (1st edn 1968, Cambridge, MA.)Google Scholar

Segal, E. (2001a) The Death of Comedy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Segal, E. (ed.) (2001b) Oxford Readings in Menander, Plautus and Terence. Oxford.

Serpieri, A., Elam, K., Gulli Publiatti, P., Kemeny, T. and Rutelli, R. (1981) ‘Toward a segmentation of the dramatic text’, Poetics Today 2: 163–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (1994) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (1996) ‘The art of deceit: Pseudolus and the nature of reading’, CQ 46: 152–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (2002) ‘An a-musing tale: gender, genre and Ovid's battles with inspiration in the Metamorphoses’, in Cultivating the Muse: Power, Desire and Inspiration in the Ancient World, ed. Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P.. Oxford: 207–27.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (2008) ‘The theatrical life of things: Plautus and the physical’, Dictynna 5: 171–89.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. and Morales, H. (eds.) (2000) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford.

Sheets, G. A. (1983) ‘Plautus and early Roman tragedy’, ICS 8: 195–209.Google Scholar

Sidnell, M. J., Conacher, D. J., Kerslake, B., Kleber, P., McDonough, C. J. and Pietropaolo, D. (1991) Sources of Dramatic Theory I: Plato to Congreve. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sidwell, K. (1995) ‘Poetic rivalry and the caricature of comic poets’, in Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E. W. Handley, ed. Griffiths, A.. London: 56–80.Google Scholar

Silk, M. S. (2000a) Aristophanes and the Definition of Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Silk, M. S. (2000b) ‘Aristophanes versus the rest: comic poetry in Old Comedy’, in Harvey and Wilkins (2000): 299–315.

Simon, M. (1961) ‘Contaminatio und furtum bei Terenz’, Helikon 1: 487–92.Google Scholar

Skafte Jensen, M. (1997) ‘The fall of Troy in Plautus’ Bacchides', C&M 48: 315–23.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1937) ‘New words from Plautus’, CR 51: 166.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1957) ‘Der Zweite Schluss der Andria’, RhM 100: 53–68.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1967) ‘Plautus: Rudens 86’, CR, n.s. 17: 11–12.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1968) Studia Enniana. London.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Quintus Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1988) ‘The fictions of patriarchy in Terence's Hecyra’, CW 81: 249–60.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1992a) ‘Plautine negotiations: the Poenulus prologue unpacked’, in Beginnings in Classical Literature (YClS 29), ed. Dunn, F. M. and Cole, T.. Cambridge: 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1992b) ‘Two republican poets on drama: Terence and Accius’, in Zimmermann (1992): 85–103.

Slater, N. W. (1995) ‘The fabrication of comic illusion’, in Dobrov (1995a): 29–45.

Slater, N. W. (2000) Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind, 2nd edn. Amsterdam. (1st edn 1985, Princeton, NJ.)Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (2001) ‘Appearance, reality and the spectre of incest’, in Auhagen (2001a): 191–203.

Slater, N. W. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.) (1993) Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. Stuttgart.CrossRef

Smith, C. (2000) ‘Worshipping mater matuta: ritual and context’, in Bispham and Smith (2000): 136–55.

Smith, J. A. (2004) ‘Buy young, sell old: playing the market economies of Phormio and Terence’, Ramus 33: 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. P. (1994) ‘Audience response to rape: Chaerea in Terence's Eunuchus’, Helios 21: 21–38.Google Scholar

Sommella, P. (2005) ‘La Roma plautina (con particolare riferimento a Curculio 467–85)’, in Raffaelli and Tontini (2005): 69–106.

Stanford, W. B. (1983) Greek Tragedy and the Emotions: An Introductory Study. London.Google Scholar

Stärk, E. (1989) Die Menaechmi des Plautus und kein griechisches Original (ScriptOralia 11). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Stärk, E. (1991) ‘Mostellaria oder Tubare statt sedare’, in Lefèvre, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1991): 107–39.

Stärk, E. (2001) ‘Zwei Vermutungen zum Original des Epidicus’, in Auhagen (2001a): 91–104.

Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) (2000) Dramatische Wäldchen: Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre zum 65 Geburtstag (Spudasmata 80). Hildesheim.

Stewart, Z. (1958) ‘The Amphitruo of Plautus and Euripides’ Bacchae', TAPhA 89: 348–73.Google Scholar

Stewart, Z. (2000) ‘Plautus’ Amphitruo: three problems', HSPh 100: 293–9.Google Scholar

Stockert, W. (1982) ‘Zur sprachlichen Charakterisierung der Personen in Plautus’ Aulularia', Gymnasium 89: 4–14.Google Scholar

Stockert, W. (1983) T. Maccius Plautus: Aulularia (with comm.). Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strong, H. A. (1906) ‘Note on Plautus’ Mostellaria: Act iii Scene ii', AJPh 27: 67–9.Google Scholar

Sutton, D. F. (1993) Ancient Comedy: The War of Generations. New York.Google Scholar

Sutton, D. F. (1994) The Catharsis of Comedy. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Taliercio, A. (1988) ‘Imitatio-aemulatio nei rapporti fra l’“Hecyra” di Terenzio e l'“Ἑκυρά” di Apollodoro di Caristo', Orpheus 9: 38–54.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1983) ‘Plautus’, in Reynolds (1983): 302–7.

Taylor, L. R. (1937) ‘The opportunities for dramatic performances in the time of Plautus and Terence’, TAPhA 68: 284–304.Google Scholar

Taylor, L. R. and Holland, L. A. (1952) ‘Janus and the Fasti’, CPh 47: 137–42.Google Scholar

Telò, M. (1998), ‘La scena di riconoscimento nello Ione di Euripide e Plauto, Rudens 1134’, SCO 46: 909–17.Google Scholar

Thalmann, W. G. (1996) ‘Versions of slavery in the Captiui of Plautus’, Ramus 25: 112–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1979) ‘New Comedy, Callimachus and Roman poetry’, HSPh 83: 179–206.Google Scholar

Traill, A. (2005) ‘Acroteleutium's Sapphic infatuation (Miles 1216–83)’, CQ 55: 518–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traina, A. (1977) Forma e suono. Rome.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (1901) ‘Italisches Volksjustiz’, RhM 56: 1–28.Google Scholar

Vahlen, J. (ed.) (1903) Ennianae poesis reliquiae, 2nd edn (1st edn 1854). Leipzig. (3rd edn Amsterdam, 1963, non vidi)

Victor, B. A. (1989) ‘The alter exitus Andriae’, Latomus 48: 63–74.Google Scholar

Vogt-Spira, G. (1991) ‘Asinaria, oder Maccus vortit Attice’, in Lefèvre, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1991): 11–69.

Vogt-Spira, G. (1995) ‘Traditionen improvisierten Theaters bei Plautus: einige programmatische Überlegungen’, in Griechisch-römische Komödie und Tragödie, ed. Zimmerman, B.. Stuttgart: 75–93.Google Scholar

Albrecht, M. (1989) Masters of Roman Prose from Cato to Apuleius: Interpretative Studies, tr. Adkin, N.. Leeds.Google Scholar

Watling, E. F. (1965) Plautus: The Pot of Gold and Other Plays. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2005) ‘The protean performer: mimesis and identity in late antique discussions of the theatre’, in Performing Ecstasies: Music, Dance and Ritual in the Mediterranean, ed. Giudice, L. del and Deusen, N.. Ottawa: 3–11.Google Scholar

Wessner, P. (1962–3) Aeli Donati Commentum Terenti (3 vols.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

White, R. S. (1981) Shakespeare and the Romance Ending. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar

Whitehorne, J. (1993) ‘The rapist's disguise in Menander's Eunuchus’, in Slater and Zimmermann (1993): 122–32.

Whitman, C. (1964) Aristophanes and the Comic Hero. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiles, D. (1991) The Masks of Menander: Sign and Meaning in Greek and Roman Performance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1963) Golden Latin Artistry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Willcock, M. (1987) Plautus: Pseudolus (with comm.). Bristol.Google Scholar

Willcock, M. (1995) ‘Plautus and the Epidicus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 19–29.Google Scholar

Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. F. (1990) Shakespeare's Reflexive Endings. Lewiston, NY.Google Scholar

Wimmel, W. (1960) Kallimachos in Rom: Die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit (Hermes Einzelschriften 16). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1998) Roman Drama and Roman History. Exeter.Google Scholar

Wohl, V. (1998) Intimate Commerce: Exchange, Gender and Subjectivity in Greek Tragedy. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Wright, J. (1974) Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the comoedia palliata. Rome.Google Scholar

Wright, J. (1975) ‘The transformations of Pseudolus’, TAPhA 105: 403–16.Google Scholar

Zagagi, N. (1994) The Comedy of Menander: Convention, Variation and Originality. London.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. (2003) Modes of Viewing in Hellenistic Poetry and Art. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1981) ‘Travesties of gender and genre in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazousae', Critical Inquiry 8: 301–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1985) ‘Playing the other: theatre, theatricality and the feminine in Greek drama’, Representations 11: 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, B. (ed.) (1992) Antike Dramentheorien und ihre Rezeption. Stuttgart.CrossRef

Zwierlein, O. (1990) Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus. Volume I: Poenulus und Curculio. Stuttgart.

Zwierlein, O. (1991a) Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus. Volume II: Miles gloriosus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (1991b) Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus. Volume III: Pseudolus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (1992) Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus. Volume IV: Bacchides. Stuttgart.Google Scholar