Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T16:08:01.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Luise Müller
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Right to Punish
Political Authority and International Criminal Justice
, pp. 167 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adams, N. P., Scherz, Antoinette, and Schmelzle, Cord. 2020. ‘Legitimacy beyond the State: Institutional Purposes and Contextual Constraints’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (3): 281–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1565710.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam. 2001. ‘Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?American Journal of International Law 95 (1): 731. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. Rev. ed. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Altman, Andrew. 2006. ‘The Persistent Fiction of Harm to Humanity’. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (3): 367–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Andrew, and Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2009. A Liberal Theory of International Justice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. ‘What Is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109 (2): 287337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Scott. 2010. ‘The Enforcement Approach to Coercion’. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Scott. 2011. ‘Coercion’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/coercion/.Google Scholar
Appel, Benjamin J. 2018. ‘In the Shadow of the International Criminal Court: Does the ICC Deter Human Rights Violations?Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (1): 328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716639101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applbaum, Arthur. 2010. ‘Legitimacy without the Duty to Obey’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (3): 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John. 1995. Austin: The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Edited by Rumble, Wilfrid E.. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ba, Oumar. 2020. States of Justice: The Politics of the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108771818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Michael. 2000. ‘The Protection and Rights of Victims under International Criminal Law’. The International Lawyer 34 (1): 720.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2014. Introduction to International Criminal Law. 2nd rev. ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bogdandy, Armin von, and Venzke, Ingo. 2014. In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication. 1st ed. International Courts and Tribunals Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul. 2010. ‘The Concept of Genocide’. Journal of Genocide Research 12 (1–2): 6980. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2010.515402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, David. 2015. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court in a World of Power Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry. 1996. ‘Egalitarianism and Equal Availability of Political Influence’. Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (2): 118–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00045.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2002. ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy’. Ethics 112 (4): 689719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295359.001.0001.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2010. ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, 7996. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2013. The Heart of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2006. ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4): 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buitelaar, Tom. 2016. ‘The ICC and the Prevention of Atrocities: Criminological Perspectives’. Human Rights Review 17 (3): 285302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142–016-0414-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Melissa A. 1978. ‘Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy’. The American Political Science Review 72 (1): 135–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon. 1989. ‘Kant’s Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in Its Threat, Retribution in Its Execution’. Law and Philosophy 8 (2): 151200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2010. ‘Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, 119138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2011. ‘Is Democratic Legitimacy Possible for International Institutions?’ In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, edited by Archibugi, Daniele, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, and Marchetti, Raffaele, 6995. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2012. ‘The Legitimacy of International Institutions’. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, edited by Andrei, Marmor, 380393. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2020. ‘The Arbitrary Circumscription of the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (3): 352–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1565715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2021. ‘The Problem of Selective Prosecution and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court’. Journal of Social Philosophy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, Winston. 2005. Closing the Ring: The Second World War. Vol. V. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Clarke, Phil. 2018. Distant Justice: The Impact of the International Criminal Court on African Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corradetti, Claudio. 2015. ‘The Priority of Conflict Deterrence and the Role of the International Criminal Court in Kenya’s Post-Electoral Violence 2007–2008 and 2013’. Human Rights Review 16 (3): 257–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142–015-0373-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate. 2013. ‘Managing Expectations: International Criminal Trials and the Prospects for Deterrence of Mass Atrocity’. International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (3): 434–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1999. ‘Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View’. In Democracy’s Edges, edited by Hacker-Cordón, Casiano and Shapiro, Ian, 1936. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586361.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Geoff. 2017. ‘Searching for Deterrence at the International Criminal Court’. International Criminal Law Review 17 (4): 625–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01704007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Montal, Florencia. 2017a. ‘From Law versus Politics to Law in Politics: A Pragmatist Assessment of the ICC’s Impact’. American University International Law Review 32 (3): 645705.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Montal, Florencia. 2017b. ‘Unintended Positive Complementarity: Why International Criminal Court Investigations May Increase Domestic Human Rights Prosecutions’. American Journal of International Law 111 (July): 689723. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2017. ‘Human Rights Data, Processes, and Outcomes: How Recent Research Points to a Better Future’. In Human Rights Futures, edited by Hopgood, Stephen, Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, 1st ed., 2459. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108147767.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2009. ‘The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case’. International Organization 63 (1): 3365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830909002X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, Patrick. 1965. The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. 2007. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, Antony. 2010. ‘Authority and Responsibility in International Criminal Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Tasioulas, John and Besson, Samantha, 589604. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1966. ‘Lord Devlin and the Enforcement of Morals’. The Yale Law Journal 75 (6): 9861005. https://doi.org/10.2307/794893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2013. ‘A New Philosophy for International Law’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (1): 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 1995. ‘Is Law Coercive?: William A. Edmundson’. Legal Theory 1 (1): 81111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David. 2014. ‘Authority and Reason‐Giving 1’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2): 296332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1965. ‘The Expressive Function of Punishment’. The Monist 49 (3): 397423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970. Doing & Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1987. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 1: Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichtelberg, Aaron. 2006. ‘Democratic Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court: A Liberal Defence’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (4): 765–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqk002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, Andreas. 1998. ‘Survey Article: Subsidiarity’. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2): 190218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9760.00052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1958. ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart’. Harvard Law Review 71 (4): 630–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, Kenneth S. 2013. ‘Addressing the Democratic Deficit in International Criminal Law and Procedure: Defense Participation in Lawmaking’. In The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law, edited by Jalloh, Charles Chernor, 572–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248778.040.Google Scholar
Glasius, M. 2012. ‘Do International Criminal Courts Require Democratic Legitimacy?European Journal of International Law 23 (1): 4366. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Krasner, Stephen D.. 2003. ‘The Limits of Idealism’. Daedalus 132 (1): 4763.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1988. ‘What Is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?Ethics 98 (4): 663–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosepath, Stefan. 2001. ‘The Global Scope of Justice’. Metaphilosophy 32 (1–2): 135–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9973.00179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosepath, Stefan. 2004. Gleiche Gerechtigkeit: Grundlagen Eines Liberalen Egalitarismus. 1. Aufl. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 1665. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gosepath, Stefan. 2015. ‘The Principles and the Presumption of Equality’. In Social Equality: On What It Means to Be Equals, edited by Fourie, Carina, Schuppert, Fabian, and Wallimann-Helmer, Ivo, 167–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graf, Sinja. 2018. ‘“A Trespass against the Whole Species”: Universal Crime and Sovereign Founding in John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government’. Political Theory 46 (4): 560–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591717752468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gur-Arye, Miriam, and Harel, Aron. 2016. ‘Taking Internationalism Seriously: Why International Criminal Law Matters’. In Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, edited by Heller, Kevin Jon, Mégret, Frédéric, Nouwen, Sarah M. H., Ohlin, Jens David, and Robinson, Darryl, 215237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Nathan. 2012. ‘It’s Only Natural: Legal Punishment and the Natural Right to Punish’. Social Theory and Practice 38 (4): 598616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1967. ‘Social Solidarity and the Enforcement of Morality’. The University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1): 113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1598946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2012. The Concept of Law. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2016. ‘The Deterrent Effects of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya’. International Interactions 42 (4): 616–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1185713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 11996. Hobbes: Leviathan: Revised Student Edition. Edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Daniel. 2014. Justice and Foreign Rule: On International Transitional Administration. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2016. ‘Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?International Organization 70 (3): 443–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2017. ‘Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? – Corrigendum’. International Organization 71 (2): 419–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, Radtke, Mitchell, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2018. ‘Assessing the International Criminal Court’. In The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals, edited by Follesdal, Andreas, Ulfstein, Geir, Young, Oran R., and Squatrito, Theresa, 193233. Studies on International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348768.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1977. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Edited by Weischedel, W.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2010. ‘Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries’. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4): 939–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. 2014a. ‘Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy?Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (3): 195229. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. 2014b. ‘Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (4): 287336. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. 2016. ‘Political Rule and Its Discontents’. Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 2: 3470.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2006. ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (1), 936. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Julian, and Nzelibe, Jide. 2006. ‘Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?Washington University Law Review 84 (September), 777833.Google Scholar
Ladenson, Robert. 1980. ‘In Defense of a Hobbesian Conception of Law’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2): 134–59.Google Scholar
Ladwig, Bernd. 2013. ‘Global Justice, Cosmopolitanism and Moral Path Dependency’. Philosophy & Social Criticism 39 (1): 320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453712467750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, Seth. 2020. ‘War’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/war.Google Scholar
List, Christian, and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. 2010. ‘Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (1): 76110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1965. Essays on the Law of Nature. Edited by von Leyden, W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Student Edition. Edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorca, Rocio. 2016. ‘The Presumption of Punishment: A Critical Review of Its Early Modern Origins’. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 29 (2): 385402. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2016.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Catherine. 2018. Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics. 1st paperback ed. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 145. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 2004. ‘A Theory of Crimes against Humanity’. Yale Journal of International Law 29: 85167.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 2010. ‘Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Tasioulas, John and Besson, Samantha, 569588. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, David B. 1976. ‘Rights against Humanity’. The Philosophical Review 85 (2): 208–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maliks, Reidar. 2013. ‘Kantian Courts: On the Legitimacy of International Human Rights Courts’. In Kantian Theory and Human Rights, edited by Follesdal, Andreas and Maliks, Reidar, 153174. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
May, Larry. 2005. Crimes against Humanity: A Normative Account. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, Larry. 2008. Aggression and Crimes against Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry. 2010. Genocide: A Normative Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry, and Fyfe, Shannon. 2017. International Criminal Tribunals: A Normative Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayerfeld, Jamie. 2004. ‘The Democratic Legacy of the International Criminal Court’. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 28 (2): 147–56.Google Scholar
Meckled-Garcia, Saladin. 2015. ‘Specifying Human Rights’. In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by Cruft, Rowan, Liao, S. Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo, 300315. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.003.0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Madeline. 2002. ‘The Democratic Dilemma of the International Criminal Court’. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 5 (2): 591600. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2002.5.2.591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Luise. 2017. ‘Rawls’s Relational Conception of Human Rights’. In Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice, edited by Schaffer, Johan Karlsson and Maliks, Reidar, 5876. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650134.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Luise. 2019a. ‘Universal Jurisdiction, Pirates and Vigilantes’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4): 390411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1390660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Luise. 2019b. ‘International Crimes and the Right to Punish’. Ratio Juris 32 (3): 301–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Luise. 2022. ‘Which Practice? – Rescuing the Practical Conception of Human Rights’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (1): 128–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1859226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1969. ‘A Paradox in Locke’s Theory of Natural Rights’. Dialogue 8 (2): 256–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 1998. ‘Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century’. Crime and Justice 23: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S., and Paternoster, Raymond. 1993. ‘Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime’. Law & Society Review 27 (3): 467–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, James. 2015. ‘Personal Deserts and Human Rights’. In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by Rowan Cruft, S. Matthew Liao, , and Renzo, Massimo, 153–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1983. ‘A Consensual Theory of Punishment’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 (4): 289306.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. 2005. Libertarianism without Inequality. 1st publ. in paperback. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R. 2013. ‘Political Authority and Political Obligation’. In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 2, edited by Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian, 174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peter, Fabienne. 2017. ‘Political Legitimacy’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/legitimacy.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1988. ‘The Consequentialist Can Recognise Rights’. Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150): 4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2002. ‘Is Criminal Justice Politically Feasible?Buffalo Criminal Law Review 5 (2): 427–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2008. ‘Three Conceptions of Democratic Control’. Constellations 15 (1): 4655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2010. ‘Legitimate International Institutions: A Neo-Republican Perspective’. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, 139159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2014. ‘Criminalization in Republican Theory’. In Criminalization: The Political Morality of Criminal Law, edited by Duff, R. A., Farmer, Lindsay, Marshall, S. E., Renzo, Massimo, and Tadros, Victor, 132–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1965. ‘Obligation and Consent – I’. American Political Science Review 59 (4): 990–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1966. ‘Obligation and Consent – II’. American Political Science Review 60 (1): 3952. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quong, Jonathan. 2015. ‘Proportionality, Liability, and Defensive Harm’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 43 (2): 144–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1955. ‘Two Concepts of Rules’. The Philosophical Review 64 (1): 332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Kelly, Erin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2003. The Law of People with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded ed. Columbia Classics in Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Edited by Freeman, Samuel Richard. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom, Vol. 37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2006. ‘The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’. Minnesota Law Review 90: 1003–44.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2013. ‘On Waldron’s Critique of Raz on Human Rights’. University of Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper 80/2013; Columbia Public Law Research Paper 13.359. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1817?utm_source=scholarship.law.columbia.edu%2Ffaculty_scholarship%2F1817&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.Google Scholar
Renzo, Massimo. 2010. ‘A Criticism of the International Harm Principle’. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3): 267–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572–010–9098-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzo, Massimo. 2012. ‘Crimes Against Humanity and the Limits of International Criminal Law’. Law and Philosophy 31 (4): 443–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘“Let Us Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics’. International Organization 54 (1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, Volker, Zangl, Bernhard, and Kruck, Andreas. 2012. International Organization. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadat, Leila. 2021. The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004479739.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. 1977. ‘Rights, Goals, and Fairness’. Erkenntnis 11 (1): 8195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William. 2012. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1987. ‘Precedent’. Stanford Law Review 39 (3): 571605. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. ‘What Is Egalitarianism?Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (1): 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2015. ‘The Practice of Equality’. In Social Equality, edited by Fourie, Carina, Schuppert, Fabian, and Wallimann-Helmer, Ivo, 2044. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199331109.003.0002.Google Scholar
Schemmel, Christian. 2021. Justice and Egalitarian Relations. Oxford Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, Tommie. 2022. The Idea of Prison Abolition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzxx97q.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1989. ‘Locke’s State of Nature’. Political Theory 17 (3): 449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Studies in Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1993. On the Edge of Anarchy. Locke, Consent, and the Limits of Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400863549.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1994. ‘Original-Acquisition Justifications of Private Property’. Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2): 6384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1999. ‘Justification and Legitimacy’. Ethics 109 (4): 739–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/233944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2000. Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2010. ‘Ideal and Nonideal Theory’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (1): 536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088–4963.2009.01172.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2016. Boundaries of Authority. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Danner, Allison. 2010. ‘Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court’. International Organization 64 (2): 225–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818310000044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Jiewuh. 2015. ‘Pirates and Torturers: Universal Jurisdiction as Enforcement Gap-Filling: Pirates and Torturers’. Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (4): 471–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemplowska, Zofia. 2015. ‘Can Moral Desert Qualify or Justify Human Rights?’ In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by Cruft, Rowan, Liao, S. Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo, 166–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2011. ‘Collective Responsibility and the State’. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (2): 190208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9760.2010.00360.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2015. ‘Decolonization and Self-Determination’. Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (1): 124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052515000059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tusa, Ann, and Tusa, John. 2010. The Nuremberg Trial. New York: Skyhorse Pub.Google Scholar
Vernon, Richard. 2002. ‘What Is Crime against Humanity?Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (3): 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Richard. 2013. ‘Crime against Humanity: A Defence of the “Subsidiarity” View’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26 (1): 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehoff, Daniel. 2013. ‘The Right against Interference: Human Rights and Legitimate Authority’. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 7 (1): 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehoff, Daniel. 2014. ‘Democratic Equality and Political Authority’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (4): 337–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehoff, Daniel. 2019. ‘Power and Equality’. In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Volume 5, edited by Sobel, David, Vallentyne, Peter, and Wall, Steven, 338. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841425.003.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2017. One Another’s Equals: The Basis of Human Equality. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walen, Alec. 2021. ‘Retributive Justice’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/justice-retributive.Google Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 1996. ‘Liberalism, Samaritanism, and Political Legitimacy’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (3): 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2001. ‘Toward a Liberal Theory of Political Obligation’. Ethics 111 (4): 735–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2005. ‘Samaritanism and the Duty to Obey the Law’. In Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?, edited by Wellman, Christopher and Simmons, A. John, 190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2009. ‘Rights and State Punishment’: Journal of Philosophy 106 (8): 419–39. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2009106839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2012. ‘The Rights Forfeiture Theory of Punishment’. Ethics 122 (2): 371–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/663791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2013. ‘Does the Existing Human Rights Regime Have Political Authority?San Diego Law Review 50 (4): 931–54.Google Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2017. Rights Forfeiture and Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2023. ‘The Space between Justice and Legitimacy*’. Journal of Political Philosophy 31 (1): 323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath, and Simmons, John. 2005. Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2021. ‘Rights’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, David. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/rights.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan. 1998. ‘Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (2): 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, V., and Sentencing Project (U.S.). 2010. Deterrence in Criminal Justice: Evaluating Certainty verses Severity of Punishment. Sentencing Project. https://books.google.de/books?id=w56XAQAACAAJ.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2010. Inclusion and Democracy. Reprint. Oxford Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ypi, Lea. 2013. ‘What’s Wrong with Colonialism’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 41 (2): 158–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2016. ‘Survey Article: Four Models of a Global Order with Cosmopolitan Intent: An Empirical Assessment’. Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (1): 88119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. ‘International Authority and Its Politicization’. International Theory 4: 69106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Luise Müller, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Book: The Right to Punish
  • Online publication: 16 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009378109.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Luise Müller, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Book: The Right to Punish
  • Online publication: 16 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009378109.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Luise Müller, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Book: The Right to Punish
  • Online publication: 16 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009378109.007
Available formats
×