Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-22T07:23:07.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Nudging the capabilities for a sustainable city?

When the libertarian paternalist meets the Paretian liberal

from Part I - Social Choice and Capabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

By
P. B. Anand
Edited by
Flavio Comim ,
P. B. Anand  and
Shailaja Fennell
Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
Universitat Ramon Llull
P. B. Anand
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Shailaja Fennell
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The aim of this chapter is to explore how social choice theory and the capability approach can help in clarifying important ethical dilemmas and issues of injustice that need to be addressed for cities to become sustainable cities. Six types of important injustices are identified, covering both intra- and intergenerational fairness. Some important criticisms of smart cities are considered and important safeguards and policy priorities for smart cities from the social choice and capability approach framings are identified. The main message of this chapter is that the sustainability of cities is an ethical issue and not one of technology or measurement, and it is all about the six types of injustices, with cities needing to tackle all six of them in their quest to become sustainable. Nudging and smart cities can help, but these must be contextualized to prioritize participation and equality. Social choice theory as formulated by Amartya Sen provides important insights to understand and deal with conflicts between the different demands on the freedoms of different individuals.

Keywords

Social choicesustainable citiesnudgingsmart citiescapabilities
Type
Chapter
Information
Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities , pp. 85 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akbulut-Yuksel, M., and Boulatoff, C. (2021) The effects of a green nudge on municipal solid waste: evidence from a clear bag policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 106 (C): DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, P., Sharholy, M., and Ahmad, K. (2020) A study on the landfill leachate and its impact on groundwater quality of Ghazipur area, New Delhi, India. In Recent Developments in Waste Management: Select Proceedings of Recycle 2018, Kalamdhad, A. S. (ed.): 345–58. Singapore: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Anand, P. B. (2007) Scarcity, Entitlements and the Economics of Water in Developing Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, P. B. (2014) Sustainability and the capability approach: from theory to action? In The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice, Ibrahim, S., and Tiwary, M. (eds.): 118–47. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anand, P. B. (2018) Cities and the capability approach. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 519–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anand, P. B. (2020) Assessing smart city projects and their public policy implications in the Global South. Contemporary Social Science, 16 (2): 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, P. B., and Navio, J. (2018) Governance and economics of smart cities: opportunities and challenges. Telecommunications Policy, 42 (10): 795–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, S., and Sen, A. K. (2000) Human development and economic sustainability. World Development, 28 (12): 2029–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C. (2016) Health Divides: Where You Live Can Kill You. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, J., Bietz, S., Rauber, J., and Reisch, L. (2021) Nudging healthier food choices in a cafeteria setting: a sequential multi-intervention field study. Appetite, 160: DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, J., and Kosowsky, H. (2020) Nudging: progress to date and future directions. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 161 (Supp.): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butot, V., Bayerl, P., Jacobs, G., and de Haan, F. (2020) Citizen repertoires of smart urban safety: perspectives from Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 158 (2020): DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcott, A., and Bull, J. (2007) Ecological Footprint of British City Residents. London: Worldwide Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Charnock, G., March, H., and Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2021) From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincializing and the Barcelona model. Urban Studies, 58 (3): 581–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., and van den Bergh, J. (2020) Assessing synergy of incentives and nudges in the energy policy mix. Energy Policy, 144: DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacherini, M., Gilli, M., Mancinelli, S., and Zoli, M. (2021) Nudging food waste decisions at restaurants. European Economic Review, 135 (C): DOI 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giest, S. (2020) Do nudgers need budging? A comparative analysis of European smart meter implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 37 (4): DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grilli, G., and Curtis, J. (2021) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours: a review of methods and approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135: DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimaraes, J., Severo, E., Felix Júnior, L., Preston, W., Da Costa, L., and Salmoria, F. (2020) Governance and quality of life in smart cities: towards sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Prodution, 253: DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119926.Google Scholar
Hedden, B. (2021) On statistical criteria of algorithmic fairness. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 49 (2): 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoxby, C., and Turner, S. (2012) Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low income students, Discussion Paper 12-014. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hummel, D., and Meadche, A. (2019) How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Economics, 80: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Health Equity (2020) Marmot Review: Ten Years On. London: Institute of Health Equity, University College London.Google Scholar
Islam, S., and Winkel, J. (2017) Climate change and social inequality, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Working Paper 152. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., and Van Woerden, F. (2018) What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C., Stewart, I., Facchini, A., Cersosimo, I., Mele, R., Chen, B., Uda, M., Kansal, A., Chiu, A., Kim, K., Debeux, C., Rovere, E., Cunha, B., Pincetl, S., Keirstead, J., Barles, S., Pusaka, S., Gunawan, J., Adegbile, M., Nazariha, M., Hoque, S., Marcotullio, P., Otharan, F., Ganena, T., Ibrahim, N., Farooqui, R., Cervantes, G., and Sahin, A. (2015) Energy and material flows of megacities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (19): 5985–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchin, R. (2016) The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374: DOI 10.1098/rsta.2016.0115.Google ScholarPubMed
Kontokosta, C., and Hong, B. (2021) Bias in smart city governance: how socio-spatial disparities in 311 complaint behaviour impact the fairness of data-driven decisions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64: DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, M., Mont, O., and Heiskanen, E. (2016) Nudging: a promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production, 134 (Part A): 166–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. A. (1955) The Theory of Economic Growth. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
McGee, J., Ergas, C., Greiner, P., and Clement, M. (2017) How do slums change the relationship between urbanization and the carbon intensity of well-being? PLoS ONE, 12 (12): DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0189024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandela, N. (1994) Long Walk to Freedom. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Marcano-Olivier, M., Pearson, R., Ruparell, A., Horne, P., and Viktor, S. (2019) A low-cost behavioural nudge and choice architecture intervention targeting school lunches increases children’s consumption of fruit: a cluster randomised trial. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16 (1): DOI 10.1186/s12966-019-0773-x.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2010) Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. London: Institute of Health Equity, University College London.Google Scholar
Mberu, B., Haregu, T., Kyobutungi, C., and Ezeh, A. (2016) Health and health-related indicators in slum, rural, and urban communities: a comparative analysis. Global Health Action, 9: DOI 10.3402/gha.v9.33163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubaltelli, E., Manicardi, D., Orsini, F., Mulatti, C., and Lotto, L. (2021) How to nudge drivers to reduce speed: the case of left-digit effect. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78: 259–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, T. (1998) Arrow’s impossibility theorem and planning process. Progress in Planning, 50 (2): 75–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, D., Huq, S., Pelling, M., Reid, H., and Lankao, P. (2007) Adapting to climate change in urban areas: the possibilities and constraints in low- and middle-income nations, Human Settlements Discussion Paper 1. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Schubert, E., Smith, E., Brydevall, M., Lynch, C., Ringin, E., Dixon, H., Kashima, Y., Wakefield, M., and Bode, S. (2021) General and specific graphic health warning labels reduce willingness to consume sugar-sweetened beverages. Appetite, 161: DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, A. K. (1970) The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78 (1): 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977) Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6 (4): 317–44.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2009) The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2017) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, expanded edn. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Shamsuzzoha, A., Nieminen, J., Piya, S., and Rutledge, K. (2021) Smart city for sustainable environment: a comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities, 114: DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. (1993) An Almost Practical Step toward Sustainability. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., and Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thellufsen, J., Lund, H., Sorknaes, P., Oostergard, P., Chang, M., Drysdale, D., Nielsen, S., Djorup, S., and Sperling, K. (2020) Smart energy cities in a 100% renewable energy context. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 129: DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomita, A., Cuadros, D., Burns, J., Tanser, F., and Slotow, R. (2020) Exposure to waste sites and their impact on health: a panel and geospatial analysis of nationally representative data from South Africa, 2008–2015. Lancet Planetary Health, 4 (6): e223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2010) Water and cities: facts and figures. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations (2018) World urbanization prospects 2018: highlights. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations (2019) Disability and Development: Realising the Sustainable Development Goals by, for and with Persons with Disabilities, 2018. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations HABITAT (2012) Sustainable Urban Energy: A Sourcebook for Asia. Nairobi: UN Human Settlements Programme (HABITAT).Google Scholar
Upton, D., Upton, P., and Taylor, C. (2013) Increasing children’s lunchtime consumption of fruit and vegetables: an evaluation of the Food Dudes programme. Public Health Nutrition, 16 (6): 1066–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J., and Moriarty, P. (2019) Energy savings from smart cities: a critical analysis. Energy Procedia, 158: 3271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. (2008) Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36 (1): 2–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wensing, J., Caputo, V., Carraresi, L., and Broring, S. (2020) The effects of green nudges on consumer valuation of bio-based plastic packaging. Ecological Economics, 178: DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2015) Waste and human health: evidence and needs, meeting report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×