Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Spinoza and the Stoics , pp. 211 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. (1993). ‘Aquinas’s philosophy in its historical setting’, in Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleonore, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 12–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alanen, Lilli (2003). Descartes’s Concept of Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alanen, Lilli (2011). ‘Spinoza on the human mind’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 35: 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, Keimpe, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap, and Schofield, Malcolm (eds.) (1999). The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (1987). Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Aloni, Nimrod (2008). ‘Spinoza as educator: from eudaimonistic ethics to an empowering and liberating pedagogy’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40: 531–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P. (1980). ‘Internalism and externalism in epistemology’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5. Reprinted in Kornblith (2001a): 179–221.Google Scholar
Alter, J. M. M. (ed.) (1965). Catalogus van de biblioteek der Vereniging ‘het Spinozahuis’ te Rijnsburg (Leiden: E. J. Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (1990). ‘Stoic epistemology’, in Everson, Stephen, ed., Epistemology: Cambridge Companions to Ancient Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 184–203.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (1992). Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (1999a). Platonic Ethics, Old and New (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (1999b). ‘Aristotle on virtue and happiness’, in Sherman, Nancy, ed., Aristotle’s Ethics: Critical Essays (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Press): 35–55.Google Scholar
Ansaldi, Saverio (2001). ‘Amour, perfection et puissance: un modèle de la nature humaine? en marge de la cinquième partie de l’éthique (Spinoza et G. Bruno)’, Archives De Philosophie, 64: 741–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Aristotle (1985). Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics: Books I, II, and VIII, trans. Woods, Michael (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
Aristotle (2002). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Rowe, Christopher, introduction and commentary by Broadie, Sarah (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Barbone, Steven (2002). ‘What counts as an individual for Spinoza?’, in Koistinen, and Biro, (2002): 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, Reid (1998). English Epicures and Stoics: Ancient Legacies in Early Stuart Culture (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press).Google Scholar
Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R. (1984). ‘Is seventeenth century physics indebted to the Stoics?’, Centaurus, 27: 148–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan, and Mignucci, Mario (eds.) (1988). Matter and Metaphysics (Naples: Bibliopolis).Google Scholar
Barney, Rachel (2003). ‘A puzzle in Stoic ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. XXIV: 303–40.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1740). Dictionnaire historique et critique (Amsterdam: Chez P. Brunel).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1965). Pierre Bayle: Historical and Critical Dictionary – Selections, trans. Popkin, Richard H. (New York: Library of Liberal Arts).Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1983). ‘Teleology and Spinoza’s conatus’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8: 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Betegh, Gábor (2003). ‘Cosmological ethics in the Timaeus and early Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24: 273–302.Google Scholar
Bidney, David (1962). The Psychology and Ethics of Spinoza: A Study in the History and Logic of Ideas, 2nd edn (New York: Russell & Russell).Google Scholar
Blecher, Ian (2006). ‘The Stoic method of happiness’, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 39: 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Hans W., and Winkel, Laurens C. (eds.) (2004). Grotius and the Stoa (Assen: Royal van Gorcum Press).Google Scholar
Bobzien, Susanne (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Boeri, Marcelo D. (2001). ‘The Stoics on bodies and incorporeals’, Review of Metaphysics, 54: 723–52.Google Scholar
Boeri, Marcelo D. (2004). ‘Socrates, Aristotle, and the Stoics on the apparent and real good’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 20: 109–41.Google Scholar
Boudouris, K. J. (ed.) (1994). Hellenistic Philosophy, vol. II (Athens: International Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture, 1994).Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard (2003). ‘Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstsorge–Zur Tradition der oikeiosis in der Neuzeit’, Archiv fuer Geschichte der Philosophie, 85: 179–97.Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad (2005). The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1955). ‘Οìĸεíωσıς and Οìĸεóτης: Theophrastus and Zeno on nature and moral theory’, Phronesis, 1: 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1959). Five Types of Ethical Theory (Paterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.).Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher (2012). Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo (1987). The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni, ed. and trans. Griffiths, Gordon, Hankins, James and Thompson, David (Binghamton, NY: SUNY Press).Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques (1986). ‘The cradle argument’, in Schofield, and Striker, (1986): 113–44.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques (1988). ‘La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l’ontologie platonicienne’, in Barnes, and Mignucci, (1988): 19–127.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques (1990). ‘Sur une façon stoïcienne de ne pas être’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie, 122: 389–403.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques (1999). ‘Introduction: the beginnings of Hellenistic epistemology’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 229–59.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques, and Nussbaum, Martha C. (eds.) (1993). Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler (1986). ‘Cartesian error and the objectivity of perception’, in Pettit, Philip and McDowell, John, eds., Subject, Thought and Context (Oxford: Clarendon Press): 120–40.Google Scholar
Buys, Ruben (2010). ‘Between actor and spectator: Arnout Geulincx and the Stoics’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18: 741–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Sarah Catherin (2013). Perception, Sensibility, and Moral Motivation in Augustine: A Stoic- Platonic Synthesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Caizzi, Fernanda Decleva (1994). ‘The porch and the garden: early Hellenistic images of the philosophical life’, in Bulloch, Anthony, Gruen, Erich S., Long, A. A. and Stewart, Andrew, eds., Images and Ideologies: Self-Definition in the Hellenistic World (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press): 303–29.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1998). ‘The value of laws: explanation and prediction’, excerpted from Carnap, Rudolf, Philosophical Foundations of Physics; reprinted in Curd, Martin and Cover, J. A., eds., Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (New York: W. W. Norton and Co.): 678–84.Google Scholar
Carriero, John P. (1991). ‘Spinoza’s views on necessity in historical perspective’, Philosophical Topics, 19: 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John P. (2002). ‘Monism in Spinoza’, in Biro, John and Koistinen, Olli, eds., Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John P. (2005). ‘Spinoza on final causality’, Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. II: 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John P. (2011). ‘Conatus and perfection in Spinoza’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 35: 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John P. (forthcoming). ‘The highest good and perfection in Spinoza’, in Della Rocca, Michael, ed., The Handbook to Spinoza (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cicero, (1931). Cicero: De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, trans. Rackham, H. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Cicero, (2001). Cicero: On Moral Ends, ed. Annas, Julia, trans. Woolf, Raphael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colerus, Johannes (1706). The Life of Benedict de Spinosa, Done out of French (London: printed by D. L. and sold by Benj. Bragg).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1993). The Idea of History, revised edition, ed. van der Dussen, Jan (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (2005). ‘The emotional life of the wise’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43: 176–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (2009). ‘Chrysippus on physical elements’, in Salles, (2009a): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin (1986). ‘Analysis in the Meditations: the quest for clear and distinct ideas’, in Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, ed., Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press): 153–76.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin (1990). ‘Bennett on Spinoza on teleology’, in Curley, Edwin M. and Moreau, P. F., eds., Spinoza: Issues and Directions (Leiden: E. J. Brill): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin (1991). ‘The state of nature and its law in Hobbes and Spinoza’, Philosophical Topics, 19: 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Angers, Julien Eymard (1976). Recherches sur le Stoïcisme aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles (New York: Georg Olms Verlag).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1999). ‘Spinoza’s causal theory of the affects’, in Yovel, (1999a): 95–111.Google Scholar
DeBrabander, Firmin (2007). Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions (London: Continuum International Publishing).Google Scholar
De Dijn, Herman (1996). Spinoza: The Way to Wisdom (West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press).Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (1996a). ‘Spinoza’s metaphysical psychology’, in Garrett, (1996a): 192–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (1996b). Representation and the Mind–Body Problem in Spinoza (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2003a). ‘The power of an idea: Spinoza’s critique of pure will’, Noûs, 37: 200–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2003b). ‘A rationalist manifesto: Spinoza and the principle of sufficient reason’, Philosophical Topics, 31: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2012). ‘Violations of the principle of sufficient reason in Leibniz and Spinoza’, in Correia, Fabrice and Schnieder, Benjamin, eds., Grounding and Explanation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 139–65.Google Scholar
Den Uyl, Douglas J. (1983). Power, State and Freedom: An interpretation of Spinoza’s Political Philosophy (Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum).Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1931). The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vols. I–II, trans Haldane, Elizabeth S. and Ross, G. R. T. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1964–74). Oeuvres, vols. I–X, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul (Paris: J. Vrin/CNRS).Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1984–91). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. I–II, ed. and trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D.; vol. III, ed. and trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D. and Kenny, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1924). Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Erste Hälfte, ed. Misch, G. (Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1957). Dilthey’s Philosophy of Existence, trans. Kluback, William and Weinbaum, Martin (New York: Bookman Associates).Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes (1972). Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vols. I–II, trans. Hicks, R. D. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Paul D. (1971). ‘How to understand De Intellectus Emendatione’, The Journal of the History of Philosophy, 9: 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Paul D. (1977). ‘Is Spinoza an ethic naturalist?’, in Hessing, Siegfried, ed., Speculum Spinozanum, 1677–1977 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul): 145–64.Google Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar (1996). ‘Cognition and its object’, in Gerson, Lloyd, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 217–49.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (1990). The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis (Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press).Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen, and Whiting, Jennifer (eds.) (1996). Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus, (1928). Epictetus: The Discourses, Books II–IV, trans. Oldfather, W. A. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus, (1983). Handbook of Epictetus, trans. White, Nicholas (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Ettinghausen, Henry (1972). Francisco de Quevedo and the Neostoic Movement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Everson, Stephen (ed.) (1991). Companions to Ancient Thought II: Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis Samuel (1958). Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism (Boston: Beacon Hill Press).Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (2001). Platonic Theology, trans. Allen, Michael J. B., ed. Hankins, James, vols. I–VI (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Fish, Jeffrey, and Sanders, Kirk R. (eds.) (2011). Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, D. (2008). ‘Free will and the freedom of the sage in Leibniz and the Stoics’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 25: 203–19.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart, and Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (2012). ‘Introduction’, in Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak Y., eds., Spinoza and German Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankena, William K. (1975). ‘Spinoza’s “new moralityˮ: notes on Book IV’, in Mandelbaum, and Freeman, (1975): 85–100.Google Scholar
Franks, Paul (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1983). ‘Stoics and skeptics on clear and distinct impressions’, in Burnyeat, Myles, ed., The Skeptical Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press): 65–93.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1986). ‘The affections of the soul’, in Schofield, and Striker, (1986): 93–112.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1999). ‘The Stoic conception of the good’, in Ierodiakonou, Katerina, ed., Topics in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Michael (2011). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, ed. Long, A. A. (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1996). ‘Spinoza’s natural science and methodology’, in Garrett, D. (1996a): 142–91.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1992). ‘Descartes’ physics’, in Cottingham, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 286–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Aaron (2003). Meaning in Spinoza’s Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don (1990). ‘“The free man always acts honestly”: freedom and the good in Spinoza’s Ethics’, in Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F., eds., Spinoza: Issues and Directions (New York: E. J. Brill): 221–38.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (ed.) (1996a). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (1996b). ‘Spinoza’s ethical theory’, in Garrett, (1996a): 267–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don (2002). ‘Spinoza’s conatus argument’, in Koistinen, and Biro, (2002): 127–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don (2008). ‘Representation and consciousness in Spinoza’s naturalistic theory of the imagination’, in Huenemann, Charlie, ed., Interpreting Spinoza (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garver, Eugene (2006). ‘Spinoza and the discovery of morality’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 23: 357–74.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher (2003). ‘The School in the Roman imperial period’, in Inwood, (2003): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin (1980). ‘The internalist conception of justification’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5. Reprinted in Kornblith (2001a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E. (2009). ‘An idea is not something mute like a picture on a pad’, Review of Metaphysics, 62: 591–631.Google Scholar
Gourinat, Jean-Baptiste (2009). ‘The Stoics on matter and prime matter: “corporealism” and the imprint of Plato’s Timaeus’, in Salles, (2009a): 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeser, Andreas (1991). ‘Stoische Philosophie bei Spinoza’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 45: 336–46.Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret R. (ed. and trans.) (2002). Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret R. (2007). Stoicism and Emotion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (ed.) (1973). Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1925). De iure belli ac pacis, Latin text with an English translation by Kelsey, Francis W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Guigon, Ghislain (2012). ‘Spinoza on composition and priority’, in Goff, (2012): 183–205.Google Scholar
Gullan-Whur, Margaret (2000). Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza (New York: Thomas Dunne Books).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1973). ‘Leibniz and Descartes: proof and eternal truth’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 59. Reprinted in Ian Hacking, Historical Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002): 175–88.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1999). The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1977). The Origins of Stoic Cosmology (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1896). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vols. I–III, ed. and trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, Frances H. (London: Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Heller, Bernard (1932). Stoic Elements in the Philosophy of Spinoza, unpublished doctoral dissertation (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul (2011). ‘Final causation in Spinoza’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 14: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Terry, and Potrč, Matjaž (2012). ‘Existence monism trumps priority monism’, in Goff, (2012): 51–76.Google Scholar
Huenemann, Charlie (2014). Spinoza’s Radical Theology (Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas (2006). ‘Value theory’, in Copp, David, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 357–79.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (ed.) (1999). Topics in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad (1985). Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad (2012). ‘How unified is Stoicism, anyway?’, in Kamtekar, Rachana, ed., Virtue and Happiness: Essays in Honour of Julia Annas (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 223–44.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad, and Gerson, L. P. (eds. and trans.) (1997). Hellenistic Philosophy, 2nd edn (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Irvine, William B. (2009). A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Irwin, T. E. (2007–9). The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, vols. 1–3 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Eric Paul (2005). From Cosmology to Ecology: The Monist World-View in Germany from 1770–1930 (Berlin: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
James, Susan (1993). ‘Spinoza the Stoic’, in Sorrell, T., ed., The Rise of Modern Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 289–316.Google Scholar
James, William (1978). ‘The knowing of things together’, reprinted in his Essays in Philosophy, Burkhardt, F. H. and Skrupskelis, I. K, eds. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press): 372–80.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Charles (1976a). ‘Spinoza’s ontological argument’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 6: 685–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, Charles (1976b). ‘A note on Spinoza’s ontology’, Philosophical Studies, 29: 415–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, Charles (1978). ‘The logical structure of Spinoza’s Ethics, Part I’, Synthese, 37: 15–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, Charles (2002). ‘Spinoza on the relativity of good and evil’, in Koistinen, and Biro, (2002): 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, Harold H. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel (1999). ‘Objective happiness’, in Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N., eds., Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation): 3–25.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1965). Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Kemp-Smith, Norman (New York: St Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1998). ‘Descartes on the will’, reprinted in Cottingham, John, ed., Descartes (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 132–59.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1971). ‘Stoic intermediates and the end for man’, in Long, (1971a): 150–72.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J., and Youpa, Andrew (eds.) (2014). Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitanov, Severin V. (2011). ‘Happiness in a mechanistic universe: Thomas Hobbes on the nature and attainability of happiness’, Hobbes Studies, 24: 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, Olli, and Biro, John (eds.) (2002). Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary (ed.) (2001a). Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers).Google Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary (2001b). ‘A brief historical introduction’, in Kornblith, (2001a): 1–9.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraye, Jill (1988). ‘Moral philosophy’, in Schmitt, Charles B. and Skinner, Quentin, eds., The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 303–86.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill (ed.) (1997). Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts, vol. I Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar (1984). ‘Stoic and Neoplatonic sources of Spinoza’s Ethics’, History of European Ideas, 5: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulstad, Mark (2008). ‘Newton, Spinoza, Stoics and others: a battle line in Leibniz’s wars of (natural) religion’, The Leibniz Review, 18: 81–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laerke, Mogens (2011). ‘Spinoza’s cosmological argument in the Ethics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49: 439–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrée, Jacqueline (2004). Spinoza et le débat religieux (Presses Universitaires de Rennes).Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael (1973). ‘Archai and stoicheia: a problem in Stoic cosmology’, Phronesis, 18: 140–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael (2004). ‘Why Spinoza tells people to try to preserve their being’, Archiv Fuer Geschichte Der Philosophie, 86: 119–45.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael (2010). From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1969). Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters, 2nd edn, trans. and ed. Loemker, Leroy E. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1985). Theodicy, ed. Farrer, Austin, trans. Huggard, E. M. (Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1989). G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (2005). ‘The rationalist conception of substance’, in Nelson, Alan, ed., A Companion to Rationalism (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing): 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesses, Glenn (1998). ‘Content, cause, and Stoic impressions’, Phronesis, 43: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Martin (2004). ‘Spinoza’s metaphysics of desire: the demonstration of IIIP6’, Archiv Fuer Geschichte Der Philosophie, 86: 21–55.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin (2006). ‘Teleology and human action in Spinoza’, Philosophical Review, 115: 317–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (2004). Politica: Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction, ed. and trans. Waszink, Jan (Assen, the Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum Press).Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (2006). On constancy, trans. Stradling, John, ed. Sellars, John (Exeter, UK: Bristol Phoenix Press).Google Scholar
Liu, Irene (2008). ‘Nature and knowledge in Stoicism: on the ordinariness of the Stoic sage’, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 41: 247–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve (1994). Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve (2008). Providence Lost (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1983). ‘Greek ethics after Macintyre and the Stoic community of reason’, Ancient Philosophy, 3. Reprinted in Long, (1996): 184–97.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986). Hellenistic Philosophy, 2nd edn (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1989). ‘Stoic Eudaimonism’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 4. Reprinted in Long, (1996): 77–101.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1991). ‘Representation and the self in Stoicism’, in Everson, (1991). Reprinted in Long, (1996): 246–85.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2003). ‘Stoicism in the philosophical tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler’, in Miller, and Inwood, (2003): 7–29.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2011). ‘Aristotle on eudaimonia, nous, and divinity’, in Miller, Jon, ed., Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (eds. and trans.) (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers, vols. I–II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Manning, Richard (2002). ‘Spinoza, thoughtful teleology, and the causal significance of content’, in Koistinen, and Biro, (2002): 182–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1998). A Short History of Ethics, 2nd edn (Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice, and Freeman, Eugene (eds.) (1975). Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation (LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing).Google Scholar
Mark, Thomas (1978). ‘Truth and adequacy in Spinozistic ideas’, in Shahan, and Biro, (1978): 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Eugene (2013). The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza’s Science of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Marshall, John (1998). Descartes’s Moral Theory (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Richard (1986). ‘Spinoza on modality’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 35: 313–42.Google Scholar
Mason, Richard (1997). The God of Spinoza (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre (1994). ‘Le moment stoïcien de l’Éthique de Spinoza’, in Moreau, (1994): 147–61.Google Scholar
Matson, Wallace (1994). ‘Spinoza on beliefs’, in Yovel, Yirmiyahu, ed., Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind (Leiden: E. J. Brill): 67–81.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. (2011). ‘The heyday of teleology and early modern Philosophy’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 35: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrade, Arthur Stephen, Kilcullen, John, and Kempshall, Matthew (eds. and trans.) (2001). The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
McRae, Robert (1965). ‘“Idea” as a philosophical term in the seventeenth century’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 26: 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinwald, Constance (2005). ‘Ignorance and opinion in stoic epistemology’, Phronesis, 50: 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (2013a). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (2013b). ‘Spinoza’s metaphysics of thought: parallelisms and the multifaceted structure of ideas’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86: 636–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen (1995). ‘Physics as a virtue’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 11: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen (1998). Descartes and Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Christia (2001). Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Susan Sauvé (2008). Ancient Ethics: A Critical Introduction (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Miller, Jon (2001). ‘Spinoza’s possibilities’, The Review of Metaphysics, 54: 779–814.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon (2003). ‘Spinoza and the concept of a law of nature’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 20: 257–76.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon (2005). ‘Stoics and Spinoza on suicide’, in Boros, Gábor, ed., Der Einfluss des Hellenismus auf die Philosophie der Frühen Neuzeit (Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag): 107–35.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon (2009). ‘Grotius and Stobaeus’, in Blom, Hans, ed., Property, Piracy and Punishment: Hugo Grotius on war and booty in De iure praedae (Leiden: E. J. Brill): 104–26.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon (2010). ‘A distinction regarding happiness in ancient philosophy’, Social Research: An International Quarterly of the Social Sciences, 77: 595–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jon (2014). ‘Spinoza on the life according to nature’, in Kisner, and Youpa, (2014): 102–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jon, and Inwood, Brad (eds.) (2003). Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miraeus, Aubertus (1629). Iusti Lipsi Sapientiae et Litterarum Antistitis Fama Postuma, editio tertia (Antwerp: J. Moretus).Google Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip (2003). ‘Locke’s offices’, in Miller, and Inwood, (2003): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip (2006). Review of Nancy Sherman’s Stoic Warriors, published in Studies in the History of Ethics, February 2006.Google Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip (2013). ‘Epicurus: freedom, death, and hedonism’, in Crisp, Roger, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 73–87.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François (ed.) (1994). Le Stoïcisme aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles (Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen).Google Scholar
Morford, M. (1991). Stoics and Neostoics: Rubens and the Circle of Lipsius (Princeton: Princeton Univerity Press).Google Scholar
Morrison, James C. (1994). ‘Spinoza on the self, personal identity, and immortality’, in Hunter, Graeme, ed., Spinoza: The Enduring Questions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press): 31–47.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin, and Correia, Fabrice (2013). ‘Facts’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/facts/ (last checked 4.12.14).Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1999). Spinoza: A Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (2001a). Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (2001b). ‘Spinoza in the garden of good and evil’, in Kremer, Elmar and Latzer, Michael, eds., The Problem of Evil in Early Modern Philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, Samuel (2010). ‘Another kind of Spinozistic monism’, Noûs, 44: 469–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, Samuel (2013). ‘Spinoza’s modal metaphysics’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-modal/ (last checked 4.12.14).Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel (1980). Late-Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition (Amsterdam: North-Holland Press).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1986). The Fragility of Goodness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1994). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2000). Sex and Social Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papy, Jan (2011). ‘Lipsius’ Stoic physics and the Neostoic reading of the world’, in Hirai, Hiro and Papy, Jan, eds., Justus Lipsius and Natural Philosophy (Brussels: Royal Academy of Belgium): 9–18.Google Scholar
Parmenides, (1994). Philosophy Before Socrates, trans. McKirahan, Richard D. Jr (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk (1994). ‘Stoic psychotherapy in Descartes and Spinoza’, Faith and Philosophy, 11: 592–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, Casey (2005). ‘Stoic epistemology and the limits of externalism’, Ancient Philosophy, 25: 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutarch, (1976). Plutarch: Moralia, Parts I–II, trans. Cherniss, Harold (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Protagoras, (1997). Plato: Complete Works, ed. Cooper, John M., trans. Lombardo, Stanley and Bell, Karen (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1981). Reason, Truth and History (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quevedo, Francisco (1997). ‘Defense of Epicurus against commonly held opinions’, in Kraye, (1997): 211–22.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria (1973). Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of ethics, fragments and excerpts, trans. Konstan, David (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).Google Scholar
Reed, Baron (2002). ‘The Stoic account of the cognitive impression’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 23: 147–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, Ursula (2009). ‘Spinozas erkenntnistheorie: Eine naturalisierte epistemologie?’, Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie, 57: 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1983). ‘Introduction’, in Reynolds, L. D., ed., Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford: Clarendon Press): 1–48.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., and Wilson, N. G. (1991). Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Lee (1975). ‘Spinoza on individuation’, in Mandelbaum, and Freeman, (1975): 195–214.Google Scholar
Rist, John (ed.) (1978). The Stoics (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg (1996). ‘The two faces of Stoicism: Rousseau and Freud’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 34: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael A. (2001). ‘Tolerance as a virtue in Spinoza’s Ethics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 39: 535–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. M. (1974). ‘Seneca’s philosophical influence’, in Costa, C. D. N., ed., Seneca (London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul): 116–65.Google Scholar
Russell, D. C. (2004). ‘Stoic value theory: indifferent things and conditional goods’, Southwest Philosophy Review: The Journal of the Southwestern Philosophical Society, 20: 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (1999). ‘Salvation as a state of mind: the place of acquiescentia in Spinoza’s Ethics’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7: 447–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (2004). ‘On the happy life: Descartes vis-à-vis Seneca’, in Strange, and Zupko, (2004): 177–97.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (2012). ‘The end of ends? Aristotelian themes in early modern ethics’, in Miller, Jon, ed., The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 194–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salles, Ricardo (2001). ‘Compatibilism: Stoic and modern’, Archiv Fuer Geschichte Der Philosophie, 83: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salles, Ricardo (ed.) (2009a). God and Cosmos in Stoicism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salles, Ricardo (2009b). ‘Chrysippus on conflagration and the indestructibility of the cosmos’, in Salles, (2009a): 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2003). ‘Is there a fundamental level?’, Noûs, 37: 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2010). ‘Monism: the priority of the whole’, Philosophical Review, 119. Reprinted in Goff (2012): 31–76.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2014). ‘Monism’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/monism/ (last checked 4.12.14).Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (1980). ‘Preconception, argument, and God’, in Schofield, et al. (1980): 283–308.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (1999). ‘Social and political thought’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 739–70.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm, Burnyeat, Myles, and Barnes, Jonathan (eds.) (1980). Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm, and Striker, Gisela (eds.) (1986). The Norms of Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schroeder, Mark (2012). ‘Value theory’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition):http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-theory/ (last checked 4.12.14).Google Scholar
Scott, Dominic (1995). Recollection and Experience: Plato’s Theory of Learning and Its Successors (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, William Robert (1900). Francis Hutcheson: His Life, Teaching and Position in the History of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1982). ‘The Stoic criterion of identity’, Phronesis, 27: 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David (1985). ‘The Stoic theory of universals’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23, supplement: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David (1989). ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, Miriam and Barnes, Jonathan, eds., Philosophia Togata (Oxford: Clarendon Press): 97–119.Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1999). ‘Hellenistic physics and metaphysics’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 355–411.Google Scholar
Sedley, David (2003). ‘The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in Inwood, (2003): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, (1925). Seneca: Epistulae Morales, trans. Gummere, Richard M. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1932) Moral Essays, vol. II, trans. Basore, John W. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1995) Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, ed. and trans. Cooper, John M. and Procopé, J. F. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, David (2007). Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters, trans. Inwood, Brad (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Shahan, R. W., and Biro, J. I. (eds.) (1978). Spinoza: New Perspectives (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
Shaver, Robert (1996). ‘Grotius on Scepticism and self-interest’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 78: 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, Noa (2009a). ‘The false dichotomy between the objective and subjective interpretations of Spinoza’s theory of attributes’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17: 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, Noa (2009b). ‘Spinoza’s theory of attributes’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-attributes/ (last checked 4.12.14).Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher (2012). Ancient Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2001). Four Dimensionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simplicius, (2002). Commentary on Epictetus’ Handbook, vols. I–II, ed. and trans. Brittain, Charles and Brennan, Tad (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (1990). ‘Perceptual content in the Stoics’, Phronesis, 35: 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2000). Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch/Benedict (1925). Spinoza Opera, vols. I–V, ed. Gebhardt, Carl (Heidelberg: Carl Winters).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch/Benedict (1985). The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. I, ed. and trans. Curley, E. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch/Benedict (2002). Spinoza: The Complete Works, trans. Shirley, Samuel, ed. Morgan, Michael L. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Steinberg, Justin (2013). ‘Spinoza’s political philosophy’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-political/ (last checked 4.12.14).Google Scholar
Strange, Steven K. (2004). ‘The Stoics on the voluntariness of the passions’, in Strange, and Zupko, (2004): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Steven K., and Zupko, Jack (eds.) (2004). Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin (2003/2004). ‘Appetitus societatis and oikeiosis’, Grotiana (n.s.), 24/25: 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1974). ‘Κριτήριον τῆς ἀληθείας’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, I.Phil.-hist. Klasse, 2 (1974). Reprinted in Striker (1996): 48–110.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1983). ‘The role of oikeiosis in Stoic ethics’, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy I. Reprinted in Striker (1996): 145–67.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1986). ‘Antipater, or the Art of Living’, in Schofield and Striker (1986). Reprinted in Striker, (1996): 185–204.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1990). ‘The problem of the criterion’, in Everson, Stephen, ed., Epistemology: Companions to Ancient Thought 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Reprinted in Striker, (1996): 143–60.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1991). ‘Following nature: a study in Stoic ethics’, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy IX. Reprinted in Striker, (1996): 1–73.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (ed.) (1996). Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Matthew (2013). Locke’s Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, L. W. (2002). ‘Happiness now and then’, in Jost, Lawrence J. and Shiner, Roger A., eds., Eudaimonia and Well-Being (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing): 21–39.Google Scholar
Svensson, Frans (2011). ‘Happiness, well-being, and their relation to virtue in Descartes’ ethics’, Theoria, 77: 238–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tararkiewicz, Wladyslaw (1976). Analysis of Happiness, trans. Rothert, Edward and Zielinskn, Danuta (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Robert B. (1978). ‘Monism and immanence: the foundations of Stoic physics’, in Rist, (1978): 137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1987). ‘The “modern” theory of natural law’, in Pagden, Anthony, ed., The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usener, Hermannus (1977). Glossarium Epicureum, ed. Gigante, M. and Schmid, W. (Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo e Bizzarri).Google Scholar
Verbeke, Gerard (1973). ‘Le stoïcisme, une philosophie sans frontières’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 1–4: 3–42.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista (1948). The New Science, 3rd edn (of 1744), trans. Bergin, Thomas Goddard and Fisch, Max Harold (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Viljanen, Valterri (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria (2009). ‘Sons of the earth: are the Stoics metaphysical brutes?’, Phronesis, 54: 136–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Arnim, H. (1964). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, vols. I–IV (reprint, Stuttgart: Teubner Verlag).Google Scholar
Watson, Gerard (1994). ‘The concept of “phantasia” from the late Hellenistic period to early Neoplatonism’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II.36.7: 4765–4810.Google Scholar
White, Michael J. (2003). ‘Stoic natural philosophy (physics and cosmology)’, in Inwood, (2003): 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine (2008). Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret D. (1996). ‘Spinoza’s theory of knowledge’, in Garrett, (1996a): 89–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza, vols. I and II (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew (2007). ‘Spinoza’s theory of motivation’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88: 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, Andrew (2010). ‘Spinoza’s theories of value’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18: 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu (1989). Spinoza and Other Heretics, 1: The Marrano of Reason (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu (ed.) (1999a). Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist (New York: Little Room Press).Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu (1999b). ‘Transcending mere survival: from Conatus to Conatus Intelligendi’, in Yovel, (1999a): 45–62.Google Scholar
Zanta, Léontine (1975). La Renaissance du Stoïcisme au XVIe Siècle (first published 1914; reprinted in Genève: Slatkine Reprints).Google Scholar