Abramovitz, Mimi. Under Attack, Fighting Back: Women and Welfare in the United States. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, Scott. “Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence.” The Journal of Politics 55, no. 1 (1993): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almong-Bar, M., and Schmid, H.. “Advocacy Activities of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations: A Critical Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43, no. 1 (2014): 11–35.Google Scholar

Amenta, Edwin, and Caren, Neal. “Social Movements, Political Consequences Of.” Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Ritzer, George. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

Amenta, Edwin, Caren, Neal, Chiarello, Elizabeth, and Yang, Su. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (2010): 287–307.Google Scholar

American Tort Reform Association. “About ATRA.” Accessed December 10, 2013. www.atra.org/about.Google Scholar

Appelbaum, Lauren D. “The Influence of Perceived Deservingness on Policy Decisions Regarding Aid to the Poor.” Political Psychology 22, no. 3 (2001): 419–42.Google Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, David, and Wright, John R.. “Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator’s Vote.” Social Choice and Welfare 9 (1992): 229–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, David, and Wright, John R.. “Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 38, no. 1 (1994): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey S.. “Costly Signaling and Cheap Talk in Models of Political Influence.” European Journal of Political Economy 18, no. 2 (2002): 263–80.Google Scholar

Balz, Dan. “A Historic Republican Triumph: GOP Captures Congress; Party Controls Both Houses for First Time since ’50s.” The Washington Post, November 9, 1994, A1.Google Scholar

Balz, Dan, and Brownstein, Ronald. Storming the Gates: Protest Politics and the Republican Revival. Waltham, MA: Little, Brown, 1996.Google Scholar

Banks, Jeffrey S. Signaling Games in Political Science, edited by Ferejohn, John, Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics: Political Science and Economics Section. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Barreto, Matt A., Nuno, Stephen A., and Sanchez, Gabriel R.. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate – New Evidence from Indiana.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42, no. 1 (2009): 111–16.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bass, Gary D., Abramson, Alan J., and Dewey, Emily. “Effective Advocacy: Lessons for Nonprofit Leaders from Research.” In Nonprofits and Advocacy: Engaging Community and Government in an Era of Retrenchment, edited by Pekkanen, Robert J., Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Tsukinaka, Yutaka. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014. 254–94.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bennett, William J. “The Best Welfare Reform: End It,” Wall Street Journal, March 30, 1994: A19.Google Scholar

Berry, Jeffrey M. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Berry, Jeffrey M. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Berry, Jeffrey M., and Arons, David F.. A Voice for Nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Blank, Rebecca. It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Blank, Rebecca M., and Schmidt, Lucie. “Work, Wages, and Welfare.” In The New World of Welfare, edited by Blank, Rebecca and Haskins, Ron. Washington, DC: Brookings University Press, 2001. 70–102.Google Scholar

Blee, Kathleen M., and Creasap, Kimberly A.. “Conservative and Right-Wing Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (2010): 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 2 (1995): 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne, and Furstenberg, Frank F.. “The Children of Adolescent Mothers: Physical, Academic, and Psychological Outcomes.” Developmental Review 6, no. 3 (1986): 224–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, William P. “Organized Interests and Their Issue Niches: A Search for Pluralism in a Policy Domain.” The Journal of Politics 52, no. 2 (1990): 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownstein, Ronald. “GOP Welfare Proposals Becoming More Conservative.” Los Angeles Times. March 9, 1994, A20.Google Scholar

Cammisa, Anne Marie. Governments as Interest Groups. Westport, CT: Prager, 1995.Google Scholar

Catholic Charities USA. “About Catholic Charities USA.” Accessed July 1, 2012. https://catholiccharitiesusa.org/about.Google Scholar

Child Welfare League of America. “Welcome to CWLA.” Accessed July 1, 2012. www.cwla.org/pubs/welcome.htm.Google Scholar

CNN. “Conservatives Criticize ‘Stand for Children’ March.” May 31, 1996. Accessed July 5, 2011. LexisNexis Academic.Google Scholar

Children’s Defense Fund. “An Invitation to Stand for Children.” 1996. Available at http://diglib.lib.utk.edu/cdf/main.php?bid=214&cat2id=2.Google Scholar

Coalition for America’s Children. “Who’s for Kids and Who’s Just Kidding,” 1995. Legacy Tobacco Documents Library. University of California–San Francisco. Accessed May 4, 2010. Available at www.industrydocumentslibrary.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=xmgn0039Google Scholar

Coalition on Human Needs. “About CHN.” Accessed January 10, 2010. www.chn.org/about-chn/.Google Scholar

Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities. “About CCD.” Accessed July 1, 2012. www.c-c-d.org/about/about.htm.Google Scholar

“Contract with America’s Children.” C-SPAN Video Library, December 15, 1994. Accessed May 15, 2013. Available at www.c-spanvideo.org/event/47827.Google Scholar

CQ Weekly. “Section Notes: As Expected, Clinton Vetoes Welfare Overhaul Bill.” January 13, 1996: 95. Available at http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR409769.Google Scholar

Daly, Mary, and Burkhauser, Richard V.. “The Supplemental Security Income Program.” In Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, edited by Moffit, Robert A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. 79–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, Sharon M., and Lewis, Deborah. “Unlikely Allies Oppose Welfare Reform Policy.” Chicago Tribune, November 30, 1994. Accessed October 20, 2009. Available via LexisNexis Academic.Google Scholar

Danziger, Sheldon H. “Welfare Reform Policy from Nixon to Clinton.” In Social Science and Policy Making, edited by Featherman, D. and Vinovskis, M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001. 137–64.Google Scholar

Dao, James. “Odd Allies Seek Changes for Welfare.” New York Times, November 13, 1995. B1.Google Scholar

Delgado, Gary. Organizing the Movement: The Roots and Growth of ACORN. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

DeNavas-Walt, Carmen, and Proctor, Bernadette D.. “Current Population Reports, P60–252, Income and Poverty in the United States: 2014.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015.Google Scholar

Denzau, Arthur T., and Munger, Michael C.. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80, no. 1 (1986): 89–106.Google Scholar

DeParle, Jason. “Clinton Planners Facing a Quiet Fight on Welfare.” New York Times, March 18, 1994a. A18.Google Scholar

DeParle, Jason. “From Pledge to Plan: The Campaign to End Welfare – A Special Report; the Clinton Welfare Bill: A Long, Stormy Journey.” New York Times, July 15, 1994b. A1Google Scholar

DeParle, Jason. “The Nation Despising Welfare, Pitying Its Young “New York Times, December 18, 1994c. Accessed September 5, 2009. Available via LexisNexis Academic.Google Scholar

De Vita, Carol J., Mosher-Williams, Rachel, and Stengel, Nicholas A.. “Nonprofit Organizations Engaged in Child Advocacy.” In Who Speaks for America’s Children: The Role of Child Advocates in Public Policy, edited by De Vita, Carol J. and Mosher-Williams, Rachel. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, 2001: 3–38.Google Scholar

De Vita, Carol J., Nokolova, Milena, and Roeger, Katie L.. “Nonprofit Advocacy in the Nation’s Capital.” In Nonprofits and Advocacy: Engaging Community and Government in an Era of Retrenchment, edited by Pekkanen, Robert J., Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Tsukinaka, Yutaka. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. Committees in Congress, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denzau, Arthur T., and Munger, Michael C.. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests get Represented.” The American Political Science Review (1986): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Jennifer. “Group: Welfare Reform Must Put Children First.” Moscow-Pullaman Daily News, 16 December 1994.Google Scholar

Epstein, David. “Legislating from Both Sides of the Aisle: Information and the Value of Bipartisan Consensus.” Public Choice 101, no. 1–2 (1999): 1–22.Google Scholar

Erkulwater, Jennifer L. Disability Rights and the American Social Safety Net. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Esterling, Kevin M. The Political Economy of Expertise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36, no. 1 (1992): 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts: Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1978.Google Scholar

Focus. “The Family Support Act of 1988.” University of Wisconsin-Madison Institute for Research on Poverty 11, no. 4 (Winter 1988–1989): 15–18.Google Scholar

Furstenberg, Frank F. Jr, Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne, and Chase-Lansdale, Lindsay. “Teenaged Pregnancy and Childbearing.” American Psychologist 44, no. 2 (1989): 313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gais, Thomas L., and Walker, Jack L.. “Pathways to Influence in American Politics.” In Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. 103–21.Google Scholar

Gais, Thomas L., Nathan, Richard P., Lurie, Irene, and Kaplan, Thomas. “Implementation of the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996.” In The New World of Welfare, edited by Blank, Rebecca and Haskins, Ron. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. 35–69.Google Scholar

Gardner, Marilyn. “‘Stand for Children’ – Can a Weekend Rally Make a Difference?” Christian Science Monitor, May 30, 1996.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Georges, Christopher. “A Media Crusade Gone Haywire,” Forbes Media Critic, September 1995.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2 (2004): 341–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gibbons, Robert. Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-Poverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science 33, no. 2 (1989): 459–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingrich, Newt. et al., eds. Contract with America: The Bold Plan by Rep. Newt Gingrich, Rep. Dick Armey and the House Republicans to Change the Nation. New York: Three Rivers Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Giugni, Marco G. “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology (1998): 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Kenneth M. Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Jerry. “The 104th Congress: Issues and Agendas – Liberal Anger, Stats’ Hope and a Technology Debate; Welfare: G.O.P. Governors Make Their Pitch. New York Times. January 7, 1995. Section 1, p. 8, 1995.Google Scholar

Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Interest Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996Google Scholar

Greenberg, Mark, and Savner, Steve. “A Brief Summary of the Key Provisions of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Block Grant of H.R. 3734,” 1996. Accessed March 5, 2014. www.clasp.org/resources-and-publications/archive/0005.pdf.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, Steven. “Labor and Clergy Are Reunited to Help the Underdogs of Society.” New York Times August 18, 1996, 1.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Richard L., and Deardorff, Alan. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 1 (2006): 69–84.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L., and Wayman, Frank W.. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” The American Political Science Review (1990): 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halperin, Mark. “Coalition Calls for Health Reform.” Time Magazine, May 8, 2007. Accessed December 10, 2013, http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1618705,00.html.Google Scholar

Hansen, John Mark. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Haskins, Ron. “Liberal and Conservative Influences on the Welfare Reform Legislation of 1996.” In For Better and for Worse: State Welfare Reform and the Well-Being of Low-Income Families and Children, edited by Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay and Duncan, Greg. New York: Russell Sage, 2002.Google Scholar

Haskins, Ron. Work over Welfare: The Inside Story of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Haveman, Robert, Blank, Rebecca, Moffitt, Robert, Smeeding, Timothy, and Wallace, Geoffrey. “The War on Poverty: Measurement, Trends, and Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34, no. 3 (2015): 593–638.Google Scholar

Havemann, Judith. “Liberal Advocacy Groups Urge Veto of Welfare Bill.” The Houston Chronicle, October 6, 1995, P7.Google Scholar

Havemann, Judith, and Vobejda, Barbara. “Moderates Kill ‘Family Cap’ in Senate Welfare Measure.” Washington Post, September 14, 1995, A1.Google Scholar

Hays, R. Allen. Who Speaks for the Poor? New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Heaney, Michael T. “Issue Networks, Information, and Interest Group Alliances: The Case of Wisconsin Welfare Politics, 1993–99.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4, no. 3 (2004): 237–70.Google Scholar

Heaney, Michael T. “Brokering Health Policy: Coalitions, Parties, and Interest Group Influence.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31, no. 5 (2006): 887–944.Google Scholar

Heaney, Michael T., and Lorenz, Geoffrey M.. “Coalition Portfolios and Interest Group Influence over the Policy Process.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 2, no. 3 (2013): 251–77.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. “The Politics of Welfare Reform.” In The New World of Welfare, edited by Blank, Rebecca and Haskins, Ron. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. 169–200.Google Scholar

Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelsom, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert H.. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policymaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Helpman, Elhanan, and Persson, Torsten. “Lobbying and Legislative Bargaining.” Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 1, no. 1 (2001): 1–31.Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara. “Twenty-One Variables Beyond the Size of Winning Coalitions.” The Journal of Politics 41, no. 1 (1979): 61–87.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Jennifer L. What’s Fair?: American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Hojnacki, Marie. “Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone.” American Journal of Political Science 41, no. 1 (1997): 61–87.Google Scholar

Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David C.. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92, no. 4 (1998): 775–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., and Leech, Beth L.. “Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (2012): 379–99.Google Scholar

Holyoke, Thomas T. Competitive Interests: Competition and Compromise in American Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Holyoke, Thomas T. “Interest Group Competition and Coalition Formation.” American Journal of Political Science 53, no. 2 (2009): 360–75.Google Scholar

Hula, Kevin W. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hume, Sandy. “Christian Coalition Touts Its Electoral Clout.” Hill, March 13, 1996.Google Scholar

Imig, Douglas R. Poverty and Power: The Political Representation of Poor Americans. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Imig, Douglas R. “Building a Social Movement for America’s Children.” Journal of Children and Poverty 12, no. 1 (2006): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imig, Douglas R. “Resource Mobilization and Survival Tactics of Poverty Advocacy Groups.” The Western Political Quarterly 45, no. 2 (1992): 501–20.Google Scholar

Jones, Rachel L. “200,000 Rally for Children’s Causes: While Some Spoke against GOP Budget Cuts, Some Conservatives Criticized a “Big Government” Emphasis.” Philadelphia Inquirer, June 2, 1996, A01.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. “Welfare Bill Reshapes Cash Programs Reduces Eligibility for SSI.” CQ Weekly, February 18, 1995a.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. “House Passes Welfare Bill; Senate Likely to Alter It.” CQ Weekly, March 25, 1995b.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. “Governors Group Sidelined in Welfare Debate.” CQ Weekly, May 20, 1995c.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. “Human Services: GOP Rift Delays Action on Welfare.” CQ Weekly, June 17, 1995d.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. “Welfare: Dole Bill Aims to Clear Obstacles for Snarled Welfare Overhaul.” CQ Weekly, August 5, 1995e.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. “Reconciliation: GOP Produces Welfare Agreement, Urges Clinton to Sign On.” CQ Weekly, November 11, 1995f.Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L., and Hosansky, David. “Provisions of House Welfare Bill.” CQ Weekly, March 18, 1995.Google Scholar

Katz, Michael B. The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Katz, Michael B. The Undeserving Poor. New York: Pantheon Books, 1989.Google Scholar

Kersh, Rogan. “The Well-Informed Lobbyist: Information and Interest Group Lobbying.” In Interest Group Politics, 7th ed., edited by Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A.. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007. 389–411.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Kollman, Ken. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Lanpher, Katherine. “Standing for Children.” St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 26, 1996, 1B.Google Scholar

LaPira, Timothy M., and Thomas, Herschel F.. “Revolving Door Lobbyists and Interest Representation.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3, no. 1 (2014): 4–29.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret, and Murphy, Gillian H.. “Coalitions of Contention: The Case of the WTO Protests in Seattle.” Political Studies 54, no. 4 (2006): 651–70.Google Scholar

Lewin, Tamar. “The Nation; Abortion Foes Worry About Welfare Cutoffs.” New York Times, March 19, 1995, 4.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Suzanne. “A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action.” American Political Science Review 87 (1993): 319–33.Google Scholar

Loomis, Burdett A. “Coalitions of Interests: Building Bridges in the Balkanized State.” In Interest Group Politics, 2nd ed., edited by Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Loose, Cindy. “Children’s March Mum on Crowd; Organizers Avoid Time-Honored Tactic of Trumpeting Attendance Figures.” Washington Post, May 31, 1996, F3.Google Scholar

Lowi, Theodore. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton, 1969.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Christine. “Networking vs. Allying: The Decision of Interest Groups to Join Coalitions in the US and the EU.” Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 2 (2007): 366–83.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Christine, and Baumgartner, Frank R.. “Partners in Advocacy: Lobbyists and Government Officials in Washington.” The Journal of Politics 77, no. 1 (2015): 202–15.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Christine, and Baumgartner, Frank R.. “The Determinants and Effects of Interest Group Coalitions.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar

Manza, Jeff, and Uggen, Christopher. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mathis, Nancy. “Religious Right Crusades for the Soul of the GOP in State and States, Mainsteam and Moderate Republicans Are Losing Control.” The Times Union, September 4, 1994, A1.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Mead, Lawrence M. Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Free Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Mead, Lawrence M. The New Politics of Poverty: The Non Working Poor in America. New York: Basic Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Mitchell, William C., and Munger, Michael C.. “Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory Survey.” American Journal of Political Science 35, no. 2 (1991): 512.Google Scholar

Mosley, Jennifer E. “Collaboration, Public-Private Intermediary Organizations, and the Transformation of Advocacy in the Field of Homeless Services.” American Review of Public Administration 44, no. 3 (2014): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Charles. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Murray, Charles. “Organizational Resources and Environmental Incentives: Understanding the Policy Advocacy Involvement of Human Service Nonprofits.” Social Service Review 84, no.1 (2010): 57–67.Google Scholar

Nathan, Richard P. Social Science in Government: The Role of Policy Researchers. Albany: Rockefeller Institute Press, 2000.Google Scholar

National Commission on Childhood Disability. “Supplemental Security Income for Children with Disabilities,” Report to Congress of the National Commission on Childhood Disability. October 1995.Google Scholar

National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). Voter Identification Laws in Effect in 2015. Accessed January 10, 2014. Available at www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx.Google Scholar

Nelson, David, and Yackee, Susan Webb. “Lobbying Coalitions and Government Policy Change: An Analysis of Federal Agency Rulemaking.” The Journal of Politics 74, no. 2 (2012): 339–53.Google Scholar

New York Times, “How Much Will All This Cost Our Kids?” 1995a.Google Scholar

New York Times, “Why Every Woman in America Should Beware of Welfare Cuts,” August 8, 1995b.Google Scholar

Nownes, Anthony J. Total Lobbying: What Lobbyists Want (and How They Try to Get It). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, John B., and Haner, Jim. “America’s Most Wanted Welfare Plan.” Baltimore Sun, January 22, 1995.Google Scholar

Ornstein, Allan C., Levine, Daniel U., and Gutek, Gerry. Foundations of Education. Bellmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Page, Scott E. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Patterson, James T. America’s Struggle against Poverty, 1900–1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Pear, Robert. “The 104th Congress: Welfare: Republicans’ Philosophical Discord Stalls Plan for Change.” New York Times, January 12, 1995, A20.Google Scholar

Pear, Robert. “Governors Deadlocked on Replacing Welfare Programs with Grants to States.” New York Times, January 31, 1995, A14.Google Scholar

Pear, Robert. “Thousands to Rally in Capital on Children’s Behalf.” New York Times, June 1, 1996, 10.Google Scholar

Pekkanen, Robert J., Smith, Steven Rathgen, and Tsujinaka, Yutaka (eds.). Nonprofit Advocacy: Engaging Community and Government in an Era of Retrenchment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perez-Pena, Richard. “Stronger Aid Urged to Ease Move from Welfare to Work.” New York Times, April 1, 1997, B6.Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard Andrew. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Random House, 1979.Google Scholar

Potters, Jan, and Van Winden, Frans. “Lobbying and Asymmetric Information.” Public Choice 74, no. 3 (1992): 269–92.Google Scholar

Preston, Jennifer. “Births Fall and Abortions Rise under New Jersey Family Cap.” New York Times, November 3, 1998.Google Scholar

Price, Joyce. “Children’s Fund Founder Enjoys First-Family Ties.” Washington Times, February 21, 1993, A1.Google Scholar

Proctor, Bernadette D., Semega, Jessica L., and Kollar, Melissa A.. Income and Poverty in the United States: 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports P60-256(RV). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2016.Google Scholar

“Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Groups Schedule Joint Press Briefing Wednesday on Child Exclusion Policies.” US Newswire, June 13, 1995. Accessed September 5, 2009. LexisNexis Academic.Google Scholar

Rector, Robert. “The Impact of New Jersey’s Family Cap on Out-of-Wedlock Births and Abortions.” September 6, 1995. The Heritage Foundation. Accessed September 5, 2009. www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/report/the-impact-new-jerseys-family-cap-out-wedlock-births-and-abortions.Google Scholar

Reese, Ellen. Backlash against Welfare Mothers: Past and Present. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Responsibility and Empowerment Support Program Providing Employment, Child Care, and Training Act of 1993. HR 3500. 103rd Cong., 1st sess., Congressional Record 139: H9563.Google Scholar

Rich, Andrew. Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rich, Spencer. “GOP Plan for Disabled Children Draws Fire.” Washington Post, February 25, 1995, A12.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Megan. “Faith, Politics and Charity; They All Call Themselves Christians. But in the Battle over Welfare Reform They’re Preaching Two Gospels.” Washington Post, August 9, 1995, D01.Google Scholar

Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar

Rubin, Alissa J. “The Budget: Governors Hope Welfare, Medicaid Plan Will Lead to Overall Budget Deal.” CQ Weekly, February 10, 1996, 352–53. March 25, 2014. library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/toc.php?mode=weekly-date&level=3&values=1996%7E02|February#.Google Scholar

Salamon, L. M., and Geller, S. L.. “Nonprofit America: A Force for Democracy? (Communique No. 9).” John Hopkins University Center for Civil Society Studies (2008). Accessed July 15, 2015. http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/09/LP_Communique9_2008.pdf.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert H. “Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 78, no. 1 (1984): 64–76.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert H. “The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington: More Groups, Less Clout.” In The New American Political System, 2nd ed., edited by King, Anthony. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert H., Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., and Nelson, Robert L.. “Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition.” American Political Science Review 81, no. 4 (1987): 1217–34.Google Scholar

Sandfort, Jodi. “Analyzing the Practice of Nonprofit Advocacy: Comparing Two Human Service Networks.” In Nonprofits and Advocacy: Engaging Community and Government in an Era of Retrenchment, edited by Pekkanen, Robert J., Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Tsukinaka, Yutaka. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. Organized Interests and American Democracy. Boston: HarperCollins Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Shaw, Clay, Johnson, Nancy, and Grandy, Fred. “Moving Ahead: How America Can Reduce Poverty Through Work.” Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, 1992.Google Scholar

Smith, Richard A. “Interest Group Influence in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly (1995): 89–139.Google Scholar

Snyder, James. “Long-Term Investing in Politicians; or, Give Early, Give Often.” Journal of Law and Economics 35 (1992): 15–43.Google Scholar

Social Security Administration (SSA). 1997. The Definition of Disability for Children. SSA Publication no. 05–11053. Washington, DC: U.S. General Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Social Security Administration (SSA). “Some Antiabortion Activists Question Consequences of GOP Welfare Reform.” Washington Post, February 1, 1995, A4.Google Scholar

Spence, Michael. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1973): 355–74.Google Scholar

Staggenborg, Suzanne. “Coalition Work in the Pro-Choice Movement: Organizational and Environmental Opportunities and Obstacles.” Social Problems 33, no. 5 (1986): 374–90.Google Scholar

Stand for Children Rally. C-SPAN video. June 1, 1996. www.c-span.org/video/?72650–1/stand-children-rallyGoogle Scholar

State Legislative Leaders Foundation. “State Legislative Leaders: Keys to Effective Legislation for Children and Families.” Centerville, MA: State Legislative Leaders Foundation, 1995.Google Scholar

Stepp, Laura Sessions. “A Lobby for Youth: A Broad-Based Coalition Pushes Its ‘Contract with America’s Children.’” Washington Post, January 3, 1995, C5.Google Scholar

Strolovitch, Dara Z. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Stout, Hilary. “GOP’s Welfare Stance Owes a Lot to Prodding from Robert Rector.” Wall Street Journal, January 23, 1995, A1.Google Scholar

Superville, Darlene. “Rally to Look for Answers.” Salina Journal, May 27, 1996. A1.Google Scholar

Swarns, Rachel L. “Welfare Family Advocates, Once Allies, Become Rivals.” New York Times, March 29, 1997, 1.1.Google Scholar

Szerlag, Heather. “Building a Children’s ‘Movement’: Florida’s Savvy Children’s Campaign.” Youth Today, July/August 1996, 27.Google Scholar

Tanner, Michael. “Welfare State has Failed Our Kids.” San Jose Mercury News, June 2, 1996, 6C.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest. Ithaca: Cornell University, 1991.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (1996): 41–61.Google Scholar

Taylor, Paul. “Nonprofits Boost Advocacy in the Interest of Children; Changes in Policy, Attitudes Seen Necessary.” Washington Post, January 13, 1992, A1.Google Scholar

Teles, Steven M. Whose Welfare? AFDC and Elite Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1998.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar

Toner, Robin. “The Right Thinkers: Some Voices in the New Political Conversation.” New York Times, November 11, 1994, B7.Google Scholar

Toner, Robin. “The 104th Congress: Welfare; War over an Overhaul Appears to Be No Contest.” New York Times, January 13, 1995, A22.Google Scholar

Trattner, Walter. From Poor Laws the Welfare State: The History of Social Policy in America, 5th ed. New York: Free Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Trisi, Danilo, and Pavetti, LaDonna. “TANF Weakening as a Safety Net for Poor Families.” The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2012. Accessed January 20, 2016. www.cbpp.org/research/tanf-weakening-as-a-safety-net-for-poor-families.Google Scholar

United States General Accounting Office. “Social Security: Rapid Rise in Children on SSI Disability Rolls Follows New Regulations.” September 1994 (GAO/HEHS-94–225).Google Scholar

Van Winden, Frans. “Interest Group Behavior and Influence.” In The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, edited by Rowley, Charles K. and Schneider, Friedrich. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry E., and Nie, Norman H.. “Citizen Activity: Who Participates? What Do They Say?” American Political Science Review 87, no. 2 (1993): 303–18.Google Scholar

Vobejda, Barbara. “Conservative Welfare Idea Criticized; Bills Would Cut Funds for Unwed Mothers.” Washington Post, June 24, 1994, A18.Google Scholar

Vobejda, Barbara. “GOP Outlines Broad Welfare Reform. Washington Post, January 7, 1995, A1.Google Scholar

Vobejda, Barbara. “Controversy Hits March for Children; Critics Say Backers Seek More Welfare.” Washington Post, May 31, 1996, A1.Google Scholar

Vobejda, Barbara. “Welfare Bill Opponents Turn Up Pressure.” Washington Post, July 27, 1996, A04.Google Scholar

Vrazo, Fawn. “Old Foes Find Each Other on Same Side; Abortion-Rights Forces and Anti-Abortionists Make Unlikely Allies. Both, However, See Proposed Welfare Cuts as Hurting the Cause.” Philadelphia Inquirer, March 26, 1995, E01.Google Scholar

Walker, Jack. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Warren, Dorian T., and Cohen, Cathy J.. “Organizing at the Intersection of Labor and Civil Rights: A Case Study of New Haven.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 2(4) (2000): 629–55.Google Scholar

Weaver, R. Kent. “The Changing World of Think Tanks.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22, no. 3 (1989): 563–78.Google Scholar

Weaver, R. Kent. Ending Welfare as We Know It. Wasington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Weaver, R. Kent, Shapiro, Robert Y., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. “Trends: Welfare.” Public Opinion Quarterly (1995): 606–27.Google Scholar

Wednesday Group. “Moving Ahead: Initiatives for Expanding Opportunity in America.” Washington, DC: House of Representatives, 1991.Google Scholar

Weiner, Tim. “A Capital Rally Attracts Groups from across the Nation to Focus on Children’s Needs.” New York Times, June 2, 1996.Google Scholar

Weiner, Tim. “Welfare Reform, 1987–1988 Legislative Chronology.” In Congress and the Nation, 1985–1988 (Vol. 7). Washington DC: CQ Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Weiner, Tim. “Welfare Reform, 1995–1996 Legislative Chronology.” In Congress and the Nation, 1993–1996 (Vol. 9). Washington DC: CQ Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Western, Bruce, and Pettit, Becky. “Incarceration & Social Inequality.” Daedalus 139, no. 3 (2010): 8–19.Google Scholar

Wetzstein, Cheryl. “CDF March Aims to Stem Cutbacks on Youth: Stand for Children Hopes for 200,000.” Washington Times, May 30, 1996, A2.Google Scholar

Wetzstein, Cheryl. “Senate Drops ‘Family Cap’ as GOP Splits.” Washington Times, September 14, 1995, A2.Google Scholar

Whitford, Andrew B. “The Structures of Interest Coalitions: Evidence from Environmental Litigation.” Business and Politics 5, no. 1 (2003): 45–64.Google Scholar

Who Stands for Children? C-SPAN video. May 31, 1996 www.c-span.org/video/?72623–1/stands-children.Google Scholar

Williams, Amy E. “Odd Coalition Lines up against Curbs in Welfare-Reform Bill.” The State Journal-Register, February 13, 1995, 1.Google Scholar

Wilson, James Q. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar

Winden, Frans. “Interest Group Behavior and Influence.” In Encyclopedia of Public Choice, edited by Rowley, C. K. and Schneider, F.. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar

Winston, Pamela. Welfare Policymaking in the States: The Devil in Devolution. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Witham, Larry. “Religious Right’s Turnout Rises – Republicans Benefit from Evangelical Third of Electorate.” Washington Times, November 11, 1994.Google Scholar

Wright, John R. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. New York: Longman, 2003 [1995].Google Scholar

Wright, John R. “Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 84 (1990): 417–38.Google Scholar

Yin, Robert K. Case Studies Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar