Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T13:48:17.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Theoretical Facets of Biohistorical Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2017

Christopher M. Stojanowski
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
William N. Duncan
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Studies in Forensic Biohistory
Anthropological Perspectives
, pp. 315 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, B. (2014). Life after life: Bioarchaeology and post-mortem agency. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 24(3), 523529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. (1992). Prey into Hunter: The Politics of Religious Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J. E. and Scott, R. E. (2009). Identity formation: Communities and individuals. In Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas, eds. Knudson, K. J. and Stojanowski, C. M.. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, pp. 2458.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. and Gaydarska, B. (2007). Parts and Wholes: Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Charlier, P. (2006). Médecin des morts: Récits de paléopathologie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Charlier, P. (2014). Naming the body (or the bones): Human remains, anthropological/medical collections, religious beliefs, and restitution. Clinical Anatomy, 27(3), 291295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P., Poupon, J., Eb, A., et al. (2010). The “relics of Joan of Arc”: A forensic multidisciplinary analysis. Forensic Science International, 194(1–3), e9e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, A. M. and Crowder, C. M. (2009). Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(6), 12111216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crais, C. and Scully, P. (2009). Sara Baartman and the Hottentot Venus: A Ghost Story and a Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crandall, J. J. and Harrod, R. P. (2014). Ghostly gunslingers: The postmortem lives of the Kiel brothers, Nevada’s first frontiersmen. Cambridge Archaeology Journal, 24(3), 487497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossland, Z. (2009). Of clues and signs: The dead body and its evidential traces. American Anthropologist, 111(1), 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossland, Z. (2010). Materiality and embodiment. In Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, eds. Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M. C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 386405.Google Scholar
Csordas, T. J. (1997). The Sacred Self: A Cultural Phenomenology of Charismatic Healing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csordas, T. (1999). The body’s career in anthropology. In Anthropological Theory Today, ed. Moore, H. L.. New York: Polity Press, pp. 172205.Google Scholar
Davies, C. (2010). Technological taxidermy: Recognisable faces in celebrity deaths. Mortality, 15(2), 138153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirkmaat, D. C., Cabo, L. L., Ousley, S. D., and Symes, S. A. (2008). New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 51(547), 3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. N. and Schwarz, K. R. (2014). Partible, permeable, and relational bodies in a Maya mass grave. In Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains, eds. Osterholtz, A. J., Baustian, K. M., and Martin, D. L.. Springer: New York, pp. 149172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. N. and Schwarz, K. R. (2015). A Postclassic Maya mass grave from Zacpetén. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(2): 143165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. N. and Stojanowski, C. M. (2008). A case of squamosal craniosynostosis from the 16th century Southeastern United States. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 18(4), 407420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. N. and Stojanowski, C. M. (2014). Why some bodies matter: Defacement and narrative in historical forensic cases. In Forensic and Bioarchaeological Approaches to Interpreting Violence, eds. Martin, D. L. and Anderson, C. P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148168.Google Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, G. (1984). The political economy of death: Communication and change in Malagasy colonial history. American Ethnologist, 11(1), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltyn, J. L. (2008). Dead famous and dead sexy: Popular culture, forensics, and the rise of the corpse. Mortality, 13(2), 153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontein, J. and Harries, J. (2013). The vitality and efficacy of human substances. Critical African Studies, 5(3): 115126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, Vol. 1, trans. Hurley, R.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A. (2014). Sexual harassment is common in scientific fieldwork. Available at: http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2014/07/sexual-harassment-common-scientific-fieldwork (accessed March 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Gibson, M. (2007). Death and mourning in technologically mediated culture. Health Sociology Review, 16(5), 415424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Glaubrecht, M., Seethaler, N., Teßmann, B., and Koel-Abt, K. (2013). The potential of biohistory: Re-discovering Adelbert von Chamisso’s skull of an Aleut collected during the “Rurik” expedition 1815–1818 in Alaska. Zoosystematics and Evolution, 89(2), 317336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, E. (2010). Articulating bones: An epilogue. Journal of Material Culture, 15(4), 465492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space Among the Maya. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harper, S. (2010). The social agency of dead bodies. Mortality, 15(4), 308322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R. (1960). Death and the Right Hand, trans. Needham, R. and Needham, C.. Aberdeen: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, J. (2001). What killed Mozart? Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(11), 13811389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoskins, J. (2006). Agency, biography and objects. In Handbook of Material Culture, eds. Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., and Spyer, P.. London: Sage, pp. 7485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. A. (2005). Archaeology of the body. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 139158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, L. and Start, H.. (1999). Death at the undertakers. In The Loved Body’s Corruption: Archaeological Contributions to the Study of Human Mortality, eds. Downes, J. and Pollard, T.. Glasgow: Cruithne Press, pp. 200208.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaña, R. (2011). Dead bodies: The deadly display of Mexican border politics. In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, ed. Mascia-Lees, F.. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 157171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masterton, M. (2010). Duties to Past Persons: Moral Standing and Posthumous Interests of Old Human Remains. PhD dissertation Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moon, C. (2013). Interpreters of the dead: Forensic knowledge, human remains and the politics of the past. Social & Legal Studies, 22(2), 149169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakhaeizadeh, S., Dror, I. E., and Morgan, R. M. (2014). Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias. Science and Justice, 54(3), 208214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradise, J. and Andrews, L. (2007). Tales from the crypt: Scientific, ethical, and legal considerations for biohistorical analysis of deceased historical figures. Temple Journal of Science, Technology & Environmental Law, 26, 223299.Google Scholar
Penfold-Mounce, R. (2010). Consuming criminal corpses: Fascination with the dead criminal body. Mortality, 15(3), 250265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshaw, L. (2011). Exhuming Loss: Memory, Materiality and Mass Graves of the Spanish Civil War. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Renshaw, L. (2013). The exhumation of civilian victims of conflict and human rights abuses: Political, ethical, and theoretical considerations. In The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds. Tarlow, S. and Stutz, L. Nilsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 781800.Google Scholar
Rival, L. (2005). Introduction: What constitutes a human a body in Native Amazonia. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 3(2), 105110.Google Scholar
Roberts, C., Manchester, K., and Storey, A. (1992). Margaret Clitherow: Skeletal identification of an historical figure. Forensic Science International, 57(1), 6371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2011). Dissection: The body in tatters. Dismemberment, dissection, and the return of the repressed. In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, ed. Mascia-Lees, F.. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 172206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. and Lock, M. M. (1987). The mindful body: A prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(1), 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, A. (1993). Lizzie Borden took an axe: History, feminism and American culture. American Studies, 34(1), 91103.Google Scholar
Scott, D., Willey, P., and Connor, M. A. (2013). They Died with Custer: Soldiers’ Bones from the Battle of the Little Bighorn. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. R. (2006). The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanowski, C. M. and Duncan, W. N. (2008). Anthropological Contributions to the Cause of the Georgia Martyrs. Occasional Papers of the Georgia Southern Museum.Google Scholar
Stojanowski, C. M. and Duncan, W. N. (2009). Historiography and forensic analysis of the Fort King George “skull”: Craniometric assessment using the specific population approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(2), 275289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanowski, C. M. and Duncan, W. N. (2011). Biohistory and cranial morphology: A forensic case study from Spanish colonial Georgia. In The Bioarchaeology of the Human Head: Decapitation, Deformation, and Decoration, ed. Bonogofsky, M.. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, pp. 179202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. C., Starrs, J. E., and Stoneking, M. (2001). Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the presumptive remains of Jesse James. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(1), 173176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia, Vol. 6. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, M. (1999). Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labor of the Negative. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, T. (2011). Bodiliness: The body beyond the soul. Social, material and spiritual dimensions of bodiliness. In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, ed. Mascia-Lees, F.. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 102118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wolputte, S. (2004). Hang on to yourself: Of bodies, embodiment, and selves. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 251269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdery, K. (1999). The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Vilaça, A. (2005). Chronically unstable bodies: Reflections on Amazonian corporealities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(3), 445464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, R. J. (2012). Biohistorical narratives of racial difference in the American Negro: Notes toward a nuance history of American physical anthropology. Current Anthropology, 53(S5), 196209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. (2004). Death warmed up: The agency of bodies in early Anglo-Saxon cremation rites. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 263291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×