Book contents
- Talking with Children
- Talking with Children
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Transcription Conventions
- Introduction
- Part I Talk as Social Action
- Part II Pedagogy in Interaction
- 8 Literacy
- 9 Storytelling
- 10 Digital Technologies
- 11 Mathematics
- 12 Creativity
- 13 Multilingualism
- 14 Belonging
- Part III Interaction and Inclusion
- Index
- References
14 - Belonging
from Part II - Pedagogy in Interaction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2022
Book contents
- Talking with Children
- Talking with Children
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Transcription Conventions
- Introduction
- Part I Talk as Social Action
- Part II Pedagogy in Interaction
- 8 Literacy
- 9 Storytelling
- 10 Digital Technologies
- 11 Mathematics
- 12 Creativity
- 13 Multilingualism
- 14 Belonging
- Part III Interaction and Inclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, we review some of the most commonly invoked educational challenges of working with children who are bilingual or multilingual and point to their moorings in a normative, strictly monolingual perspective – a monolingual bias. We then move on to present an alternative, and radically social, understanding of childhood multilingualism firmly based in the growing body of CA-oriented studies of bi- and multilingual interaction in early childhood education settings. Drawing on data from different educational contexts, we examine the manifold ways that participants make use of language alternation, showing how the availability of more than one language can be used productively, as a resource that supports learning. We round off the chapter by highlighting some implications for educators who work with multilingual children. Although the extracts provided in the text are taken from settings where both teacher and children share more than one language, the affordances we discuss will be of relevance to educators who do not have access to children’s first language.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Talking with ChildrenA Handbook of Interaction in Early Childhood Education, pp. 286 - 306Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Bateman, A., and Church, A. (2017) Children’s use of objects in an Early Years playground. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(1), 55–71.Google Scholar
Björk-Willén, P. (2013). Samtal i förskolans tambur – på skilda villkor. (Talk in the preschool entrance hall – on different terms). In Björk-Willén, P., Gruber, S., and Puskás., T. Nationell förskola med mångkulturellt uppdrag (pp. 91–115). Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Björk-Willén, P. (2016). The preschool entrance hall: a bilingual transit zone for preschoolers, In Bateman, A. and Church, A. (eds.), Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction. Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.169–187). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Björk-Willén, P. (2018). Learning to apologise – moral socialisation as an interactional practice in preschool. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björk-Willén, P., and Cromdal, J. (2009). When education seeps into ‘free play’: how preschool children accomplish multilingual education. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1493–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and Gorbatt, N. (2014). ‘Say princess’; the challenges and affordances of young Hebrew L2 novices’ interaction with their peers. In Cekaite, A., Blum-Kulka, S., Grøver, V., and Teubal, E. (eds.), Children’s Peer Talk: Learning from Each Other (pp. 169–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boldermo, S. (2020). Fleeting moments: young children’s negotiations of belonging and togetherness, International Journal of Early Years Education, 28(2), 136–150.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A., and Björk-Willén, P. (2018). Enchantment in storytelling: co-operation and participation in children’s aesthetic experience. Linguistics and Education, 48, 52–60.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A., Blum-Kulka, S., Grøver, V., and Teubal, E. (eds.). (2014). Children’s Peer Talk: Learning from Each Other. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (2003). We’re Friends, Right? Inside Kids’ Cultures. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (2018). The Sociology of Childhood (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Training. (2009/2019). Belonging, Being & Becoming – The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations, Council of Australian Governments.Google Scholar
Engdahl, I. (2012). Doing friendship during the second year of life in a Swedish preschool. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20, 83–98.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relation in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., and Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography. Practices of Control, Care and Mundane Creativity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, J., O’Toole, L., and Whitman, C. (2008). A sense of belonging as part of children’s wellbeing. Early Childhood Matters, 111, 7–12.Google Scholar
Haraldsson, K., Isaksson, P., and Eriksson, M. (2017). ‘Happy when they arrive, happy when they go home’ – focusing on promoting children’s mental health creates a sense of trust at preschools. Early Years, 37(4), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1191442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm Kvist, M. (2018). Children’s crying in play conflicts: a locus for moral and emotional socialization. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37386Google Scholar
Holm Kvist, M., and Cekaite, A. (2020). Emotion socialization-compassion or non-engagement in young children’s responses to peer distress. Language, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juutinen, J., Puroila, A-M., and Johansson, E. (2018). ‘There is no room for you!’ The politics of belonging in children’s play situation. In Johansson, E., Emilson, A., and Puroila, A.-M. (eds.), Values Education in Early Childhood Settings, Concepts, Approaches and Practices (pp. 249–264). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Karrebæk, M. S. 2010. ‘I can be with!’ a novice kindergartner’s successes and challenges in play participation and the development of communicative skills. Pragmatics & Language Learning, 12, 325–358.Google Scholar
Krause, K. (2011). Developing sense of coherence in educational contexts: making progress in promoting mental health in children. International Review of Psychiatry, 23(6), 525–532.Google Scholar
Løkken, G. (2004). Greetings and welcomes among toddler peers in a Norwegian barnehage. International Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
Löfdahl, A. (2010). Who gets to play? Peer groups, power and play in early childhood settings. In Brooker, L. and Edwards, S. (eds.), Engaging Play (pp. 122–135). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2017). Te Whāriki. He Whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L., and Bateman, A. (2018). Belonging and culturally nuanced communication in a refugee early childhood centre in Aotearoa New Zealand. Early Childhood, 19(4), 379–391.Google Scholar
Nagel, C. (2011). Belonging. In Del Casino, V. J. Jr, Thomas, M. E., Cloke, P., and Panelli, R. (eds.), A Companion to Social Geography (pp. 108–124). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ólafsdóttir, S. M., Danby, S., Einarsdóttir, J., and Theobald, M. (2017). ‘You need to own cats to be a part of the play’: Icelandic preschool children challenge adult-initiated rules in play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25 (6), 824–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, C., and Fleer, M. (2014). The theory of ‘belonging’: defining concepts used within belonging, being and becoming—The Australian Early Years Learning Framework. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 914–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.781495Google Scholar
Puskás, T. (2016). Doing ‘belonging’ in a Swedish preschool. Early Childhood Folio, 20 (1), 30–34.Google Scholar
Rydland, V., Grøver, V., and Lawrence, J. (2014). The potentials and challenges of learning words from peers in preschool: a longitudinal study of second language learners in Norway. In Cekaite, A., Blum-Kulka, S., Grøver, V., and Teubal, E. (eds.), Children’s Peer Talk: Learning from Each Other (pp. 214–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salonen, E., Laakso, M.-L., and Sevón, E. (2016). Young children in day and night care: negotiating and constructing belonging during daily arrivals. Early Child Development and Care, 186 (12), 2022–2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1146717Google Scholar
Stratigos, T., Bradley, B., and Sumsion, J. (2014). Infants, family day care and the politics of belonging. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-014-0110-0Google Scholar
Swedish National Agency for Education. (2018). Curriculum for the Preschool, Lpfö,18. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
Woodhead, M., and Brooker, L. (2008). A sense of belonging. Early Childhood Matters (111), 3–6.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by