Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T15:27:37.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Epilogue: The Transit of 1882

Get access

Summary

The discussion which took place, and the innumerable articles which appeared in every journal, (the Echo included), at the time of the 1874 transit must have familiarised the nation at large with the fact that these transits of Venus are regarded by astronomers as affording an excellent, if not the best, method of determining what is technically known as solar parallax.

The Echo, 1 March 1881

I do not think a method which allows an observer only one observation as the result of a costly expedition can be a good method … But the Transit of Venus carries an undue traditional importance, even amongst some astronomers, as a parallax-determining method; and we must try to observe it as well as we can.

David Gill to George Airy, 1880

Whatever we may consider as concluded from the observations of the transit of Venus, 1874, I think we may well believe that the scientific world will not be satisfied unless we take the opportunity of securing all that can be obtained from the Transit of 1882: such an opportunity as will recur only after the extinction of three generations of mankind.

George Airy, May 1880

Back in 1857, when Airy first described plans to observe the transits of Venus, he had proposed to devote most attention to the transit of 1882. The circumstances of the 1882 transit were more favourable for a few reasons: the transit duration was longer and thus its measure should have a smaller degree of error, and the entire transit would be visible from existing observatories throughout North America. The transit of 1882 should have brought an even larger effort by the astronomical community.

An article in the New York Times put a cynical and wildly inaccurate spin on the ‘great popular transit’, making the claim that astronomers in 1874 had purposely hidden the fact that there was to be a transit of Venus in 1882 (and that they also hid the fact that a ‘transit [sic – confused with Mars in ascension] of Mars’, which allegedly could just as well be used to measure the parallax, had been due in 1877).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×