Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Amanda. “A Short History of International Humanitarian Law.” European Journal of International Law 26, no. 1 (2015): 109–38.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. The European–African Confrontation: A Study in Treaty Making. Leiden: Sijthoff, 1973.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. “Introduction.” In Van der Molen, Gesina H. J., Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law: His Life, Work and Times. Leiden: Albertus Willem Sijthoff, 1968.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16th, 17th and 18th Centuries). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. The Law of Nations in Global History, edited by Pitts, Jennifer and Armitage, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alfert, Robert. “Hostes Humani Generis: An Expanded Notion of US Counterterrorist Legislation.” Emory International Law Review 6, no. 1 (1992): 171–214.Google Scholar

Kai, Ambos. “The New Enemy of Mankind: The Jurisdiction of the ICC over Members of ‘Islamic State’.” EJIL: Talk!, November 26, 2015.Google Scholar

Amorosa, Paolo. Rewriting the History of the Law of Nations: How James Brown Scott Made Francisco de Vitoria the Founder of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anghie, Antony. “Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions: Sovereignty, Economy, and the Mandate System of the League of Nations.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 34, no. 3 (2001): 513–633.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. “Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law.” Harvard International Law Journal 40, no. 1 (1999): 1–80.Google Scholar

Anglim, Simon. “Callwell versus Graziani: How the British Army Applied ‘Small Wars’ Techniques in Major Operations in Africa and the Middle East, 1940–41.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 19, no. 4 (2008): 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae: Existence and Nature of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Armigero Gazzera, Ermelinda. Alberico Gentili: Bibliografia. Tolentino: Francesco Filelfo, 1917.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. London: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. “The Fifty Years Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations.” Modern Intellectual History 1, no. 1 (2004): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armitage, David. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armitage, David. The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armitage, David. “What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée.” History of European Ideas 38, no. 4 (2012): 493–507.Google Scholar

Armitage, David, and Guldi, Jo. “The Return of the Longue Durée: An Anglo-American Perspective.” Victoria 70, no. 2 (2014): 219–47.Google Scholar

Asser, Tobias Michael Carel. “Alberigo Gentili.” Algemeen Handelsblad, February 6, 1877.Google Scholar

Ayala, Balthazar. De jure et officiis bellicis et disciplina militari libri tres. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1912.Google Scholar

Bain, William. “Grotius in International Relations Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius, edited by Lesaffer, Randall and Nijman, Janne E., 597–618. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Bain, William, ed. Medieval Foundations of International Relations. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Bain, William. Political Theology of International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, William, and Nardin, Terry. “International Relations and Intellectual History.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balakrishnan, Gopal. The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar

Balch, Thomas Willing. “Albericus Gentilis.” The American Journal of International Law 5, no. 3 (1911): 665–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balch, Thomas Willing. “Letter from Thomas Balch to Thomas Erskine Holland,” Papers relating to Albericus Gentilis, held at the Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, October 27, 1911.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne. “What’s in a War? (Politics as War, War as Politics).” Ratio Juris 21, no. 3 (2008): 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, William. Counterinsurgency Law: New Directions in Asymmetric Warfare. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bann, Stephen. Romanticism and the Rise of History. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar

Barducci, Marco. Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution, 1613–1718: Transnational Reception in English Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak. “Decolonising War.” European Journal of International Security 1, no. 2 (2016): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak, and Brighton, Shane. “Conclusion: Absent War Studies? War, Knowledge and Critique.” In The Changing Character of War, edited by Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, 524–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak, and Brighton, Shane. “Powers of War: Fighting, Knowledge, and Critique.” International Political Sociology 5, no. 2 (2011): 126–43.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. War in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter, Richard. Humanizing the Laws of War: Selected Writings of Richard Baxter, edited by Vagts, Detlev F., Meron, Theodor, Schwebel, Stephen M., and Keever, Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Dictionnaire Historique et Critique. Paris: Beuchot, 1820.Google Scholar

Bayly, Christopher Alan. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Beaulac, Stéphane. “The Westphalian Model in Defining International Law: Challenging the Myth.” Australian Journal of Legal History 8, no. 2 (2004): 181–213.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought.” The Historical Journal 49, no. 1 (2006): 281–98.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 3, no. 1 (2001): 115–26.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27, no. 3 (2002): 327–50.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “Political Realism and International Relations.” Philosophy Compass 12, no. 2 (2017): 1–12.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “Political Theory and the Functions of Intellectual History: A Response to Emmanuel Navon.” Review of International Studies 29, no. 1 (2003): 151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “What Is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42, no. 6 (2014): 682–715.Google Scholar

Bendersky, Joseph W. Carl Schmitt, Theorist for the Reich. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, Lauren. “Beyond Anachronism: Histories of International Law and Global Legal Politics.” Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 21, no. 1 (2019): 7–40.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, Lauren, and Ford, Lisa. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law 1800–1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Berdal, Mats. “The ‘New Wars’ Thesis Revisited.” In The Changing Character of War, edited by Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, 109–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Bernstorff, Jochen von. “The Battle for the Recognition of Wars of National Liberation.” In The Battle for International Law: South–North Perspectives on the Decolonization Era, edited by Dann, Philipp and von Bernstorff, Jochen, 52–70. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstorff, Jochen von. “The Use of Force in International Law before World War I: On Imperial Ordering and the Ontology of the Nation-State.” European Journal of International Law 29, no. 1 (2018): 233–60.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. Humanity in Warfare: The Modern History of the International Law of Armed Conflicts. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980.Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. “The Contextual Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, edited by Klosko, George, 11–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. “Contextualism: From Modernist Method to Post-Analytic Historicism?” Journal of the Philosophy of History 3, no. 3 (2009): 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bevir, Mark. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. “On Tradition.” Humanitas 8, no. 2 (2000): 28–53.Google Scholar

Bhuta, Nehal. “State Theory, State Order, State System: Jus Gentium and the Constitution of Public Power.” In System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel, edited by Kadelbach, Stefan, Kleinlein, Thomas, and Roth-Isigkeit, David, 398–417. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Binns, J. W. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Age. Leeds: Francis Cairns, 1990.Google Scholar

Black, Cyril E. Neutralization and World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. European Warfare, 1494–1660. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Blane, Alexis, and Kingsbury, Benedict. “Punishment and the ius post bellum.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 241–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. Six Books of the Commonwealth. Translated by Michael J. Tooley. Oxford: Blackwell’s Political Texts, 1955.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. Les six livres de la république. Paris: Fayard, 1986.Google Scholar

Borschberg, Peter. “The Seizure of the Sta. Catarina Revisited: The Portuguese Empire in Asia, VOC Politics and the Origins of the Dutch–Johor Alliance (1602–c.1616).” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 1 (2002): 31–62.Google Scholar

Botting, Eileen Hunt, and Zlioba, Ariana. “Religion and Women’s Rights: Susan Moller Okin, Mary Wollstonecraft, and the Multiple Feminist Liberal Traditions.” History of European Ideas 44, no. 8 (2018): 1169–88.Google Scholar

Boucher, David. Appropriating Hobbes: Legacies in Political, Legal, and International Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Bourke, Richard, and Skinner, Quentin. Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Branch, Jordan. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brazil, Lia. “British War Office Manuals and International Law, 1899–1907.” In Empire and Legal Thought: Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity, edited by Cavanagh, Edward, 548–77. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. Changes of State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris. “Political Thought, International Relations Theory and International Political Theory: An Interpretation.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, Ian. International Law and the Use of Force by States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. “The Grotian Conception of International Society.” In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, edited by Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin. London: Allen & Unwin, 1966.Google Scholar

Bullen, Barrie. “Walter Pater’s ‘Renaissance’ and Leonardo da Vinci’s Reputation in the Nineteenth Century.” The Modern Language Review 74, no. 2 (1979): 268–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, Douglas R. Jr. “Hostis Humani Generi: Piracy, Terrorism and a New International Law.” University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review 13, no. 2 (2005): 293.Google Scholar

Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution. London: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Burgess, Glenn. “Bodin in the English Revolution.” In The Reception of Bodin, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., 387–408. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Burke, Martin J., and Richter, Melvin. Why Concepts Matter: Translating Social and Political Thought. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. The Fortunes of the Courtier: The European Reception of Castiglione’s Cortegiano. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. “The History and Theory of Reception.” In The Reception of Bodin, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., 21–38. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. “Tacitism, Scepticism, and Reason of State.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, edited by Burns, James H. and Goldie, Mark, 477–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry. “The English School: A Neglected Approach to International Security Studies.” Security Dialogue 46, no. 2 (2015): 126–43.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. “Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (2014): 437–62.Google Scholar

Callwell, Charles Edward. Small Wars: Their Principles and Practice. London: HM Stationery Office, 1903.Google Scholar

Canning, Joseph. “The Medieval Roman and Canon Law Origins of International Law.” In Medieval Foundations of International Relations, edited by Bain, William, 102–16. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. London: Chapman and Hall, 1840.Google Scholar

Carvalho, Benjamin de, Leira, Halvard, and Hobson, John M.. “The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919.” Millennium–Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 735–58.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. “States: Rise and Decline of the Primary Subjects of the International Community.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 49–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Cavanagh, Edward. “A Company with Sovereignty and Subjects of Its Own? The Case of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1763.” Canadian Journal of Law & Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 26, no. 1 (2011): 25–50.Google Scholar

Certeau, Michel de. L’invention du quotidien. Paris: Union générale d’éditions, 1980.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Chandler, David. “The Revival of Carl Schmitt in International Relations: The Last Refuge of Critical Theorists?” Millennium 37, no. 1 (2008): 27–48.Google Scholar

Chernilo, Daniel. “The Critique of Methodological Nationalism: Theory and History.” Thesis Eleven 106, no. 1 (2011): 98–117.Google Scholar

Church, William. “The Decline of the French Jurists as Political Theorists, 1660–1789.” French Historical Studies 5, no. 1 (1967): 1–40.Google Scholar

Church, William. Richelieu and Reason of State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De officiis. London: W. Heinemann, 1961.Google Scholar

Colás, Alejandro, and Mabee, Bryan, eds. Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires: Private Violence in Historical Context. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Cole, Laurence. Different Paths to the Nation: Regional and National Identities in Central Europe and Italy, 1830–70. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collini, Stefan. “What Is Intellectual History?” History Today, October 1985. www.historytoday.com/stefan-collini/what-intellectual-history.Google Scholar

Comparato, Vittor Ivo, and Quaglioni, Diego. “From Machiavellism to the End of the Seventeenth Century.” In European Political Thought, 1450–1700: Religion, Law and Philosophy, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., Burgess, Glenn, and Hodson, Simon, 55–101. London: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, Richard. “Holland, Sir Thomas Erskine (1835–1926).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944.Google Scholar

Costa Lopez, Julia. “International Relations in/and the Middle Ages.” In The Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, edited by Lopez, Julia Costa, Leira, Halvard, and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 408–18. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Costa Lopez, Julia, de Carvalho, Benjamin, Latham, Andrew A., Zarakol, Ayse, Bartelson, Jens, and Holm, Minda. “In the Beginning There Was No Word (for It): Terms, Concepts, and Early Sovereignty.” International Studies Review 20, no. 3 (2018): 489–519.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “Between Law and History: The Berlin Conference of 1884–1885 and the Logic of Free Trade.” London Review of International Law 3, no. 1 (2015): 31–59.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “Colonialism and Domination.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 862–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “The Invention of a Tradition: Westlake, The Berlin Conference and the Historicisation of International Law.” In Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline, edited by Nuzzo, Luigi and Vec, Miloš, 363–403. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2012.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew “Theorizing the Turn to History in International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, edited by Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian, 21–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Deruelle, Benjamin. “The Sixteenth-Century Antecedents of Special Operations ‘Small War’.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 25, no. 4 (2014): 754–66.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard. “‘The Battle Is All There Is’: Philosophy and History in International Relations Theory.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (August 8, 2017): 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devetak, Richard. “Historiographical Foundations of Modern International Thought: Histories of the European States-System from Florence to Göttingen.” History of European Ideas 41 (2014): 1–16.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard. “A Rival Enlightenment? Critical International Theory in Historical Mode.” International Theory 6, no. 3 (2014): 417–53.Google Scholar

Digelmann, Oliver. “The Periodization of the History of International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 997–1011. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Doe, Norman. “Phillimore, Sir Robert Joseph, Baronet (1810–1885).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944Google Scholar

Domingo, Rafael, and Minnucci, Giovanni. “Alberico Gentili and the Secularization of the Law of Nations.” In Christianity and Global Law, edited by Rafael Domingo and John Witte, Jr., 98–111. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar

Doran, Robert. “Editor’s Introduction: Choosing the Past: Hayden White and the Philosophy of History.” In Philosophy of History after Hayden White, edited by Doran, Robert, 1–34. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, Michael. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: W. W. Norton, 1998.Google Scholar

Dumont, Jean. Corps universel diplomatique du droit des gens, contenant un recueil des traitez d’alliance, de paix, de trêve, de neutralité, de commerce, etc., qui ont été faits en Europe, depuis le règne de l’empereur Charlemagne jusques à présent. Amsterdam: P. Brunel, R. and J. Wetstein, and G. Smith, Henri Waesberge, and Z. Chatelain, 1726.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dunne, Timothy. “Mythology or Methodology? Traditions in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 19, no. 3 (1993): 305–18.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Easley, Eric S. The War over Perpetual Peace: An Exploration into the History of a Foundational International Relations Text. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar

Edelstein, Daniel. “Hostis Humani Generis: Devils, Natural Right, and Terror in the French Revolution.” Telos 2007, no. 141 (2007): 57–81.Google Scholar

Edmonds, James E. Land Warfare: An Exposition of the Laws and Usages of War on Land, for the Guidance of Officers of His Majesty’s Army. London: HM Stationery Office, 1912.Google Scholar

Engster, Daniel. “Jean Bodin, Scepticism and Absolute Sovereignty.” History of Political Thought 17, no. 4 (1996): 469–99.Google Scholar

Fabre, Cécile. “In Defence of Mercenarism.” British Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3 (2010): 539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farneti, Roberto. Il canone moderno. Filosofia politica e genealogia. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri, 2002.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo. “Carl Schmitt (1888–1985).” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 1173–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo. “Stories of War and Peace: On Writing the History of International Law in the Third Reich and After.” European Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (2002): 479–512.Google Scholar

Fauchille, Paul. Traité de droit international public. Edited by Bonfils, Henri. Paris: Rousseau, 1898.Google Scholar

Fawcett, Louise. “Between West and Non-West: Latin American Contributions to International Thought.” The International History Review 34, no. 4 (2012): 679–704.Google Scholar

Field, Dudley. “De la possibilité d’appliquer le droit international européen aux nations orientales.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 7 (1875): 293–94.Google Scholar

Fiocchi Malaspina, Elisabetta. “Le droit des gens di Emer de Vattel: La genesi di un successo editoriale secolare.” Nuova Rivista Storica 98, no. 2 (2014): 733–54.Google Scholar

Fiocchi Malaspina, Elisabetta. “Emer de Vattel’s ‘Le droit des gens’: Its Circulation and Reception in the 19th Century.” Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 43, no. 2 (2013): 303–20.Google Scholar

Fiocchi Malaspina, Elisabetta, and Keller-Kemmerer, Nina. “International Law and Translation in the 19th Century.” Rechtsgeschichte-Legal History 22 (2014): 214–26.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “Context in the History of International Law.” Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 20, no. 1 (2018): 5–30.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “Equality between European and Non-European Nations in International Law.” In International Law in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by van Hulle, Inge and Lesaffer, Randall, 75–104. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2019.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. Humanism and America: An Intellectual History of English Colonisation, 1500–1625. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. King Leopold’s Ghostwriter: The Creation of Persons and States in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “Liberalism and Empire in Nineteenth Century International Law.” The American Historical Review 117, no. 1 (2012): 122–40.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “The Resilience of Natural Law in the Writings of Sir Travers Twiss.” In British International Thinkers from Hobbes to Namier, edited by Hall, Ian and Hill, Lisa, 137–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Foisneau, Luc. “Security as a Norm in Hobbes’s Theory of War: A Critique of Schmitt’s Interpretation of Hobbes’s Approach to International Relations.” In War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth-Century Europe, edited by Schröder, Peter and Asbach, Olaf, 163–80. Farnham: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Fonck, Bertrand, and Satterfield, George. “The Essence of War: French Armies and Small War in the Low Countries (1672–1697).” Small Wars & Insurgencies 25, no. 4 (2014): 767–83.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Murray Greensmith, Keens-Soper, Maurice H. A., and Savigear, Peter. The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. London: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. “Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and His Critics.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, edited by Burns, James H. and Goldie, Mark, 298–323. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Fulgosius, Raphaël. “Just War Reduced to Public War.” In The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings, edited by Reichberg, Gregory M., Syse, Henrik, and Begby, Endre, 227–30. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

Garibian, Sévane. “Hostes Humani Generis: Les pirates vus par le droit.” Critique, no. 6 (2008): 470–79.Google Scholar

Garnsey, Peter. Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Genin, Vincent. “The Institute of International Law’s Crisis in the Wake of the Franco-Prussian War (1873–1899).” In International Law in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by van Hulle, Inge and Lesaffer, Randall, 214–32. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2019.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. Il diritto di guerra (de iure belli libri III, 1598). Edited by Marchetto, G. and Zendri, C., translated by P. Nencini, with an introduction by Diego Quaglioni. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2008.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. De iure belli libri tres. Edited by Scott, James Brown, translated by John Carew Rolfe, with an introduction by Coleman Phillipson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. Lectionum et Epistolarum quæ ad ius civile pertinent Libri I–IV. Londini: Iohannes Wolfius, 1583.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. De legationibus libri tres. Edited by Scott, James Brown, translated by Gordon J. Laing, with an introduction by Ernest Nys. New York: Oxford University Press, 1924.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. Regales disputationes tres: id est, de potestate regis absoluta. De vnione regnorum Britanniæ. De vi ciuium in regem semper iniusta. Hanau: W. Antonius, 1605.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. The Wars of the Romans: A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis romanis. Edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, translated by David A. Lupher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Giesey, Ralph E. “Medieval Jurisprudence in Bodin’s Concept of Sovereignty.” In Jean Bodin, edited by Franklin, Julian H., 105–22. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Giladi, Rotem. “Francis Lieber on Public War.” Goettingen Journal of International Law 4 (2012): 447–77.Google Scholar

Glafey, Adam Friedrich. Vollständige Geschichte des Rechts der Vernunft. Leipzig: Neudruck der Ausgabe, 1739.Google Scholar

Goldie, Mark. The Reception of Locke’s Politics: From the 1690’s to the 1830’s. London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit. The Standard of Civilization in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gould, Harry. “Cicero’s Ghost: Rethinking the Social Construction of Piracy.” In Maritime Piracy and the Construction of Global Governance, edited by Struett, Michael J., Carlson, Jon D., and Nance, Mark T., 23–46. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Greene, Jody. “Hostis Humani Generis.” Critical Inquiry 34, no. 4 (2008): 683–705.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher. “International Law and the ‘War against Terrorism’.” International Affairs 78, no. 2 (2002): 301–17.Google Scholar

Grewe, Wilhelm Georg. The Epochs of International Law. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar

Grimm, Gunter. Rezeptionsgeschichte: Grundlegung einer Theorie: mit Analysen und Bibliographie. Munich: WFink, 1977.Google Scholar

Grosjean, Blandine. “La « guerre d’Algérie » reconnue à l’assemblée. Les députés adoptent la proposition de loi officialisant cette expression.” Libération, June 1999. www.liberation.fr/france/1999/06/11/la-guerre-d-algerie-reconnue-a-l-assemblee-les-deputes-adoptent-la-proposition-de-loi-officialisant-277134.Google Scholar

Gross, Leo. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948.” American Journal of International Law 42, no. 1 (1948): 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. De iure belli ac pacis libri tres. Edited and with an introduction by Scott, James Brown, translated by Francis Kelsey with the collaboration of Boak, Sanders, Reeves and Wright. New York: Oceana, 1964.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. Edited and with an introduction by Tuck, Richard, from the edition by Jean Barbeyrac. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Francesco. Dialogue on the Government of Florence. Translated by Alison Brown. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Guilhot, Nicolas. “The First Modern Realist: Felix Gilbert’s Machiavelli and the Realist Tradition in International Thought.” Modern Intellectual History 13, no. 3 (2016): 681–711.Google Scholar

Guilhot, Nicolas. The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Guillaume, Xavier. “Historical Periods and the Act of Periodization.” In The Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, edited by Lopez, Julia Costa, Leira, Halvard, and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 562–70. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Guldi, Jo, and Armitage, David. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. “Il diritto della guerra et della pace di Alberico Gentili.” In Atti del convegno quarta giornata gentiliana 21 settembre 1991. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 1995.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. “Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland’s Inaugural Lecture.” In Hugo Grotius and International Relations, edited by Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Roberts, Adam, 133–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. “La place de Francisco de Vitoria parmi les fondateurs du droit international.” In Actualité de la pensée juridique de Francisco de Vitoria: Travaux de la journée d’études organisée à Louvain-La-Neuve par le centre Charles de Visscher, edited by Truyol y Serra, Antonio, Mechoulan, Henry, Ortiz-Arce, Antonio, Marino, Primitivo, Haggenmacher, Peter, and Verhoeven, Joe, 27–36. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1988.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. “Préface.” In Le nomos de la terre, by Schmitt, Carl. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2012.Google Scholar

Hall, Ian. “The History of International Thought and International Relations Theory: From Context to Interpretation.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 241–60.Google Scholar

Hall, Ian, and Bevir, Mark. “Traditions of British International Thought.” The International History Review 36, no. 5 (2014): 823–34.Google Scholar

Hallam, Henry. Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries. Paris: John Murray, 1839.Google Scholar

Hansen, Peo, and Jonsson, Stefan. “Building Eurafrica: Reviving Colonialism through European Integration, 1920–1960.” In Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies, edited by Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, Sèbe, Berny, and Maas, Gabi. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014.Google Scholar

Heeren, Arnold Hermann Ludwig. A Manual of the History of the Political System of Europe and Its Colonies: From Its Formation at the Close of the Fifteenth Century, to Its Re-Establishment upon the Fall of Napoleon. Oxford: DA Talboys, 1834.Google Scholar

Heller-Roazen, Daniel. The Enemy of All: Piracy and the Law of Nations. New York: Zone Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Henshall, Nicholas. The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early Modern European Monarchy. London: Longman, 1992.Google Scholar

Heuser, Beatrice. “Misleading Paradigms of War: States and Non-State Actors, Combatants and Non-Combatants.” War & Society 27, no. 2 (2008): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heuser, Beatrice. “Small Wars in the Age of Clausewitz: The Watershed Between Partisan War and People’s War.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 33, no. 1 (2010): 139–62.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, T. J. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. “Hobbes’s Thucydides.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, edited by Martinich, Aloysius and Hoekstra, Kinch, 547–74. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. “A Source of War: Gentili’s Thucydides.” Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2008.Google Scholar

Holden, Gerard. “Who Contextualizes the Contextualizers: Disciplinary History and the Discourse about IR Discourse.” Review of International Studies 28, no. 2 (2002): 253–70.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. “The Early Literature on the Law of War.” In Studies in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879, 40–58.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. An Inaugural Lecture on Albericus Gentilis, Delivered at All Souls College, November 7, 1874. London: Macmillan, 1874.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. The Laws of War on Land (Written and Unwritten). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Lecture XIX: War. Measures of: Operations by Dolus.” In Lectures on International Law, edited by Walker, Thomas Alfred and Walker, Wyndham Legh, 286–98. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1933.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Lecture XVIII: War: Definition of and Effects of, in Lectures on International Law.” In Lectures on International Law, edited by Walker, Thomas Alfred and Walker, Wyndham Legh, 263–85. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1933.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Preface.” In Alberico Gentili: Bibliografia, by Gazzera, Ermelinda Armigero. Tolentino: F. Filelfo, 1917.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Review: Commentaries upon International Law, by Sir Robert Phillimore.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 12 (1880): 246–47.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. Studies in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898.Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine. A Valedictory Retrospect (1874–1910): Being a Lecture Delivered at All Souls College, June 17, 1910. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1910.Google Scholar

Holmqvist, Caroline. “Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 41, no. 3 (2013): 535–52.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Holub, Robert. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar

Holub, Robert. “Trends in Literary Theory: The American Reception of Reception Theory.” The German Quarterly 55, no. 1 (1982): 80–96.Google Scholar

Hooker, William. Carl Schmitt’s International Thought: Order and Orientation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hopkins, A. G. “Overseas Expansion, Imperialism, and Empire 1815–1914.” In The Nineteenth Century: Europe 1789–1914, edited by Blanning, T. C. W., 210–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds. The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World. London: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. “The History of Philosophy and the Persona of the Philosopher.” Modern Intellectual History 4, no. 3 (2007): 571–600.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. “The History of Theory.” Critical Inquiry 33, no. 1 (2006): 78–112.Google Scholar

Hutchings, Kimberly, Bartelson, Jens, Keene, Edward, Ypi, Lea, Kinsella, Helen M., and Armitage, David. “Critical Exchange: Foundations of Modern International Theory.” Contemporary Political Theory 13, no. 4 (2014): 387–418.Google Scholar

Ideville, Henry d. Le Maréchal Bugeaud, d’après sa correspondance intime et des documents inédits, 1784–1849. Paris: Librairie de Firmin-Didiot et Cie, 1882.Google Scholar

Ingham, Patricia Clare. “Review: Kathleen Davis. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time.” The American Historical Review 115, no. 5 (2010): 1436–38.Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. Munich: WFink, 1984.Google Scholar

Iurlaro, Francesca. The Invention of Custom: Natural Law and the Law of Nations, CA. 1550–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iurlaro, Francesca. “Pirati, barbari e pastori: Tre figure al limite dell’humanitas nel pensiero di Alberico Gentili (1552–1608).” Historia et Ius 10 (2016): 1–11.Google Scholar

Jahn, Beate. The Cultural Construction of International Relations: The Invention of the State of Nature. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar

Jahn, Beate. “Introduction.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jauss, Hans Robert. Literaturgeschichte als Provokation. Erstausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970.Google Scholar

Jeffery, Renée. Hugo Grotius in International Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar

Jeffery, Renée. “Tradition as Invention: The ‘Traditions Tradition’ and the History of Ideas in International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34, no. 1 (2005): 57–84.Google Scholar

Johnson, James Turner. Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Johnston, David, Urbinati, Nadia, and Vergara, Camila, eds. Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Jouannet, Emmanuelle. The Liberal-Welfarist Law of Nations: A History of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kadelbach, Stefan, Kleinlein, Thomas, and Roth-Isigkeit, David. System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Kaldor, Mary. New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Stathis. “The Changing Character of Civil Wars: 1800–2009.” In The Changing Character of War, edited by Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, 202–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Keen, Maurice Hugh. The Laws of War in the Late Middle Ages. London: Routledge, 1965.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-Making against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century.” International Organization 61, no. 02 (2007): 311–39.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “Images of Grotius.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 233–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “International Intellectual History and International Relations: Contexts, Canons and Mediocrities.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 341–56.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. International Political Thought: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “The Reception of Thucydides in the History of International Relations.” In A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides, edited by Lee, Christine and Morley, Neville, 355–72. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “The Standard of ‘Civilisation’, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-Century International Social Space.” Millennium–Journal of International Studies 42, no. 3 (2014): 651–73.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “Three Traditions of International Theory.” In Guide to the English School in International Studies, edited by Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel, 171–83. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. “The Treaty-Making Revolution of the Nineteenth Century.” The International History Review 34, no. 3 (2012): 475–500.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “The Development and Context of Bodin’s Method.” In Jean Bodin: Verhandlungen der internationalen Bodin-Tagung, edited by Denzer, Horst, 123–50. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1973.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance. London: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “The Rise of Legal History in the Renaissance.” History and Theory 9, no. 2 (1970): 174–94.Google Scholar

Kelly, John M. A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David. Of War and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict. “Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili’s Combination of Pragmatic Pluralism and Normative Judgment.” American Journal of International Law 92, no. 4 (1998): 713–23.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict. “A Grotian Tradition of Theory and Practice: Grotius, Law, and Moral Skepticism in the Thought of Hedley Bull.” Quinnipac Law Review 17 (1997): 3–33.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, and Straumann, Benjamin, eds. The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan. “Rebel with a Cause? Terrorists and Humanitarian Law.” European Journal of International Law 14, no. 2 (2003): 299–312.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, James T. Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Knutsen, Torbjørn L. A History of International Relations Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Koch, Christophe de. Histoire abrégée des traités de paix, entre les puissances de l’Europe, depuis la paix de Westphalie. Paris: Chez Gide fils, 1817.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “Carl Schmitt and International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 592–611. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations.” In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Byers, Michael, 17–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “The Epochs of International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51, no. 3 (2002): 746–51.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “International Law and raison d’état: Rethinking the Prehistory of International Law.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 297–339. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “International Law as Political Theology: How to Read Nomos Der Erde?” Constellations 11, no. 4 (2004): 492–511.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity.” International Relations 26, no. 1 (2012): 3–34.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “Out of Europe: Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Turn to ‘International Relations’.” In The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, 413–509. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “Vitoria and Us.” Rechtsgeschichte–Legal History 22 (2014): 119–38.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lacchè, Luigi. “Monuments of International Law: Albericus Gentilis and Hugo Grotius in Constructing a Discipline (1875–1886).” In Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline, edited by Nuzzo, Luigi and Vec, Miloš, 147–250. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2012.Google Scholar

Lane, Melissa. “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s Genealogical Turn.” Journal of the History of Ideas 73, no. 1 (2012): 71–82.Google Scholar

Latham, Andrew. “Political Theology of International Order: William Bain.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 5 (2020): 814–16.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La découverte, 2013.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch. “The Grotian Tradition in International Law.” British Yearbook of International Law 23 (1946): 1–53.Google Scholar

Le Goff, Jacques. Faut-il vraiment découper l’histoire en tranches? Paris: Le Seuil, 2014.Google Scholar

Learoyd, Arthur. “Configurations of Semi-Sovereignty in the Long-Nineteenth Century.” In De-Centering State Making: Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Bartelson, Jens, Hall, Martin, and Teorell, Jan, 155–74. Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar

Learoyd, Arthur. “Semi-Sovereignty and Relationships of Hierarchy.” D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017.Google Scholar

Lee, Christine, and Morley, Neville, eds. A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.Google Scholar

Lee, Daniel. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Lee, Daniel. The Right of Sovereignty: Jean Bodin on the Sovereign State and the Law of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hartmut, and Richter, Melvin, eds. The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 1996.Google Scholar

Lemnitzer, Jan. Power, Law and the End of Privateering. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall. “Alberico Gentili’s ius post bellum and Early Modern Peace Treaties.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 210–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall. “The Classical Law of Nations (1500–1800).” In Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law, edited by Orakhelashvili, Alexander, 408–40. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall. “The End of the Cold War as an Epochal Event in the History of International Law?” Tilburg Working Paper Series on Jurisprudence and Legal History 10 (2010): 1–25.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall. Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall. “Peace Treaties and the Formation of International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 71–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Levack, Brian. The Civil Lawyers in England, 1603–1641: A Political Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Levack, Brian. “Law and Ideology: The Civil Law and Theories of Absolutism in Elizabethan and Jacobean England.” In The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture, edited by Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard, 220–41. London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Levy, J. A. “Alberigo Gentili.” Algemeen Handelsblad. February 3, 1877.Google Scholar

Li, Darryl. The Universal Enemy: Jihad, Empire, and the Challenge of Solidarity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Lifschitz, Avi. Engaging with Rousseau: Reaction and Interpretation from the Eighteenth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Liu, Glory M. “Rethinking the ‘Chicago Smith’ Problem: Adam Smith and the Chicago School, 1929–1980.” Modern Intellectual History 17, no. 4 (2020): 1041–68.Google Scholar

Lobban, Michael. “English Approaches to International Law in the Nineteenth Century.” In Time, History and International Law, edited by Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, and Vogiatzi, Maria, 65–90. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar

Lobban, Michael. “Twiss, Sir Travers (1809–1897).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944Google Scholar

Lopez, Julia Costa. “Political Authority in International Relations: Revisiting the Medieval Debate.” International Organization 74, no. 2 (2020): 222–52.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Chris, and Berger, Stefan. Nationalizing the Past: Historians as Nation Builders in Modern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar

Luard, Evan. War in International Society: A Study in International Sociology. London: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Luban, David. “A Theory of Crimes against Humanity.” Yale Journal of International Law 29 (2004): 85–167.Google Scholar

Lubell, Noam. Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lupher, David. “The De armis romanis and the Exemplum of Roman Imperialism.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 85–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Macalister-Smith. “Bio-Bibliographical Key to the Membership of the Institut de droit international, 1873–2001.” Journal of the History of International Law 5, no. 1 (2003): 77–160.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. Edited by Codevilla, Angelo. London: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. A Short History of Ethics. New York: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar

MacKay, Joseph, and LaRoche, Christopher David. “The Conduct of History in International Relations: Rethinking Philosophy of History in IR Theory.” International Theory 9, no. 2 (July 2017): 203–36.Google Scholar

McMahon, Darrin. Happiness: A History. New York: Grove Press, 2005.Google Scholar

McMahon, Darrin. Divine Fury: A History of Genius. New York: Basic Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. “Alberico Gentili and the Ottomans.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 127–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. “Hobbes’ Theory of International Relations.” In Aspects of Hobbes, edited by Malcolm, Noel, 433–55. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. Useful Enemies: Islam and the Ottoman Empire in Western Political Thought, 1450–1750. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Mancini, Pasquale. Della nazionalità come fondamento del diritto delle genti. Milan: Tipografia Eredi Botta, 1854.Google Scholar

Mantena, Karuna. “Social Theory in the Age of Empire.” In Empire and Modern Political Thought, edited by Muthu, Sankar, 324–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Marchand, Suzanne. “Intellectual History Confronts the Longue Durée.” History and Theory 59, no. 3 (2020): 482–89.Google Scholar

Martens, Georg Friedrich von. Primae lineae iuris gentium europaearum practici in usum auditorum adumbratae. Gottingen: Dietrich, 1785.Google Scholar

Martineau, Anne-Charlotte. “Concerning Violence: A Post-Colonial Reading of the Debate on the Use of Force.” Leiden Journal of International Law 29, no. 1 (2016): 95–112.Google Scholar

Martines, Lauro. Lawyers and Statecraft in Renaissance Florence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Mattingly, Garrett. Renaissance Diplomacy. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation, 1955.Google Scholar

McCormick, John. “Teaching in Vain: Carl Schmitt, Thomas Hobbes, and the Theory of the Sovereign State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 269–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

McLeod, Travers. Rule of Law in War: International Law and United States Counterinsurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

McMahon, Darrin, and Moyn, Samuel. Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric. “From ‘Savages’ to ‘Unlawful Combatants’: A Postcolonial Look at International Humanitarian Law’s ‘Other’.” In International Law and Its Others, edited by Orford, Anne, 265–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mehring, Reinhard. Carl Schmitt: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Menchi, Silvana Seidel. Erasmo in Italia, 1520–1580. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri, 1987.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor. “Common Rights of Mankind in Gentili, Grotius and Suarez.” American Journal of International Law 85, no. 1 (1991): 110–16.Google Scholar

Milton, Patrick, Axworthy, Michael, and Simms, Brendan. Towards A Westphalia for the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Minnucci, Giovanni. Alberico Gentili tra mos italicus e mos gallicus: l’inedito commentario ad legem juliam de adulteriis. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 2002.Google Scholar

Minnucci, Giovanni. “Per una rilettura del metodo gentiliano.” In Alberico Gentili: La tradizione giuridica perugina e la fondazione del diritto internazionale, edited by Treggiari, Ferdinando, 29–56. Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, 2008.Google Scholar

Molloy, Seàn. Kant’s International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Moreman, Tim R. “‘Small Wars’ and ‘Imperial Policing’: The British Army and the Theory and Practice of Colonial Warfare in the British Empire, 1919–1939.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 19, no. 4 (1996): 105–31.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, and Sartori, Andrew. Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Muldoon, James. Empire and Order: The Concept of Empire, 800–1800. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. London: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Mumford, Andrew, and Reis, Bruno C.. The Theory and Practice of Irregular Warfare: Warrior-Scholarship in Counter-Insurgency. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Münkler, Herfried. Die neuen Kriege. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 2002.Google Scholar

Münkler, Herfried. The New Wars. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Murphy, Craig. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance since 1850. Europe and the International Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar

N. A. “Inauguration de la table commemorative d’Albéric Gentil.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 9 (1877): 293–94.Google Scholar

N. A. “Informational Booklet of the English Sub-Committee,” 1875. L.Ital.A55d2. Bodleian Law Library.Google Scholar

Nabulsi, Karma. Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance, and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Nabulsi, Karma, and Hazareesingh, Sudhir. “Using Archival Sources to Theorize about Politics.” In Political Theory: Methods and Approaches, edited by Leopold, David and Stears, Marc, 150–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen C. Justice among Nations: A History of International Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen C. War and the Law of Nations: A General History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Neocleous, Mark. “Friend or Enemy: Reading Schmitt Politically.” Radical Philosophy 79 (1996): 13–23.Google Scholar

Newman, Edward. “The ‘New Wars’ Debate: A Historical Perspective Is Needed.” Security Dialogue 35, no. 2 (2004): 173–89.Google Scholar

Nexon, Daniel H. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Nézard, Henry. “Albericus Gentilis.” In Les fondateurs du droit international: leurs œuvres, leurs doctrines, edited by Barthélemy, Joseph, 37–92. Paris: V. Giard & E. Brière, 1904.Google Scholar

Nordin, Astrid H. M., and Öberg, Dan. “Targeting the Ontology of War: From Clausewitz to Baudrillard.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 43, no. 2 (2015): 392–410.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Arthur. A Concise History of the Law of Nations. New York: Macmillan, 1947.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Luigi. Origini di una scienza: diritto internazionale e colonialismo nel XIX secolo. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann Vittorio, 2012.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Luigi, and Vec, Miloš, eds. Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2012.Google Scholar

Nys, Ernest. “L’inauguration du monument d’Albéric Gentil à San Ginesio.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée Series 2, Vol. 10 (1908): 645–47.Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Cian, and Brunstetter, Daniel, eds. Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Odysseos, Louiza, and Petito, Fabio. The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Odysseos, Louiza, and Petito, Fabio. “Vagaries of Interpretation: A Rejoinder to David Chandler’s Reductionist Reading of Carl Schmitt.” Millennium 37, no. 2 (2008): 463–75.Google Scholar

Oestreich, Gerhard. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Ompteda, Dietrich Heinrich Ludwig von. Litteratur des gesammten sowohl natürlichen als positiven Völkerrechts. Regensberg: Johann Leopold Montags Erben, 1785.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa Francis. International Law: A Treatise. London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1912.Google Scholar

Orford, Anne. “On International Legal Method.” London Review of International Law 1, no. 1 (2013): 166.Google Scholar

Orford, Anne. “What Is the Place of Anachronism in International Legal Thinking.” Université Paris 1, 2013. www.sam-network.org/video/what-is-the-place-of-anachronism-in-international-legal-thinking.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.” International Organization 55, no. 2 (2001): 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen. The Transformation of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Owens, Patricia. Economy of Force: Counterinsurgency and the Historical Rise of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. The Burdens of Empire: 1539 to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. “Gentili, Vitoria, and the Fabrication of a ‘Natural Law of Nations’.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 340–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Pallant, Anne. “Scipione Gentili: A Sixteenth Century Jurist.” Kingston Law Review 14 (1984): 97.Google Scholar

Palonen, Kari. Politics and Conceptual Histories: Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar

Palonen, Kari. “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 3 (1999): 60–73.Google Scholar

Panizza, Diego. “Alberico Gentili’s De armis romanis: The Roman Model of the Just Empire.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 53–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Panizza, Diego. “Alberico Gentili’s De iure belli: The Humanist Foundations of a Project of International Order.” In Atti dei convegni nel quarto centenario della morte 2008, 557–86. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2010.Google Scholar

Panizza, Diego. “Il pensiero politico di Alberico Gentili: religione, virtù e ragion di stato.” In Alberico Gentili: politica e religione nell’età delle guerre di religione: atti del convegno, seconda giornata gentiliana, San Ginesio, 17 Maggio 1987, edited by Panizza, Diego, 57–213. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2002.Google Scholar

Panizza, Diego. “Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili’s De iure belli: The Great Debate between ‘Theological’ and ‘Humanist’ Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius.” In The Roots of International Law/Les fondements du droit international: Liber amicorum Peter Haggenmacher, edited by Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Chetail, Vincent, and Haggenmacher, Peter, 211–47. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar

Patriarca, Silvana, and Riall, Lucy, eds. The Risorgimento Revisited: Nationalism and Culture in Nineteenth Century Italy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar

Pejcinovic, Lacy. War in International Society. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Pennington, Kenneth. The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Peralta, Jaime. Baltasar de Ayala y el derecho de la guerra. Madrid: Ínsula, 1964.Google Scholar

Percy, Sarah. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Petito, Fabio, and Odysseos, Louiza. “Carl Schmitt.” In Critical Theorists and International Relations, edited by Edkins, Jenny and Vaughan-Williams, Nick, 305–16. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar

Phillimore, Robert. Commentaries upon International Law. London: W. Benning, 1854.Google Scholar

Phillips, Andrew, and Sharman, J. C.. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman. “Albericus Gentilis.” Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 12 (1911).Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman. “Albericus Gentilis.” In Great Jurists of the World, edited by Macdonell, John and Manson, Edward, 109–43. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1914.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman. “Introduction.” In Alberico Gentili, De iure belli libri tres, edited by Scott, James Brown, translated by John Carew Rolfe, 9–51. London: Clarendon Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman. “Letter from Coleman Phillipson to Thomas Erskine Holland,” Papers relating to Albericus Gentilis, held at the Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, October 27, 1911.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. “International Relations and the Critical History of International Law.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 282–98.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. London: Methuen, 1972.Google Scholar

Poirson, Martial. Ombres de Molière: naissance d’un mythe littéraire à travers ses avatars du XVIIe siècle à nos jours. Paris: Armand Colin, 2012.Google Scholar

Policante, Amedeo. The Pirate Myth: Genealogies of an Imperial Concept. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

Porch, Douglas. “Bugeaud, Gallieni, Lyautey: The Development of French Colonial Warfare.” In Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, edited by Paret, Peter, Craig, Gordon A., and Gilbert, Felix, 376–407. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Porch, Douglas. Counterinsurgency: Exposing the Myths of the New Way of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Porch, Douglas. “Introduction.” In Small Wars: Their Principles and Practice, by Callwell, Charles Edward, 1–20. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1899.Google Scholar

Potts, John. Ideas in Time: The Longue Durée in Intellectual History. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence, 2019.Google Scholar

Press, Steven. Rogue Empires: Contracts and Conmen in Europe’s Scramble for Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Quaglioni, Diego. “The Italian ‘Readers’ of Bodin, 17th–18th Centuries: The Italian ‘Readers’ Out of Italy – Alberico Gentili (1552–1608).” In The Reception of Bodin, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., 371–86. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Quaglioni, Diego. “Il “Machiavellismo” di Jean Bodin (“République,” V, 5–6).” Il pensiero politico 22, no. 2 (1989): 198–207.Google Scholar

Quaglioni, Diego. “Pour une histoire du droit de guerre au début de l’âge moderne. Bodin, Gentili, Grotius.” Translated by Jean-Louis Fournel. Laboratoire italien. Politique et société, no. 10 (2010): 9–20.Google Scholar

Rasch, William. “Introduction: Carl Schmitt and the New World Order.” South Atlantic Quarterly 104, no. 2 (2005): 177–83.Google Scholar

Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “Francisco de Vitoria’s Unexpected Transformations and Reinterpretations for International Law.” International Community Law Review 15, no. 3 (1, 2013): 287–318.Google Scholar

Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “Grotian Revivals in the Theory and History of International Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius, edited by Lesaffer, Randall and Nijman, Janne E., 578–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “The Problem of Periodization in the History of International Law.” Law and History Review 37, no. 1 (2019): 275–308.Google Scholar

Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “The Shifting Origins of International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2015): 419–40.Google Scholar

Rava, Luigi. Ministro della istruzione pubblica, Alberico Gentili: Discorso pronunciato all’inaugurazione del monumento in San Ginesio, 26 Settembre 1908. Roma, 1908.Google Scholar

Ravndal, Ellen. “Acting Like a State: Non-European Membership of International Organisations in the Nineteenth Century.” In De-Centering State Making Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Bartelson, Jens, Hall, Martin, and Teorell, Jan, 175–96. Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar

Ravndal, Ellen. “Colonies, Semi-Sovereigns, and Great Powers: IGO Membership Debates and the Transition of the International System.” Review of International Studies 46, no. 2 (2020): 278–98.Google Scholar

Ravndal, Ellen. “From an Inclusive to an Exclusive International Order: Membership of International Organisations from the 19th to the 20th Century.” STANCE Working Paper Series, Lund: Department of Political Science, Lund University 8 (2016).Google Scholar

Rech, Walter. Enemies of Mankind: Vattel’s Theory of Collective Security. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar

Rech, Walter. “Rightless Enemies: Schmitt and Lauterpacht on Political Piracy.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 2 (2012): 235–63.Google Scholar

Reid, Julian. “Reappropriating Clausewitz: The Neglected Dimensions of Counter-Strategic Thought.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 277–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Riall, Lucy. The Italian Risorgimento: State, Society and National Unification. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Richter, Melvin. The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul. “Appropriation.” In Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation, by Ricœur, Paul, 182–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Ringmar, Erik. Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Rivier, Alphonse. “Review: An Inaugural Lecture on Albericus Gentilis. Delivered at All Souls College, by Thomas Erskine Holland.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 7 (1875): 321–24.Google Scholar

Rivier, Alphonse. “Review: The Law of Nationals Considered as Independent Political Communities. On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Times of War.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 7 (1875): 699–702.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Albéric Gentil. Hommages à sa mémoire.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 8 (1876): 141–44.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Quelques mots sur les hommages projetés à la mémoire de Grotius et d’Albéric Gentil, et sur les dernières publications y relatives.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 8 (1876): 690–96.Google Scholar

Rösch, Felix. Power, Knowledge, and Dissent in Morgenthau’s Worldview. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Sophia. Common Sense: A Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Roshchin, Evgeny. “(Un)Natural and Contractual International Society: A Conceptual Inquiry.” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 2 (2013): 257–79.Google Scholar

Rossi, Christopher R. Broken Chain of Being: James Brown Scott and the Origins of Modern International Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 1998.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Emma. “Arcs of Ideas: International History and Intellectual History.” In Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien, edited by Budde, Gunilla, Conrad, Sebastian, and Janz, Oliver, 217–26. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar

Rubin, Alfred P. The Law of Piracy. Newport, RI: Naval War College Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Rubin, Alfred P., and Boczek, B. A.. “Private and Public History; Private and Public Law.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 30–39, 1988.Google Scholar

Sarkees, Meredith Reid, Wayman, Frank Whelon, and Singer, J. David. “Inter-State, Intra-State, and Extra-State Wars: A Comprehensive Look at Their Distribution over Time, 1816–1997.” International Studies Quarterly 47, no. 1 (2003): 49–70.Google Scholar

Sbarbaro, Pietro. Da Socino a Mazzini. Rome: Edoardo Perino, 1886.Google Scholar

Scarfi, Juan Pablo. The Hidden History of International Law in the Americas: Empire and Legal Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Scheipers, Sibylle. Clausewitz on Small War. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2016.Google Scholar

Scheipers, Sibylle. “‘The Most Beautiful of Wars’: Carl von Clausewitz and Small Wars.” European Journal of International Security 2, no. 1 (2017): 47–63.Google Scholar

Scheipers, Sibylle. Unlawful Combatants: A Genealogy of the Irregular Fighter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Schellhase, Kenneth C. Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought. London: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William E. Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Brian. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “The Changing Structure of International Law.” Journal for Cultural Research 20, no. 3 (2016): 310–28.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “The Concept of Piracy (1937).” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 2, no. 1 (2011): 27–29.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “Forms of Modern Imperialism in International Law.” In Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, edited by Legg, Stephen, 29–45. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “Der Führer schützt das Recht.” Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung, no. 39 (1934): 945–50.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “The Großraum in International Law with a Ban on Intervention for Spatially Foreign Powers.” In Writings on War, edited by Nunan, Timothy, 75–124. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “Großraum versus Universalism: The International Legal Struggle over the Monroe Doctrine,” In Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, edited by Legg, Stephen, 46–54. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “The International Crime of Aggression and the Principle ‘nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege’.” In Writings on War, edited and translated by Nunan, Timothy, 125–97. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. New York: Telos Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “Reich Staat Bund. Antrittsvorlesung, Gehalten an der Kölner Universität Am 20. Juni 1933.” In Positionen und Begriffe: Im Kampf mit Weimar – Genf – Versailles 1923–1939, 190–98. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Theory of the Partisan: Intermediate Commentary on the Concept of the Political. New York: Telos Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “The Turn to the Discriminating Concept of War.” In Writings on War, edited by and translated Nunan, Timothy, 30–74. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Schöndorf, Roy S. “Extra-State Armed Conflicts: Is There a Need for a New Legal Regime?” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (2004): 1–78.Google Scholar

Schröder, Peter. “Carl Schmitt’s Appropriation of the Early Modern European Tradition of Political Thought on the State and Interstate Relations.” History of Political Thought 33, no. 2 (2012): 348–71.Google Scholar

Schröder, Peter. Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Schröder, Peter. “Vitoria, Gentili, Bodin: Sovereignty and the Law of Nations.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 163–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Schulz, Carsten-Andreas. “Civilisation, Barbarism and the Making of Latin America’s Place in 19th-Century International Society.” Millennium 42, no. 3 (2014): 837–59.Google Scholar

Schwab, George. The Challenge of the Exception: An Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt between 1921 and 1936. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Schwab, George. “Introduction.” In Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Edited and translated by Schwab, George. Foreword by Strong, Tracy B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006, xxxvvii–lii.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Benjamin. “Some Polarities in Confucian Thought.” In Confucianism in Action, edited by Nivison, David S. and Wright, Arthur F., 50–62. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Seigel, Jerrold. The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Sharman, J. C., and Phillips, Andrew. Outsourcing Empire: How Company-States Made the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Sharp, Andrew. “Alberico Gentili’s Obscure Resurrection as a Royalist in 1644.” In Alberico Gentili: l’ordine internazionale in un mondo a più civiltà: atti del convegno decima giornata gentiliana. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2002, 285–313.Google Scholar

Shiller, Robert J. Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Simmonds, K. R. “The Gentili Manuscripts.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte/Romanistische Abteilung 76, no. 1 (1959): 534–52.Google Scholar

Simmonds, K. R. “Hugo Grotius and Alberico Gentili.” German Yearbook of International Law 8 (1959): 85–100.Google Scholar

Simpson, Gerry. “Enemies of Mankind.” In Ethics, Law, and Society, Vol. 2, edited by Gunning, Jennifer and Holm, Søren, 85–94. Chalgrove: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Singh, Prabhakar. “Book Review: Lauren Benton and Lisa Ford. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850; Andrew Fitzmaurice. Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000.” European Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2017): 975–86.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “A Genealogy of the Modern State (British Academy Lecture).” Proceedings of the British Academy 162 (2008): 325–70.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1969): 3–53.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “A Reply to My Critics.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James, 231–88. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James, 97–118. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics (3 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Skodo, Admir. “Post-Analytic Philosophy of History.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 3, no. 3 (2009): 308–33.Google Scholar

Slomp, Gabriella. Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

Smeltzer, Joshua. “On the Use and Abuse of Francisco de Vitoria: James Brown Scott and Carl Schmitt.” Journal of the History of International Law 20, no. 2 (2018), 345–72.Google Scholar

Somos, Mark, and Smeltzer, Joshua. “Vitoria, Suárez, and Grotius: James Brown Scott’s Enduring Revival.” Grotiana 41, no. 1 (2020): 137–62.Google Scholar

Specter, Matthew G. “What’s ‘Left’ in Schmitt? From Aversion to Appropriation in Contemporary Political Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 426–54. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Spiers, Edward M. “The Use of the Dum Dum Bullet in Colonial Warfare.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 4, no. 1 (1975): 3–14.Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard. “Die Träger des ius belli ac pacis 1648–1806.” In Staat und Krieg: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Moderne, edited by Rösener, Werner, 595–613. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.Google Scholar

Stern, Philip J. The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Straumann, Benjamin. “The Corpus iuris as a Source of Law Between Sovereigns in Alberico Gentili’s Thought.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 101–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Straumann, Benjamin. “The Energy of Concepts: The Role of Concepts in Long-Term Intellectual History and Social Reality.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 14, no. 2 (2019): 147–82.Google Scholar