Abdullah, Carolyne, Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Raphael, Chad. 2016. “Affinity Groups, Enclave Deliberation, and Equity.” Journal of Public Deliberation 12(2): 1–40.Google Scholar

Abizadeh, Arash. 2020. “Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly.” Perspectives on Politics 19(3): 1–16.Google Scholar

Abrajano, Marisa, and Poole, Keith T.. 2011. “Assessing the Ethnic and Racial Diversity of American Public Opinion.” In Who Gets Represented? ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 32–60.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan. 2018. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H.. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76(3): 502–521.Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, and Fishkin, James S.. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, James, and Ezrow, Lawrence. 2009. “Who Do European Parties Represent?: How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders.” Journal of Politics 71(1): 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, David, and Ansell, Ben. 2020. “Housing and Populism.” West European Politics 43(2): 344–65.Google Scholar

Adler, Kayla. 2019. “Elise Stefanik Wants the Unthinkable: More Women in the GOP.” City and State New York (November 18, 2019). www.cityandstateny.com/personality/2019/11/elise-stefanik-wants-the-unthinkable-more-women-in-the-gop/176704/Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz Before a Blind Audience?’” American Political Science Review 83(1): 123–141.Google Scholar

Alexander, Amy C., and Welzel, Christian. 2017. “The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction.” ILE Working Paper Series.Google Scholar

Allcock, J. B. 1971. “’Populism’: A Brief Biography.” Sociology 5(3): 371–387.Google Scholar

Allen, Nicholas, Magni, Gabriele, Searing, Donald, and Warncke, Philip. 2020. “What Is a Career Politician? Theories, Concepts, and Measures.” European Political Science Review 12(2): 199–217.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., and Zürn, Michael. 2020. “Conceptualising Backlash Politics: Introductions to a Special Issie on Backlash Politics in Comparison.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 563–584.Google Scholar

Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amenta, Edwin, Carruthers, Bruce G., and Zylan, Yvonne. 1992. “A Hero for the Aged? The Townsend Movement, the Political Mediation Model, and U.S. Old-Age Policy, 1934–1950.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 308–339.Google Scholar

Anastasopoulos, Lefteris. 2016. “Estimating the Gender Penalty in House of Representative Elections Using a Regression Discontinuity Design.” Electoral Studies 43: 150–157.Google Scholar

Andersen, Vibeke Normann, and Hansen, Kasper M.. 2007. “How Deliberation Makes Better Citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the Euro.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 531–556.Google Scholar

Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, André, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andersson, Staffan, Bergman, Torbjörn, and Ersson, Svante. 2014. “The European Representative Democracy Data Archive, Release 3.”Google Scholar

Ansell, Ben W. 2010. From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnesen, Sveinung and Peters, Yvette. 2018. “The Legitimacy of Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 51(7): 868–899.Google Scholar

Arnold, Christine, and Franklin, Mark N.. 2012. “Introduction: Issue Congruence and Political Responsiveness.” West European Politics 35(6): 1217–1225.Google Scholar

Arzheimer, Kai, and Berning, Carl C.. 2019. “How the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and Their Voters Veered to the Radical Right, 2013–2017.” Electoral Studies 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arzheimer, Kai. 2015. “The AfD: Finally a Successful Right-Wing Populist Eurosceptic Party for Germany?” West European Politics 38(3):535–556.Google Scholar

Astor, Maggie. 2019. “‘It Can’t Be Worse’: How Republican Women Are Trying to Rebuild.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/republican-women-congress.html.Google Scholar

Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65(4):1040–1061.Google Scholar

Audickas, Lukas. 2016. “Social Background of MPs 1979–2015.” House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. CBP 7483.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34(1): 124–152.Google Scholar

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. 1963. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework.” American Political Science Review 57(3): 632–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, André, and Gerber, Marléne. 2014. “Gentlemanly Conversation or Vigorous Contestation?: An Exploratory Analysis of Communication Modes in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (Europolis).” In Deliberative Mini-publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, eds. Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., and Setälä, M.. Colchester: ECPR Press, 115–134.Google Scholar

Bächtiger, André, and Goldberg, Saskia. 2020. “Towards a More Robust, but Limited and Contingent Defense of the Political Uses of Deliberative Minipublics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, Andre, and Parkinson, John. 2019. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Toward a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bächtiger, Andre, Dryzek, John, Mansbridge, Jane, and Warren, Mark E., eds. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bäck, Hanna, and Carroll, Royce. 2018. Polarization and gridlock in parliamentary regimes. The Legislative Scholar 3: 1–6.Google Scholar

Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57: 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Tiffany D., and Saxton, Gregory W.. 2019. “Working-Class Legislators and Perceptions of Representation in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly 72(4): 910–928.Google Scholar

Barnes, Tiffany D., and Burchard, Stephanie M.. 2013. “‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 46(7): 767–790.Google Scholar

Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83(4): 1181–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut.” Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 15–31.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2014. “U.S. Is a World Leader in Class Conflict over GovernmentS.” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey–cage/wp/2014/04/21/u–s– is–a–world–leader–in–class–conflict–over–government–spending/.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883363.Google Scholar

Bashir, Omar S. 2015. “Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the ‘Oligarchy’ Result.” Research and Politics 2(4): 1–7.Google Scholar

Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 571–597.Google Scholar

Beauvais, Edana, and Warren, Mark E.. 2019. “What Can Deliberative Mini-Publics Contribute to Democratic Systems?” European Journal of Political Research 58(3): 893–914.Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bentley, Arthur F. 2008 [1908]. The Process of Government. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Beramendi, Pablo, Kitschelt, Herbert, Häusermann, Silja, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2015. “Introduction: The Politics of Advanced Capitalism.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, eds. Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H., Herbert, and Kriesi, H.. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–64.Google Scholar

Beramendi, Pablo. 2012. The Political Geography of Inequality: Regions and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berbuir, Nicole, Lewandowsky, Marcel, and Siri, Jasmin. 2015. “The AfD and Its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany?” German Politics 24(2): 154–178.Google Scholar

Bergmann, Henning, Bäck, Hanna, and Saalfeld, Thomas. 2022. “Party-System Polarisation, Legislative Institutions and Cabinet Survival in 28 Parliamentary Democracies, 1945–2019.” West European Politics 45(3): 612–637.Google Scholar

Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27: 5–19.Google Scholar

Bernauer, Julian, Giger, Nathalie, and Rosset, Jan. 2015. “Mind the Gap: Do Proportional Electoral Systems Foster a More Equal Representation of Women and Men, Poor and Rich?” International Political Science Review 36(1): 78–98.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Dan, Krasa, Stefan, and Polborn, Mattias. 2008. “Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias.” Journal of Public Economics 92(5–6): 1092–1104.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control: Applied Studies towards a Sociology of Language. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar

Bessette, Joseph M. 1980. “Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government.” In How Democratic Is the Constitution? eds. Goldwin, R. A. and Schambra, W. A.. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 102–116.Google Scholar

Bessette, J. M. 1997. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Best, Heinrich, and Cotta, Maurizio, eds. 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, Heinrich. 2007. “New Challenges, New Elites? Changes in the Recruitment and Career Patterns of European Representative Elites.” Comparative Sociology 6(1): 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beste, Simon, and Wyss, Dominik. 2014. “Cognitive Complexity as a Proxy for High-Quality Deliberation? A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration of Cognitive Complexity and Deliberative Quality in the EuroPolis Discussions.” In ECPR General Conference September 3–6. Glasgow.Google Scholar

Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhatti, Yosef and Erikson, Robert S.. 2011. “How Poorly Are the Poor Represented in the US Senate?” In Who Gets Represented? eds. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 223–246.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Christopher, and Accetti, Carlo Invernizzi. 2017. “Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20(2): 186–206.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 519–533.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 2017. “Polarized We Govern?” In Governing in a Polarized Age: Elections, Parties and Political Representation in America, eds. Gerber, Alan S., Schickler, Eric, and Mayhew, David R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223–242.Google Scholar

Binnema, Harmen, and Michels, Ank. 2021. “Does Democratic Innovation Reduce Bias? The G1000 as a New Form of Local Citizen Participation.” International Journal of Public Administration 45(6): 475–485.Google Scholar

Bird, Karen. 2014. “Ethnic Quotas and Ethnic Representation Worldwide.” International Political Science Review 35(1): 12–26.Google Scholar

Black, Merle. 1978. “Racial Composition of Congressional Districts and Support for Federal Voting Rights in the American South.” Social Science Quarterly 59: 435–450.Google Scholar

Bohman, James. 2010. Democracy across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Böker, Marit. 2017. “Justification, Critique and Deliberative Legitimacy.” Contemporary Political Theory 16(1): 19–40.Google Scholar

Bølstad, J. 2015. “Dynamics of European Integration: Public Opinion in the Core and Periphery.” European Union Politics 16(1): 23–44.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano. 2013. The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bornschier, Simon. 2015. “The New Cultural Conflict, Polarization, and Representation in the Swiss Party System, 1975–2011.” Swiss Political Science Review 21(4): 680–701.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja, and Zürn, Michael. 2020. “Contestations of the Liberal Script (SCRIPTS). A Research Program.” SCRIPTS Working Paper (1).Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark A. P., and Wille, Anchrit. 2017. Diploma democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., De Boef, Suzanna, and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 515–528.Google Scholar

Branham, J. Alexander, Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2017. “When Do the Rich Win?” Political Science Quarterly 132(1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratton, Kathleen A., and Ray, Leonard P. 2002. “Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science, 46(2): 428–437.Google Scholar

Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Breux, Sandra, Couture, Jérôme, and Koop, Royce. 2019. “Influences on the Number and Gender of Candidates in Canadian Local Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 52(1): 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Broockman, David E., Carnes, Nicholas, Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Skovron, Christopher. 2021. “Why Local Party Leaders Don’t Support Nominating Centrists.” British Journal of Political Science 51(2): 724–749.Google Scholar

Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Clem, Nieuwbeerta, Paul and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Cleavage-Based Voting Behavior in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Six Postwar Democracies.” Social Science Research 35(1): 88–128.Google Scholar

Brown, Mark B. 2006. “Survey Article: Citizen’s Panels and the Concept of Representation”. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(2): 203–225.Google Scholar

Broz, Lawrence J., Frieden, Jeffrey, and Weymouth, Stephen. 2021. “Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash.” International Organization 75(2): 464–494.Google Scholar

Brundidge, Jennifer, Kelly Garrett, R., Hernando, Rojas, and Gil de Zúñiga, Homero. 2014. “Political Participation and Ideological News Online: ‘Differential Gains’ and ‘Differential Losses’ in a Presidential Election Cycle.” Mass Communication and Society 17(4): 464–486.Google Scholar

Brunner, Eric, Ross, Stephen L., and Washington, Ebonya. 2013. “Does Less Income Mean Less Representation?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2): 53–76.Google Scholar

Bucchianeri, Peter. 2018. “Is Running Enough? Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom about Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 40(2): 435–466.Google Scholar

Budge, Ian. 2015. “Issue Emphases, Saliency Theory and Issue Ownership: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis.” West European Politics 38(4): 761–777.Google Scholar

Bullock III, Charles S. 1981. Congressional Voting and the Mobilization of a Black Electorate in the South. The Journal of Politics, 43(3): 662–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burden, Barry C., Ono, Yoshikuni, and Yamada, Masahiro. 2017. “Reassessing Public Support for a Female President.” The Journal of Politics 79(3):1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgoon, Brian, Noort, Sam, Rooduijn, Matthijs, and Underhill, Geoffrey. 2019. “Positional Deprivation and Support for Radical Right and Radical Left Parties.” Economic Policy 34(97): 49–93.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R., Goerres, Achim, and Weschle, Simon. 2009. “Attitudes towards Redistributive Spending in an Era of Demographic Ageing: The Rival Pressures from Age and Income in 14 OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 195–212.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R., Garritzmann, Julian L., and Neimanns, Erik. 2020. A Loud, but Noisy Signal? Public Opinion and Education Reform in Western Europe. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R., Garritzmann, Julian L., Neimanns, Erik, and Nezi, Roula. 2018. “Investing in Education in Europe: Evidence from a Survey of Public Opinion in Eight European Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 28(1): 34–54.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R., Rathgeb, Philip, and Sahm, Alexander H. J.. 2022. “Authoritarian Values and the Welfare State: The Social Policy Preferences of Radical Right Voters.” West European Politics, 45(1): 77–101. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1886497.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R. 2012. “Inequality and the Political Economy of Education: An Analysis of Individual Preferences in OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 22(3): 219–240.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R. 2013. “Education Funding and Individual Preferences for Redistribution.” European Sociological Review 29(4): 707–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R. 2015. Skills and Inequality: The Political Economy of Education and Training Reforms in Western Welfare States. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

CAWP. 2019. “Women in Elective Office 2019.” Center for American Women in Politics.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Dalton, Russell, and Scarrow, Susan. 2003. Democracy Transformed: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68(2): 233–247.Google Scholar

Campbell, Rosie, and Cowley, Philip. 2014. “What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment.” Political Studies 62(4): 745–765.Google Scholar

Campbell, Rosie, and Erzeel, Silvia. 2018. “Exploring Gender Differences in Support for Rightist Parties: The Role of Party and Gender Ideology.” Politics and Gender 14(1): 80–105.Google Scholar

Campbell, Rosie, Childs, Sarah, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2010. “Do Women Need Women Representatives?” British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 171–194.Google Scholar

Canovan, Margaret. 1982. “Two Strategies for the Study of Populism.” Political Studies 30(4): 544–552.Google Scholar

Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47(1): 2–16.Google Scholar

Cantillon, Bea. 2011. “The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon Era.” Journal of European Social Policy 21(5): 432–449.Google Scholar

Caramani, Daniele. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111(1): 54–67.Google Scholar

Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas, and Hansen, Eric. 2016. “Does Paying Politicians More Promote Economic Diversity in Legislatures?” American Political Science Review 110(4): 699–716.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas, and Lupu, Noam. 2015. “Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 1–18.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas, and Lupu, Noam. 2016a. “Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates?” American Political Science Review 110(4): 832–844.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas, and Lupu, Noam. 2016b. “What Good Is a College Degree? Education and Leader Quality Reconsidered,” Journal of Politics 78(1): 35–49.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas, and Arnold, R. Douglas. 2012. “Holding Mayors Accountable: New York’s Executives from Koch to Bloomberg.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 949–963.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas. 2012. Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly 37: 5–34.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas. 2018. The Cash Ceiling: Why Only the Rich Run for Office – And What We Can Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, Susan J., ed. 2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Casillas, Christopher J., Enns, Peter K. and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 74–88.Google Scholar

Cattaneo, M. Alejandra, and Wolter, Stefan C.. 2009. “Are the Elderly a Threat to Educational Expenditures?” European Journal of Political Economy 25(2): 225–236.Google Scholar

Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63(4): 1214–1229.Google Scholar

Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2011. “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?” Political Studies 60(1): 213–255.Google Scholar

Chiba, Daina, Martin, Lanny W., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2015. “A Copula Approach to the Problem of Selection Bias in Models of Government Survival.” Political Analysis 23(1): 42–58.Google Scholar

Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chwalisz, Claudia. 2020. “Reimagining democratic institutions: Why and how to embed public deliberation”. In Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Citrin, Jack and Green, Donald Philip. 1990. The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion. In Research in Micropolitics, Volume 3, ed. Long, Samuel. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1–28.Google Scholar

Citrin, Jack. 2009. “Proposition 13 and the Transformation of California Government.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 1(1): 1–9.Google Scholar

Clayton, Amanda, Josefsson, Cecilia, and Wang, Vibeke. 2017. “Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Evidence from a Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates.” Politics and Gender 13(2): 276–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Jeffrey E., and King, James D.. 2004. “Relative Unemployment and Gubernatorial Popularity.” Journal of Politics 66(4): 1267–1282.Google Scholar

Cook, Fay Lomax, Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2007. Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America. In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, ed. Rosenberg, Shawn W.. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–44.Google Scholar

Cooperman, Rosalyn, and Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2018. “A Run for Their Money: Republican Women’s Hard Road to Campaign Funding.” In The Right Women: Republican Party Activists, Candidates, and Legislators, eds. Shames, Shauna L. and Och, Malliga. Denver: Praeger, 107–130.Google Scholar

Corbett, Richard, Jacobs, Francis and Schackleton, Michael. 2011. The European Parliament, 8th edition, London: John Harper Publishing.Google Scholar

Council of the European Union (2002). Council Decision of 25 June and 23 September 2002 Amending the Act Concerning the Election of the Representatives of the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage, annexed to Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom (2002/772/EC, Euratom).Google Scholar

Council of the European Union (2018). Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/994 of 13 July 2018 Amending the Act Concerning the Election of the Members of the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage, annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976.Google Scholar

Cotta, Maurizio, and Best, Heinrich. 2007. “Parliamentary Representatives from Early Democratization to the Age of Consolidated Democracy: National Variations and International Convergence in a Long-Term Perspective.” In Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence, eds. Cotta, Maurizio and Best, Heinrich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar

Crafts, Nicholas, and Mills, Terence C.. 2020. “Is the UK Productivity Slowdown Unprecedented?” National Institute Economic Review 251:47–53.Google Scholar

Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Crosby, Ned, and Nethercut, Dough. 2005. “Citizen Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People.” In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, eds. Gastil, John and Levine, Peter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 111–119.Google Scholar

Crouch, Colin. 2002. Post-Democracy. Cambridge, MA: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Smith, Adrienne R.. 2015. “How the Strategic Context Affects Women’s Emergence and Success in Local Legislative Elections.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3(2): 295–317.Google Scholar

Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2014. “A Partisan Gap in the Supply of Female Potential Candidates in the United States.” Research and Politics 1(1): 1–7.Google Scholar

Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2018. “Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation.” Journal of Politics 80(4): 1211–1224.Google Scholar

Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, and Trounstine, Jessica. 2020. “Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps.” Urban Affairs Review 56(1): 124–153.Google Scholar

Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics and Gender 9(4): 390–413.Google Scholar

Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2020. “Baker, Bus Driver, Babysitter, Candidate? Revealing the Gendered Development of Political Ambition among Ordinary Americans.” Political Behavior 42: 359–384.Google Scholar

Crozier, Michael, Huntington, Samuel, and Watanuki, Joji. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Crum, Ben, and Fossum, John E.. 2009. “The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU.” European Political Science Review 1(2): 249–271.Google Scholar

Curato, N., Vrydagh, J., and Bächtiger, A.. 2020. “Democracy without Shortcuts: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 16(2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.413.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlberg, Stefan, Linde, Jonas, and Holmberg, Sören. 2014. “Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output.” Political Studies 63(S1): 18–37.Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1965. Gesellschaft und Demokratie in Deutschland. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar

Dal Bó, Ernesto, Finan, Frederico, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2017. “Who Becomes a Politician?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4): 1877–1914.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J., Bürklin, Wilhelm, and Drummond, Andrew. 2001. “Public Opinion and Direct Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 12(4): 141–153.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. 1999. Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. 2013. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Damore, David F. 2004. The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly 57: 391–397.Google Scholar

De Bruycker, Iskander. 2017. “Politicisation and the Public Interest: When Do the Elites in Brussels Address Public Interests in EU Policy Debates?” European Union Politics 18(4): 603–619.Google Scholar

De Ville, Ferdi, and Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2017. “Why TTIP Is a Game-Changer and its Critics Have a Point.” Journal of European Public Policy 24(10): 1491–1505.Google Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H., Banducci, Susan A., Semetko, Holli A., and Boomgaarden, Hajo G.. 2006. “The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries.” European Union Politics 7(4): 477–504.Google Scholar

De Vries, Catherine E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Vries, Catherine E., and Hobolt, Sara B.. 2020. Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter. 2013. “Representative Claims Analysis: Theory Meets Method.” Journal of European Public Policy 20(2): 278–294.Google Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter. 2019. The Quality of Representative Claims: Uncovering a Weakness in the Defense of the Liberal World Order. Political Studies 68(2): 271–292.Google Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter, Koopmans, Ruud, and Zürn, Michael. 2014. “The Political Sociology of Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism: Representative Claims Analysis.” WZB Berlin Social Science Center.Google Scholar

Dean, Rikki, Rinne, Jonathan, and Geissel, Brigitte. 2019. “Systematizing Democratic Systems Approaches: Seven Conceptual Building Blocks.” Democratic Theory 6(2): 41–57.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2019. “Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4(19): 2–17.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1986. “Unwanted Children: Political Violence and the Cycle of Protest in Italy, 1966–1973.” European Journal of Political Research 14(5–6): 607–632.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1997. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. 1969. Nationalism and Its Alternatives. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry. 2020. “Breaking out of the Democratic Slump.” Journal of Democracy 31(1): 36–50.Google Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and van Roozendaal, Peter. 1998. “The Duration of Cabinet Formation Processes in Western Multi-Party Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 1999. “Cabinet Survival and Competing Risks.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1051–1068.Google Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2000. “Cabinet Terminations and Critical Events.” The American Political Science Review 94(3): 627–640.Google Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, Eraslan, Hulya, and Merlo, Antonio. 2003. “A Structural Model of Government Formation.” Econometrica 71(1): 27–70.Google Scholar

Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105(1): 100–114.Google Scholar

Disch, Lisa. 2015. The “Constructivist Turn” in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead‐End? Constellations 22: 487–499.Google Scholar

Dittmar, Kelly. 2019. Unfinished Business: Women Running in 2018 and Beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics.Google Scholar

Dittmar, Kelly. 2021. Measuring Success: Women in 2020 Legislative Elections. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence C. 1976. Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Doerr, Nicole. 2018. Political Translation: How Social Movement Democracies Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Michael, and Lefkofridi, Zoe L.. 2014. “Economic and Political Inequality in Modern Democracies: Differential Responsiveness to the Policy Preferences of Economic Classes.” EUI Working Paper MWP Red Number Series 13/2014.Google Scholar

Döring, Holger, and Manow, Philip. 2016. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development Version. Bremen.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2011. Segmented Representation: The Reagan White House and Disproportionate Responsiveness. In Who Gets Represented? Ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 166–188.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S., and Tanasoca, Ana. 2021. Democratizing Global Justice: Deliberating Global Goals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S., and Stevenson, Hayley. 2011. “Global Democracy and Earth System Governance.” Ecological Economics 70(11): 1865–1874.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S., and Niemeyer, Simon. 2008. “Discursive Representation.” American Political Science Review 102(4): 481–493.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S., Bächtiger, André, Chambers, Simone, Cohen, Joshua, Druckman, James N., Felicetti, Andrea, Fishkin, James S., Farrell, David M., Fung, Archon, Gutmann, Amy, Landemore, Hélène, Mansbridge, Jane, Marien, Sofie, Neblo, Michael A., Niemeyer, Simon, Setälä, Maija, Slothuus, Rune, Suiter, Jane, Thompson, Dennis, and Warren, Mark E.. 2019. The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation. Science 363(6432): 1144–1146.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John. S. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2013. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dutwin, David. 2003. “The Character of Deliberation: Equality, Argument, and the Formation of Public Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15(3): 239–264.Google Scholar

Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Ecker, Alejandro, and Meyer, Thomas M.. 2015. “The Duration of Government Formation Processes in Europe.” Research and Politics 2(4): 1–9.Google Scholar

Ecker, Alejandro, and Meyer, Thomas M.. 2020. “Coalition Bargaining Duration in Multiparty Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 50(1): 261–80.Google Scholar

Edelman. 2019. “Edelman Trust Barometer 2019.” www.edelman.co.uk/research/2019-trust-barometer.Google Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry. 2018. The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Eijk, Cvd, and Franklin, M., eds. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2012. The Politics of Parenthood. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, Christopher R., Daniel Ura, Joseph and Robinson, Jenna Ashley. 2006. “The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 59(2): 227–233.Google Scholar

Ellis, Christopher. 2013. “Social Context and Economic Biases in Representation.” Journal of Politics 75(3): 773–786.Google Scholar

Ellis, Christopher. 2017. Putting Inequality in Context. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Elsässer, Lea, Hense, Svenja, and Schäfer, Armin. 2017. “‘Dem Deutschen Volke?’ Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27(2): 161–180.Google Scholar

Elsässer, Lea, Hense, Svenja, and Schäfer, Armin 2018. “Government of the People, by the Elite, for the Rich: Unequal Responsiveness in an Unlikely Case.” MPlfG Discussion Paper.Google Scholar

Elsässer, Lea, Hense, Svenja, and Schäfer, Armin. 2021. Not Just Money. Unequal Responsiveness in Egalitarian Democracies. Journal of European Public Policy 28(12): 1890–1908.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elstub, Stephen, and Escobar, Oliver. 2019. The Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

el-Wakil, Alice. 2017. “The Deliberative Potential of Facultative Referendums: Procedure and Substance in Direct Democracy.” Democratic Theory 4(1): 59–78.Google Scholar

Engler, Sarah, and Weisstanner, David. 2020. “The Threat of Social Decline: Income Inequality and Radical Right Support.” Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 1–21.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. Group Opinion and the Study of Representation. In Who Gets Represented? ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1–25.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2018. Making Sense of the Supreme Court-Public Opinion Relationship. In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior, ed. Howard, Robert M. and Randazzo, Kirk. New York: Routledge Press, 180–195.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K., Kelly, Nathan J., Morgan, Jana, Volscho, Thomas, and Witko, Christopher. 2014. “Conditional Status Quo Bias and Top Income Shares: How U.S. Political Institutions Have Benefited the Rich.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 289–303.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. 2014. “The Public’s Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 857–872.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. 2015a. “Comment on: ‘Support for Redistribution in an Age of Rising Inequality: New Stylized Facts and Some Tentative Explanations.’” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 406–417.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. 2015b. “Reconsidering the Middle: A Reply to Martin Gilens.” Perspectives on Politics 13(4): 1072–1074.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. 2015c. “Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 13(4): 1053–1064.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. 2016. Incarceration Nation: How the United States Became the Most Punitive Democracy in the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. “A Child-Centred Social Investment Strategy.” In Why We Need a New Welfare State, ed. Esping-Andersen, G.. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 26–67.Google Scholar

Espírito-Santo, Ana, Freire, André, and Serra-Silva, Sofia. 2018. “Does Women’s Descriptive Representation Matter for Policy Preferences? The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 26(2): 227–237.Google Scholar

ESS Round 6. 2012. European Social Survey Round 6 Data File Edition 2.4. NSD Norwegian Centre for Research Data.Google Scholar

Estévez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., D. and Soskice. 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, eds. Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D.. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 145–183.Google Scholar

Eulau, Heinz and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(3): 233–254.Google Scholar

European Parliament. 2015. “European Parliament Resolution of 8 July 2015 Containing the European Parliament’s Recommendations to the European Commission on the Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (2014/2228(INI)).Google Scholar

Faricy, Christopher G. 2015. Welfare for the Wealthy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, David M., and Suiter, Jane. 2019. Reimagining Democracy: Lessons in Deliberative Democracy from the Irish Front Line. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, David, and Scully, R.. 2010. “The European Parliament: One Parliament, Several Modes of Political Representation on the Ground?” Journal of European Public Policy 17: 36–54.Google Scholar

Farrell, David M., Suiter, Jane, and Harris, Clodagh. 2019. “‘Systematizing’ Constitutional Deliberation: The 2016–18 Citizens’ Assembly in Ireland.” Irish Political Studies 34(1): 113–123.Google Scholar

Farrell, David M., Suiter, Jane, Harris, Clodagh, and Cunningham, Kevin. 2020. The Effects of Mixed Membership in a Deliberative Forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014. Political Studies 68(1): 54–73.Google Scholar

Fernandes, Jorge M., and Magalhães, Pedro C.. 2016. “Government Survival in Semi-Presidential Regimes.” European Journal of Political Research 55(1): 61–80.Google Scholar

Fernandez, Raquel, and Rogerson, Richard. 1995. “On the Political Economy of Education Subsidies.” Review of Economic Studies 62(2):249–262.Google Scholar

Ferrin, Monica, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2016. How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferrin, Monica. (2012). What Is Democracy to Citizens? Understanding Perceptions and Evaluations of Democratic Systems in Contemporary Europe. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S., Luskin, Robert C., and Siu, Alice. 2014. “Europolis and the European Public Sphere: Empirical Explorations of a Counterfactual Ideal.” European Union Politics 15(3): 328–351.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. 2018. Democracy When the People Are Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flaherty, T., and Rogowski, R.. 2021. Rising Inequality As a Threat to the Liberal International Order. International Organization, 75(2): 495–523.Google Scholar

Flavin, Patrick and Franko, William W.. 2017. “Government’s Unequal Attentiveness to Citizens’ Political Priorities.” Policy Studies Journal 45(4): 659–687.Google Scholar

Flavin, Patrick. 2012. “Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States.” American Politics Research 40(1):29–59.Google Scholar

Flöthe, Linda and Rasmussen, Anne. 2019. “Public voices in the heavenly chorus? Group type bias and opinion representation.” Journal of European Public Policy 26(6): 824–842.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. 2011. The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Fournier, Patrick, van der Kolk, Henk, Carty, R. Kenneth, Blais, André, and Rose, Jonathan. 2011. When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Franck, Raphaël, and Rainer, Ilia. 2012. “Does the Leader’s Ethnicity Matter?” American Political Science Review 106(2): 294–325.Google Scholar

Franklin, Mark N. 2014. “Why Vote at an Election with No Apparent Purpose? Voter Turnout at Elections to the European Parliament.” SIEPS – European Policy Analysis, April (4).Google Scholar

Franko, William W., and Witko, Christopher. 2018. The New Econoic Populism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael. 2003. Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–356.Google Scholar

Freeman, Jo. 1987. “Whom You Know versus Whom You Represent: Feminist Influence in the Democratic and Republican Parties.” InThe Women’s Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy, eds. Fainsod Katzenstein, M. and Mueller, C.. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 215–244.Google Scholar

Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Osborne, Michael A.. 2017. “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 (January): 254–80.Google Scholar

Frid-Nielsen, S. S. 2018. “Human Rights or Security? Positions on Asylum in European Parliament Speeches.” European Union Politics, 19: 344–362.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. 2003a. “Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards.” Governance 16(1): 51–71.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. 2003b. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 338–367.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66: 66–75.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. 2013. “The Principle of Affected Interests: An Interpretation and Defense.” In Representation: Elections and beyond, ed. Nagel, J. and Smith, R.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 236–268.Google Scholar

GESIS 2019. GESIS Panel Standard Edition. Köln: GESIS Datenarchiv.Google Scholar

Galston, William A. 2018. “The Populist Challenge to Liberal-Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 29(2): 5–19.Google Scholar

Gambetta, Diego. 1998. “‘Claro!’: An Essay on Discursive Machismo.” Deliberative democracy, ed. Elster, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–43.Google Scholar

Gamson, William A., and Meyer, David S.. 1996. Framing Political Opportunity. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 275–290.Google Scholar

Garritzmann, Julian, Busemeyer, Marius R., and Neimanns, Erik. 2018. “Public Demand for Social Investment: New Supporting Coalitions for Welfare State Reform in Western Europe?” Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 844–861.Google Scholar

Garritzmann, Julian, Häusermann, Silja, Palier, Bruno, and Zollinger, Christine. 2017. “WOPSI: The World Politics of Social Investment.” LIEPP Working Paper 64.Google Scholar

Garritzmann, Julian L. 2016. The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance: The Politics of Tuition Fees and Subsidies in OECD Countries, 1945–2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, and Wright, Erik Olin. 2019. Legislatures by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, and Knobloch, Katherine. 2020. Hope for Democracy: How Citizens Can Bring Reason Back into Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John. 2008. Communication and Public Deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar

Gattermann, Katjana, and Vasilopoulou, Sofia. 2015. “Absent yet Popular? Explaining News Visibility of Members of the European Parliament.” European Journal of Political Research 54: 121–140.Google Scholar

Gauland, Alexander. 2018. “Warum muss es Populismus sein?” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, October 6.Google Scholar

Gaus, Daniel, Landwehr, Claudia, and Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer. 2020. Defending Democracy against Technocracy and Populism: Deliberative Democracy’s Strengths and Challenges, Constellations 27 (3): 335–347.Google Scholar

Gaus, Daniel 2013. “Rational Reconstruction as a Method of Political Theory between Social Critique and Empirical Political Science.” Constellations 20(4): 553–570.Google Scholar

Gerber, Marléne, Bächtiger, André, Fiket, Irena, Steenbergen, Marco, and Steiner, Jürg. 2014. “Deliberative and Non-Deliberative Persuasion: Mechanisms of Opinion Formation in EuroPolis.” European Union Politics 15(3): 410–429.Google Scholar

Gerber, Marléne, Bächtiger, André, Shikano, Susumu, Reber, Simon, and Rohr, Samuel. 2018. “Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis).” British Journal of Political Science 48(4): 1093–1118.Google Scholar

Gerber, Marléne. 2015. “Equal Partners in Dialogue? Participation Equality in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis).” Political Studies 63(1): 110–130.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Pemstein, Daniel, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2018. “An Ordinal, Concept-Driven Approach to Measurement: The Lexical Scale.” Sociological Methods and Research (Online). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118782531.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John 2008. “Case Selection for Case-Study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques’.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, J., Brady, H. E., and Collier, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 645–684.Google Scholar

Gheyle, N. 2019. “Conceptualizing the Parliamentarization and Politicization of European Policies.” Politics and Governance 7: 227–236.Google Scholar

Giannetti, Daniela, Pedrazzani, Andrea, and Pinto, Luca. 2020. “Bicameralism and Government Formation: Does Bicameral Incongruence Affect Bargaining Delays?” European Political Science Review (Online). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000235.Google Scholar

Gidron, Noam, and Hall, Peter A.. 2017. “The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right.” The British Journal of Sociology 68:57–84.Google Scholar

Gidron, Noam, and Hall, Peter A.. 2019. “Populism as a Problem of Social Integration.” Comparative Political Studies 53(7): 1027–1059.Google Scholar

Giger, Nathalie, Rosset, Jan, and Bernauer, Julian. 2012. “The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective.” Representation 48(1): 47–61.Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2015. “The Temporary Importance of Role Models for Women’s Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 957–970.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives Politics 12(3):564–581.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5): 778–796.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2009. “Preference Gaps and Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2):335–341.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2011. Policy Consequences of Representational Inequality. In Who Gets Represented? ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2015. “The Insufficiency of ‘Democracy by Coincidence’: A Response to Peter k. Enns.” Perspectives on Politics 13(04): 1065–1071.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2016. “Simulating Representation: The Devil’s in the Detail.” Research and Politics 3(2): 1–7.Google Scholar

Gillion, Daniel Q. 2012. Protest and Congressional Behavior: Assessing Racial and Ethnic Minority Protests in the District. Journal of Politics 74: 950–962.Google Scholar

Gillion, Daniel Q. 2013. The political power of protest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gillion, Daniel Q. 2020. The Loud Minority: Why Protests Matters in American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Saskia. (2021). “Just Advisory and Maximally Representative: A Conjoint Experiment on Non-Participants’ Legitimacy Perceptions of Deliberative Forums.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17(1): 56–75.Google Scholar

Golder, Matt. 2003. “Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36(4): 432–466.Google Scholar

Golder, Matt. 2016. “Far Right Parties in Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 19(1): 477–497.Google Scholar

Golder, Sona N. 2010. “Bargaining Delays in the Government Formation Process.” Comparative Political Studies 43(1): 3–32.Google Scholar

Goodhart, David. 2017. The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., and Dryzek, John S.. 2006. “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics.” Politics and Society 34(2): 219–244.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert J. 2014a. The Demise of US Economic Growth: Restatement, Rebuttal, and Reflections. Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert J. 2014b. “The Turtle’s Progress: Secular Stagnation Meets the Headwinds.” In Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures, eds. Teulings, C. and Baldwin, R.. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research Press, 47–59.Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99(1): 29–43.Google Scholar

Griffin, John D. and Newman, Brian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, John D., and Anewalt-Remsburg, Claudia. 2013. “Legislator Wealth and the Effort to Repeal the Estate Tax.” American Politics Research 41(4): 599–622.Google Scholar

Griffin, John D., Newman, Brian and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2012. “A Gender Gap in Policy Represesentation in the U.S. Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37(1): 35–66.Google Scholar

Gronke, Paul, and Newman, Brian. 2003. “FDR to Clinton, Mueller to? A Field Essay on Presidential Approval,” Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 501–512.Google Scholar

Grose, Christian, Malhotra, Neil, and Van Houweling, Robert P.. 2015. “Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain Their Policy Positions and How Citizens React.’” American Political Science Journal 59(3): 724–743.Google Scholar

Grose, Christian. 2013. “Risk and Roll Calls: How Legislators’ Personal Finances Shape Congressional Decisions.” SSRN Working Paper 2220524.Google Scholar

Grossmann, Matt, and Hopkins, David A.. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Die Postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S., Rehm, Philipp and Schlesinger, Mark. 2013. “The Insecure American: Economic Experiences, Financial Worries, and Policy Attitudes.” Perspectives on Politics 11(1): 23–49.Google Scholar

Hagemann, Sara, Hobolt, Sara B., and Wratil, Christopher. 2017. “Government Responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council Voting.” Comparative Political Studies, 50(6): 850–976.Google Scholar

Han, Kyung J. 2016. “Income Inequality and Voting for Radical Right-Wing Parties.” Electoral Studies 42: 54–64.Google Scholar

Hansen, Kasper M. 2010. “The Equality Paradox of Deliberative Democracy. Evidence from a National Deliberative Poll.” In Political Discussion in Modern Democracies: A Comparative Perspective, eds. Wolf, M., Morales, L., and Ikdeda, K.. London: Routledge, 26–43.Google Scholar

Hathaway, O. (2020). “Presidential Power over International Law.” In Foreign Policy Secrecy in the Age of Transparency, eds. Abazi, V. and Rosén, G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Häusermann, Silja, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2015. “What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, eds. Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–230.Google Scholar

Häusermann, Silja, Kurer, Thomas, and Schwander, Hanna. 2015. “High-Skilled Outsiders? Labor Market Vulnerability, Education and Welfare State Preferences.” Socio-Economic Review 13(2): 235–258.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk A., Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, and Andreadis, Ioannis. 2018. “The Activation of Populist Attitudes.” Government and Opposition 55(2): 283–307.Google Scholar

Hay, C. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heath, Oliver. 2018. “Policy Alienation, Social Alienation and Working-Class Abstention in Britain, 1964–2010.” British Journal of Political Science 48(4): 1053–1073.Google Scholar

Heckman, James J. 2006. “Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children.” Science 312: 1900–1902.Google Scholar

Heinelt, Hubert. 2018. Handbook on Participatory Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitical Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hemerijck, Anton, ed. 2017. The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hemerijck, Anton. 2013. Changing Welfare States. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hemerijck, Anton. 2018. “Social Investment as a Policy Paradigm.” Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 810–827.Google Scholar

Hernandez, Jesus. 2009. “Redlining Revisited: Mortgage Lending Patterns in Sacramento 1930– 2004.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(2): 291–313.Google Scholar

Herzog, Jr., Harold, A. 1993. “‘The Movement Is My Life’: The Psychology of Animal Rights Activism.” Journal of Social Issues 49(1): 103–119.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J., and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy. Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickerson, Andrea, and Gastil, John. 2008. “Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation: Gender, Emotion, and the Jury Experience.” Communication Theory 18: 281–303.Google Scholar

Hillen, Sven, and Steiner, Nils D.. 2019. “Citizens with Economically Left-Wing and Culturally Right-Wing Views Vote Less and Are Less Satisfied with Politics.” Democratic Audit. www.democraticaudit.com/2019/11/15/citizens-with-economically-left-wing-and-culturally-right-wing-views-vote-less-and-are-less-satisfied-with-politics/.Google Scholar

Hillier, Amy E. 2003. “Spatial Analysis of Historical Redlining: A Methodological Exploration.” Journal of Housing Research 14(1): 137–167.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 668–698.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul G., and Roland, Gérard. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon, Raunio, Tapio, and Scully., Roger 2003. “Fifty Years On: Research on the European Parliament, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2): 191–202.Google Scholar

Hobolt, Sara B. and Klemmensen, Robert. 2008. “Government Responsivenesss and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies, 41(3): 309–337.Google Scholar

Hobolt, Sara B., and Tilley, James. 2014. Blaming Europe? Responsibility without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobolt, Sara B. 2016. “The Brexit Vote. A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent.” Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1259–1277.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie R. 2016. “The Ecstatic Edge of Politics: Sociology and Donald Trump.” Contemporary Sociology 45(6): 683–689.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1981. What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Holman, Mirya R. 2014. Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Lisbeth, and Marks, Gary. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Lisbeth, and Marks, Gary. 2017. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (SI: Theory Meets Crisis): 109–135.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Wilson, Carole J.. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965–989.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Marc. 1999. “The Rebuke of Thersites. Deliberative Democracy under Conditions of Inequality.” Acta Politica 34(4): 287–301.Google Scholar

Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Moretti, Enrico. 2019. “Housing Constraints and Spatial Misallocation.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11(2): 1–39.Google Scholar

Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2014. “Income Inequality and Redistribution in Post-Industrial Democracies: Demographic, Economic and Political Determinants.” Socio-Economic Review 12(2): 245–267.Google Scholar

Huber, Evelyne, Gunderson, Jacob, and Stephens, John D.. 2020. “Private Education and Inequality in the Knowledge Economy.” Policy and Society 39(2): 171–188.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Iakhnis, Evgeniia, Rathbun, Brian, Reifler, Jason, and Scotto, Thomas J.. 2018. “Populist Referendum: Was ‘Brexit’ an Expression of Nativist and Anti-Elitist Sentiment?” Research and Politics (Online). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018773964.Google Scholar

Ignazi, Piero. 1992. “The Silent Counter-Revolution. Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right-Wing Parties in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 22(1): 3–34.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John. 2020. A World Safe for Democracy. Liberal Internationalism and the Crisis of Global Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2017. “Trump and the Populist Authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15(2): 443–454.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 2003. “How Solid Is Mass Support for Democracy—and How Can We Measure It?” Political Science and Politics 36(1):51–57.Google Scholar

International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. 2019. “World Economic Outlook, October 2019: Global Manufacturing Downturn, Rising Trade Barriers.” In IMF chapter, Closer Together or Further Apart? Subnational Regional Disparities and Adjustment in Advanced Economies.Google Scholar

Parline, IPU, ed. 2020. “Percentage of Women in National Parliaments.” https://data.ipu.org/women-averages.Google Scholar

Isernia, Pierangelo, and Fishkin, James S.. 2014. “The EuroPolis Deliberative Poll.” European Union Politics 15(3): 311–327.Google Scholar

Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth. 2008. “What Unites Right-Wing Populists in Western Europe?” Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 3–23.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2019. Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” American Political Science Review 99(1): 107–123.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda. 2005. American Democracy in an Era of Rising Inequality. In Inequality and American Democracy, ed. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1–18.Google Scholar

Jacquet, Vincent, and van der Does, Ramon. 2020. “The Consequences of Deliberative Minipublics: Systematic Overview, Conceptual Gaps, and New Directions.” Representation 57(1): 131–141.Google Scholar

Jahn, Detlef. 2006. “Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development.” International Organization 60: 401–431.Google Scholar

Jakobi, Anja P. 2011. “Political Parties and the Institutionalization of Education: A Comparative Analysis of Party Manifestos.” Comparative Education Review 55(2): 189–209.Google Scholar

Kaiser Family Foundation. 2013. “2013 Survey of Americans on the U.S. Role in Global Health.” https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/8508-f-2013-survey-of-americans-on-the-u-s-role-in-global-health.pdf.Google Scholar

Kalbfleisch, John D., and Prentice, Ross L.. 2002. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Kaldor, Mary. 2003. “The Idea of Global Civil Society.” International Affairs 79(3): 583–593.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Lee Shaker, L. 2012. Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation. American Political Science Review 106(3): 533–547.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S. 2001. ‘The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy,” Party Politics 7(3): 277–296.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Karen M. and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Under- standing the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 864–887.Google Scholar

Keane, John. 2003. Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, Nathan J. and Enns, Peter K.. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 855–870.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Macedo, Stephen, and Moravcsik, Andrew. 2009. “Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism.” International Organization 63(1): 1–31.Google Scholar

Key, V. O. Jr. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar

Kinder, Donald R. and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Alt, James E., Burns, Nancy Elizabeth, and Laver, Michael. 1990. “A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 34(3): 846–871.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. [1984] 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little and Brown.Google Scholar

Kinski, L. 2018. “Whom to Represent? National Parliamentary Representation during the Eurozone Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 25(3): 346–368.Google Scholar

Kirkland, Patricia A. 2018. “The Business of Being Mayor: Mayors and Fiscal Policy in U.S. Cities.” Working paper.Google Scholar

Kitchens, Karin E., and Swers, Michele L.. 2016. “Why Aren’t There More Republican Women in Congress? Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections.” Politics and Gender 12(4): 648–676.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, and McGann, Anthony J.. 1997. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. 1st ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, and Rehm, Philipp. 2014. “Occupations as a Site of Political Preference Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 47(12):1670–1706.Google Scholar

Klüver, Heike, and Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2015. “Bringing Salience Back in: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” Party Politics 21(4): 553–564.Google Scholar

Kollman, Ken, Hicken, Allen, Caramani, Daniele, Backer, David, and Lublin, David. 2017. Constituency-Level Elections Archive. Ann Arbor: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

König, Thomas, and Debus, Marc. 2010. Reform Processes and Policy Change: Veto Players and Decision-Making in Modern Democracies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Koo, Richard C. 2014. The Escape from Balance Sheet Recession and the QE Trap: A Hazardous Road for the World Economy. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Koopmans, R., and Zürn, M.. 2019. Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism – How Globalization Is Reshaping Politics in the Twenty-First Century. In The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism, eds. De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., Merkel, W., Strijbis, O., and Zürn, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–34.Google Scholar

Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review 63(5): 661–687.Google Scholar

Koster, Willem de, Achterberg, Peter, and Waal, Jeroen. 2013. “The New Right and the Welfare State: The Electoral Relevance of Welfare Chauvinism and Welfare Populism in the Netherlands.” International Political Science Review 34(1): 3–20.Google Scholar

Kraus, Michael W., and Callaghan, Bennett. 2014. “Noblesse Oblige? Social Status and Economic Inequality Maintenance among Politicians.” PLoS ONE 9(1): 1–6.Google Scholar

Kreitzer, Rebecca J., and Osborn, Tracy L.. 2019. “The Emergence and Activities of Women’s Recruiting Groups in the U.S.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7(4): 842–852.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic, Hutter, Swen, and Wüest, Bruno. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Morlino, L. (2016). “Conclusion – What Have We Learnt, and Where Do We Go from Here?” In How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, eds. Kriesi, H. and Ferrin, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 307–326.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2014. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics 37(2): 361–378.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2020. “Is There a Crisis of Democracy in Europe?” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 61: 237–260.Google Scholar

Kröger, Sandra, and Friedrich, Dawid. 2013. “Introduction: The Representative Turn in EU Studies.” Journal of European Public Policy 20(2): 155–170.Google Scholar

Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul. 2014. “Four Observations on Secular Stagnation.” In Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures, eds. Teulings, C. and Baldwin, R.. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research Press, 61–68Google Scholar

Kunovitch, Sheri. 2018. “Occupational Diversity in Polish Politics, 1991–2011.” International Journal of Sociology 48(1): 60–75.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Ladam, Christina, Harden, Jeffrey J., and Windett, Jason H.. 2018. “Prominent Role Models: High-Profile Female Politicians and the Emergence of Women as Candidates for Public Office.” American Journal of Political Science 62(2): 369–381.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2015. “Deliberation, Participation and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Minipublics Shape Public Policy?” Journal of Political Philosophy 23(1): 40–63.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2017. “Can Democracy Be Deliberative and Participatory? The Democratic Case for Political Uses of Mini-Publics.” Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 146(3): 85–105.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2019. Democracy without Shortcuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina . 2020a. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2020b. “Against Anti-Democratic Shortcuts: A Few Replies to Critics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2): 96–109.Google Scholar

Landemore, Hélène. 2020. Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia., and Steiner, Nils D.. 2017. “Where Democrats Disagree: Citizens’ Normative Conceptions of Democracy.” Political Studies 65(4): 786–804.Google Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia, and Faas, Thorsten. 2016. Who Wants Democratic Innovations, and Why. Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität.Google Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia. 2009. Political Conflict and Political Preferences: Communicative Interaction between Facts, Norms, and Interests. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia. 2015. “Democratic Meta-Deliberation. Towards Reflective Institutional Design.” Political Studies 63(S1): 38–54.Google Scholar

Lang, Amy, and Warren, Mark E.. 2012. “Supplementary Democracy? Democratic Deficits and Citizens’ Assemblies.” In Imperfect Democracies, eds. Lenard, P. and Simeon, R.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 291–314.Google Scholar

Latinno Project. 2019. “The Latinno Project.”Google Scholar

Lau, Richard R. and Heldman, Caroline. 2009. “Self-Interest, Symbolic Attitudes, and Support for Public Policy.” Political Psychology 30(4): 513–537.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Ben Hunt, W.. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lawless, Jennifer, and Fox, Richard. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lax, Jeffrey R., Phillips, Justin H. and Zelizer, Adam. 2019. “The Party or the Purse? Unequal Representation in the US Senate.” American Political Science Review 113(4): 917–940.Google Scholar

Lee, Caroline W. 2015. Do-It-Yourself Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E., and McCarty, Nolan M., ed. 2019. Can America Govern Itself? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Taeku. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lefkofridi, Z., and Katsanidou, A.. 2014. “Multilevel Representation in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 15(1): 108–131.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Pola, Regel, Sven, and Schlote, Sara. 2015. “Ungleichheit in der politischen Repräsentation.” In Demokratie und Krise: Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie, ed. Merkel, W.. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 157–180.Google Scholar

Leib, Ethan. 2010. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar

Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan. 2014. Who Votes Now? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar