Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:31:10.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Freedom, Creativity, and Decision in Recovering the Human Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

James Laidlaw
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Barbara Bodenhorn
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Holbraad
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Recovering the Human Subject
Freedom, Creativity and Decision
, pp. 1 - 23
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Catherine, Buchli, Victor, and Humphrey, Caroline (eds). 2007. Urban Life in Post-Soviet Central Asia. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Astuti, Rita. 2012. ‘Some After Dinner Thoughts on Theory of Mind’. Anthropology of This Century, 3: http://aotcpress.com/articles/dinner-thoughts-theory-mind/Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2001. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Translated and with an introduction by Hallward, Peter. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2003. Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Translated by Brassier, Ray. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bear, Laura (ed.). 2014. Doubt, Conflict, Mediation: The Anthropology of Modern Time. Winchester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bennett, Rebecca Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Biehl, João. 2005. Vita: Life in a Zone of Social Abandonment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. ‘Post Human, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology’. Theory, Culture, and Society, 23 (7–8): 197208.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, Levi R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Michigan, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Carrithers, Michael and Humphrey, Caroline (eds.). 1991. The Assembly of Listeners: Jains in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana H. and Frost, Samantha (eds.). 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, Vincent. 1980. Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 1995. Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 2016. Varieties of Ontological Pluralism’, in Charbonnier, Pierre, Salmon, Gildas, and Skafish, Peter (eds.), Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology After Anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield: 2739.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980 (1966). Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1938 (1895). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979 (1976). The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, An Introduction. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1997. Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth: Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1980. New York, NY: New Press.Google Scholar
Gane, Nicholas. 2003. ‘Posthuman’. Theory, Culture, and Society, 23 (2–3): 431443.Google Scholar
Graham, Elaine. 2002. Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens, and Others in Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Chris. 2015. ‘On Religiosity and Commercial Life: Toward a Critique of Cultural Economy and Posthumanist Value Theory’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4: 7388.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane. 2007. ‘Prophesy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time’. American Ethnologist, 34 (3): 409421.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1992. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Re.Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Alresford: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 2008. How we Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henare, Amira, Holbraad, Martin, and Wastell, Sari (eds). 2006. Thinking Through Things: Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin, and Pedersen, Morten Axel (eds). 2013. Times of Security: Ethnographies of Fear, Protest and the Future. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, Martin, and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1978. ‘Women, Taboo, and the Suppression of Attention’, in Ardener, Shirley (ed.), Defining Women: The Nature of Women in Society. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1984. ‘Barter and Economic Disintegration’. Man (NS), 20: 4872.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1993. ‘Women and Ideology in Hierarchical Societies in East Asia’, in Ardener, Shirley (ed.), Persons and Powers of Women in Diverse Cultures. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1996. Shamans and Elders: Experience, Knowledge, and Power Among Daur Mongols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1997. ‘Exemplars and Rules: Aspects of the Discourse of Moralities in Mongolia’, in Howell, Signe (ed.), The Ethnography of Moralities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1998. Marx Went Away, But Karl Stayed Behind. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2002a. ‘Stalin and the Blue Elephant: Paranoia and Complicity in Post-Communist Metahistories’, in West, Harry and Sanders, Todd (eds), Transparency and Conspiracy: Ethnographies of Suspicion in the New World Order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2002b. The Unmaking of Soviet Life: Everyday Economies After Socialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2004. ‘Sovereignty and Ways of Life: The Marshrut System in the City of Ulan-Ude’, in Nugent, David and Vincent, Joan (eds), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2007. ‘Alternative Freedoms’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 151: 110.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2008a. ‘Reassembling Individual Subjects: Events and Decisions in Troubled Times’. Anthropological Theory, 8 (4): 357380.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2008b. ‘The “Creative Bureaucrat”: Conflicts in the Production of Soviet Communist Party Discourse’. Inner Asia, 10: 536.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2009. ‘The Mask and the Face: Imagination and Social Life in Russian Chat-Rooms and Beyond’. Ethnos, 74: 3150.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2012. ‘Hospitality and Tone: Holding Patterns of Strangeness in Rural Mongolia’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 6375.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2014. ‘Detachable Groups and Kinship Tensions: The Tsongol at the Russian-Qing Border’. Inner Asia, 16: 3463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Hugh-Jones, Stephen (eds). 1992. Barter, Exchange and Value: An Anthropological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Laidlaw, James. 1994. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated with the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2007. ‘Sacrifice and Ritualization’, in Kiriyakidis, Evangelos (ed.), The Archaeology of Ritual. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Skvirskaja, Vera (eds.). 2012. Post-Cosmopolitan Cities: Explorations in Coexistence. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Sneath, David (eds.). 1996. Culture and Environment in Inner Asia. Two Volumes. Cambridge: The White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Sneath, David (eds.). 1999. The End of Nomadism? Society, the State and the Environment in Inner Asia. Cambridge: The White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Hurelbaater, Ujeed. 2005. ‘Regret as a Political Intervention: An Essay in the Historical Anthropology of the Early Mongols’. Past and Present, 186: 345.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Ujeed, Hurelbaater. 2014. A Monastery in Time: The Making of Mongolian Buddhism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge, and Description. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Michael. 2013. The Wherewithal of Life: Ethics, Migration, and the Question of Well-Being. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003. ‘Self-Interpretation, Agency, and the Objects of Anthropology: Reflections on a Genealogy’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45: 222248.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2007. Christian Modern: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Knappett, Carol and Malafouris, Lambros. 2008. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2002. ‘For an Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom’. The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2001. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8: 311332.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James and Humphrey, Caroline. 2006. ‘Action’, in Kreinath, Jens, Snoek, Jan, and Stausberg, Michael (eds), Theorizing Rituals: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. The Hague: Brill.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2003. ‘Ethical Formation and Politics of Autonomy in Contemporary Egypt’. Social Research, 70: 837863.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marriott, McKim. 1976. ‘Hindu Transactions: Diversity Without Dualism’, in Kapferer, Bruce (ed.), Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Martin, P. R. and Bateson, P. P. G.. 2007. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables of the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 2014. What Animals Teach Us About Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Cheryl. 2012. ‘Two Virtue Ethics and the Anthropology of Morality’. Anthropological Theory, 12: 161184.Google Scholar
Ong, Aiwa and Collier, Stephen J. (eds). 2004. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Paras, Eric. 2006. Foucault 2.0: Beyond Power and Knowledge. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten Axel and Holbraad, Martin. 2013. ‘Introduction: Times of Security’, in Pedersen, Morten Axel and Holbraad, Martin (eds.), Times of Security: Ethnographies of Fear, Protest and the Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pepperell, Robert. 1993. The Posthuman Condition. Exeter Books: Intellect.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2007. ‘Continuity Thinking and the Problem of Christian Culture: Belief, Time, and the Anthropology of Christianity’. Current Anthropology, 48: 538.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel and Rumsey, Alan (eds). 2008. ‘Social Thought and Commentary Special Section: Anthropology and the Opacity of Other Minds’. Anthropological Quarterly, 407482.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1995. ‘Disembodied Choice’, in Rosen, Lawrence (ed.), Other Intentions: Cultural Contexts and the Attribution of Inner States. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2005. Kinship, Law, and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Nicholas and Humphrey, Caroline (eds.). 1994. Shamanism, History and the State. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna. 2013. ‘More-Than-Human-Sociality: A Call for Critical Description’, in Hastrup, Kirsten (ed.), Anthropology and Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1950 (1903–1917). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Translated and edited by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×