Foundations of Political Psychology

doi:10.1017/9781108779104.001

Part I - Foundations of Political Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022

Edited by

Danny Osborne and

Chris G. Sibley

Show author details

Danny Osborne: Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley: Affiliation:
University of Auckland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 1 - 174

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779104.001 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058772 Google Scholar

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2022). The structure, prevalence, and nature of mass belief systems. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bastian, A. (1860). Der Mensch in der Geschichte: Zur Begründung einer psychologischen Weltanschauung. Otto Wigand.Google Scholar

Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2022). The politics of hate: Derogatory language in politics and intergroup relations. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bizumic, B., & Sheppard, H. (2022). A political psychology of ethnocentrism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, C. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2022). The developmental science of politics: Insights from the 2016 US presidential election. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Mullinix, K. J. (2022). Rational choice and information processing. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Christ, O., Schmid, K., & Green, E. G. T. (2022). Macro-diversity and intergroup attitudes. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Claessens, S., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2022). The evolutionary basis of political ideology. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, L., DeMora, S. L., & Long, S. (2022). Demographic change, white decline, and the changing nature of racial politics in election campaigns. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press.Google Scholar

Duckitt, J. (2022). Authoritarianism: Conceptualisation, research, and new developments. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunaway, J., & Settle, J. E. (2022). Opinion formation and polarisation in the news feed era: Effects from digital, social, and mobile media. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eker, I., Cichocka, A., & Cislak, A. (2022). Collective narcissism: How being narcissistic about your groups shapes politics, group processes and intergroup relations. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, G., & Opacic, A. (2022). How social class influences political choices. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Farhart, C. E. (2022). Conspiracy theory belief and conspiratorial thinking. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Federico, C. M. (2022). The personality basis of political preferences. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Geiger, N., Gruszczynski, M., & Swim, J. K. (2022). Political psychology and the climate crisis. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gidengil, E., & Stolle, D. (2022. Populism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2008). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout (2nd ed.). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Green, D. P., & Gomez, J. S. (2022). Psychological theories meet the challenge of persuading and mobilising voters. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hanson, B. E., Wisneski, D. C., & Morgan, G. S. (2022). The consequences of moral conviction in politics: More negative than positive? In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, E., Pärnamets, P., Sternisko, A., Robertson, C., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2022). The psychology and neuroscience of partisanship. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawi, D. R., Bou Zeineddine, F., Saab, R., Ayanian, A. H., & Harb, C. (2022). Political psychology in the Arab region: A commentary on navigating research in unstable contexts. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a Google Scholar

Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2022). The psychology of public opinion. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001 Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. (2022). Fear and loathing in American politics: A review of affective polarisation. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2022). Two sides of the same coin: A new look at differences and similarities across political ideology. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the world war. K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, Ltd.Google Scholar

Le Bon, G. (1896). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Malka, A. (2022). Religiosity and openness to authoritarian governance. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McDermott, R. (2022). Genetic contributions to political phenomena. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McFarland, S. (2022). International and individual differences in support for human rights. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Merriam, C. E. (1925). New aspects of politics. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mintz, A., & Barr, K. (2022). Rethinking group dynamics: The Cuban Missile Crisis revisited. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mintz, A., & Mograbi, E. (2015). Political Psychology: Submissions, acceptances, downloads, and citations. Political Psychology, 36(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12277 Google Scholar

Osborne, D., Becker, J. C., Bahamondes, J., & García-Sánchez, E. (2022). The political psychology of inequality: Why rising rates of economic inequality affect our health and democracy. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Osborne, D., García-Sánchez, E., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Identifying the psychological mechanisms underlying the effects of inequality on society: The Macro-micro model of Inequality and RElative Deprivation (MIRED). In Jetten, J. & Peters, K. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 249–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_16 Google Scholar

Osborne, D., Sengupta, N., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking forward. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12302 Google Scholar

Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., & Sengupta, N. K. (2015). Income and neighbourhood-level inequality predict self-esteem and ethnic identity centrality through individual- and group-based relative deprivation: A multilevel path analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2087 Google Scholar

Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001 Google Scholar

Quayle, M., Pautz, N., & Mhlongo, B. (2020). A coauthorship analysis of internationalization in political psychology through the lens of ISPP dissemination activities. Political Psychology, 41(5), 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12656 Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P., & Mattes, K. (2022). Emotions and politics. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reynolds, K. J. (2018). Looking back, looking forward: ISPP at 40 and future directions for political psychology. Political Psychology, 39(4), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12509 Google Scholar

Reynolds, K. J., & Yeow, C. J. L. (2018). Where have we come from and where are we heading? An examination of ISPP as a diverse and international society. ISPP Governing Council. https://www.ispp.org/uploads/attachments/UPDATED_Final_ISPP_Diversity_Report_2018_Recd_July2019.pdf Google Scholar

Rivera Pichardo, E. J., Vargas Salfate, S., & Jost, J. T. (2022). Political psychology in the Global South: Collective memory, intergroup relations, ideology, and political participation. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, K., & Sanbonmatsu, K. (2022). The persistence of gender in campaigns and elections. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shandler, R., Snider, K. L. G., & Canetti, D. (2022). The political psychology of cyberterrorism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.Google Scholar

Sutton, R. M., Murphy, A. O., Petterson, A., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). The politics of abortion, pregnancy, and motherhood. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202 Google Scholar

Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., & McGarty, C. (2022). Collective action for social change: Individual, groups and contextual factors shaping collective action and its outcomes. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tileagă, C., & Augoustinos, M. (2022). Critical perspective in political psychology. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Valentino, N. A., & Kim, Y. P. (2022). The political dynamics of immigration opinion worldwide. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2022). Political extremism. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vollhardt, J. R., Jeong, H. Y., & Bilail, R. (2022). Reconciliation in the aftermath of collective violence. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Welzel, C. (2022). A cultural theory of autocracy-vs-democracy: On the psychological foundations of political regimes. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yogeeswaran, K., & Verkuyten, M. (2022). The political psychology of national identity. In Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Aktipis, A., Cronk, L., Alcock, J., et al. (2018). Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–018-0378-4 Google Scholar

Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579 Google Scholar

Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246–1247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1979 Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Danso, H. A., Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., Bond, M. H., & Keung, D. K. Y. (2005). Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: A cross-cultural perspective. In Sorrentino, R. M., Cohen, D., Olsen, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Culture and social behavior: The Ontario symposium (pp. 1–29). (Ontario Symposia on Personality and Social Psychology Series; Vol. 10). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612793 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, Article 823. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0823-z Google Scholar

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bas-Hoogendam, J. M., Steenbergen, H. V., Kreuk, T., van der Wee, N. J. A., & Westenberg, P. M. (2017). How embarrassing! The behavioral and neural correlates of processing social norm violations. PLoS ONE, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176326 Google Scholar

Batrićević, N., & Littvay, L. (2017). A genetic basis of economic egalitarianism. Social Justice Research, 30(4), 408–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211–017-0297-y Google Scholar

Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442(7105), 912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04981 Google Scholar

Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005 Google Scholar

Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/204166 Google Scholar

Borg, J. S., Lieberman, D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1529–1546. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20109 Google Scholar

Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932 Google Scholar

Bromham, L., Hua, X., Cardillo, M., Schneemann, H., & Greenhill, S. J. (2018). Parasites and politics: Why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181100 Google Scholar

Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M., Brügger, R. K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2018). Evolutionary origins of morality: Insights from non-human primates. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00017 Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01138.x Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.Google Scholar

Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(10), 3721–3726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710069105 Google Scholar

Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2020). The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–020-0850-9 Google Scholar

Claidière, N., & Whiten, A. (2012). Integrating the study of conformity and culture in humans and nonhuman animals. Psychological Bulletin, 138(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025868 Google Scholar

Conway, L. G., Chan, L., & Woodard, S. R. (2020). Socio-ecological influences on political ideology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.034 Google Scholar

Cronk, L., & Leech, B. L. (2013). Meeting at Grand Central: Understanding the social and evolutionary roots of cooperation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.Google Scholar

Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., Schreiber, D., et al. (2012). Neural basis of egalitarian behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(17), 6479–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118653109 Google Scholar

Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 23(2), 744–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025 Google Scholar

Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2016). How the mind makes welfare tradeoffs: Evolution, computation, and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.06.006 Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12006 Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090–5138(04)00005-4 Google Scholar

Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021 Google Scholar

Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., Hartsen, K. M., & Preve, R. M. (2008). Right-wing authoritarianism in relation to proposed judicial action, electromyographic response, and affective attitudes toward a schizophrenic mother. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(1), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00303.x Google Scholar

Foerster, S., Franz, M., Murray, C. M., et al. (2016). Chimpanzee females queue but males compete for social status. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 35404. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35404 Google Scholar

Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754 Google Scholar

Geniole, S. N., MacDonell, E. T., & McCormick, C. M. (2017). The threat premium in economic bargaining. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.004 Google Scholar

Gilby, I. C. (2006). Meat sharing among the Gombe chimpanzees: Harassment and reciprocal exchange. Animal Behaviour, 71(4), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.009 Google Scholar

Goodall, J. (1982). Order without law. In Gruter, M. & Bohannan, P. (Eds.), Law, biology and culture: The evolution of law (pp. 50–62). Ross-Erikson, Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281 Google Scholar

Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2020). Political orientation is associated with behavior in public-goods- and trust-games. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–020-09606-5 Google Scholar

Gurven, M. (2004). Reciprocal altruism and food sharing decisions among Hiwi and Ache hunter-gatherers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56(4), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265–004-0793-6 Google Scholar

Gurven, M., Rueden, C. von, Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Vie, M. L. (2013). How universal is the big five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030841 Google Scholar

Haesevoets, T., Folmer, C. R., & Van Hiel, A. (2015). Cooperation in mixed-motive games: The role of individual differences in selfish and social orientation. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1992 Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Halali, E., Dorfman, A., Jun, S., & Halevy, N. (2018). More for us or more for me? Social dominance as parochial egoism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732819 Google Scholar

Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476(7360), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10278 Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001\_3 Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Byrne, E., & McDermott, R. (2012). Introduction: What is a ‘gene’ and why does it matter for political science? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629812437752 Google Scholar

Haun, D. B. M., Rekers, Y., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Majority-biased transmission in chimpanzees and human children, but not orangutans. Current Biology, 22(8), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.006 Google Scholar

Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.195747 Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X Google Scholar

Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10110 Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112137 Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192 Google Scholar

Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., Boisvert, J., Hafer, C. L., MacInnis, C. C., & Costello, K. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.002 Google Scholar

Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x Google Scholar

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802110007 Google Scholar

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611429024 Google Scholar

Jensen, K., Vaish, A., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2014). The emergence of human prosociality: Aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00822 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127 Google Scholar

Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21(8), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.017 Google Scholar

Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(30), 12577–12580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705345104 Google Scholar

Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., Dejesus, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623 Google Scholar

Koomen, R., & Herrmann, E. (2018). An investigation of children’s strategies for overcoming the tragedy of the commons. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(5), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–018-0327-2 Google Scholar

Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2017). The temporal stability of in-group favoritism is mostly attributable to genetic factors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699250 Google Scholar

Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006a). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311(5765), 1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123007 Google Scholar

Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006b). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: Tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 72(2), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.018 Google Scholar

Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Chimpanzees coordinate in a negotiation game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(6), 381–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.05.003 Google Scholar

Morgan, T. J. H., Rendell, L. E., Ehn, M., Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2011). The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1729), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1172 Google Scholar

Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2012). Threat(s) and conformity deconstructed: Perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for conformist attitudes and behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.863 Google Scholar

Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. M. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.12.001 Google Scholar

Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622 Google Scholar

Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., et al. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356 Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755 Google Scholar

Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627 Google Scholar

Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1600234X Google Scholar

Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary political psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 1–19). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376 Google Scholar

Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2019). Upper-body strength and political egalitarianism: Twelve conceptual replications. Political Psychology, 40(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12505 Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. https://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/Google Scholar

Pollet, T. V., Tybur, J. M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Rickard, I. J. (2014). What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature? Human Nature, 25(3), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110–014-9206-3 Google Scholar

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 Google Scholar

Price, M. E., Kang, J., Dunn, J., & Hopkins, S. (2011). Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 636–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.009 Google Scholar

Price, M. E., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Sidnaius, J., & Pound, N. (2017). Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.001 Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: Young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.875 Google Scholar

Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., et al. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400106X Google Scholar

Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. The University of Chicago Press. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/547797 Google Scholar

Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). No third-party punishment in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(37), 14824–14829. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203179109 Google Scholar

Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402596 Google Scholar

Schulman, G. I. (1967). Asch conformity studies: Conformity to the experimenter and/or to the group? Sociometry, 30(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786436 Google Scholar

Scott, J., & Lockard, J. S. (2007). Competition coalitions and conflict interventions among captive female gorillas. International Journal of Primatology, 28(4), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764–007-9161-5 Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate-proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528 Google Scholar

Service, E. R. (1962). Primitive social organization: An evolutionary perspective. Random House.Google Scholar

Silk, J. B., Brosnan, S. F., Vonk, J., et al. (2005). Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature, 437(7063), 1357–1359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04243 Google Scholar

Sinn, J. S., & Hayes, M. W. (2017). Replacing the moral foundations: An evolutionary-coalitional theory of liberal-conservative differences. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12361 Google Scholar

Snell-Rood, E. C. (2013). An overview of the evolutionary causes and consequences of behavioural plasticity. Animal Behaviour, 85(5), 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.031 Google Scholar

Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018). The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation. Psychological Review, 125(5), 714–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000104 Google Scholar

Stanford, C. B. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: Empirical evidence and shifting assumptions. Current Anthropology, 39(4), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1086/204757 Google Scholar

Sterelny, K. (2007). Social intelligence, human intelligence and niche construction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2006 Google Scholar

Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003 Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x Google Scholar

Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/668207 Google Scholar

Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812 Google Scholar

Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., et al. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(44), 12408–12413. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607398113 Google Scholar

Tybur, J. M., Merriman, L. A., Hooper, A. E. C., McDonald, M. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related? Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/epjournal-1329 [pii]Google Scholar

Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s responses to guilt displays. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1248–1262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024462 Google Scholar

Van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299(5603), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078004 Google Scholar

Van Wilgenburg, E., Torres, C. W., & Tsutsui, N. D. (2010). The global expansion of a single ant supercolony. Evolutionary Applications, 3(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00114.x Google Scholar

Wallace, B., Cesarini, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Johannesson, M. (2007). Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(40), 15631–15634. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706642104 Google Scholar

Warneken, F., Chen, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development, 77(3), 640–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00895.x Google Scholar

Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301–1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448 Google Scholar

Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2014). The hidden agenda of the political mind: How self-interest shapes our opinions and why we won’t admit it. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851966 Google Scholar

Westermarck, E. (1891). The history of human marriage. Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar

Whiten, A., Spiteri, A., Horner, V., et al. (2007). Transmission of multiple traditions within and between chimpanzee groups. Current Biology, 17(12), 1038–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.031 Google Scholar

References

Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167.Google Scholar

Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379.Google Scholar

Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2004). The origin of politics: An evolutionary theory of political behavior. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 707–723.Google Scholar

Alink, L. R., Mesman, J., Van Zeijl, J., et al. (2006). The early childhood aggression curve: Development of physical aggression in 10‐to 50‐month‐old children. Child Development, 77(4), 954–966.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . (2006). Politics. ReadHowYouWant.com.Google Scholar

Barrett, H. C. (2012). A hierarchical model of the evolution of human brain specializations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Suppl. 1), 10733–10740.Google Scholar

Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection: Opposites are sometimes said to attract, but in fact we are likely to marry someone who is similar to us in almost every variable. American Scientist, 73(1), 47–51.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.Google Scholar

Cyranoski, D. (2020, 3 January). What CRISPR-baby prison sentences mean for research. Nature.Google Scholar

Devkota, S., & Chang, E. B. (2015). Interactions between diet, bile acid metabolism, gut microbiota, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Digestive Diseases, 33(3), 351–356.Google Scholar

Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 640–649.Google Scholar

Eaves, L., D’Onofrio, B., & Russell, R. (1999). Transmission of religion and attitudes. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 2(2), 59–61.Google Scholar

Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2008). Transmission of attitudes toward abortion and gay rights: Effects of genes, social learning and mate selection. Behavior Genetics, 38(3), 247–256.Google Scholar

Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Do we choose our spouse based on our in‐laws? Resolving the effects of family background and spousal choice for educational attainment, religious practice, and political preference. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1253–1278.Google Scholar

Elia, A., Wilson, O. J., Lees, M., et al. (2019). Skeletal muscle, haematological and splenic volume characteristics of elite breath-hold divers. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 119(11–12), 2499–2511.Google Scholar

Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2013). In defense of genopolitics. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 362–374.Google Scholar

Fowler, J. H., & Schreiber, D. (2008). Biology, politics, and the emerging science of human nature. Science, 322(5903), 912–914.Google Scholar

Funk, C. (2020, 12 February). Key findings about Americans’ confidence in science and their views on scientists’ role in society. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/12/key-findings-about-americans-confidence-in-science-and-their-views-on-scientists-role-in-society/Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & McDermott, R. (2017). The relationship between sexual preferences and political orientations: Do positions in the bedroom affect positions in the ballot box? Personality and Individual Differences, 105(15), 318–325.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Funk, C. L., Medland, S. E., et al. (2009). Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. The Journal of Politics 71(3), 1141–1156.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Gillespie, N. A., Eaves, L. J., et al. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 271–285.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Medland, S. E., et al. (2010). Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 798–814.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (Eds.). (2011a). Man is by nature a political animal: Evolution, biology, and politics. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2011b). The normative implications of biological research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 325–329.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012a). The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress. Trends in Genetics, 28(10), 525–533.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P., & McDermott, R. (2012b). Policing the perimeter: Disgust and purity in democratic debate. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 675–687.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2016). Give me attitudes. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 331–350.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2012). The different effects of gender and sex on vote choice. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 76–92.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2013). Fear as a disposition and an emotional state: A genetic and environmental approach to out‐group political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 279–293.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., et al. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294.Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Negativity bias and political preferences: A response to commentators. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 333–350.Google Scholar

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714–725.Google Scholar

Klofstad, C. A., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses? The role of politics in human mate attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(2), 100–108.Google Scholar

Klofstad, C. A., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013). The dating preferences of liberals and conservatives. Political Behavior, 35(3), 519–538.Google Scholar

Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Jardine, R., Feingold, L. M., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(12), 4364–4368.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Distinguishing sex and gender. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(1), 89–92.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014a). The study of international politics in the neurobiological revolution: A review of leadership and political violence. Millennium, 43(1), 92–123.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014b). Political ecology: On the mutual formation of biology and culture. Political Psychology, 35(3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00901.x Google Scholar

McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). The relationship between physical aggression, foreign policy and moral choices: Phenotypic and genetic findings. Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 37–46.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2018). DNA is not destiny. In Hopcroft, R. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evolution, biology, and society (pp. 241–263). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., Lopez, A. C., & Hatemi, P. K. (2016). An evolutionary approach to political leadership. Security Studies, 25(4), 677–698.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., Tingley, D., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014). Assortative mating on ideology could operate through olfactory cues. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 997–1005.Google Scholar

Morgan, X. C., Segata, N., & Huttenhower, C. (2013). Biodiversity and functional genomics in the human microbiome. Trends in Genetics, 29(1), 51–58.Google Scholar

Oosterhoff, B., Shook, N. J., & Ford, C. (2018). Is that disgust I see? Political ideology and biased visual attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 336, 227–235.Google Scholar

Penn, D., & Potts, W. (1998). How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences? Advances in Immunology, 69(41), 411–436.Google Scholar

Petersen, M. B. (2012). Social welfare as small‐scale help: Evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Schreiber, D., Fonzo, G., Simmons, A. N., et al. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLoS ONE, 8(2), Article e52970.Google Scholar

Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8(3), 204–210.Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D., & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(4), 264–269.Google Scholar

References

Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Muñoz, J. (2013). Turning a blind eye: Experimental evidence of partisan bias in attitudes toward corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1664–1692.Google Scholar

Anwar, S., Bayer, P., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2012). The impact of jury race in criminal trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 1017–1055.Google Scholar

Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91.Google Scholar

Baron, J., & Jost, J. T. (2019). False equivalence: Are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 292–303.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35–50.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.Google Scholar

Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. Demos.Google Scholar

Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2013). The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage, 76, 412–427.Google Scholar

Blais, A., & Young, R. (1999). Why do people vote? An experiment in rationality. Public Choice, 99(1–2), 39–55.Google Scholar

Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization (No. w26669). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26669.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.Google Scholar

Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2020, 24 April). Most Democrats who are looking for a relationship would not consider dating a Trump voter. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/24/most-democrats-who-are-looking-for-a-relationship-would-not-consider-dating-a-trump-voter/Google Scholar

Brown, D. (1991). Human universals. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bullock, J. G. (2007). Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating [Ph.D. dissertation]. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Bullock, J. G. (2009). Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1109–1124.Google Scholar

Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578.Google Scholar

Carlson, E. (2015). Ethnic voting and accountability in Africa: A choice experiment in Uganda. World Politics, 67(2), 353–385.Google Scholar

Carlson, E. (2016). Finding partisanship where we least expect it: Evidence of partisan bias in a new African democracy. Political Behavior, 38(1), 129–154.Google Scholar

Chawke, C., & Kanai, R. (2016). Alteration of political belief by non-invasive brain stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 621.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., & Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431–457.Google Scholar

Che, Y. K., & Mierendorff, K. (2019). Optimal dynamic allocation of attention. American Economic Review, 109(8), 2993–3029.Google Scholar

Cikara, M., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 245–274.Google Scholar

Cikara, M., Van Bavel, J. J., Ingbretsen, Z. A., & Lau, T. (2017). Decoding ‘us’ and ‘them’: Neural representations of generalized group concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(5), 621–631.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.Google Scholar

Coppock, A. E. (2016). Positive, small, homogeneous, and durable: Political persuasion in response to information [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University.Google Scholar

Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). On the precipice of a ‘majority-minority’ America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1189–1197.Google Scholar

DeSilver, D. (2013, 17 July). Partisan polarization, in Congress and among public, is greater than ever. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/17/partisan-polarization-in-congress-and-among-public-is-greater-than-ever/Google Scholar

DeSilver, D. (2017, 3 November). US trails most developed countries in voter turnout. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/11/03/in-past-elections-u-s-trailed-most-developed-countries-in-voter-turnout/Google Scholar

Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., et al. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Duran, N. D., Nicholson, S. P., & Dale, R. (2017). The hidden appeal and aversion to political conspiracies as revealed in the response dynamics of partisans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 268–278.Google Scholar

Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 933–946.Google Scholar

Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2018). On the measurement of conspiracy beliefs. Research & Politics, 5(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2019). Informational cues, partisan-motivated reasoning, and the manipulation of conspiracy beliefs. Political Communication, 36(1), 83–102.Google Scholar

Enders, A. M., Smallpage, S. M., & Lupton, R. N. (2020). Are all ‘birthers’ conspiracy theorists? On the relationship between conspiratorial thinking and political orientations. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 849–855.Google Scholar

Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1705–1710.Google Scholar

Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, A., & Green, D. P. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 794–818.Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173.Google Scholar

Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2012). The impact of social ties on group interactions: Evidence from minimal groups and randomly assigned real groups. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(1), 101–115.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Brady, W. J., et al. (2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing predict infections and mortality during the coronavirus pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1186–1197.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, J. (2018). Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research. Cortex, 102, 150–160.Google Scholar

Graf, J., & Aday, S. (2008). Selective attention to online political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(1), 86–100.Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1049.Google Scholar

Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403.Google Scholar

Greene, S. (2002). The social-psychological measurement of partisanship. Political Behavior, 24(3), 171–197.Google Scholar

Harris, E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2021). Preregistered replication of ‘feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority’. Psychological Science, 32(3), 451–458.Google Scholar

Hartstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 179–193.Google Scholar

Hawkins, D. (2020, 17 May). Eric Trump claims coronavirus is Democratic hoax, will ‘magically’ vanish after 2020 election. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/17/eric-trump-coronavirus/Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. Routledge.Google Scholar

Hornsby, A. N., & Love, B. C. (2020). How decisions and the desire for coherency shape subjective preferences over time. Cognition, 200, 104244.Google Scholar

Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.Google Scholar

Hunt, J. (2017, 2 November). ‘Fake news’ named Collins Dictionary’s official Word of the Year for 2017. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fake-news-word-of-the-year-2017-collins-dictionary-donald-trump-kellyanne-conway-antifa-corbynmania-a8032751.html Google Scholar

Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., & Krupenkin, M. (2018). The strengthening of partisan affect. Political Psychology, 39(4), 201–218.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146.Google Scholar

Johnston, R. (2006). Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 329–351.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Hennes, E. P., & Lavine, H. (2013). ‘Hot’ political cognition: Its self-, group-, and system-serving purposes. In Carlston, D. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 851–875). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Noorbaloochi, S., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The ‘chicken-and-egg’ problem in political neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 317–318.Google Scholar

Jurkowitz, M., Mitchell, A., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2020). US media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. Pew Research Center.Google Scholar

Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86.Google Scholar

Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5), 785–794.Google Scholar

Kevins, A., & Soroka, S. N. (2018). Growing apart? Partisan sorting in Canada, 1992–2015. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 51(1), 103–133.Google Scholar

Klein, E. (2020). Why we’re polarized. Profile Books.Google Scholar

Knutson, K. M., Wood, J. N., Spampinato, M. V., & Grafman, J. (2006). Politics on the brain: An fMRI investigation. Social Neuroscience, 1(1), 25–40.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, A., & Murphy, J. P. (2019, 11 September). Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the ‘partisans without constraint’ thesis.Google Scholar

Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435–462.Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.Google Scholar

Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017). The limits of partisan prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 485–501.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2010). Genetic evidence for multiple biological mechanisms underlying in-group favoritism. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1623–1628.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. J., Kandler, C., & Riemann, R. (2014). Distinct heritable influences underpin in-group love and out-group derogation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 407–413.Google Scholar

Lupu, N. (2015). Party polarization and mass partisanship: A comparative perspective. Political Behavior, 37(2), 331–356.Google Scholar

Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, S. J. (2017). How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: Evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional voting. Research & Politics, 4(1).Google Scholar

McConnell, C., Margalit, Y., Malhotra, N., & Levendusky, M. (2018). The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 5–18.Google Scholar

McGuire, W. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). Academic Press.Google Scholar

McNamara, J., & Houston, A. (1980). The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 85(4), 673–690.Google Scholar

Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27–51.Google Scholar

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74.Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844.Google Scholar

Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. S., Skitka, L. J., & Wisneski, D. C. (2010). Moral and religious convictions and intentions to vote in the 2008 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 10(1), 307–320.Google Scholar

Morisi, D., Jost, J. T., & Singh, V. (2019). An asymmetrical ‘president-in-power’ effect. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 614–620.Google Scholar

Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., Kaggen, L., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2018). Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(2), 133–138.Google Scholar

Nefes, T. S. (2014). Rationale of conspiracy theorizing: Who shot the President Chen Shui-bian? Rationality and Society, 26(3), 373–394.Google Scholar

Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489.Google Scholar

Pereira, A., Harris, E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (in press). Identity concerns drive belief: The impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider. http://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. (2020). In changing U.S. electorate, race and education remain stark dividing lines. https://www.people-press.org/2020/06/02/in-changing-u-s-electorate-race-and-education-remain-stark-dividing-lines/Google Scholar

Ripberger, J. T., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., et al. (2017). Bayesian versus politically motivated reasoning in human perception of climate anomalies. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), Article 114004.Google Scholar

Robbett, A., & Matthews, P. H. (2018). Partisan bias and expressive voting. Journal of Public Economics, 157, 107–120.Google Scholar

Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Metacognitive failure as a feature of those holding radical beliefs. Current Biology, 28(24), 4014–4021.Google Scholar

Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 880–892.Google Scholar

Samuels, D., & Zucco, C. Jr. (2014). The power of partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from survey experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 212–225.Google Scholar

Sarlin, B. (2018, 14 January). ‘Fake news’ went viral in 2016. This expert studied who clicked. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/fake-news-went-viral-2016-expert-studied-who-clicked-n836581 Google Scholar

Schaffner, B. F., & Luks, S. (2018). Misinformation or expressive responding? What an inauguration crowd can tell us about the source of political misinformation in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 135–147.Google Scholar

Shafranek, R. M. (2021). Political considerations in nonpolitical decisions: A conjoint analysis of roommate choice. Political Behavior, 43, 271–300.Google Scholar

Shearer, E., & Gottfried, J. (2017). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/Google Scholar

Sherif, M., White, B. J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60(4), 370–379.Google Scholar

Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 995–998.Google Scholar

Siddiqui, N. (2020). Who do you believe? Political parties and conspiracy theories in Pakistan. Party Politics, 26(2), 107–119.Google Scholar

Silverman, C. (2016, 16 November). This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook Google Scholar

Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917.Google Scholar

Smallpage, S. M., Enders, A. M., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefs. Research & Politics, 4(4).Google Scholar

Stern, C., West, T. V., & Schmitt, P. G. (2014). The liberal illusion of uniqueness. Psychological Science, 25(1), 137–144.Google Scholar

Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: Social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 1–6.Google Scholar

Strandberg, T., Olson, J. A., Hall, L., Woods, A., & Johansson, P. (2020). Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback. PLoS ONE, 15(2), Article e0226799.Google Scholar

Strandberg, T., Sivén, D., Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Pärnamets, P. (2018). False beliefs and confabulation can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(9), 1382–1399.Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., Lodge, M., & Glathar, J. (2001). The motivated construction of political judgments. In Kuklinski, J. H. (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 198–226). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–103.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.Google Scholar

Tappin, M. B., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. R. (2020). Thinking clearly about casual inferences of politically motivated reasoning: Why paradigmatic study designs often undermine casual inference. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 81–87.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 227–238.Google Scholar

Toner, K., Leary, M. R., Asher, M. W., & Jongman-Sereno, K. P. (2013). Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2454–2462.Google Scholar

Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., et al. (2018, March). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Hewlett Foundation. https://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Social-Media-Political-Polarization-and-Political-Disinformation-Literature-Review.pdf Google Scholar

Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., Harris, E. A., Pärnamets, P., Rathje, S., Doell, K. C., & Tucker, J. A. (in press). Political psychology in the digital (mis)information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Social Issues and Policy Review.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2008). The neural substrates of in-group bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1131–1139.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., Sternisko, A., Harris, E., & Robertson, C. (2020). The social function of rationalization: An identity perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43.Google Scholar

Van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. J. (2020). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51.Google Scholar

Van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578.Google Scholar

Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51.Google Scholar

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.Google Scholar

Wilson, A., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228.Google Scholar

Xiao, Y. J., Coppin, G., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016). Clarifying the role of perception in intergroup relations: Origins of bias, components of perception, and practical implications. Psychological Inquiry, 27(4), 358–366.Google Scholar

Xiao, Y. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2019). Sudden shifts in social identity swiftly shape implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 55–69.Google Scholar

Yudkin, D. A., Rothmund, T., Twardawski, M., Thalla, N., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016). Reflexive intergroup bias in third-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(11), 1448–1459.Google Scholar

Zimerman, A., & Pinheiro, F. (2020). Appearances can be deceptive: Political polarization, agrarian policy, and coalitional presidentialism in Brazil. Politics & Policy, 48(2), 339–371.Google Scholar

Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407–418.Google Scholar

References

Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2 Google Scholar

Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threat. Nature Human Behavior, 4(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-z Google Scholar

Baldassari, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010098 Google Scholar

Bardeen, J. R., & Michel, J. S. (2019). Associations among dimensions of political ideology and Dark Tetrad personality features. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 7(1), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1071 Google Scholar

Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. Routledge.Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (1997). Harmony and security value orientations in political evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234006 Google Scholar

Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2020). Worldview conflict and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.002 Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, W. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x Google Scholar

Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M. J., & Wagner, M. W. (2012). Political ideology in American politics: One, two, or none? The Forum, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1526 Google Scholar

Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. The American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648 Google Scholar

Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x Google Scholar

Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000005 Google Scholar

Cizmar, A. M., Layman, G. C., McTague, J., Pearson-Merkowitz, S., & Spivey, M. (2014). Authoritarianism and American political behavior from 1952 to 2008. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913492019 Google Scholar

Clifford, S., Jewell, R., & Waggoner, P. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072 Google Scholar

Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 Google Scholar

Collins, T. P., Crawford, J. T., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). No evidence for ideological asymmetry in dissonance avoidance. Social Psychology, 48(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000300 Google Scholar

Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 1–74). Free Press.Google Scholar

Czarnek, G., & Kossowska, M. (2019, 6 July). Welfare state regime and political engagement modify the relationship between openness and economic beliefs. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q4uks Google Scholar

Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007 Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6 Google Scholar

Duckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34(6), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022 Google Scholar

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x Google Scholar

Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x Google Scholar

Eichmeier, A., & Stenhouse, N. (2019). Differences that don’t make much difference: Party asymmetry in open-minded cognitive styles has little relationship to information processing behavior. Research & Politics, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019872045 Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. Praeger.Google Scholar

Federico, C. M. (2015). The structure, foundations, and expression of ideology. In Berinsky, A. (Ed.), New directions in public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 81–103). Routledge.Google Scholar

Federico, C. M. (2020). When do psychological differences predict political differences? Engagement and the psychological bases of political polarization. In van Prooijen, J.-W. (Ed.), Political polarization (pp. 17–37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042433 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., Deason, G., & Fisher, E. L. (2012). Ideological asymmetry in the relationship between epistemic motivation and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029063 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., & Ekstrom, P. D. (2018). The political self: How identity aligns preferences with epistemic needs. Psychological Science, 29(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617748679 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. V. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517273 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., Fisher, E. L., & Deason, G. (2011). Expertise and the ideological consequences of the authoritarian predisposition. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr026 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., & Goren, P. (2009). Motivated social cognition and ideology: Is attention to elite discourse a prerequisite for epistemically motivated political affinities? In Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 267–291). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.001.0001 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., Hunt, C. V., & Ergun, D. (2009). Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: Translating ‘competitive jungles’ and ‘dangerous worlds’ into ideological reality. Social Justice Research, 22(2–3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0097-0 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., Johnston, C. D., & Lavine, H. G. (2014). Context, engagement, and the (multiple) functions of negativity bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002550 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477 Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., & Reifen Tagar, M. (2014). Zeroing in on the right: Education and the partisan expression of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 36, 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9250-4 Google Scholar

Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00316 Google Scholar

Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055 Google Scholar

Fleishman, J. A. (1988). Attitude organization in the general public: Evidence for a bidimensional structure. Social Forces, 67(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/67.1.159 Google Scholar

Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003 Google Scholar

Funder, D. C. (2010). The personality puzzle (5th ed.). W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). The Big Five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659 Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031 Google Scholar

Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (1953). Character and social structure. Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar

Goren, P. (2012). On voter competence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 Google Scholar

Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group-interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Random House.Google Scholar

Harper, C. A. (2020, 19 March). Ideological measurement in social and personality psychological science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wpsje Google Scholar

Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669 Google Scholar

Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00230 Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604 Google Scholar

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K. (1992). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(4), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1086/269335 Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, C. D., & Wronski, J. (2015). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology, 36(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12068 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2013). Political ideologies and their social psychological functions. In Freeden, M., Sargent, L. T., & Stears, M. (Eds.), Handbook of political ideologies (pp. 232–250). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Sterling, J., & Stern, C. (2017). Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation. In Kopetz, C. & Fishbach, A. (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface – From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski (pp. 56–87). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O., & Sterling, J. (2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324 Google Scholar

Kahan, D. M. (2015). What is the ‘science of science communication’? Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312080110 Google Scholar

Kalmoe, N. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41(4), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650 Google Scholar

Kettle, K. L., & Salerno, A. (2017). Anger promotes economic conservatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1440–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718169 Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 778–867). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R., & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2010). Latin American party systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Knight, K. (1999). Liberalism and conservatism. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 2, pp. 59–158). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Knoke, D. M. (1979). Stratification and the dimensions of American political orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 772–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110806 Google Scholar

Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 Google Scholar

Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in western and eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24(3), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00338 Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.2.196 Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed-mindedness. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & DeGrada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84 Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘freezing’. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263 Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 Google Scholar

Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8(6), 612–622. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456 Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. Norton.Google Scholar

Lavine, H., Burgess, D. M., Snyder, J., et al. (1999). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003006 Google Scholar

Lavine, H., Lodge, M., Polichak, J., & Taber, C. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentation: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10(4), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.4.343 Google Scholar

Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088434 Google Scholar

Lefkofridi, Z., Wagner, M., & Willmann, J. E. (2014). Left-authoritarians and policy representation in Western Europe: Electoral choice across ideological dimensions. West European Politics, 37(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.818354 Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man. Doubleday.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luttig, M. D. (2018). The ‘prejudiced personality’ and the origins of partisan strength, affective polarization, and partisan sorting. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(S1), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12484 Google Scholar

Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Holzer, N. (2017). Rethinking the rigidity of the right model: Three suboptimal methodological practices and their implications. In Crawford, J. T. & Jussim, L. (Eds.) Frontiers of social psychology: Politics of social psychology (pp. 116–135). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072 Google Scholar

Malka, A., & Soto, C. J. (2015). Rigidity of the economic right? Menu-independent and menu-dependent influences of psychological dispositions on political attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414556340 Google Scholar

Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170 Google Scholar

Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12485 Google Scholar

McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America. MIT Press.Google Scholar

McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953011 Google Scholar

McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323 Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mooney, C. (2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science – and reality. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2013). ‘Not for all the tea in China!’: Political ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations. PLoS ONE, 8(4), Article e59837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059837 Google Scholar

Newcomb, T. M. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. Dryden.Google Scholar

Noel, H. (2013). Political ideologies and political parties in America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Does personality matter? Openness correlates with vote choice, but particularly for politically sophisticated voters. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.09.001 Google Scholar

Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Within the limits of civic training: Education moderates the relationship between openness and political attitudes. Political Psychology, 36(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12070 Google Scholar

Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D. J., Laustsen, S., Smith, K. N., & Petersen, M. B. (in press). The psychophysiology of political ideology: Replications, reanalysis, and recommendations. Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/714780 Google Scholar

Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627 Google Scholar

Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary political psychology: On the origin and structure of heuristics and biases in politics. Political Psychology, 36(S1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12237 Google Scholar

Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left‐right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x Google Scholar

Rodriguez, C. G., Moskowitz, J. P., Salem, R. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2017). Partisan selective exposure: The role of party, ideology and ideological extremity over time. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000121 Google Scholar

Roets, A., Cornelis, I., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). Openness as a predictor of political orientation and conventional and unconventional political activism in Western and Eastern Europe. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.809354 Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R., & Eva, G. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161–193). Sage.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z Google Scholar

Sears, D. O., & Levy, S. R. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. L. (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 60–109). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shafer, B. E., & Claggett, W. J. (1995). The two majorities: The issue context of modern American politics. The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, K. B., & Warren, C. (2020). Physiology predicts ideology. Or does it? The current state of political psychophysiology research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.001 Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., & Bullock, J. (2004). A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence. In Saris, W. E. & Sniderman, P. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 337–357). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stangor, C., & Leary, S. P. (2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38005-7 Google Scholar

Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.365 Google Scholar

Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from eastern and western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008 Google Scholar

Tomkins, S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In White, R. W. (Ed.), The study of lives: Essays on personality in honor of Henry A. Murray (pp. 388–411). Atherton Press.Google Scholar

Treier, S., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp067 Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004 Google Scholar

Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., Crowson, H. M., & Roets, A. (2016). The relationship between right-wing attitudes and cognitive style: A comparison of self-report and behavioural measures of rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2082 Google Scholar

Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., & De Pauw, S. (2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1765–1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00669.x Google Scholar

Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333 Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671403 Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019). Psychological features of extreme political ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418817755 Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569706 Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Emmer, J. (2018). Ideological responses to the EU refugee crisis: The left, the right, and the extremes. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 9(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731501 Google Scholar

Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2017). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 9(8), 927–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731500 Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1948). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2016). An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-Western replication and extension. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000661 Google Scholar

Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Aarøe, L. (2012). When citizens go against elite directions: Partisan cues and contrast effects on citizens’ attitudes. Party Politics, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380093 Google Scholar

Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000770 Google Scholar

Algan, Y., Dalvit, N., Do, Q.-A., Le Chapelain, A., & Zenou, Y. (2015). How social networks shape our beliefs: A natural experiment among future French politicians [Mimeo]. Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080210 Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes Democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227643 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2018). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/698928 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2020). Understanding partisan cue receptivity: Tests of predictions from the bounded rationality and expressive utility perspectives. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1086/707616 Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Rethinking the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review. https://psyarxiv.com/a3jf5/Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-z Google Scholar

Barber, M., & Pope, J. C. (2019). Does party trump ideology? Disentangling party and ideology in America. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000795 Google Scholar

Boutyline, A., & Vaisey, S. (2017). Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1371–1447. https://doi.org/10.1086/691274 Google Scholar

Brandt, M. J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019). What is central to political belief system networks? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824354 Google Scholar

Bullock, J. G. (2021). Education and attitudes toward redistribution in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1230–1250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000504 Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Caughey, D., O’Grady, T. O. M., & Warshaw, C. (2019). Policy ideology in European mass publics, 1981–2016. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000157 Google Scholar

Chambers, C. (2019). The seven deadly sins of psychology: A manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc779w5 Google Scholar

Connors, E. C. (2020). The social dimension of political values. Political Behavior, 42(3), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09530-3 Google Scholar

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110756 Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650 Google Scholar

Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10 Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2010). Ideology, partisanship, and democratic development. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., & Norris, P. (Eds.), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in the 21st century (pp. 143–163). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288740.n7 Google Scholar

Dawes, C. T., & Weinschenk, A. C. (2020). On the genetic basis of political orientation. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.012 Google Scholar

DellaPosta, D. (2020). Pluralistic collapse: The ‘oil spill’ model of mass opinion polarization. American Sociological Review, 85(3), 507–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420922989 Google Scholar

Dinas, E. (2013). Why does the apple fall far from the tree? How early political socialization prompts parent-child dissimilarity. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000033 Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper. https://doi.org/10.2307/444355 Google Scholar

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x Google Scholar

Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249(5454), 288–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/249288a0 Google Scholar

Enke, B. (2019). Kinship, cooperation, and the evolution of moral systems. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 953–1019. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz001 Google Scholar

Erikson, R. S., & Stoker, L. (2011). Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000141 Google Scholar

Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2002). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada in response to the September 11, 2001 ‘Attack on America’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00028.x Google Scholar

Fasching, N., Arceneaux, K., Bakker, B. N. (2021). Childhood personality is not systematically associated with ideology in adulthood [Working Paper].Google Scholar

Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477 Google Scholar

Feldman, S., Huddy, L., Wronski, J., & Lown, P. (2020). The interplay of empathy and individualism in support for social welfare policies. Political Psychology, 41(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12620 Google Scholar

Fournier, P., Soroka, S., & Nir, L. (2021). Negativity biases and political ideology: A comparative test across 17 countries. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131 Google Scholar

Fraley, R. C., Griffin, B. N., Belsky, J., & Roisman, G. I. (2012). Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131 Google Scholar

Freeze, M., & Montgomery, J. M. (2015). Static stability and evolving constraint: Preference stability and ideological structure in the mass public. American Politics Research, 44(3), 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15607299 Google Scholar

Garrido, N. R. (2020). Can education reduce traditional gender role attitudes? Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, SA (Ivie).Google Scholar

Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412 Google Scholar

Goren, P. (2020). Values and public opinion. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 1–29). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.954 Google Scholar

Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.x Google Scholar

Goren, P., Schoen, H., Reifler, J., Scotto, T., & Chittick, W. (2016). A unified theory of value-based reasoning and U.S. public opinion. Political Behavior, 38(4), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–016-9344-x Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. B. (2019). Ideology justifies morality: Political beliefs predict moral foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12448 Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., & Verhulst, B. (2015). Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits. PLoS ONE, 10(3), Article e0134072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118106 Google Scholar

Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Childhood socialization and political attitudes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000996 Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192 Google Scholar

Hillygus, D. S. (2011). The evolution of election polling in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 962–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr054 Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1968). The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400115709 Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090719 Google Scholar

Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316341452 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 Google Scholar

Kalmoe, N. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41(4), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650 Google Scholar

Kandler, C., Bell, E., Shikishima, C., Yamagata, S., & Riemann, R. (2015). Genetic foundations of attitude formation. In Scott, R. A., Kosslyn, S. M., & Buchmann, M. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–21). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772 Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066 Google Scholar

Knight, K. (2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062502 Google Scholar

Kozlowski, A., & Murphy, J. P. (2021). Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the ‘partisans without constraint’ thesis. Social Science Research, 94, Article 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020 Google Scholar

Lavine, H., Sullivan, J. L., Borgida, E., & Thomsen, C. J. (1996). The relationship of national and personal issue salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues. Political Psychology, 17(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791812 Google Scholar

Lelkes, Y. (2020). Ancestral kinship and the origins of ideology [Working Paper].Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–009-9094-0 Google Scholar

Linzer, D. A. (2008). The structure of mass ideology and its consequences for democratic governance. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 170. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304655873?accountid=35812 Google Scholar

Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3 Google Scholar

Martin, G. J., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–2599. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160812 Google Scholar

McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/Sl537592707071873 Google Scholar

McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953011 Google Scholar

McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952868 Google Scholar

Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2020). Does openness to experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, Article 103979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103979 Google Scholar

Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627 Google Scholar

Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). China’s ideological spectrum. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1086/694255 Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116 Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–013-9255-z Google Scholar

Shafer, E. F., & Malhotra, N. (2011). The effect of a child’s sex on support for traditional gender roles. Social Forces, 90(1), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/90.1.209 Google Scholar

Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1200 Google Scholar

Slothuus, R. (2010). When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment. Political Communication, 27(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584601003709381 Google Scholar

Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12255 Google Scholar

Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), Article e25552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025552 Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with trade-offs: Psychological constraints and political implications. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., & Popkin, S. L. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 239–263). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.011 Google Scholar

Van den Akker, O., Weston, S. J., Campbell, L., et al. (2019). Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial.Google Scholar

Van der Brug, W., & Van Spanje, J. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00841.x Google Scholar

Wattenberg, M. P. (2019). The changing nature of mass belief systems: The rise of concept and policy ideologues. Critical Review, 31(2), 198–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2019.1690223 Google Scholar

Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111583 Google Scholar

References

Abeles, A. T., Howe, L. C., Krosnick, J. A., & MacInnis, B. (2019). Perception of public opinion on global warming and the role of opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.001 Google Scholar

Albertson, B. L. (2011). Religious appeals and implicit attitudes. Political Psychology, 32(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00793.x Google Scholar

Anand, S., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). The impact of attitudes toward foreign policy goals on public preferences among presidential candidates: A study of issue publics and the attentive public in the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0360491802250541 Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M., & Hartley, E. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 2–11). Holt. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520313514-017 Google Scholar

Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. SAGE.Google Scholar

Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001 Google Scholar

Bell, E., Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2009). The origins of political attitudes and behaviours: An analysis using twins. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990060 Google Scholar

Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., & Tuchfarber, A. J. (1980). Experiments in filtering political opinions. Political Behavior, 2(4), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990173 Google Scholar

Bishop, G. F., Tuchfarber, A. J., & Oldendick, R. W. (1986). Opinions on fictitious issues: The pressure to answer survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/268978 Google Scholar

Brandt, M. J., & Wetherell, G. A. (2012). What attitudes are moral attitudes? The case of attitude heritability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611412793 Google Scholar

Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1972). Comment: The assessment of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 66(2), 450–458.Google Scholar

Burden, B. C., & Rice Sanberg, J. N. (2003). Budget rhetoric in presidential campaigns from 1952 to 2000. Political Behavior, 25(2), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023825212333 Google Scholar

Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103 Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97 Google Scholar

Campbell, J. E. (1983). Ambiguity in the issue positions of presidential candidates: A causal analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111018 Google Scholar

Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075 Google Scholar

Claassen, R. L. (2007). Ideology and evaluation in an experimental setting: Comparing the proximity and the directional models. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907302050 Google Scholar

Claassen, R. L. (2009). Direction versus proximity: Amassing experimental evidence. American Politics Research, 37(2), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08321756 Google Scholar

Conover, P. J. (1988). Feminists and the gender gap. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 985–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131388 Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press of Glencoe. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650 Google Scholar

Crespi, L. P. (1948). The interview effect in polling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/265924 Google Scholar

Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., Hansen, K. M., & Larsen, M. V. (2017). How election polls shape voting behaviour. Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12094 Google Scholar

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408 Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897 Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Ehret, P. J., Van Boven, L., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618758709 Google Scholar

Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130 Google Scholar

Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2018). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and rights. Political Psychology, 39(1), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12402 Google Scholar

Fournier, P., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior, 25(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022952311518 Google Scholar

Frankovic, K., Johnson, T., & Stavrakantonaki, M. (2017). Freedom to conduct opinion polls: A 2017 worldwide update. https://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/library/news/ESOMAR-WAPOR_Freedom-to-Conduct-Opinion-Polls.pdf Google Scholar

Gallup, G., & Rae, S. F. (1940). Is there a bandwagon vote? Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/265397 Google Scholar

Gelpi, C., Feaver, P. D., & Reifler, J. (2006). Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security, 30(3), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228805775969573 Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009X Google Scholar

Gilens, M. (1996). ‘Race coding’ and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082611 Google Scholar

Grillo, A. (2017). Risk aversion and bandwagon effect in the pivotal voter model. Public Choice, 172(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0457-5 Google Scholar

Hansen, J. M. (1985). The political economy of group membership. American Political Science Review, 79, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956120 Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K., Gillespie, N. A., Eaves, L. J., et al. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610001015 Google Scholar

Herbst, S. (1993). The meaning of public opinion: Citizens’ constructions of political reality. Media, Culture & Society, 15(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344393015003007 Google Scholar

Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the Democratic process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hildum, D. C., & Brown, R. W. (1956). Verbal reinforcement and interviewer bias. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(1), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040518 Google Scholar

Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., Gardner, W. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669333 Google Scholar

Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600 Google Scholar

Insko, C. A. (1965). Verbal reinforcement of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(4), 621–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022485 Google Scholar

Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172 Google Scholar

Jones, P. E., Brewer, P. R., Young, D. G., Lambe, J. L., & Hoffman, L. H. (2018). Explaining public opinion toward transgender people, rights, and candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy009 Google Scholar

Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560 Google Scholar

Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106 Google Scholar

Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190156 Google Scholar

Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330253 Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T., & Lindsey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.; pp. 778–867). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior, 12(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992332 Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., et al. (2002). The impact of ‘no opinion’ response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1086/341394 Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., & Milburn, M. A. (1990). Psychological determinants of political opinionation. Social Cognition, 8(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.49 Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996). Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. New Directions for Evaluation, 70, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1033 Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In Krosnick, J. A. & Petty, R. E. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 Google Scholar

Kuru, O., Pasek, J., & Traugott, M. W. (2017). Motivated reasoning in the perceived credibility of public opinion polls. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(2), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx018 Google Scholar

Lacy, D., & Paolino, P. (2010). Testing proximity versus directional voting using experiments. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.008 Google Scholar

Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990050 Google Scholar

Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2012). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743 Google Scholar

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127736 Google Scholar

Madonna, G. T., & Young, M. (2002). The first political poll. https://www.fandm.edu/uploads/files/271296109834777015-the-first-political-poll-6-18-2002.pdf Google Scholar

Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Beliefs about climate beliefs: The importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1279–1307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000321 Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00384.x Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2016). The origins of policy issue salience: Personal and national importance impact on behavioral, cognitive, and emotional issue engagement. In Krosnick, J. A., Chang, I.-C. A., & Stark, T. A. (Eds.), Political psychology: New explorations (pp. 125–171). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445687 Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A., Tahk, A., & Dionne, L. (2016). The impact of policy change threat on financial contributions to interest groups. In Krosnick, J. A., Chang, I.-C. A., & Stark, T. A. (Eds.), Political psychology: New explorations (pp. 172–202). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445687 Google Scholar

Miller, R. L. (1976). Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(2), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/268290 Google Scholar

Morton, R. B., Muller, D., Page, L., & Torgler, B. (2015). Exit polls, turnout, and bandwagon voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. European Economic Review, 77, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.03.012 Google Scholar

Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar

Mutz, D. C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior, 14(2), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992237 Google Scholar

O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B. R., & Smith, N. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM 2010 – Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1536/1842 Google Scholar

Oskarsson, S., Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., et al. (2015). Linking genes and political orientations: Testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis. Political Psychology, 36(6), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12230 Google Scholar

Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018 Google Scholar

Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293192006 Google Scholar

Ripberger, J. T. (2011). Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.x Google Scholar

Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rothschild, D., & Malhotra, N. (2014). Are public opinion polls self-fulfilling prophecies? Research and Politics, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014547667 Google Scholar

Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.Google Scholar

Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4 Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1954). Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1086/266513 Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334 Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Hagen, M. G., Tetlock, P. E., & Brady, H. E. (1986). Reasoning chains: Causal models of policy reasoning in mass publics. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004506 Google Scholar

Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042782 Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819 Google Scholar

Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2008). Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080301 Google Scholar

Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Simmons, J. P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00522-X Google Scholar

Waterton, J., & Lievesley, D. (1987). Attrition in a panel study of attitudes. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(3), 267–282.Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848 Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154 Google Scholar

References

Achen, C., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246–278.Google Scholar

Althaus, S. L. (1998). Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 545–558.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K. (2008). Can partisan cues diminish democratic accountability? Political Behavior, 30(2), 139–160.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 23–42.Google Scholar

Barker, D. C. (2005). Values, frames, and persuasion in presidential nomination campaigns. Political Behavior, 27(4), 375–394.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 194–230.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.Google Scholar

Bechtel, M. M., Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Helbling, M. (2015). Reality bites: The limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(3), 683–695.Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bisgaard, M. (2015). Bias will find a way: Economic-perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860.Google Scholar

Bisgaard, M., & Slothuus, R. (2018). Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 456–469.Google Scholar

Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262.Google Scholar

Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2014). Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 48–62.Google Scholar

Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, 79(4), 1061–1078.Google Scholar

Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 496–515.Google Scholar

Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578.Google Scholar

Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473.Google Scholar

Chong, D. (1993). How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 867–899.Google Scholar

Chong, D. (2000). Rational lives: Norms and values in politics and society. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126.Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663–680.Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Mullinix, K. J. (2019). Information and issue constraints on the influence of partisan cues. American Politics Research, 47(6), 1209–1238.Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y. (2005). Managing voter ambivalence in growth and conservation campaigns. In Martinez, S. C. & Martinez, M. D. (Eds.), Ambivalence, politics, and public policy (pp. 103–125). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ciuk, D. J., & Yost, B. A. (2016). The effects of issue salience, elite influence, and policy content on public opinion. Political Communication, 33(2), 328–345.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.Google Scholar

Conlisk, J. (1996). Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 669–700.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). Free Press.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2001a). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2001b). Using credible advice to overcome framing effects. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17(1), 62–82.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2001c). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review, 24(2), 199–216.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). Is public opinion stable? Resolving the micro/macro disconnect in studies of public opinion. Daedalus, 141(4), 50–68.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Enns, P. K., & McAvoy, G. E. (2012). The role of partisanship in aggregate opinion. Political Behavior, 34(4), 627–651.Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974.Google Scholar

Gerber, E. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2003). Development ballot measures, interest group endorsements, and the political geography of growth preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 625–639.Google Scholar

Gershkoff, A., & Kushner, S. (2005). Shaping public opinion: The 9/11-Iraq connection in the Bush administration’s rhetoric. Perspectives on Politics, 3(3), 525–537.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychology Review, 103(4), 650–669.Google Scholar

Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379–396.Google Scholar

Glazier, R. A., & Boydstun, A. E. (2012). The president, the press, and the war: A tale of two framing agendas. Political Communication, 29(4), 428–446.Google Scholar

Goren, P. (2002). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 627–641.Google Scholar

Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2020). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1497–1515.Google Scholar

Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue framing. Journal of Politics, 63(2), 520–543.Google Scholar

Hanggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27(2), 141–157.Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2009). How do you know? The economics of ordinary knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hartman, T. K., & Weber, C. R. (2009). Who said what? The effects of source cues in issue frames. Political Behavior, 31(4), 537–558.Google Scholar

Healy, A., & Lenz, G S. (2014). Substituting the end for the whole: Why voters respond primarily to the election-year economy. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 31–47.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hogarth, R. M., & Reder, M. W. (1987). Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1449–1475.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.Google Scholar

Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Political Behavior, 27(2), 163–182.Google Scholar

Kernell, G., & Mullinix, K. J. (2019). Winners, losers, and perceptions of vote (mis)counting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Khanna, K., & Sood, G. (2018). Motivated responding in studies of factual learning. Political Behavior, 40(1), 79–101.Google Scholar

Kim, S.-Y., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Klar, S. (2014). Partisanship in a social setting. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 687–704.Google Scholar

Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M., & Popkin, S. (Eds.), Elements of political reason (pp. 153–182). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.Google Scholar

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971.Google Scholar

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lavine, H., Johnston, C., & Steenbergen, M. (2012). The ambivalent partisan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lebo, M. J., & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28(6), 719–746.Google Scholar

Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Advances in Political Psychology 35(Suppl. 1), 129–156.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: an experimental test. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–76.Google Scholar

Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The Democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malhotra, N., & Kuo, A. G. (2008). Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 120–135.Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderator roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844.Google Scholar

Mullinix, K. J. (2016). Partisanship and preference formation: Elite polarization, issue importance, and competing motivations. Political Behavior, 38(2), 383–411.Google Scholar

Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13.Google Scholar

Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.Google Scholar

Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067.Google Scholar

Nicholson, S. P., & Howard, R. M. (2003). Framing support for the Supreme Court in the aftermath of Bush v Gore. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 676–695.Google Scholar

Nir, L. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504–532.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Parker-Stephen, E. (2013). Tides of disagreement: How reality facilitates (and inhibits) partisan public opinion. Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1077–1088.Google Scholar

Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., & Ramsoy, T. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2012). The elaboration likelihood model. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 224–245). Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127.Google Scholar

Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518.Google Scholar

Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472–496.Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P. (2004). What voters do: Information search during election campaigns. Political Psychology, 25(4), 595–610.Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever ‘get it’? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.Google Scholar

Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 25–43.Google Scholar

Riggle, E. D., Ottati, V. C., Wyer, R. S., Kuklinski, J., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Bases of political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information. Political Behavior, 14(1), 67–87.Google Scholar

Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016). Elite polarization and public opinion. Political Communication, 33(2), 261–282.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, A. (1998). Modeling bounded rationality. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 407–436.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1995). Rationality in political behavior. Political Psychology, 16(1), 45–61.Google Scholar

Slothuus, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In Morris, A. D. & Mueller, C. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 456–472). Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137–155.Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.Google Scholar

Weingast, B. R. (1979). A rational choice perspective on congressional norms. American Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 245–262.Google Scholar

Wise, D., & Brewer, P. R. (2010). Competing frames for a public health issue and their effects on public opinion. Mass Communication and Society, 13(4), 435–457.Google Scholar

Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–163.Google Scholar

References

Adams, T. G., Stewart, P. A., & Blanchar, J. C. (2014). Disgust and the politics of sex: Exposure to a disgusting odorant increases politically conservative views on sex and decreases support for gay marriage. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e95572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095572 Google Scholar

Åhäll, L., & Gregory, T. (Eds.). (2015). Emotions, politics and war. Routledge.Google Scholar

Ahn, W.-Y., Kishida, K. T., Gu, X., et al. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24(22), 2693–2699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.050 Google Scholar

Averill, J. R. (1980). On the paucity of positive emotions. In Blankstein, K., Pliner, P., & Polivy, J. (Eds.), Advances in the study of communication and affect: Vol. 6. Assessment and modification of emotional behavior (pp. 7–45). Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1 Google Scholar

Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145 Google Scholar

Baele, S. J. (2017). Lone‐actor terrorists’ emotions and cognition: An evaluation beyond stereotypes. Political Psychology, 38(3), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12365 Google Scholar

Banks, A. J. (2014). Anger and racial politics: The emotional foundation of racial attitudes in America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Banks, A. J., & Hicks, H. M. (2016). Fear and implicit racism: Whites’ support for voter ID laws. Political Psychology, 37(5), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12292 Google Scholar

Bar‐Tal, D., Halperin, E., & De Rivera, J. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 441–460.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239 Google Scholar

Basta, K. (2020). ‘Time’s up!’: Framing collective impatience for radical political change. Political Psychology, 41(4), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12649 Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353 Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2014). Disgust, harm, and morality in politics. Political Psychology, 35(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12053 Google Scholar

Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240104 Google Scholar

Boukala, S., & Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2017). The politics of fear vs. the politics of hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek election and referendum campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182933 Google Scholar

Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226788302 Google Scholar

Brader, T., & Marcus, G. E. (2013). Emotion and political psychology. In Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology, (2nd ed.; pp. 165–204). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brader, T., Marcus, G. E., & Miller, K. L. (2011). Emotion and public opinion. In Edwards, G. C. III, Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 384–401). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0024 Google Scholar

Breeze, R. (2019). Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse & Society, 30(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074 Google Scholar

Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., & Landau, M. J. (2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta‐analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12005 Google Scholar

Cabral, J. C. C., & de Almeida, R. M. M. (2019). Effects of anger on dominance seeking and aggressive behaviors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbeh Google Scholar

Capelos, T. (2013). Understanding anxiety and aversion: The origins and consequences of affectivity in political campaigns. In Demertzis, N. (Ed.), Emotions in politics (pp. 39–59). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025661_3 Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965 Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, L. A., MacInnis, D. J., & Weiss, A. M. (2016). Perceptual dimensions differentiate emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 30(8), 1430–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1070119 Google Scholar

Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cheung‐Blunden, V., & Ju, J. (2016). Anxiety as a barrier to information processing in the event of a cyberattack. Political Psychology, 37(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12264 Google Scholar

Clifford, S. (2019). How emotional frames moralize and polarize political attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12507 Google Scholar

Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2018). Disgust, anxiety, and political learning in the face of threat. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12350 Google Scholar

Clifford, S., & Wendell, D. G. (2016). How disgust influences health purity attitudes. Political Behavior, 38(1), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015 Google Scholar

Cohen-Chen, S., Crisp, R. J., & Halperin, E. (2017). A new appraisal-based framework underlying hope in conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 9(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916670023 Google Scholar

Collins, J., & Block, R. Jr. (2020). Fired up, ready to go: The impact of age, campaign enthusiasm, and civic duty on African American voting. Political Behavior, 42, 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9488-y Google Scholar

Cottam, M. L., Mastors, E., Preston, T., & Dietz, B. (2015). Introduction to political psychology (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671932 Google Scholar

Curato, N. (2016). Politics of anxiety, politics of hope: Penal populism and Duterte’s rise to power. Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341603500305 Google Scholar

Davis, M. (1998). Are different parts of the extended amygdala involved in fear versus anxiety? Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1239−1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00288-1 Google Scholar

Demertzis, N. (Ed.). (2017). Emotions in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30, 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9056-y Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740 Google Scholar

Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614542889 Google Scholar

Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 2(4), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938808412702 Google Scholar

Epstein, S. (1972). The nature of anxiety with emphasis upon its relationship to expectancy. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 291−337). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696 Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336−353. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696 Google Scholar

Finn, C., & Glaser, J. (2010). Voter affect and the 2008 US presidential election: Hope and race mattered. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01206.x Google Scholar

Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103 Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive emotions. In Lewis, M, Haviland-Jones, J. M, & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Vol. 3, pp. 777–796). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Frija, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frimer, J. A., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). The Montagu Principle: Incivility decreases politicians’ public approval, even with their political base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 845–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000140 Google Scholar

Gervais, B. T. (2017). More than mimicry? The role of anger in uncivil reactions to elite political incivility. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw010 Google Scholar

Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and antideliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532 Google Scholar

Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2 Google Scholar

Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (Eds.). (2001). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gould, D. B. (2004). Passionate political processes: Bringing emotions back into social movements. In Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.), Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning, and emotion (pp. 155–175). Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018067108 Google Scholar

Grimmer, J., & King, G. (2011). General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2643–2650.Google Scholar

Habib, M., Cassotti, M., Moutier, S., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00253 Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In Davidon, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Kimhi, S. (2012). In love with hatred: Rethinking the role hatred plays in shaping political behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2231–2256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00938.x Google Scholar

Halperin, E., & Schori-Eyal, N. (2019). Moral emotions in political decision making. In Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.922 Google Scholar

Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Partisan provocation: The role of partisan news use and emotional responses in political information sharing in social media. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12092 Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.Google Scholar

Hoewe, J., & Parrott, M. S. (2019). The power of anger: How emotions predict information seeking and sharing after a presidential election. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27, 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1614925 Google Scholar

Houghton, D. P. (2014). Political psychology: Situations, individuals, and cases (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar

Hu, X., Zhuang, C., Wang, F., Liu, Y.-J., Im, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2019). fNIRS evidence for recognizably different positive emotions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00120 Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Weber, C. (2007). The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207305951 Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604 Google Scholar

Huebner, B. (2011). Genuinely collective emotions. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-010-0006-2 Google Scholar

Hunter, L. E., Meer, E. A., Gillan, C. M., Hsu, M., & Daw, N. D. (2019). Excessive deliberation in social anxiety. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/522433 Google Scholar

Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408 Google Scholar

Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing emotions in world politics. International Theory, 6(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000232 Google Scholar

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802110007 Google Scholar

Jenkins, L. (2018). Why do all our feelings about politics matter? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117746917 Google Scholar

Jepson, C., & Chaiken, S. (1990). Chronic issue-specific fear inhibits systematic processing of persuasive communications. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 61–84.Google Scholar

Johnston, G., Roseman, I. J., & Katz, S. (2014). Discrete emotions mediate perceptions of presidential candidates: A study using a nationally representative sample [Poster presented at the 26th Annual Convention, Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA].Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341 Google Scholar

Keinan, G. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 639–644.Google Scholar

Kosmidis, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Can social media incivility induce enthusiasm? Evidence from survey experiments. Public Opinion Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa014 Google Scholar

Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Meulders, M. (2004). Every cloud has a silver lining: Interpersonal and individual differences determinants of anger-related behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271176 Google Scholar

Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J., & De Boeck, P. (2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 3(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.254 Google Scholar

Lambert, A., Scherer, L., Schott, J. P., et al. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019086 Google Scholar

Lamprianou, I., & Ellinas, A. A. (2019). Emotion, sophistication and political behavior: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Political Psychology, 40(4), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12536 Google Scholar

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1992). A motivational analyses of emotion: Reflex–cortex connections. Psychological Science, 3, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00255.x Google Scholar

Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, S., & Lang, A. (2009). Discrete emotion and motivation: Relative activation in the appetitive and aversive motivational systems as a function of anger, sadness, fear, and joy during televised information campaigns. Media Psychology, 12(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260902849927 Google Scholar

Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433 Google Scholar

Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763 Google Scholar

Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146 Google Scholar

Lickel, B., Steele, R. R., & Schmader, T. (2011), Group‐based shame and guilt: Emerging directions in research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00340.x Google Scholar

Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x Google Scholar

Macleod, C., & Rutherford, E. M. (1992). Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: Mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behavior Research and Therapy, 30, 479−491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90032-C Google Scholar

Marcus, G. E. (2003). The psychology of emotion and politics. In Sears, D. O. & Huddy, L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 182–221). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 672–685. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938743 Google Scholar

Marcus, G. E., Neuman, R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1963). The need to know and the fear of knowing. The Journal of General Psychology, 68, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1963.9920516 Google Scholar

Mason, L. (2015). ‘I disrespectfully agree’: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089 Google Scholar

Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018738019346 Google Scholar

Mattern, J. (2014). On being convinced: An emotional epistemology of international relations. International Theory, 6(3), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000323 Google Scholar

Mattes, K., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). The positive case for negative campaigning. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mattes, K., Roseman, I. J., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2018). Contempt and anger in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In Lucas, J. C., Galdieri, C. J., & Sisco, T. S. (Eds.), Conventional wisdom, parties, and broken barriers in the 2016 election (pp. 101–114). Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Matthes, J., Schmuck, D., & von Sikorski, C. (2019). Terror, terror everywhere? How terrorism news shape support for anti‐Muslim policies as a function of perceived threat severity and controllability. Political Psychology, 40(5), 935–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12576 Google Scholar

McLaughlin, B., Holland, D., Thompson, B. A., & Koenig, A. (2020). Emotions and affective polarization: How enthusiasm and anxiety about presidential candidates affect interparty attitudes. American Politics Research, 48(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19891423 Google Scholar

Meijinders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). Role of negative emotion in communication about CO₂ risks. Risk Analysis, 21(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.215164 Google Scholar

Mercer, J. (2014). Feeling like state: Social emotion and identity. International Theory, 6(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000244 Google Scholar

Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2018). Contempt and disgust: The emotions of disrespect. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12159 Google Scholar

Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77, 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010 Google Scholar

Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Miles, F., & Dixon, R. (2004). Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000158 Google Scholar

Montiel, C. J., & Uyheng, J. (2020). Mapping contentious collective emotions in a populist democracy: Duterte’s push for Philippine federalism. Political Psychology, 41(4), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12648 Google Scholar

Nai, A., Schemeil, Y., & Marie, J. L. (2017). Anxiety, sophistication, and resistance to persuasion: Evidence from a quasi‐experimental survey on global climate change. Political Psychology, 38, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12331 Google Scholar

Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. W., Crigler, A. N., & MacKuen, M. (2007). The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion and political thinking and behavior. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2018). The mistreatment of my people: Victimization by proxy and behavioral intentions to commit violence among Muslims in Denmark. Political Psychology, 39(3), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12435 Google Scholar

Quigley, B. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212008 Google Scholar

Park, C. S. (2015). Applying ‘negativity bias’ to Twitter: Negative news on Twitter, emotions, and political learning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(4), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1100225 Google Scholar

Phoenix, D. L. (2019). The anger gap: How race shapes emotion in politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 79(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.283 Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.). (2006). Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A., & Lau, R. R. (2007). Affective intelligence and voting information processing and learning in a campaign. In Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Crigler, A. (Eds.), The affect effect: The political dynamics of thinking and feeling (pp. 152–179). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226574431-007 Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P., & Pierce, D. R. (2017). Emotions and voting. In Arzheimber, K., Evans, J., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of electoral behaviour (pp. 406–432). Sage.Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P., Roseman, I. J., Mattes, K., & Katz, S. (2018). Donald Trump, contempt, and the 2016 GOP Iowa caucuses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 28(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1441848 Google Scholar

Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2016). The politics of hope: Donald Trump as an entrepreneur of identity. In Fitzduff, M. (Ed.), Why irrational politics appeals: Understanding the allure of Trump (pp. 25–40). Praeger.Google Scholar

Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261 Google Scholar

Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 11–36.Google Scholar

Roseman, I. J. (2011). Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review, 3(4), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410744 Google Scholar

Roseman, I. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912469591 Google Scholar

Roseman, I. J. (2018). Rejecting the unworthy: The causes, components, and consequences of contempt. In Mason, M. (Ed.), The moral psychology of contempt (pp. 107–130). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Roseman, I. J., Mattes, K., Redlawsk, D. P., & Katz, S. (2020). Reprehensible, laughable: The role of contempt in negative campaigning. American Politics Research, 48(1), 44–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19857968 Google Scholar

Ryan, T. J. (2012). What makes us click? Demonstrating incentives for angry discourse with digital-age field experiments. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000540 Google Scholar

Salam, A. P., Rainford, E., van Vugt, M., & Ronay, R. (2017). Acute stress reduces perceived trustworthiness of male racial outgroup faces. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(4), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0065-0 Google Scholar

Salmela, M. (2014). The functions of collective emotions in social groups. In Konzelmann Ziv, A. & Schmid, H. (Eds.), Institutions, emotions, and group agents: Contributions to social ontology (Studies in the philosophy of sociality, Vol. 2, pp. 159–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6934-2_10 Google Scholar

Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419 Google Scholar

Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2018). Emotional dynamics of right-and left-wing political populism. Humanity & Society, 42(4), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597618802521 Google Scholar

Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106 Google Scholar

Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, S. L., Danvers, A. F., Osborne, E. A., Sng, O., & Yee, C. I. (2014). Positive emotion differentiation: A functional approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(3), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12092 Google Scholar

Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, S. L., Yeung, W. H., Moser, S. E., & Perea, E. F. (2011). Feeling good: Autonomic nervous system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion, 11, 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024278 Google Scholar

Shook, N. J., Oosterhoff, B., Terrizzi, J. A. Jr., & Brady, K. M. (2017). ‘Dirty politics’: The role of disgust sensitivity in voting. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000111 Google Scholar

Sirin, C. V., & Villalobos, J. D. (2019). The study of discrete emotions in politics. In Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of political decision making. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.918 Google Scholar

Sirin, C. V., Villalobos, J. D., & Valentino, N. A. (2016). Group Empathy Theory: The effect of group empathy on US intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of immigration threats. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216676246 Google Scholar

Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00621.x Google Scholar

Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813 Google Scholar

Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2016). Group-level emotions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 15–19. https://doi.org/B10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.005 Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., et al. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.820 Google Scholar

Sparks, H. (2015). Mama grizzlies and guardians of the republic: The Democratic and intersectional politics of anger in the Tea Party Movement. New Political Science, 37(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2014.945252 Google Scholar

Steen-Johnsen, K., & Winsvold, M. S. (2019). Islamist terrorism, out-group trust, and motivation to control prejudice. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edz014. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz014 Google Scholar

Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media: Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408 Google Scholar

Stohr, K. (2017, 23 January). Our new age of contempt. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/opinion/our-new-age-of-contempt.html Google Scholar

Stolwijk, S. B., Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). How anxiety and enthusiasm help explain the bandwagon effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(4), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw018 Google Scholar

Suhay, E., & Erisen, C. (2018). The role of anger in the biased assimilation of political information. Political Psychology, 39(4), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12463 Google Scholar

Sylvers, P., Laprarie, J., & Lilienfeld, S. (2011). Differences between trait fear and trait anxiety: Implications for psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.004 Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145 Google Scholar

Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973 Google Scholar

Tolbert, C. J., Redlawsk, D. P., & Gracey, K. J. (2018). Racial attitudes and emotional responses to the 2016 Republican candidates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1441846 Google Scholar

Tong, E. M. W. (2015). Differentiation of 13 positive emotions by appraisals. Cognitive Emotions, 29, 484–503.Google Scholar

Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000939 Google Scholar

Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x Google Scholar

Valentino, N. A., & Neuner, F. G. (2017). Why the sky didn’t fall: Mobilizing anger in reaction to voter ID laws. Political Psychology, 38(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12332 Google Scholar

van der Toorn, J., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Twenty years of system justification theory: Introduction to the special issue on ‘Ideology and system justification processes’. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214531509 Google Scholar

Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569706 Google Scholar

Vasilopoulos, P., & Brouard, S. (2019). System justification and affective responses to terrorism: Evidence from the November 2015 Paris attacks. Political Psychology, 41(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12639 Google Scholar

Vasilopoulos, P., Marcus, G. E., & Foucault, M. (2017). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39(3), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12439 Google Scholar

Vasilopoulou, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Fear, anger, and enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of emotional reactions on public preferences towards European integration. European Union Politics, 18(3), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517698048 Google Scholar

Walter, A., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2021). The effects of politician’s moral violations on voters’ moral emotions. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09749-z Google Scholar

Weise, D. R., Arciszewski, T., Verlhiac, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2011). Terror management and attitudes toward immigrants. European Psychologist, 17(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000056 Google Scholar

Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.Google Scholar

Yin, D., Bond, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.10 Google Scholar

References

Allen, G. L. (1994). The growth of children’s political knowledge during an election year. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40(3), 356–377. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087350 Google Scholar

Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic development. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909650300221X Google Scholar

Barrett, M. D., Born, M., Macek, P., et al. (2018). Processes influencing democratic ownership and participation (PIDOP) in nine European countries, 2009–2012. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37137.v1 Google Scholar

Beck, P. M., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960445 Google Scholar

Bigler, R. S., Arthur, A. E., Hughes, J. M., & Patterson, M. M. (2008). The politics of race and gender: Children’s perceptions of discrimination and the U.S. presidency. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00161.x Google Scholar

Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x Google Scholar

Bigler, R. S., & Wright, Y. F. (2014). Reading, writing, arithmetic, and racism? Risks and benefits to teaching children about intergroup biases. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12057 Google Scholar

Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-2303 Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, C. S. (2017). Discrimination in childhood and adolescence: A developmental intergroup approach. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208381 Google Scholar

Brown, C. S., Alabi, B., Hyunh, V., & Masten, C. (2011). Ethnicity and gender in late childhood and early adolescence: Group identity and awareness of bias. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021819 Google Scholar

Brown, C. S., & Lee, C. A. (2015). Impressions of immigration: Comparisons between immigrant and nonimmigrant children’s immigration beliefs. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12067 Google Scholar

Cho, J., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Structural antecedents to knowledge and participation: Extending the knowledge gap concept to participation. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00340.x Google Scholar

Conway, M. M., Ahern, D., & Wyckoff, M. L. (1981). The mass media and changes in adolescents’ political knowledge during an election cycle. Political Behavior, 3, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989956 Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1187–1234. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01598.x Google Scholar

Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280.Google Scholar

Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217 Google Scholar

Geller, R. C. (2020). Teacher political disclosure in contentious times: A ‘responsibility to speak up’ or ‘fair and balanced’? Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1740125 Google Scholar

Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2016). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738871 Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, R., Plutzer, E., & Sprague, J. (1993). Alternative contexts of political behavior: Churches, neighborhoods, and individuals. The Journal of Politics, 55(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132270 Google Scholar

Hughes, J. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). Predictors of African American and European American adolescents’ endorsement of race-conscious social policies. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021309 Google Scholar

Junn, J., & Masuoka, N. (2020). The gender gap is a race gap: Women voters in US presidential elections. Perspectives on Politics, 18(4), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719003876 Google Scholar

Leshin, R. A., Vraneski-Shachnai, R., & Cimpian, A. (2019, March). Are presidents bossy? Boys’ and girls’ concepts of presidents differentially predict political aspirations [Poster presented at the 2019 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Baltimore, MD].Google Scholar

Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Powlishta, K. K. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), i–183.Google Scholar

Lizotte, M. (2017). Gender differences in American political behavior. Scholars Strategy Network. https://scholars.org/contribution/gender-differences-american-political-behavior Google Scholar

McDevitt, M. (2005). The partisan child: Developmental provocation as a model of political socialization. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh079 Google Scholar

McIntosh, H., Hart, D., & Youniss, J. (2007). The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: Which parent qualities matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(3), 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096507070758 Google Scholar

Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E pluribus…separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. The Civil Rights Project. https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national Google Scholar

Owen, D., & Dennis, J. (1988). Gender differences in the politicization of American children. Women & Politics, 8(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v08n02_02 Google Scholar

Pacheco, J. S. (2008). Political socialization in context: The effect of political competition on youth voter turnout. Political Behavior, 30(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9057-x Google Scholar

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.Google Scholar

Patterson, M. M., Bigler, R. S., Pahlke, E., et al. (2019). Toward a developmental science of politics. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 84(3), 7–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12410 Google Scholar

Patterson, M. M., Pahlke, E., & Bigler, R. S. (2013). Witnesses to history: Children’s views of race in the 2008 United States presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01303.x Google Scholar

Payne, K. A., & Journell, W. (2019). ‘We have those kinds of conversations here…’: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2018.12.008 Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. (2017, May 15). U.S. trails most developed countries in voter turnout. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/15/u-s-voter-turnout-trails-most-developed-countries/Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge.Google Scholar

Rideout, V. (2017). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/csm_zerotoeight_fullreport_release_2.pdf Google Scholar

Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm Google Scholar

Sears, D. O., & Valentino, N. A. (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952258 Google Scholar

Simon, A. (2017). How can we explain the gender gap in children’s political knowledge? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(2), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216689123 Google Scholar

Stewart, E. A., Baumer, E. P., Brunson, R. K., & Simons, R. L. (2009). Neighborhood racial context and perceptions of police-based racial discrimination among Black youth. Criminology, 47(3), 847–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00159.x Google Scholar

Sugarman, S. (2007). If kids could vote: Children, democracy, and the media. Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press.Google Scholar

US Census Bureau. (2017). Voting in America: A look at the 2016 presidential election. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2017/05/voting_in_america.html Google Scholar

van Deth, J. W., Abendschön, S., & Vollmar, M. (2011). Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology, 32(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00798.x Google Scholar

Wolak, J., & McDevitt, M. (2011). The roots of the gender gap in political knowledge in adolescence. Political Behavior, 33(3), 505–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-010-9142-9 Google Scholar

Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177 Google Scholar

Book contents

Part I - Foundations of Political Psychology

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive