Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T09:13:09.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - An Overview of International Perspectives on PICUs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2024

By
Angus McLellan  and
Andrew Molodynski
Edited by
Roland Dix ,
Stephen Dye  and
Stephen M. Pereira
Roland Dix
Affiliation:
Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester
Stephen Dye
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Ipswich
Stephen M. Pereira
Affiliation:
Keats House, London
Get access

Summary

Psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs) are an important provision but are significantly under-provided internationally. Law, funding and stigma all have significant influence on mental health service provision and the consequent lack of access to appropriate treatment. Whilst this varies from country to country, there are themes throughout which can be applied everywhere. Improving legal frameworks, providing more resources, educating the population and working more closely with patients will be key to creating a truly global approach to severe mental illness. PICUs are a key element in providing safe, effective care for the most unwell people. Practices such as shackling need to end and mental health care in all countries around the world must be brought front and centre in the twenty-first century, having spent so long in the shadows.

Keywords

high-income group (HIG) countriesMental Health Act (MHA)psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU)mental health fundingmental illnessmental health law
Type
Chapter
Information
Psychiatric Intensive Care , pp. 324 - 331
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australasian Health Infrastructure Alliance (AHIA) (2015) Australasian Health Facility Guidelines. Part B - Health Facility Briefing and Planning. 0137 – Mental Health Intensive Care Unit. North Sydney: AusHFG.Google Scholar
Brown, S, Chhina, N and Dye, S (2008) The Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Survey of Patient Demographics and Outcomes at Seven English PICUs. Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care 4 (1–2) 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J (2018) Mental Health Law in Saudi Arabia. BJPsych International 15 (1) 17–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter-Song, E, Chu, E, Drake, RE, Ritsema, M, Smith, B and Alverson, H (2010) Ethno-Cultural Variations in the Experience and Meaning of Mental Illness and Treatment: Implications for Access and Utilization. Transcultural Psychiatry 47 (2) 224–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danivas, V, Lepping, P, Punitharani, S, Gowrishree, H, Ashwini, K, Raveesh, BN, et al. (2016) Observational Study of Aggressive Behaviour and Coercion on an Indian Acute Ward. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 22: 150–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (DOH) (2011) No Health without Mental Health: A Cross Government Mental Health Outcomes Strategy for People of all Ages. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2018) Number of Psychiatrists: How Do Countries Compare? Website. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20181205–1.Google Scholar
Fazel, S and Seewald, K (2018) Severe Mental Illness in 33,588 Prisoners Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 200 (5) 364–73.Google Scholar
Fistein, EC, Holland, AJ, Clare, ICH and Gunn, MJ (2009) A Comparison of Mental Health Legislation from Diverse Commonwealth Jurisdictions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 32 (3) 147–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgieva, I, de Haan, G, Smith, W and Mulder, CL (2010) Successful Reduction of Seclusion in a Newly Developed Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care 6 (1) 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, FH, Klimidis, S, Minas, H and Tan, ES (2006) Cultural Attribution of Mental Health Suffering in Chinese Societies: The Views of Chinese Patients With Mental Illness and Their Caregivers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15 (8)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, DB, Viney, W and Woody, WD (2007) A History of Psychology: Ideas and Context, 4th ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A (2009) Global Mental Health: A Failure of Humanity. Lancet 374 (9690) 603–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Rights Watch (2020) Living in Chains. Website. www.hrw.org/report/2020/10/06/living-chains/shackling-people-psychosocial-disabilities-worldwide.Google Scholar
McLellan, A and Molodynski, A (2023) The Mental Health of Prisoners: An International Overview. In Gogineni, RR, Pumariega, AJ, Kallivayalil, R, Kastrup, M and Rothe, EM (eds.), The WASP Textbook on Social Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadkarni, P, Jayaram, M, Nadkarni, S, Rattehalli, R, Adams, C, Rapid Tranquilisation: a global perspective, BJPsych Int. 2015 Nov; 12(4): 100–102, Nov. 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Psychiatric Intensive Care and Low Secure Units (NAPICU) (2017) Design Guidance for Psychiatric Intensive Care Units. Glasgow: NAPICU International Press. https://napicu.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Design-Guidance-for-Psychiatric-Intensive-Care-Units-2017.pdf.Google Scholar
National Association of Psychiatric Intensive Care and Low Secure Units (NAPICU) (2014) National Minimum Standards for Psychiatric Intensive Care in General Adult Services.Google Scholar
Okasha, TA, Sabry, WM, Zaki, NH, Rabie, MA and Elhawary, YA (2021) Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to the First Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit in Egypt. South African Journal of Psychiatry 27: 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, I, Marais, D, Abdulmalik, J, Ahuja, S, Alem, A Chisholm, C, et al. (2017) Strengthening Mental Health System Governance in Six Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Africa and South Asia: Challenges, Needs, and Potential Strategies. Health Policy and Planning 32 (5) 699–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raja, T, Tuomainen, H, Madan, J, Mistry, D, Jain, S, Easwaran, K, et al. (2021) Psychiatric Hospital Reform in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Literature. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 56 (8) 1341–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raveesh, BN and Lepping, P (2019) Restraint Guidelines for Mental Health Services in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 61(Suppl 4) S698–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, K, Webster, M, Herbert, R and Ivanov, M (2023) Standards for Psychiatric Intensive Care Units, 3rd ed. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Salzmann-Erikson, M and Soderqvist, C (2017) Being Subject to Restrictions, Limitations and Disciplining: A Thematic Analysis of Individuals’ Experiences in Psychiatric Intensive Care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 38 (7) 540–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, C (1993) Law and Lunacy in Psychiatry’s ‘Golden Age’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (4) 479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velpry, N and Eyraud, B (2014) Confinement and Psychiatric Care: A Comparison Between High-Security Units for Prisoners and for Difficult Patients in France.Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 38 (4) 550–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voskes, Y, van Melle, AL, Widdershoven, G, van Mierlo, AFMM, Bovenberg, F and Mulder, C (2021) High and Intensive Care in Psychiatry: A New Model for Acute Inpatient Care. Psychiatric Services 72 (4) 475–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Mental Health Atlas. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) WHO QualityRights Initiative – Improving Quality, Promoting Human Rights. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G (1986) Political Dissent and ‘Sluggish’ Schizophrenia in the Soviet Union. British Medical Journal 293 (6548) 641–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×