Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:16:57.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Hare and the Tortoise? Vita Prima Sancti Samsonis, Vita Paterni, and Merovingian Hagiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Lynette Olson
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

In the attempt to achieve a better understanding of the First Life of St Samson (VIS), which is potentially a key text for the understanding of the early christian history of both Brittany and western Britain, but whose dating, authorship, and historical reliability continue to present problems, the investigation of the text's literary sources must play an important part. François Kerlouégan, Neil Wright, Bernard Merdrignac, and Joseph-Claude Poulin have all made substantial contributions towards identifying the literary models for this and other works of Breton hagiography: this has helped to establish anterior and posterior dating limits for the composition of the work, and to build up a picture of the literary culture of the author or authors.

Some of these models are popular texts that were diffused throughout Latin Christendom in the early middle ages (for instance the Life of St Martin by Sulpicius Severus, a blueprint for hagiographers everywhere in the Western Church), but one source that has the potential to provide more precise information about the contacts available to the author is the Vita Sancti Paterni (VP) by Venantius Fortunatus. St Paternus, according to this Vita, was the son of a noble Aquitanian family who became a monk and hermit in the Cotentin and then at Sciscy (the future Saint-Pairsur- Mer) on the coast of Normandy, and at the age of seventy was appointed bishop of Avranches by King Childebert I (ob. 558). He probably died in 564. His Life was written by Fortunatus, at the request of a certain Abbot Martianus, probably not long after the saint's death and certainly before ca 600 when Fortunatus himself died – thus, some time in the last third of the sixth century, considerably earlier than VIS, which is unlikely to be earlier than ca 650. Robert Fawtier was the first to note the similarities between the two texts, and Bernard Merdrignac in 1988 produced a table identifying a range of similar narrative motifs (see Table 4.1).

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×