Does the Animal Welfare Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Hold for Japanese Canines?

04 June 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine if and how Japanese canine welfare has improved in the past several decades. I had two possible scenarios: A steady and monotonic improvement or an inverted U-shaped welfare change. I included the influence of status on canine welfare in my investigations by using complete domestic dog data from the period when the status of canines changed. I empirically examined which hypothesis was more relevant using four measures: The percentages of 1) stray dogs captured, 2), not-rehomed stray dogs (total data), 3) not-rehomed stray dogs (panel data), and 4) rabies shots. I observed an inverted U-shaped welfare change for the four measures, indicating the existence of an animal welfare Kuznets curve (AWKC). My results suggested that considering important factors, such as status change, multiple statuses, or both may improve the detection of an AWKC.

Keywords

animal welfare
economic development
Kuznets Curve
canine
inverted U-shaped curve

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.