War, Guilt, and World Politics after World War II

"Thomas Berger has read widely in the now extensive English, German, and Japanese scholarship and produced a thoughtful synthesis about how the governments and peoples of West Germany and then unified Germany, Austria, and Japan have both faced and avoided facing the crimes of Nazism and the Japanese Imperial government during World War II. Berger's balanced assessments and astute analytical efforts should interest historians who have focused on each of these national histories. The work comprises a welcome addition to interpretive, comparative, and historical social science regarding the way official as well as public, collective memory of past crime influences ongoing policy."
Jeffrey Herf, Professor of Modern European History, University of Maryland, College Park

"Thomas Berger’s War, Guilt, and World Politics after World War II is a masterful comprehensive account explaining Germany, Austria, and Japan’s different responses to the suffering they inflicted during WWII. Fluent in Japanese and German, Berger is thoroughly at home in dealing with history, politics, and psychology. An impressive work of scholarship."
Ezra F. Vogel, Henry Ford II Professor of the Social Sciences Emeritus, Harvard University

"Berger shows the interests of the 'aggressors' and 'victims' of WWII, and how they shaped the ability of the multiple factions on each side to dominate the fashioning of historical memory and postconflict policies … The discussion of sometimes surprising cross-party alliances is excellent, as is the sensitive treatment of popular attitudes. Summing up: recommended."
M. Tétreault, Choice

"For over half a century, Germany and Japan have struggled to put World War II behind them. Berger has produced one of the most sophisticated and sensitive treatments yet about how these two countries have contended with their troubled histories."
G. John Ikenberry, Foreign Affairs

"Berger’s study focuses on one particular aspect of war guilt, namely the construction of an official narrative by the state in Germany, Austria and Japan to deal with economic, political, security and moral issues that arose as a consequence of their role in WWII. Berger proposes a methodological approach that makes use of historical determinism, instrumentalism and culturalist explanations in an eclectic manner … Berger’s comparative approach forms a valuable contribution that may also trigger further new research on the issues of war, guilt and penitence by other countries and in other parts of the world."
Kurt W. Radtke, The Sungkyun Review

"… [an] exceptionally thoughtful and useful book …"
Wilfred M. McClay, Books and Culture