Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T14:19:15.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Debate 34B - Should an Attempt at Debulking Grossly Metastatic Endometrial Cancer be Undertaken?

No

from Section IV - Endometrial Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2023

Dennis S. Chi
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Nisha Lakhi
Affiliation:
Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island
Nicoletta Colombo
Affiliation:
University of Milan-Bicocca
Get access

Summary

Surgical debulking for metastatic cancer is a cornerstone of treatment for gynecologic cancers. Endometrial cancer is rarely diagnosed in advances stages; thus, the role of surgical cytoreduction and the development of best practice remain controversial. The physiologic principles of cytoreductive surgery, retrospective data on stage IV endometrial cancer surgical survival outcomes, and extrapolating from randomized prospective data from advanced stage ovarian cancer provide a compelling rationale for tumor debulking surgery in order to provide the best possible outcomes for advanced endometrial cancer patients.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlin JN, et al. Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2010;118:1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.005Google ScholarPubMed
Coleman RL, et al. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1929–1939. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1902626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landrum LM, et al. Stage IVB endometrial cancer: does applying an ovarian cancer treatment paradigm result in similar outcomes? A case-control analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:337341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.009Google Scholar
Lambrou NC, et al. Optimal surgical cytoreduction in patients with stage III and stage IV endometrial carcinoma: a study of morbidity and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:653658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.015Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×