Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T09:57:29.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Personality Affect Construal Theory

A Model of Personality and Affect in the Workplace

from Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

By
Stuti Thapa ,
Emorie D. Beck  and
Louis Tay
Edited by
Liu-Qin Yang ,
Russell Cropanzano ,
Catherine S. Daus  and
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Liu-Qin Yang
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Russell Cropanzano
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Catherine S. Daus
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Get access

Summary

Even decades after the affective revolution (Ashkanasy & Dorris, 2017), affect remains an integral part of organizational psychology. The two primary perspectives in affective research center on affect as a dispositional construct (i.e. a trait) or a momentary construct (i.e. a state) (Brief & Weiss, 2002). Dispositional perspectives of affect refer to a general tendency to experience certain types and levels of affective state. This can reflect personality traits and affective dispositions (Watson & Clark, 1984; Watson & Tellegen, 2002). Momentary affect refers to emotions experienced in the moment, including both the valence of feelings (i.e. positive, negative) and discrete emotions (e.g. guilt, awe). Integrating person, situation, and emotional construal perspectives, this chapter seeks to incorporate decades of work on affective dispositions, momentary affect, and personality to present a conceptual model that specifies how these come together to produce in-the-moment emotions embedded in specific situations. In doing so, we provide theoretical specificity connecting these dispositional and momentary perspectives, answering the call for more multi-level and systems-based theories: for example, how does personality unfold to impact state-level emotions (Ilies, Schwind, & Heller, 2007)?

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect , pp. 37 - 51
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dorris, A. (2017). Emotions in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516–113231Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–6916.2006.00003.xGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2009). Variety is the spice of life: A psychological construction approach to understanding variability in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1284–1306, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902985894Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744–6570.1991.tb00688.xGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36–59.Google Scholar
Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (2000). Affective job events–emotions matrix: A classification of job related events and emotions experienced in the workplace. In Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E. J., & Zerbe, W. J. (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 36–48). Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
Beck, E. D., & Jackson, J. J. (2019a). Consistency and change in idiographic personality: A longitudinal ESM network study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23 May, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, E. D., & Jackson, J. J. (2019b). Network approaches to representation and understanding personality dynamics, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8qws9Google Scholar
Beck, E. D., & Jackson, J. J. (2019c). Within-person variability, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kavbpGoogle Scholar
Binnewies, C., & Wörnlein, S. C. (2011). What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 589–607, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.731Google Scholar
Bouckenooghe, D., Raja, U., & Butt, A. N. (2013). Combined effects of positive and negative affectivity and job satisfaction on job performance and turnover intentions. Journal of Psychology, 147(2), 105–123, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.678411Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 279–307, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90(2), 105–126.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H. M., Hale, J. M. S., & Reb, J. (2003). The structure of affect: Reconsidering the relationship between negative and positive affectivity. Journal of Management, 29(6), 831–857, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00081–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.90.6.1241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 662–676, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.76.4.662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–553, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, N. S., & Hunt, J. M. (1968). S-R inventories of hostility and comparisons of the proportions of variance from persons, responses, and situations for hostility and anxiousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 309–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, R., Fulmer, A., Awtrey, E., & Miller, J. A. (2017). The grateful workplace: A multilevel model of gratitude in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 361–381, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0374Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of real-time affective reactions at work. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 28.Google Scholar
Fitness, J. (2000). Anger in the workplace: An emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 147–162.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distribution of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349Google Scholar
Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68(3), 451–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriel, A. S., Podsakoff, N. P., Beal, D. J., Scott, B. A., Sonnentag, S., Trougakos, J. P., & Butts, M. M. (2018). Experience sampling methods. Organizational Research Methods, 22, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626Google Scholar
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299–307.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 979–1004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005Google Scholar
Gooty, J., Gavin, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2009). Emotions research in OB: The challenges that lie ahead. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 833–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.619Google Scholar
Grandey, A. A. (2003). When “the show must go on”: Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 86–96.Google Scholar
Grandey, A. A., Tam, A. P., & Brauburger, A. L. (2002). Affective states and traits in the workplace: Diary and survey data from young workers. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 33–55.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.93.1.48Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089–2680.2.3.271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, R. T., Ksendzova, M., Nestingen, E., Yerahian, C., & Iyer, R. (2017). Your personality on a good day: How trait and state personality predict daily well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 250–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.001Google Scholar
Ilies, R., Schwind, K. M., & Heller, D. (2007). Employee well-being: A multilevel model linking work and nonwork domains. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(3), 326–341, https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701363712Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, E., Zachry, C. E., & Fleeson, W. (2019). Whole trait theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 2–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2018.06.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuppens, P., & Van Mechelen, I. (2007). Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened self-esteem, other-blame, and frustration. Cognition and Emotion, 21(1), 56–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600562193Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Nezlek, J. B., Dossche, D., & Timmermans, T. (2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment. Emotion, 7(2), 262–274, https://doi.org/10.1037/1528–3542.7.2.262Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M., De Boeck, P., & Ceulemans, E. (2007). Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition and Emotion, 21(4), 689–713, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600859219Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lievens, F. (2017). Assessing personality–situation interplay in personnel selection: Toward more integration into personality research. European Journal of Personality, 31, 424–440, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2111Google Scholar
Lindebaum, D., & Geddes, D. (2016). The place and role of (moral) anger in organizational behavior studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 738–757, https://doi.org/10.1002/jobGoogle Scholar
Lindebaum, D., & Jordan, P. J. (2012). Positive emotions, negative emotions, or utility of discrete emotions? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 1027–1030, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNiel, J. M., & Fleeson, W. (2006). The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 529–550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.05.003Google Scholar
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121–140, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309349309Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268.Google Scholar
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124, https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165Google Scholar
Murray, G., Allen, N. B., & Trinder, J. (2002). Longitudinal investigation of mood variability and the FFM: Neuroticism predicts variability in extended states of positive and negative affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1217–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Why extraverts are happier: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 11–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.02.001Google Scholar
Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Motivating job characteristics and happiness at work: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 1230–1241, https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000318Google Scholar
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & van Wijhe, C. I. (2012). Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(9), 1129–1154, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711429382Google Scholar
Parrigon, S., Woo, S. E., Tay, L., Wang, T., & Wang, T. (2016). CAPTION-ing the situation: A lexically-derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 642–681.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., … & Funder, D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 107(4), 677–718.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1259–1283, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902809375Google Scholar
Shockley, K. M., Ispas, D., Rossi, M. E., & Levine, E. L. (2012). A Meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance, 25(5), 377–411, https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.721832Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10(4), 297–303, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9280.00157Google Scholar
Tenney, E. R., Poole, J. M., & Diener, E. (2016). Does positivity enhance work performance? Why, when, and what we don’t know. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 27–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.002Google Scholar
Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & De Chermont, K. (2003). The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: a meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 914–945, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.129.6.914Google Scholar
Verduyn, P., & Lavrijsen, S. (2015). Which emotions last longest and why: The role of event importance and rumination. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 119–127, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014–9445-yGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465–490, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.96.3.465Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (2002). Aggregation, acquiescence, and the assessment of trait affectivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 589–597.Google Scholar
Waugh, C. E., Thompson, R. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2011). Flexible emotional responsiveness in trait resilience. Emotion, 11(5), 1059–1067, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, Volume 18 (pp. 1–74). Elsevier Science/JAI.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2011). Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 83–97, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754–9434.2010.01302.xGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. G. (1989). Neuroticism and extraversion in different factors of the affect intensity measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(10), 1095–1100.Google Scholar
Wilt, J., Bleidorn, W., & Revelle, W. (2017). Velocity explains the links between personality states and affect. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 86–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilt, J., Noftle, E. E., Fleeson, W., & Spain, J. S. (2012). The dynamic role of personality states in mediating the relationship between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1205–1236, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00756.xGoogle Scholar
Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2015). Affect, behaviour, cognition and desire in the Big Five: An analysis of item content and structure: ABCD scales. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 478–497, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2002Google Scholar
Wright, A., Gates, K. M., Arizmendi, C., Lane, S. T., Woods, W. C., & Edershile, E. A. (2019). Focusing personality assessment on the person: Modeling general, shared, and person specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A., & Zimmermann, J. (2019). Applied ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 21 March, https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000685Google Scholar
Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1159–1177.Google Scholar
Yeung, E., & Shen, W. (2019). Can pride be a vice and virtue at work? Associations between authentic and hubristic pride and leadership behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40, 605–624, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2352Google Scholar
Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705–731, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023980CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Traits, states, situations, and uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×