Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T15:26:44.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

64 - Fiberoptic-Guided Airway Exchange Through Supraglottic Airway Devices

from Section 7 - When the Airway Goes Bad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2017

D. John Doyle
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi
Basem Abdelmalak
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Airway Management
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
, pp. 332 - 337
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Langeron, O, Masso, E, Huraux, C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1229–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kheterpal, S, Han, R, Tremper, KK, et al. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2006;105:885–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kheterpal, S, Martin, L, Shanks, AM, et al. Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics. Anesthesiology 2009;110:891–7.Google Scholar
Kheterpal, S, Healy, D, Aziz, MF, et al. Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) Perioperative Clinical Research Committee. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology 2013;119:1360–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodsky, JB, Lemmens, HJ, Brock-Utne, JG, et al. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002;94:732–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, H, Minville, V, Delanoue, K, et al. The importance of increased neck circumference to intubation difficulties in obese patients. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1132–6.Google Scholar
Ferson, DZ, Rosenblatt, WH, Johansen, MJ, et al. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach™ in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1175–81.Google Scholar
Combes, X, Le Roux, B, Suen, P, et al. Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1146–50.Google Scholar
Amathieu, R, Combes, X, Abdi, W, et al. An algorithm for difficult airway management, modified for modern optical devices (Airtraq laryngoscope; LMA CTrach™): a 2-year prospective validation in patients for elective abdominal, gynecologic, and thyroid surgery. Anesthesiology 2011;114:2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frappier, J, Guenoun, T, Journois, D, et al. Airway management using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1510–15.Google Scholar
Dhonneur, G, Abdi, W, Ndoko, SK, et al. Video-assisted versus conventional tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2009;19:1096–101.Google Scholar
Dhonneur, G, Ndoko, SK, Yavchitz, A, et al. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: LMA CTrach vs direct laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:742–5.Google Scholar
Ndoko, SK, Amathieu, R, Tual, L, et al. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:263–8.Google Scholar
Combes, X, Sauvat, S, Leroux, B, et al. Intubating laryngeal mask airway in morbidly obese and lean patients. Anesthesiology 2005;102:1106–9.Google Scholar
Collins, JS, Lemmens, HJ, Brodsky, JB, et al. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the “sniff” and “ramped” positions. Obes Surg 2004;14:1171–5.Google Scholar
Coussa, M, Proietti, S, Schnyder, P, et al. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1491–5.Google Scholar
Gander, S, Frascarolo, P, Suter, M, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2005;100:580–4.Google Scholar
Howath, A, Brimacombe, J, Keller, C, et al. Gum elastic bougie-guided placement of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask (Letter). Can J Anesth 2002;49:528–9.Google Scholar
Drage, MP, Nunez, J, Vaughan, RS, et al. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996;51:1167–70.Google Scholar
O'Connor, CJ, Borromeo, CJ, Stix, MS. Assessing ProSeal laryngeal mask positioning: the suprasternal notch test. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1374–5.Google Scholar
Brimacombe, J, Keller, C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2002;20:871–91.Google Scholar
Cook, TM, Lee, J, Nolan, JP. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005;52:739–60.Google Scholar
Van Zundert, TCRV, Wong, DT, Van Zundert, AA. The LMA-Supreme TM as an intubation conduit in patients with known difficult airways: a prospective evaluation study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013;57:7781.Google Scholar
Stix, MS, O'Connor, CJ. Depth of insertion of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:235–7.Google Scholar
Keller, C, Brimacombe, J, Kleinsasser, A, et al. The laryngeal mask airway ProsealTM as a temporary ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002;94:737–40.Google Scholar
Aintree intubation catheter with Rapi-Fit® adapters. https://www.cookmedical.com/product/-/catalog/display?ds=cc_caeaic_webds last assessed December 15, 2013.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×