Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:41:36.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Influence of Peers on the Use of African American Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2020

Mary Kohn ,
Walt Wolfram ,
Charlie Farrington ,
Jennifer Renn  and
Janneke Van Hofwegen
Mary Kohn
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
Walt Wolfram
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Charlie Farrington
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Jennifer Renn
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Janneke Van Hofwegen
Affiliation:
Google, Inc.
Get access

Summary

Adolescents use the language of peers as models for dialect acquisition in ways that sometimes diverge from their family or home variety, often leading to broad heterogeneity and unpredictability during adolescence and early adulthood. Participants in Grade 6, 8, and 10 were paired with a same-sex peer partner and interviewed in dyads. In this chapter, using an analytical model based on Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), we establish participants’ convergence to or divergence from the peer partner. The study analyzes these accommodation patterns in adolescent African American dyads through the use of the scores from the Dialect Density Measure (DDM) composite index and an analysis for assessing relative similarity within dyads for large dyadic samples. The results reveal that samples exhibiting high and significant intra-class correlations (ICC) indicate more accommodation in terms of the DDM than those with low, non-significant ICCs. The study uncovers important gender differences in accommodative patterns intersecting with grade level as well as a role for ethnic identity. Ethnically salient features are employed as resources for accommodation for both girls and boys, but in different ways.

Keywords

Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT)ethnolinguistic vitalitydyadic interviewsDialect Density Measure (DDM)African American Language (AAL)peer speechintra-class correlation
Type
Chapter
Information
African American Language
Language development from Infancy to Adulthood
 , pp. 135 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Jessica and Giles, Howard. 2006. Ethnic identity gratifications selection and avoidance by African Americans: A group vitality and social identity gratifications perspective. Media Psychology 9(1): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 1996. Geek the girl: Language, femininity and female nerds. In Warner, Natasha, (ed.), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 119–132. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2000. Language and youth culture. American Speech 75(3): 280–283.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2003. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ciccia, Angel H. and Turkstra, Lyn S.. 2002. Cohesion, communication burden, and response adequacy in adolescent conversations. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 4(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 1980. Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nicolas. 1984. Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nicolas. 2007. Style, Variation, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Holly K. and Washington, Julie A.. 2006. Malik Goes to School: Examining the Language Skills of African American Students from Preschool-5th Grade. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Klerk, Vivian Anna. 2005. Slang and swearing as markers of inclusion and exclusion in adolescence. In Williams, Angie and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 111–126. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Donner, Allan and Bull, Shelley. 1983. Inferences concerning a common intraclass correlation coefficient. Biometrics 39(3): 771–775.Google Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., and Giles, Howard. 2016. Communication accommodation theory. In Berger, Charles R. and Roloff, Michael E. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 176–196. New York: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Drury, John. 2005. Young people’s communication with adults in the institutional order. In Williams, Angie and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 229–244. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 151–66. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 119–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2004. Adolescent language. In Finegan, Edward and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-first Century, 361–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2005. Stylistic practice and the adolescent social order. In Williams, Angie and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 93–110. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Sally, McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filardo, Emily K. 1996. Gender patterns in African American and white adolescents’ social interactions in same-race, mixed-gender groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 71–82.Google Scholar
Fischer, John. 1958. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14(1): 47–56.Google Scholar
Fortman, Jennifer. 2003. Adolescent language and communication from an intergroup perspective. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(1): 104–111.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerhard and Watt, Dominic. 2005. Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81(1): 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15(2): 87–105.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 2008. Communication accommodation theory: “When in Rome … ” or not! In Baxter, L. and Braithwaite, D. (eds.), Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives, 161–173. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nicolas and Coupland, Jennifer. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, Howard and Coupland, Nicolas (eds.), Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, 1–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard and Gasiorek, Jessica. 2013. Parameters of non-accommodation: Refining and elaborating communication accommodation theory. In Forgas, Joseph Paul, Vincze, Orsolya, and László, János (eds.), Social Cognition and Communication, 155–172. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard and Johnson, P.. 1986. Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 68: 69–99.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard and Ogay, Tania. 2007. Communication accommodation theory. In Whaley, Bryan B. and Samter, Wendy (eds.), Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars, 293–310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Reid, Scott, and Harwood, Jake. 2010. Introducing the dynamics of intergroup communication. In Giles, Howard, Reid, Scott, and Harwood, Jake (eds.), The Dynamics of Intergroup Communication, 1–14. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Mary. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gresham, Frank M. and Elliott, Stephen N.. 1990. Social Skills Rating System (SSRR). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Haggard, E.A. 1958. Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
Hannah, Annette and Murachver, Tamar. 1999. Gender and conversational style as predictors of conversational behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(2): 153–174.Google Scholar
Hare, Brian. 1985. The HARE General and Area-Specific Self-Esteem Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stony Brook, NY: SUNY Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. 2000. The role of researcher identity in conducting sociolinguistic research: A reflective case study. Southern Journal of Linguistics 24: 103–120.Google Scholar
Hecht, Michael L., Larkey, Linda Kathryn, and Johnson, Jill N.. 1992. African American and European American perceptions of problematic issues in interethnic communication effectiveness. Human Communication Research 19(2): 209–236.Google Scholar
Hecht, Michael L. and Ribeau, Sidney. 1991. Sociocultural roots of ethnic identity: A look at Black America. Journal of Black Studies 21(4): 501–513.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadephia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, Pamela. 2010. Gendered language as a dynamic intergroup process. In Giles, Howard, Reid, Scott, and Harwood, Jake (eds.), The Dynamics of Intergroup Communication, 29–40. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kenny, David A., Kashy, Deborah A., and Cook, William L.. 2006. Dyadic Data Analysis. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8(2): 177–202.Google Scholar
Kloep, Hendry L. and Kloep, Marion. 2005. Talkin’, doin’ and bein’ with friends’. Leisure and communication in adolescence. In Williams, A. and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 163–184. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kohn, Mary Elizabeth. 2014. “The Way I Communicate Changes but How I Speak Don’t”: A Longitudinal Perspective on Adolescent Language Variation and Change. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1965. Stages in the acquisition of Standard English. In Shuy, Roger W. (ed.), Social Dialects and Language Learning, 77–103. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972a. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972b. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2): 205–254.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N. and Borker, Ruth A.. 1982. A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In Gumperz, John (ed.), Language and Social Identity, 196–216. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 1996. “Muy Macha”: Gender and ideology in gang-girls’ discourse about makeup. Ethnos 61(1–2): 47–63.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma. 2003. Learning Style and Identity: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of a Bolton High School. Ph.D. dissertation. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma. 2004. Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for shared identity creation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 49(3/4): 375–396.Google Scholar
Palomares, Nicholas A. 2004. Gender schematicity, gender identity salience, and gender-linked language use. Human Communication Research 30(4): 556–588.Google Scholar
Parker, Jeffery G. and Asher, Steven A.. 1993. Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology 29(4): 611–621.Google Scholar
Renn, Jennifer E. 2010. Acquiring Style: The Development of Dialect Shifting among African American Children, Ph.D. Dissertation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. and Faye, McNair-Knox. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (eds.), Perspectives on Register: Situating Register Variation within Sociolinguistics, 235–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2004. Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(2): 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, Robert M., Stephanie, A.J. Rowley, Tabbye M. Chavous, J. Nicole Shelton and Smith, Mia. A.. 1997. Multidimensional inventory of Black identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(4): 805–815.Google Scholar
Soliz, Jordan and Giles, Howard. 2014. Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and metaanalytical review of communication accommodation theory. In Cohen, Elisia L. (ed.), Communication Yearbook 38, 106–143. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2005. Deconstructing adolescent communication. In Williams, Angie and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 1–20. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Marwick, Alice. 2005. From apprehension to awareness: Toward more critical understandings of young people’s communication experiences. In Williams, Angie and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 53–71. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Turkstra, Lyn A, Ciccia, Angel H., and Seaton, Christine. 2003. Interactive behaviors in adolescent conversation dyads. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 34(2): 117–126.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2015a. Dyadic analysis: Factors affecting African American English usage and accommodation in adolescent peer dyads. Language and Communication 41: 28–45.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2015b. The development of African American English through childhood and adolescence. In Lanehart, Sonja L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 454–474. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke and Stob, Reuben. 2012. The gender gap: How dialect usage affects reading outcomes in African American youth. Paper Presented at Linguistic Society of America 2012 Annual Meeting, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke and Wolfram, Walt. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(4): 427–455.Google Scholar
Angie, Williams. and Garrett, Peter. 2005. Adults’ perceptions of communication with young people. In Williams, Angie and Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years, 35–52. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Myrick, Caroline, Forrest, Jon, and Fox, Michael J.. 2016. Linguistic variation in the speeches of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. American Speech 91(3): 269–300.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Schilling, Natalie. 2016. American English: Dialects and Variation, 2nd edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×