Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-kb57s Total loading time: 0.724 Render date: 2022-01-21T21:39:40.197Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

17 - Climate Change in the Coral Triangle

Enabling Institutional Adaptive Capacity

from Part V - Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Paul G. Harris
Affiliation:
Education University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change and Ocean Governance
Politics and Policy for Threatened Seas
, pp. 274 - 289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, N. W., Arnell, N. W., and Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 7786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, N. W., Brown, K., Nelson, D. R., et al. (2011). Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 2(5), 757–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agardy, T. (2005). Global marine conservation policy versus site-level implementation: The mismatch of scale and its implications. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 300, 242–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alger, J. and Dauvergne, P. (2017). The global norm of large marine protected areas: Explaining variable adoption and implementation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(4), 298310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, E., Gupta, J., and Jong, P. (2012). Does individual responsibility increase the adaptive capacity of society? The case of local water management in the Netherlands. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64, 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosius, J. P. and Russell, D. (2003). Conservation from above: An anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 17(1), 3965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M., and Perry, A. (2011). Reefs at Risk Revisited. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, p. 114.Google Scholar
Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: Proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129–56.Google Scholar
Clement, F. (2012). For critical social-ecological system studies: Integrating power and discourses to move beyond the right institutional fit. Environmental Conservation, 40(1), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, J. (2009). Science, funding and participation: Key issues for marine protected area networks and the Coral Triangle Initiative. Environmental Conservation, 36(2), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, J. and Foale, S. (2017). Extracting ideology from policy: Analysing the social construction of conservation priorities in the Coral Triangle region. Marine Policy, 82, 189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CTI Secretariat. (2009). Regional Plan of Action. Jakarta: Interim Regional CTI Secretariat. p. 87.Google Scholar
Eaking, H. and Lemos, M. C. (2006). Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization. Global Environmental Change, 16(1), 718.Google Scholar
Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, N. L. and Lemos, M. C. (2010). Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelman, P. and Ekstrom, J. A. (2012). Mapping seascapes of international environmental arrangements in the Coral Triangle. Marine Policy, 36(5), 9931004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelman, P., Evans, L., Fabinyi, M., et al. (2012). Governing large-scale marine commons: Contextual challenges in the Coral Triangle. Marine Policy, 36(1), 4253. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelman, P., Evans, L., Foale, S., et al. (2014). Coalition cohesion for regional marine governance: A stakeholder analysis of the Coral Triangle Initiative. Ocean and Coastal Management, 95, 117128.Google Scholar
Fidelman, P., Leitch, A., and Nelson, D. R. (2013). Unpacking multilevel adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef. Global Environmental Change, 23(4), 800–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelman, P., Truong Van, T., Nong, K., and Nursey-Bray, M. (2017). The institutions-adaptive capacity nexus: Insights from coastal resources co-management in Cambodia and Vietnam. Environmental Science and Policy, 76, 103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foale, S. J. (2001). ‘Where’s our development?’ Landowner aspirations and environmentalist agendas in Western Solomon Islands. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 2(2), 4466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foale, S., Adhuri, D., Alino, P., et al. (2013). Food security and the Coral Triangle Initiative. Marine Policy, 38, 174–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grecksch, K. (2014). Adaptive capacity and regional water governance in north-western Germany. Water Policy, 15(5), 794815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grothmann, T., Grecksch, K., Winges, M., and Siebenhuner, B. (2013). Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: Integrating psychological dimensions in the Adaptive Capacity Wheel. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(12), 3369–84.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Bergsma, E., Termeer, C., et al. (2016). The adaptive capacity of institutions in the spatial planning, water, agriculture and nature sectors in the Netherlands. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change, 21(6), 883903. doi: 10.1007/s11027-014-9630-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., et al. (2010). The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science and Policy, 13(6), 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hoegh-Guldberg, H., Veron, J. E. N., et al. (2009). The Coral Triangle and Climate Change: Ecosystems, People and Societies at Risk. Brisbane: World Wild Fund Australia.Google Scholar
Kashwan, P. (2016). Integrating power in institutional analysis: A micro-foundation perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(1), 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaders Declaration. Coral Triangle Initiative Leaders’ Declaration on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security. Signed May 15, 2009, Manado.Google Scholar
McLeod, E., Moffitt, R., Timmermann, A., et al. (2010). Warming seas in the Coral Triangle: Coral reef vulnerability and management implications. Coastal Management, 38(5), 518–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munaretto, S. and Klostermann, J. (2011). Assessing adaptive capacity of institutions to climate change: A comparative case study of the Dutch Wadden Sea and the Venice Lagoon. Climate Law, 2(2), 219–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. R., Adger, N. W., and Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 395419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. (2017). Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: Struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum, 84, 1120.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Crawford, S. (2005). Classifying rules. In Ostrom, E., ed., Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 187215.Google Scholar
Pajaro, M. G., Mulrennan, M. E., and Vincent, A. C. J. (2010). Toward an integrated marine protected areas policy: Connecting the global to the local. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(6), 945–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, J. P., Taber, A. B., Daszak, P., et al. (2007). Globalization of conservation: A view from the south. Science, 317(5839), 755–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, F. and Olsson, P. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs, global networks, and the emergence of international institutions for ecosystem-based management: The Coral Triangle Initiative. Marine Policy, 38, 195204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, B. and Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termeer, C., Biesbroek, R., and Van Den Brink, M. (2011). Institutions for adaptation to climate change: Comparing national adaptation strategies in Europe. European Political Science, 1, 113.Google Scholar
The WorldFish Centre/USAID. (2010). The US Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) Support Program: Midterm Program Performance Evaluation Report. Penang: The WorldFish Center (WorldFish) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), p. 54.Google Scholar
Van den Brink, M., Meijerink, S., Termeer, C., and Gupta, J. (2014). Climate-proof planning for flood-prone areas: Assessing adaptive capacity of planning institutions in the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 14(3), 981–95.Google Scholar
Van den Brink, M., Termeer, C., and Meijerink, S. (2011). Are Dutch water safety institutions prepared for climate change? Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2(4), 272–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Heland, F., Crona, B., and Fidelman, P. (2014). Mediating science and action across multiple boundaries in the Coral Triangle. Global Environmental Change, 29, 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R. (2005). Science Plan – Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, p. 15.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×