Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
10 - Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 October 2017
Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing in Ethics , pp. 192 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Commissie Toekomstige Bestuursstructuur Waddengebied. (1976). Bestuur en Beheer van het Waddengebied. Harlingen: Landelijke Vereniging tot Behoud van de Waddenzee.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolšak, N., Brondizio, E. S., Carlsson, L., Cash, D. W., Gibson, C. C., Hoffmann, M. J., Knox, A., Meinzen-Dick, R. S., and Ostrom, E. (2003). Adaptation to challenges. In Dolšak, N. and Ostrom, E. (eds), The Commons in the New Millennium: Challenges and Adaptations, 337–360. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorn, N. (2012). Exploring responsibility rationales in research and development (R&D). Science, Technology, and Human Values, 37(3), 180–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorn, N. (2013). Water and justice: Towards an ethics of water governance. Public Reason, 5(1), 95–111.Google Scholar
Durant, R. F., Chun, Y., Kim, B., and Lee, S. (2004). Towards a new governance paradigm for environmental and natural resources management in the 21st century? Administration and Society, 35(6), 643–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, V. M., and Steins, N. A. (1998). Developing an analytical framework for multiple-use commons. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(3), 347–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, R. H., Jr. (2005). Legitimacy and the Constitution. Harvard Law Review, 118(6), 1787–1853.Google Scholar
Glenna, L. L. (2010). Value-laden technocratic management and environmental conflicts: The case of the New York City watershed controversy. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand River Conservation Authority/Conservation Ontario (GRCA/CO). (2003). A Review of Watershed Planning and Management: Best Practices, Legal Tools and Next Steps. The Leading Edge: Stewardship and Conservation in Canada 2003, with the support of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Real Estate Foundation of BC.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1990). Public administration: Lost an empire, not yet found a role. In Leftwich, A. (ed.), New Developments in Political Science: An International Review of Achievements and Prospects, 107–125. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Impact Assessment Unit (IUA) of Oxford Brookes University. (2003). Review of International Legal Instruments, Policies and Management in Respect of the Wadden Sea Region. Wadden Sea Forum.Google Scholar
Kiser, L. L., and Ostrom, E. (1982). The three worlds of action. In Ostrom, E. (ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry, 179–222. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 14, 79–88.Google Scholar
Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In Cafruny, A. and Rosenthal, G. (eds), The State of the European Community: The Maastricht Debate and Beyond, 391–411. Harlow, UK: Longman/Boulder.Google Scholar
Millar, H. (2003). Successful Stewardship and Conservation Organizations – Case Studies and Best Practices. Commissioned Research for the Leading Edge: Stewardship and Conservation in Canada. Salt Spring Island,BC: Land Trust Alliance of BC.Google Scholar
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority. (1996). The Nottawasaga Valley Watershed Management Plan. www.nvca.on.ca/Shared%20Documents/NVCA%20Watershed%20Plan%201996.pdf.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Ostrom, E., and Stonich, S. (2002). Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds), The Drama of the Commons, 443–490. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Toonen, T. A. J. (2003a). Administrative reform: Analytics. In Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds), Handbook of Public Administration, 467–478. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toonen, T. A. J. (2003b). Divergentie door Convergentie: een vergelijkende analyse van VROM bestuurssystemen. In Dijkstra, G., van der Meer, F. M., and Rutgers, M. (eds), Het belang van de publieke zaak, 85–119. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon.Google Scholar
Toonen, T. A. J. (2006). Analyzing institutional change and administrative transformation: A comparative view. In Oteneyo, E. and Lind, N. (eds), Comparative Public Administration: The Essential Readings, 371–392. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toonen, T. A. J., and Staatsen, A. A. M. F. (2004). Goed Bestuur voor de Wadden: een essay over de organisatie van duurzaamheidsbesluitvorming. Commissioned by the Governmental Advisory Group Waddenzeebeleid. The Hague: SDU VROM.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M., and Eijsackers, H. (2008). Science in Wadden Sea policy: From accommodation to advocacy. Environmental Science and Policy, 11(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck. (Original work published 1899)Google Scholar