Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:18:51.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - On the Complementarity between Labour Market Regulation and Tax Reforms in the European Union

from Part II - Macroeconomic Implications of Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2020

By
Angelo Martelli ,
Nauro F. Campos ,
Michael Ganslmeier ,
Yuemei Ji  and
Orkun Saka
Edited by
Nauro F. Campos ,
Paul De Grauwe  and
Yuemei Ji
Nauro F. Campos
Affiliation:
University College London
Paul De Grauwe
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Yuemei Ji
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

One reason the effects of individual structural reforms are notoriously difficult to capture is the possibility that they depend upon other reforms and institutions. This chapter studies whether and to what extent reforms in labour market regulation are complementary to tax changes in increasing employment in the European Union (EU). We use a dynamic model of employment growth to estimate and try to disentangle the individual effects from the combined effects of these reforms using a yearly panel of EU countries from 1990 to 2015. Our estimates suggest that reform complementarity between labour market policy and taxation, through substantial and significant interaction effects, seems key to foster employment growth and enhance the effectiveness of both reforms.

Keywords

structural reformslabour market regulationtax wedgeemployment growth
Type
Chapter
Information
Economic Growth and Structural Reforms in Europe , pp. 280 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amable, B. and Gatti, D. (2004). ‘Product Market Competition, Job Security, and Aggregate Employment’, Oxford Economic Papers,Vol. 56, No. 4, 667–686.Google Scholar
Amable, B., Demmou, L. and Gatti, D. (2007). ‘Employment Performance and Institutions: New Answers to an Old Question’, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 2731.Google Scholar
Amable, B., Demmou, L. and Gatti, D. (2011). ‘The Effect of Employment Protection and Product Market Regulation on Labour Market Performance: Substitution or Complementarity?’ Applied Economics, Vol. 43, No. 4, 449–464.Google Scholar
Annett, T. and Debrun, X. (2004). ‘Implementing Lisbon: Incentives and Constraints’, in Annett, A, Estevão, M, Faruqee, H, Debrun, X and Hallaert, J.-J (ed.), Euro Area Policies: Selected Issues, IMF Country Report No. 04/235. International Monetary Fund, pp. 42–81.Google Scholar
Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D. R. and Schmitt, J. (2005). ‘Labor Market Institutions and Unemployment: Assessment of the Cross-Country Evidence’, in Howell, D. R (ed.), Fighting Unemployment. The Limits of Free Market Orthodoxy. Oxford University Press.Vol. 3, pp. 72–113.Google Scholar
Bassanini, A. and Duval, R. (2006). ‘Employment Patterns in OECD Countries’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers 486.Google Scholar
Belot, M. and Van Ours, J. C. (2001). ‘Unemployment and Labour Market Institutions: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,Vol. 15,No. 4, 403–418.Google Scholar
Belot, M. and Van Ours, J. C. (2003). ‘Interactions between Institutions Matter’, CESifo DICE Report, Vol. 1, No. 2, 3–6.Google Scholar
Belot, M. and Van Ours, J. C. (2004). ‘Does the Recent Success of Some OECD Countries in Lowering Their Unemployment Rates Lie in the Clever Design of Their Labour Market Reforms?’ Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 56, No. 4, 621–642.Google Scholar
Berger, H. and Danninger, S. (2007). ‘The Employment Effects of Labour and Product Market Deregulation and Their Implications for Structural Reform’, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 54, No. 3, 591–619.Google Scholar
Berger, M. H. and Danninger, M. S. (2005). ‘Labour and Product Market Deregulation: Partial, Sequential, or Simultaneous Reform?’ No. 5-227, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Bicaba, Z. T. (2011). ‘Do Financial Reforms Complementarity and Reforms Sequence Matter for International Capital Inflows?’ Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics, Berlin.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Giavazzi, F. (2003). ‘Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labour Markets’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 3, 879–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Wolfers, J. (2000). ‘The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence’, Economic Journal, Vol. 110, No. 462, 1–33.Google Scholar
Calderón, C. and Fuentes, R. (2006). ‘Complementarities between Institutions and Openness in Economic Development: Evidence for a Panel of Countries’, Cuadernos de economía, Vol. 43, No. 127, 49–80.Google Scholar
Chang, R., Kaltani, L., and Loayza, N. V. (2009). ‘Openness Can Be Good for Growth: The Role of Policy Complementarities’, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 90, No. 1, 33–49.Google Scholar
Coe, D. T. and Snower, D. J. (1997). ‘Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labour Market Reform’, Staff Papers, Vol. 44, Vol. 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
Coricelli, F. and Maurel, M. (2011). ‘Growth and Crisis in Transition: A Comparative Perspective’, Review of International Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 49–64.Google Scholar
Daveri, F. and Tabellini, G. (2000). ‘Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries’, Economic Policy, Vol. 15, No. 30, 48–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrun, X. and Annett, A. 2004, Implementing Lisbon: Incentives and Constraints, Chapter II in Euro Area Policies – Selected Issues International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
de Macedo, J. B. and Martins, J. O. (2008). ‘Growth, Reform Indicators and Policy Complementarities’, Economics of Transition, Vol. 16, No. 2, 141–164.Google Scholar
de Macedo, J. B., Martins, J. O. and Rocha, B. (2014). ‘Are Complementary Reforms a “Luxury” for Developing Countries?’ Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 42, No. 2, 417–435.Google Scholar
Díaz-Vázquez, M. D. P. and Snower, D. J. (1996). ‘Employment, Macroeconomic Fluctuations and Job Security’ (No. 1430), CEPR Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
Duval, R. and Furceri, D. (2018). ‘The Effects of Labour and Product Market Reforms: The Role of Macroeconomic Conditions and Policies’, IMF Economic Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, 31–69.Google Scholar
Elmeskov, J., Martin, J. and Scarpetta, S. (1998). Key Lessons for Labour Market Reforms: Evidence from OECD Countries’ Experience.Google Scholar
Estevão, M. M. M. (2005). ‘Product Market Regulation and the Benefits of Wage Moderation’ (No. 5-191), International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
European Commission, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, (2017). ‘The Recent Reform of the Labour Market in Italy: A Review’, European Economy Discussion Paper 072, December.Google Scholar
Fella, G. (2000). ‘Efficiency Wage and Efficient Redundancy Pay’, European Economic Review, Vol. 44, No. 8, 1473–1490.Google Scholar
Fiori, G., Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S. and Schiantarelli, F. (2012). ‘Employment Effects of Product and Labour Market Reforms: Are There Synergies?’ Economic Journal, Vol. 122, No. 558, F79–F104.Google Scholar
Foster, E. and Sonnenschein, H. (1970). ‘Price Distortion and Economic Welfare’, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 38, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, C. and Bolaky, B. (2008). ‘Trade, Regulations, and Income’, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 87, No. 2, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, P. and Theising, A. (2015). ‘The Macroeconomic Impact of Structural Policies on Labour Market Outcomes in OECD Countries: A Reassessment’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gatti, D., Rault, C. and Vaubourg, A. (2010). ‘The Financial Determinants of Unemployment: Do They Interact with Labour Market Institutions?’ (Vol. 273). William Davidson Institute Working Paper.Google Scholar
Griffith, R., Harrison, R. and Macartney, G, (2006). ‘Product Market Reforms, Labour Market Institutions and Unemployment’, Economic Journal, Vol. 117, No. 519, C142–C166.Google Scholar
Koeniger, W. and Vindigni, A. (2003). ‘Employment Protection and Product Market Regulation’, IZA WZB Economics Seminar Series.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. B. and Pischke, J. S. (1997). ‘Observations and Conjectures on the US Employment Miracle’, (No. w6146), National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Kugler, A. and Pica, G. (2006). ‘The Effects of Employment Protection and Product Market Regulations on the Italian Labour Market: Labour Market Adjustments in Europe’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 948.Google Scholar
Lehmann, E., Lucifora, C., Moriconi, S. and Van der Linden, B. (2014). ‘Beyond the Labour Income Tax Wedge: The Unemployment-Reducing Effect of Tax Progressivity’, IZA DP No. 8276.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G. and Lancaster, K. (1956). ‘The General Theory of Second Best’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, 11–32.Google Scholar
Loayza, N. V., Oviedo, A. M. and Servén, L. (2005). Regulation and Macroeconomic Performance. World Bank.Google Scholar
Lora, E. A. (2000). ‘What Makes Reforms Likely? Timing and Sequencing of Structural Reforms in Latin America’, IDB Working Paper No. 355.Google Scholar
Nickell, S., Nunziata, L. and Ochel, W. (2005). ‘Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s: What Do We Know?’ Economic Journal, Vol. 115, No. 500, 1–27.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, G. and Scarpetta, S. (2006). ‘Regulation and Economic Performance: Product Market Reforms and Productivity in the OECD’, Institutions, Development, and Economic Growth, Vol. 13, 81.Google Scholar
Nsouli, M. S. M., Rached, M. M. and Funke, M. N. (2002). ‘The Speed of Adjustment and the Sequencing of Economic Reforms: Issues and Guidelines for Policymakers’, (No. 2-132), International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
OECD (2011). Tax Policy Studies, Taxation and Employment. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2014). ‘The 2012 Labour Market Reform in Spain: A Preliminary Assessment’, June.Google Scholar
Orszag, J. M. (1998). ‘Anatomy of Policy Complementarities’, Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 5, 11–33.Google Scholar
Piton, C. and Rycx, F. (2018). ‘The Unemployment Impact of Product and Labour Market Regulation: Evidence from European Countries’, IZA Discussion Papers 11582, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).Google Scholar
Rader, T. (1976). ‘The Welfare Loss from Price Distortions’, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 44, No. 6, 1253–1257.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (2000). Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (2015). ‘Unemployment, Institutions, and Interdependencies: Identifying Successful Reforms’, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Vol. 18, No. 1, 34–50.Google Scholar
Sakyi, D., Villaverde, J., Maza, A. and Reddy Chittedi, K. (2012). ‘Trade Openness, Growth and Development: Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Cointegration Analysis for Middle-Income Countries’, Cuadernos de Economía, Vol. 31, 21–40.Google Scholar
Sestito, P, and Viviano, E. (2018). ‘Firing Costs and Firm Hiring: Evidence from an Italian Reform’, Economic Policy, Vol. 33, No. 93, 101–130.Google Scholar
Spilimbergo, M. A., Prati, M. A. and Ostry, M. J. D. (2009). ‘Structural Reforms and Economic Performance in Advanced and Developing Countries’, (No. 268), International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Turrini, A., Koltay, G., Pierini, F. et al. (2015). ‘A Decade of Labour Market Reforms in the EU: Insights from the LABREF Database’, IZA J Labor Policy, Vol. 4, No. 12. doi:10.1186/s40173-015-0038-5.Google Scholar
Wacziarg, R. and Wallack, J. S. (2004). ‘Trade Liberalization and Intersectoral Labour Movements’, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 64, No. 2, 411–439.Google Scholar
Wasmer, E. and Weil, P. (2004). ‘The Macroeconomics of Labour and Credit Market Imperfections’, American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, 944–963.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×