Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T11:27:03.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Demand-side management strategies and the residential sector: lessons from the international experience

from Part IV - Policy and regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Tooraj Jamasb
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Michael G. Pollitt
University of Cambridge
Get access



Policies and measures targeting energy demand took off over the last three decades in response to the oil shocks of the 1970s. Since then, concerns about the sensitivity of economies to energy prices, oil dependency and more recently climate change, contributed to the development of energy efficiency (EE) policies. Demand-related policies that aim to influence quantities or patterns of energy use have traditionally been referred to as demand-side management (DSM) programmes. They include both energy efficiency policies and demand response (DR). Energy efficiency improvements can bring many benefits in terms of reduced energy infrastructure investments, decrease in electricity prices, increased energy security, improved environmental quality and other ancillary benefits. Scientists estimate that by 2050, we will need to have reduced our greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 50 per cent to avoid the worst-case scenarios of climate change. In such a context, the building sector appears as the ‘cornerstone of every national climate change strategy’, as it is responsible for up to 30 per cent of global annual GHG emissions, and 40 per cent of all energy consumption (UNEP, 2009). Furthermore, there is widespread evidence of the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency measures as compared to renewable programmes (IEA, 2006). In parallel, load growth; increased intermittency due to renewable generation; and, in the UK in particular, the renewal and reconfiguration of the electricity network pose challenges to the electricity sector never seen before. These challenges increasingly lead to the recognition of the importance of active consumer participation in load shifting, and hence interest in influencing quantities or patterns of energy demand.

There is now substantial experience particularly among OECD countries in using policy instruments to improve the overall efficiency with which energy is used. Several recent studies have assessed these experiences. For example, Geller et al. (2006) review energy intensity trends in the OECD from 1973 to 2003. They focus on the specific policies adopted by Japan, the US and a selection of European countries to improve energy use per unit of GDP across sectors. The World Energy Council (WEC) has conducted a review of energy efficiency policies using a survey of seventy countries, including examples of the most effective types of policy measures (WEC, 2008). Similarly, the United National Environment Programme Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative (UNEP-SBCI) published several reports assessing the implemented policies in various countries. A number of International Energy Agency (IEA) publications have also looked at energy use trends (IEA, 2007; IEA, 2008); reviewed the implementation of energy efficiencies policies in general (IEA, 2009b); and in the residential sector in particular (IEA, 2008).

The Future of Electricity Demand
Customers, Citizens and Loads
, pp. 337 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


ACEEE 2010
Act 129 2008
Alam, M.Sathaye, J.Barnes, D. 1998 Urban household energy use in India: efficiency and policy implicationsEnergy Policy 26 885Google Scholar
Ang, B.W. 2006 Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: from energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency indexEnergy Policy 34 574Google Scholar
Ashina, S.Nakata, T. 2008 Energy-efficiency strategy for CO2 emissions in a residential sector in JapanApplied Energy 85 101Google Scholar
Banerjee, A.Solomon, B.D. 2003 Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programsEnergy Policy 31 109Google Scholar
Bilton, M.Ramsay, C.Leach, M.Devine-Wright, H.Devine-Wright, P.Kirschen, D. 2008 Domestic electricity consumption and demand-side participation: opportunities and challenges for the UK power systemDelivering a Low-Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and PolicyCambridgeCambridge University Press207
Birner, S.Martinot, E. 2002 The GEF Energy-Efficient Product Portfolio: Emerging Experience and LessonsWashington DC
Blumstein, C.Goldman, C.Barbose, G. 2005 Who should administer energy-efficiency programsEnergy Policy 33 1053Google Scholar
Boardman, B. 2005 France: Côte d'azur
Boardman, B. 2007 Home Truths: A Low-Carbon Strategy to reduce UK Housing Emissions by 80% by 2050OxfordECI
BRE 2008 Domestic Energy Fact File 2008UKBRE Housing
Brown, M.A. 2001 Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policiesEnergy Policy 29 1197Google Scholar
CEC 2009 2009 Integrated Energy Policy Report, Final Commission Report, December 2009CaliforniaCalifornia Energy Commission
Clarke, J.A.Johnstone, C.M.Kelly, N.J.Strachan, P.A.Tuohy, P. 2008 The role of built environment energy efficiency in a sustainable UK energy economyEnergy Policy 36 4605Google Scholar
CLASP 2005
CLG 2010
CPUC 2008 California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic PlanCaliforniaCalifornia Public Utilities Commission
CRA 2005 Primer on Demand-side ManagementOakland, CAPrepared for the World Bank by Charles River Associates
Crossley, D.Maloney, M.Watt, G. 2000
Darby, S. 2006 The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy ConsumptionOxfordEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
de T'Serclaes, P. 2007 Financing Energy Efficient Homes: Existing Policy Responses to Financial BarriersParisInternational Energy Agency
DECC 2009 The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan: National Strategy for Climate and EnergyLondonDepartment of Energy and Climate Change
DECC 2010
Deringer, J.Iyer, M.Huang, Y.J. 2004 Transferred just on paper? Why doesn't the reality of Transferring/Adapting Energy Efficiency Codes and Standards come close to the potential?ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, California, US, ACEEE
DTI 2007 Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on EnergyLondonDepartment for Trade and Industry
EERE 2010
Eldridge, M.Neubauer, M.York, D.Vaidyanathan, S.Chittum, A.Nadel, S. 2008 The 2008 State Energy Efficiency ScorecardWashington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE)
Energy Star 2008 2008 Annual ReportEnergy Star
EST 2006 The Rise of the Machine: A Review of Energy Using Products in the Home from the 1970s to TodayLondonEnergy Saving Trust
Eto, J.Prahl, R.Schlegel, J. 1996 A Scoping Study on Energy-Efficiency Market Transformation by California Utility DSM ProgramsLBNL 39058
Fonseca, Almeida, A.Feilberg, N.Markogiannakis, G.Kofod, C. 2009 Characterization of the household electricity consumption in the EU, potential energy savings and specific policy recommendationsECEEE 2009 Summer Study, France
Geller, H.Harrington, P.Rosenfeld, A.H.Tanishima, S.Unander, F. 2006 Policies for increasing energy efficiency: thirty years of experience in OECD countriesEnergy Policy 34 556Google Scholar
Gillingham, K.Newell, R.Palmer, K. 2006 Energy efficiency policies: a retrospective examinationAnnual Review of Environment and Resources 31 161Google Scholar
Greening, L.A.Greene, D.L.Difiglio, C. 2000 Energy efficiency and consumption – the rebound effect – a surveyEnergy Policy 28 389Google Scholar
Grubb, M.Wilde, J. 2008 Enhancing the efficient use of electricity in the business and public sectorsGrubb, M.Jamasb, T.Pollitt, M.G.Delivering a Low-Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and PolicyCambridgeCambridge University Press207
Gunningham, N.Sinclair, D. 1999 Regulatory pluralism: designing policy mixes for environmental protectionLaw and Policy 41 49Google Scholar
Harmelink, M.Nilsson, L.Harmsen, R. 2008 Theory-based policy evaluation of 20 energy efficiency instrumentsEnergy Efficiency 1 131Google Scholar
Hartley, N. 2006 The 2006 review of energy policy: the main issuesPolitical Quarterly 77 117Google Scholar
IEA 2005 Evaluating energy efficiency policy measures and DSM programmes: Volume II: Country reports and case examples used for the evaluation guide bookSittard, the NetherlandsIEA
IEA 2006 Denmark 2006 ReviewParisInternational Energy Agency
IEA 2007 Energy Use in the New Millenium: Trends in IEA CountriesParisInternational Energy Agency
IEA 2008 Promoting Energy Efficiency: Case Studies in the Residential SectorParisInternational Energy Agency
IEA 2009 Financial Crisis and Energy EfficiencyParisOECD/IEA
IEA 2009 Implementing Energy Efficiency Policies: Are IEA Member Countries on track?ParisInternational Energy Agency
IEA 2009 Progress with Implementing Energy Efficiency Policies in the G8ParisInternational Energy Agency
IEA 2010
Jaffe, A.B.Newell, R. 1999 Energy-efficient Technologies and Climate Change Policies: Issues and EvidenceWashington, DCResources for the Future
Jaffe, A.B.Stavins, R.N. 1994 The energy-efficiency gap: what does it meanEnergy Policy 22 804Google Scholar
Jollands, N.Pasquier, S. 2008 Innovations in National Energy Efficiency Strategies and Action PlansWorkshop on Innovations in National Energy Efficiency Strategies and Action PlansInternational Energy AgencyParis, France
Koeppel, S.Urge-Vorsatz, D. 2007 Assessment of Policy Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from BuildingsBudapest, HungaryCentral European University
Lee, W.L.Yik, F.W.H. 2004 Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiencyProgress in Energy and Combustion Science 30 477Google Scholar
Lees, E. 2006 Evaluation of the Energy Efficiency Commitment 2002–05, ADEME-WEC Workshop on Energy Efficiency PoliciesOxon/London
McKinsey, 2007 Curbing Global Energy Demand Growth: The Energy Productivity OpportunitySan Francisco, CAMcKinsey Global Institute
McKinsey, 2008 The Case for Investing in Energy ProductivitySan Francisco, CAMcKinsey Global Institute
McKinsey, 2009 Averting the Next Energy Crisis: The Demand ChallengeSan Francisco, CA, Houston, TXMcKinsey & Company and McKinsey Global Institute
MURE 2008 Energy Efficiency Profile: UKMURE
MURE 2009
MURE 2010
NAO 2008 Programmes to Reduce Household Energy ConsumptionLondonNational Audit Office
Nordqvist, J. 2007 The Top Runner policy concept: Pass it down?La Colle sur Loup, France
Pyrko, J.Darby, S. 2009 Conditions of behavioural changes towards efficient energy use – a comparative study between Sweden and the United KingdomCôte d'Azur, FranceECEEE
Ramesohl, S.Dudda, C. 2001
Rayner, J.Howlett, M. 2009 Introduction: understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolutionPolicy and Society 28 99Google Scholar
Sorrell, S. 2004 Understanding barriers to energy efficiencyThe Economics of Energy EfficiencyCheltenham: Edward Elgar25
Sovacool, B.K. 2009 The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policyEnergy Policy 37 1529Google Scholar
Taylor, P.d'Ortigue, O.L.Francoeur, M.Trudeau, N. 2010 Final energy use in IEA countries: the role of energy efficiencyEnergy Policy 38 6463Google Scholar
Torriti, J.Hassan, M.G.Leach, M. 2010 Demand response experience in Europe: policies, programmes and implementationEnergy 35 1575Google Scholar
Uihlein, A.Eder, P. 2009 Towards additional policies to improve the environmental performance of buildingsLuxembourgEuropean Communities and Institute for Prospective Technological Studies
Unander, F.Ettestøl, I.Ting, M.Schipper, L. 2004 Residential energy use: an international perspective on long-term trends in Denmark, Norway and SwedenEnergy Policy 32 1395Google Scholar
UNEP 2009 Buildings and Climate ChangeParisUnited National Environment Programme Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative (UNEP-SBCI)
Utley, J.I.Shorrock, L.D. 2008 Domestic Energy Fact File 2008UKBRE Housing
Varone, F.Aebischer, B. 2001 Energy efficiency: the challenges of policy designEnergy Policy 29 615Google Scholar
Vine, E.Hamrin, J.Eyre, N.Crossley, D.Maloney, M.Watt, G. 2003 Public policy analysis of energy efficiency and load management in changing electricity businessesEnergy Policy 31 405Google Scholar
Vine, E.Rhee, C.H.Lee, K.D. 2006 Measurement and Evaluation of energy efficiency programs: California and South KoreaEnergy 31 1100Google Scholar
WEC 2008 Energy Efficiency Policies around the World: Review and EvaluationLondonWorld Energy Council
Weiss, J.A.Tschirhart, M. 1994 Public information campaigns as policy instrumentsJournal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 82Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats