Book contents
- Human Perfection, Transfiguration and Christian Ethics
- Reviews
- New Studies in Christian Ethics
- Human Perfection, Transfiguration and Christian Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Human Perfection
- Part II Jesus’ Perfection
- Part III Transfiguration and Global Perfection
- Chapter 7 Perfection and the Transfiguration
- Chapter 8 Perfection
- Chapter 9 A Perfect Planet
- Epilogue
- Select Bibliography in Christian Ethics
- Index
- Titles Published in the Series (continued from page )
- References
Chapter 9 - A Perfect Planet
from Part III - Transfiguration and Global Perfection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 May 2024
Book contents
- Human Perfection, Transfiguration and Christian Ethics
- Reviews
- New Studies in Christian Ethics
- Human Perfection, Transfiguration and Christian Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Human Perfection
- Part II Jesus’ Perfection
- Part III Transfiguration and Global Perfection
- Chapter 7 Perfection and the Transfiguration
- Chapter 8 Perfection
- Chapter 9 A Perfect Planet
- Epilogue
- Select Bibliography in Christian Ethics
- Index
- Titles Published in the Series (continued from page )
- References
Summary
Chapter 9 concludes this discussion of human perfection by looking at what many see as the most pressing global issue today – human environmental pollution and destruction. Viewed through the lens of the luminous television series A Perfect Planet, this chapter addresses the issues of unwarranted suffering from natural forces, religious and secular experiences of awe at biodiversity, and secular eschatological fears of ecological catastrophe. Damage to a perfect planet is viewed as a serious challenge to claims about human perfection. The Dominican theologians Herbert McCabe and Brian Davies (the latter debating with the philosopher Michael Ruse) are both used critically. Hope, however, is seen in the leadership offered by Pope Francis’ encyclical Laudato si and in a growing consensus among both faith and secular traditions that this damage must be addressed by effective action, based upon the moral concept of the common good, for the sake of both a perfect planet and the astonishing biodiversity (including human beings) within it.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Perfection, Transfiguration and Christian Ethics , pp. 195 - 221Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Works Cited
Barton, John (ed.). 2013. Bible and Interpretation: The Collected Essays of James Barr. Vol. II. Essay by James Barr: ‘Was Everything That God Created Really Good?’. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 178–87.Google Scholar
Bullivant, Stephen, 2019. Mass Exodus: Catholic Disaffiliation in Britain and America since Vatican II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, Lisa Sowle. 2018. ‘The Environment, the Common Good, and Women’s Participation’ in Deane-Drummond, Celia and Artinian-Kaiser, Rebecca (eds). 2018. Theology and Ecology Across the Disciplines: On Care of our Common Home. London: Bloomsbury. 135–47.Google Scholar
Carroll, Anthony and Norman, Richard. 2017. Religion and Atheism: Beyond the Divide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Drew and Sargent, Carole (eds). 2023. Forbidden: Receiving Pope Francis’s Condemnation of Nuclear Weapons. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1986. ‘Christian Responsibility for the Environment’. Modern Churchman. 28.2, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1993. How to Think about the Earth: Philosophical and Theological Models for Ecology. London: Mowbray/Cassell.Google Scholar
Collins, Robin. 2013. ‘The Fine-Tuning is Convincing’ in Moreland, James P., Meister, Chad and Sweis, Khaldoun A. (eds). Debating Christian Theism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 35–46.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian and Ruse, Michael. 2021. Taking God Seriously: Two Different Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia. 2016. Ecology in Jürgen Moltmann’s Theology, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia. 2017. A Primer in Ecotheology, Eugene, OR: Cascade/Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia, Bergmann, Sigurd, and Vogt, Markus (eds). 2017. Religion in the Anthropocene, Eugene, OR: Cascade/Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia, and Artinian-Kaiser, Rebecca (eds). 2018. Theology and Ecology Across the Disciplines: On Care of our Common Home. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia, 2021. Shadow Sophia: The Evolution of Wisdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, William. 2022. ‘The Dearth of Astonishment: On Curiosity, Scientism and Thinking as Negativity’ in Tyson, Paul (ed.). Astonishment in Science: Engagements with William Desmond. Eugene, OR: Cascade. 15–44.Google Scholar
Fergusson, David. 2018. The Providence of God: A Polyphonic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fergusson, David. 2022. ‘Providence’ St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology. www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Providence.pdf.Google Scholar
Galileo. 2012. Selected Writings, trans. Shea, William R. and Davie, Mark. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics. [I am most grateful to Mark and Grace Davie for suggesting this quotation.]Google Scholar
Gill, Robin. 2012. Theology in a Social Context: Sociological Theology, Vol. 1. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John. 1985. The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hollenbach, David. 2002. The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, Mike. 2023. Climate Change Isn’t Everything: Liberating Climate Change from Alarmism. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Willis. 2008. Ecologies of Grace: Environmental Ethics and Christian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Willis. 2013. The Future of Ethics: Sustainability, Social Justice and Religious Creativity. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Edward J. 2013. ‘A Modal Version of the Ontological Argument’ in Moreland, James P., Meister, Chad and Sweis, Khaldoun A. (eds). Debating Christian Theism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 61–71.Google Scholar
McCabe, Herbert. 2016. In Davies, Brian and Kucharski, Paul (eds). The McCabe Reader. London: Bloomsbury. 33–46 and 67–83.Google Scholar
McLeish, Tom. 2021. ‘Remembering John Polkinghorne: A Vision of One World, and One Culture’. Theology. 124.5, 324–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meister, Chad. 2013. ‘God and Evil’ in Moreland, James P., Meister, Chad and Sweis, Khaldoun A. (eds). Debating Christian Theism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 208–20.Google Scholar
Miller, Vincent J. (ed.). 2017. The Theological and Ecological Vision of Laudate Si’: Everything is Connected. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcott, Michael S. 1996. The Environment and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcott, Michael S. 2007. A Moral Climate: The Ethics of Global Warming. London: DLT.Google Scholar
Northcott, Michael S. 2023. God and Gaia: Science, Religion and Ethics on a Living Planet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham. 2013. ‘Lowe on “The Ontological Argument”’ in Moreland, James P., Meister, Chad and Sweis, Khaldoun A. (eds). Debating Christian Theism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 72–82.Google Scholar
Pickstock, Catherine. 2020. Aspects of Truth: A New Religious Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinsent, Andrew. 2022. ‘Infused Virtues, Gifts, and Fruits’ in Stump, Eleonore and White, Thomas Joseph (eds). The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 1994. The Faith of a Physicist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 2001. ‘Understanding the Universe’. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 950.1, 175–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polkinghorne, John. 2005. ‘Preface’. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World (reprint). London: SPCK. ix–xiii.Google Scholar
Ronan, Marisa. 2017. ‘American Evangelicalism, Apocalypticism, and the Anthropocene’ in Deane-Drummond, Celia, Bergmann, Sigurd and Vogt, Markus (eds). Religion in the Anthropocene. Eugene, OR: Cascade/Wipf & Stock. 218–31.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael and Davies, Brian. 2021. Taking God Seriously: Two Different Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scherz, Paul. 2019. Science and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqui, Mona and Vette, Nathanael (eds). 2023. A Theology of Gratitude: Christian and Muslim Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stenger, Victor J. 2013. ‘The Universe Shows no Evidence for Design’ in Moreland, James P., Meister, Chad, and Sweis, Khaldoun A. (eds). Debating Christian Theism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 47–58.Google Scholar
Tallis, Raymond. 2018. Logos: The Mystery of How We Make Sense of the World. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. 2020. Sharing in the Divine Nature: A Personalist Metaphysics. Eugene, OR: Cascade.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. 2014. On the Edge of Words: God and the Habits of Language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar