Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T03:14:27.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Privatization (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis control: how evidence-based is it?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Jean-Pierre Unger
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Pierre De Paepe
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Kasturi Sen
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Werner Soors
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Get access

Summary

Summary

The Public-Private Mix for Directly Observed Treatment, Short Course (PPM-DOTS) programme has been hailed as a success story in international cooperation. However, the evidence emerging from a range of sources suggests that this confidence may be motivated more by a desire to eulogize participation by private providers per se rather than on evidence of impact in terms of the cases treated.

This review of literature has therefore been triggered by the need for a sober assessment of the progress of the strategy of PPM-DOTS to date, and queries the extent to which tuberculosis control is embedded in sustainable national tuberculosis control programmes.

Our concerns over PPM-DOTS relate to three factors:

Firstly, there is growing doubt about the stewardship role of the state in LICs to adequately supervise the private for-profit sector. There is evidence from some regions that the current arrangements further weaken what remains of the public health system.

Secondly, the nature of the private for-profit sector, which in most settings is highly diverse, requires a coherent national health system absent in many cases; this fragments tuberculosis control, and undermines the long-term sustainability of PPM-DOTS.

Thirdly, the complex nature of partnerships and the frequent lack of adequate public sector supervision are leading to a rise in multidrug resistance as reported from many regions.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Health and Aid Policies
The Need for Alternatives
, pp. 57 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alubo, O. (2001). The promise and limits of private medicine: Health policy dilemmas in Nigeria. Health Policy and Planning, 16(3), pp. 313–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, V. K., Sarin, R., & Lönnroth, K. (2003). Feasibility and effectiveness of a public–private mix project for improved TB control in Delhi, India. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 7(12), pp. 1131–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Auer, C., Lagahid, J. Y., Tanner, M., & Weiss, M. G. (2006). Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis by private practitioners in Manila, Philippines. Health Policy, 77(2), pp. 172–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auer, C., Sarol, J., Tanner, M., & Weiss, M. (2000). Health seeking and perceived causes of tuberculosis among patients in Manila, Philippines. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 5(9), pp. 648–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasubramanian, V. N., Oommen, K., & Samuel, R. (2000). DOT or not? Direct observation of anti-tuberculosis treatment and patient outcomes, Kerala State, India. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 4(5), pp. 409–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Baltussen, R., Floyd, K., & Dye, C. (2005). Achieving the millennium development goals for health – Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for tuberculosis control in developing countries. British Medical Journal, 331(7529), pp. 1364–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, S. L. (2006). Public and private prenatal care providers in urban Mexico: How does their quality compare?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18(4), pp. 306–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baru, R. V. (1998). Private Health Care in India: Social Characteristics and Trends. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Baru, R. V. & Nundy, M. (2008). Blurring of boundaries-public private partnerships in health services in India. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, S. & Frick, K. (2002). Factors influencing private health providers' technical quality of care for acute respiratory infections among under-five children in rural West Bengal, India. Social Science & Medicine, 55(9), pp. 1579–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, S. (2006). Public– Private Mix for HIV (PPM-HIV). London, UK: HLSP Institute.Google Scholar
Deshpande, K., RavishankarDiwan, V. K., Lönnroth, K., Mahadik, V. K., & Chandorkar, R. K. (2004). Spatial pattern of private health care provision in Ujjain, India: A provider survey processed and analysed with a Geographical Information System. Health Policy, 68, pp. 211–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dye, C., Watt, C. J., Bleed, D. M., & Williams, B. G. (2003). What is the limit to case detection under the DOTS strategy for tuberculosis control?Tuberculosis, 83(1–3), pp. 35–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floyd, K., Arora, V. K., Murthy, K. J. R., et al. (2006). Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control: Evidence from India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(6), pp. 437–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Government of India. (2002). National Health Policy – 2002. http://mohfw.nic.in/np2002.htm.
Hanson, K. & Berman, P. (1998). Private health care provision in developing countries: A preliminary analysis of levels and composition. Health Policy and Planning, 13(3), pp. 195–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffery, P. & Jeffery, R. (2008). ‘Money itself discriminates’: Obstetric emergencies in the time of liberalisation. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 42(1), pp. 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesani, A. (2003). Social objectives of health care services: Regulating the private sector. In: Prabhu, K. S. & Sudarshan, R., eds. Reforming India's Social Sector; Poverty, Nutrition, Health and Education. New Delhi: Social Science Press, pp. 205–20.Google Scholar
Karki, D. K., Mirzoev, T. N., Green, A., Newell, J., & Baral, S. C. (2007). Costs of a succesful public–private partnership for TB control in an urban setting in Nepal. BMC Public Health, 7, p. 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khe, N. D., Toan, N. V., Xuan, L. T. T., Eriksson, B., Höjer, B., & Diwan, V. K. (2002). Primary health concept revisited: Where do people seek health care in a rural area of Vietnam?Health Policy, 61(1), pp. 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lönnroth, K., Uplekar, M., Arora, V. K., et al. (2004). Public–private mix for DOTS implementation: What makes it work?Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(8), pp. 580–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Lönnroth, K., Uplekar, M., & Blanc, L. J. (2006). Hard gains through soft contracts: Productive engagement of private providers in tuberculosis control. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84, pp. 876–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macq, J. C., Theobald, S., Dick, J., & Dembele, M. (2003). An exploration of the concept of directly observed treatment (DOT) for tuberculosis patients: From a uniform to a customised approach. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 7(2), pp. 103–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Malmborg, R., Mann, G., Thomson, R., & Squire, S. B. (2006). Can public–private collaboration promote tuberculosis case detection among the poor and vulnerable?Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(9), pp. 752–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Meng, Q., Li, R., Cheng, G., & Blas, E. (2004). Provision and financial burden of TB services in a financially decentralised system: A case study from Shandong, China. Intetnational Journal of Health Planning and Management, 19(Supplement 1), p. S45–S62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A., Brugha, R., Hanson, K., & McPake, B. (2002). What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries?Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(4), pp. 325–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Murthy, K. J., Frieden, T. R., Yazdani, A., & Hreshikesh, P. (2001). Public–private partnership in tuberculosis control: Experience in Hyderabad, India. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 5(4), pp. 354–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Newell, J. (2002). The implications for TB control of the growth in numbers of private practitioners in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(10), pp. 836–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Nshuti, L., Neuhauser, D., Johnson, J. L., & Whalen, C. C. (2001). Public and private providers' quality of care for tuberculosis patients in Kampala, Uganda. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 5(11), pp. 1006–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Nunn, P., Harries, A., Godfrey-Faussett, P., Gupta, R., Maher, D., & Raviglione, M. C. (2002). The research agenda for improving health policy, systems performance, and service delivery for tuberculosis control: A WHO perspective. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, pp. 471–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Nunn, P., Williams, B., Floyd, K., Dye, C., Elzinga, G., & Raviglione, M. C. (2005). Tuberculosis control in the era of HIV. Nature Reviews Immunology, 5, pp. 819–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portero, J. L. & Rubio, M. (2003). Private practitioners and tuberculosis control in the Philippines: Strangers when they meet?Tropical Medicine & International Health, 8(4), pp. 329–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, S. N., Mookerjee, A. L., Obasanjo, O. O., & Chaisson, R. E. (2008). Errors in the treatment of tuberculosis in baltimore. Chest, 117, pp. 734–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvam, J. M., Wares, F., Perumal, M., et al. (2007). Health-seeking behaviour of new smear-positive TB patients under a DOTS programme in Tamil Nadu, India, 2003. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 11(2), pp. 161–7.Google Scholar
Shimeles, E., Aseffa, A., Yamuah, L., Tilahun, H., & Engers, H. (2006). Knowledge and practice of private practitioners in TB control in Addis Ababa. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 10(10), pp. 1172–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Sinanovic, E. & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Financing and cost-effectiveness analysis of public–private partnerships: Provision of tuberculosis treatment in South Africa. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4(1), p. 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, V., Jaiswal, A., Porter, J. D. H., et al. (2002). TB control, poverty, and vulnerability in Delhi, India. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 7(8), pp. 693–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, M., Tolhurst, R., & Squire, S. B. (2003). Vulnerable Patients and the Public–private Mix in Tuberculosis. EQUI-TB Knowledge Programme. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
Thakur, J. S., Kar, S. S., Sehgal, A., & Kumar, R. (2006). Private sector involvement in tuberculosis control in Chandigarh. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis, 53(3), pp. 149–53.Google Scholar
,UNFPA. (2005). Reducing Poverty and Achieving Sustainable Development. New York: UNFPA.Google Scholar
Uplekar, M., Juvekar, S., Morankar, S., Rangan, S., & Nunn, P. (1998). Tuberculosis patients and practitioners in private clinics in India. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2(4), pp. 324–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Uplekar, M., Pathania, V., & Raviglione, M. (2001). Private practitioners and public health: Weak links in tuberculosis control. Lancet, 358(9285), pp. 912–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,World Health Organization. (2004). DOTS in the African Region. A framework for engaging private health care providers. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
,World Health Organization. (2005). Addressing Poverty in TB Control: Options for National TB Control Programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
,World Health Organization. (2006a). Engaging All Health Care Providers in TB Control. Guidance on Implementing Public–private Mix Approaches. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/HTM/TB/2006.360.Google Scholar
,World Health Organization. (2006b). The Stop TB Strategy. Building on and Enhancing DOTS to Meet the TB-related Millennium Development Goals. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/HTM/TB/2006.368.Google Scholar
,World Health Organization. (2007). Global Tuberculosis Control: Surveillance, Planning, Financing. WHO Report 2007. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/HTM/TB/2007.376.Google Scholar
Xu, B., Dong, H. J., Zhao, Q., & Bogg, L. (2006). DOTS in China: Removing barriers or moving barriers?Health Policy and Planning, 21(5), pp. 365–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, T., Tang, S. L., Jun, G., & Whitehead, M. (2007). Persistent problems of access to appropriate, affordable TB services in rural China: Experiences of different socio-economic groups. BMC Public Health, 7, p. 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×