Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T14:34:05.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The role of promises for children's trustworthiness and honesty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Kay Bussey
Affiliation:
(Macquarie University)
Ken J. Rotenberg
Affiliation:
Keele University
Get access

Summary

The ability to keep promises is often considered a major hallmark of trustworthiness (Rotenberg, McDougall, Boulton, Vaillancourt, Fox, and Hymel, 2004; Talwar, Lee, Bala, and Lindsay, 2002). But what are promises? Why do we keep and break them, and what purpose do they serve? It is surprising that so little is known about such an everyday concept. Apart from their colloquial use, promises serve a vital role in the legal system. In criminal proceedings, witnesses are required to take a sworn oath which entails promising to tell the truth. In this context, it is believed that promises have an honesty-promoting effect. On the other hand, promises are not always used to promote honesty. At times, they are used to inhibit it. For example, perpetrators of child sexual abuse sometimes ask their victims to promise to keep the abuse secret. Adults ask children to keep secrets within the family, and children swear each other to secrecy. Children may witness a school friend damage property and be sworn to secrecy by their friend; they may swear each other to secrecy over a less serious matter, such as who they like best in their class; or they may swear the victims of bullying to secrecy.

It is apparent, therefore, that promises can serve different purposes in different situations. In some circumstances they can promote truth-telling and in others they can undermine it. How can promises serve such different purposes?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astington, J. W. (1988a) Children's production of commissive speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 15, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, J. W. (1988b). Children's understanding of the speech act of promising. Journal of Child Language, 15, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, J. W. (1988c). Promises: Words or deeds?First Language, 8, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bala, N., Lee, K., Lindsay, R., and Talwar, V. (2001). A legal approach to the assessment of the competence of child witnesses. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 38, 409–451.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Betts, L. R. and Rotenberg, K. J. (2007). Trustworthiness, friendships and self-control: Factors that contribute to young children's school adjustment. Infant and Child Development, 16, 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Burns, N., Finkelhor, D., and Williams, L. M. (1988). Disclosure and detection. In Finkelhor, D. and Williams, L. M. (eds.), Nursery crimes: Sexual abuse in day care (pp. 99–113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bussey, K. (1992). Lying and truthfulness: Children's definitions, standards, and evaluative reactions. Child Development, 63, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussey, K. (1999). Children's categorization and evaluation of different types of lies and truths. Child Development, 70, 1338–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussey, K. and Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bussey, K. and Grimbeek, E. J. (1995). Disclosure process: Issues for child sexual abuse victims. In Rotenberg, K. J. (ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp. 166–203). New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzzelli, C. A. (1988). The development of trust in children's relations with peers. Child Study Journal, 18, 33–46.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. and Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S. and Bussey, K. (2008). The influence of promises on children's truth telling. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Goodman, G. S. and Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. and Koenig, M. A. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, B. (1979). An introduction to the philosophy of language. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyano, L. and Keenan, C. (2007). Child abuse: Law and policy across boundaries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Imber, S. (1973). Relationship of trust to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, A., Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., and Lindsay, R. C. L. (2004). “Intuitive” lie detection of children's deception by law enforcement officials and university students. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 661–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, T. D. and Saywitz, K. J. (1999). Young maltreated children's competence to take the oath. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, F. K. and Abbeduto, L. (2001). Children's judgements about intentionally and unintentionally broken promises. Journal of Child Language, 28, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malloy, L. C., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J. A., and Goodman, G. S. (2007). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights when seeking the truth. In Toglia, M. P., Read, J. D., Ross, D. F., and Lindsay, R. C. L. (eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for events (pp. 545–574). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Palmer, S. E., Brown, R. A., Rae-Grant, N. I., and Loughlin, M. J. (1999). Responding to children's disclosure of familiar abuse: What survivors tell us. Child Welfare, 78, 259–282.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1980). “A promise kept, a promise broken”: Developmental bases of trust. Child Development, 51, 614–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1986). Same-sex patterns and sex differences in the trust-value basis of children's friendship. Sex Roles, 15, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Children's interpersonal trust: An introduction. In Rotenberg, K. J. (ed.), Children's interpersonal trust: Sensitivity to lying, deception, and promise violations (pp. 1–4). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (2001). Trust across the life-span. In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 7866–7868). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Boulton, M. J., and Fox, C. L. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among children's trust beliefs, psychological maladjustment and social relationships: Are very high as well as very low trusting children at risk?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., and Boulton, M. (2005). Conceptual model for the investigation of trustworthiness in children. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., Green, S., Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K., and Carlo, G. (2005). Construction and validation of a children's interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., McDougall, P., Boulton, M. J., Vaillancourt, T., Fox, C., and Hymel, S. (2004). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among peer-reported trustworthiness, social relationships, and psychological adjustment in children and early adolescents from the United Kingdom and Canada. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 46–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotenberg, K. J., Michalik, N., Eisenberg, N., and Betts, L. R. (2008). The relations among young children's peer-reported trustworthiness, inhibitory control, and preschool adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 288–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauzier, M. (1989). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: For better or for worse. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12, 455–469.Google ScholarPubMed
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., and Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 997–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., and Lindsay, R. C. L. (2002). Children's conceptual knowledge of lying and its relation to their actual behaviors: Implications for court competence examinations. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., and Lindsay, R. C. L. (2004). Children's lie-telling to conceal a parent's transgression: Legal implications. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Motivation in context: Social relationships and achievement in middle school. In Juvonen, J. and Wentzel, K. R. (eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment (pp. 226–247). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×