Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-66d7dfc8f5-2xxhb Total loading time: 0.7 Render date: 2023-02-08T07:39:17.423Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

13 - Increasing Instability and Uncertainty among American Workers

Implications for Inequality and Potential Policy Solutions

from Part III - Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Frances McCall Rosenbluth
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Margaret Weir
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we identify how recent trends combine to increase instability and uncertainty among low-wage workers, discuss the effects of instability and uncertainty on workers and families, and consider potential policy solutions. Several trends in demographics and in the US labor market have combined to increase instability and uncertainty among low-wage workers since the 1970s: first, the long-run move of low-skilled employment demand toward the service sector, which is lower paying and less stable than manufacturing; second, the related rise of both dual-earner and single-headed households, which has led to an increase in caregiver-breadwinners, or workers who are their family’s primary care provider as well as the primary or sole income earner; third, the growth of the elderly population in the context of our societal dependence on informal caregiving; and fourth, decreasing schedule and earnings stability within service employment, which increases income volatility and decreases family well-being for caregiver-breadwinners. High-skilled workers can address these challenges through paid help, insurance, and other forms of consumption smoothing, while the increasing stress on low-skilled workers represents another, insidious form of inequality. We demonstrate how all these forms of instability can inhibit children’s human capital development, transmitting this inequality to future generations. Finally, we identify and evaluate the evidence regarding a number of policy solutions, including schedule stability legislation, universal care supports, and paid family leave, aimed at alleviating strain on low-skilled workers, particularly the growing group of such workers who combine caregiving and breadwinning, and highlight the legislative pathways for positive policy change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Who Gets What?
The New Politics of Insecurity
, pp. 307 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, Francis, Dania V., Gassman-Pines, Anna, and Gibson-Davis, Christina M.. 2013. “Children left behind: The effects of statewide job loss on student achievement.” NBER Working Paper No. 17104.Google Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, and Gassman-Pines, Anna. 2020. “Work schedule unpredictability: Daily occurrence and effects on working parents’ well-being.” Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans, Gassman-Pines, Anna, Barton, Hayley, Becker, Katie, Frances, Tamara, Rappleye, Rob, Rickert, Tim, and Suhail, Maria. 2017. Where does the money go? Federal spending on young American children. Durham, NC: Duke Center for Child and Family Policy.Google Scholar
Ananat, Elizabeth O., Gassman-Pines, Anna, and Fitz-Henley, John II. 2019. “The effects of the Emeryville Fair Workweek Ordinance on the daily lives of low-wage workers and their families.” Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Arora, Kanika, and Wolf, Douglas A.. 2018. “Does paid family leave reduce nursing home use? The California experience.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37 (1):3862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Autor, David, Dorn, David, and Hanson, Gordon. 2017. When work disappears: Manufacturing decline and the falling marriage-market value of men. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bania, Neil, and Leete, Laura. 2009. “Monthly household income volatility in the US, 1991/92 vs. 2002/03.Economics Bulletin 29 (3):21002112.Google Scholar
Berger, Lawrence M., Hill, Jennifer, and Waldfogel, Jane. 2005. “Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US.The Economic Journal 115 (501):F29F47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Annette, Batt, Rosemary, Houseman, Susan N., and Appelbaum, Eileen. 2016. “Domestic outsourcing in the United States: A research agenda to assess trends and effects on job quality.” Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 16-253. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2016. Employee tenure in 2016. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018a. Employee benefits in the United States – March 2018. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018b. Employment projections – 2016–26. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018c. Occupational outlook handbook.Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. Department of Labor. www.bls.gov/ooh/home.htmGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, Anthony P., Smith, Nicole, Melton, Michelle, and Price, Eric W.. 2015. Learning while earning: The new normal. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.Google Scholar
Charles, Kerwin Kofi, Hurst, Erik, and Schwartz, Mariel. 2018. “The transformation of manufacturing and the decline in US employment.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2018, vol. 33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chien, Nina. 2015. “Estimates of child care eligibility and receipt for fiscal year 2012.ASPE Issue Brief., Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and Office of Human Services Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Dey, Matthew, Houseman, Susan N., and Polivka, Anne E.. 2012. “Manufacturers’ outsourcing to staffing services.ILR Review 65 (3):533559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, Matthew, Houseman, Susan N., and Polivka, Anne E. 2017. “Manufacturers’ outsourcing to temporary help services: A research update.” US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Working Paper 493.Google Scholar
Dynan, Karen, Elmendorf, Douglas, and Sichel, Daniel. 2012. “The evolution of household income volatility.The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 12 (2).Google Scholar
Ettner, Susan L. 1995. “The impact of ‘parent care’ on female labor supply decisions.” Demography 32 (1):6380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahle, Sean, and McGarry., Kathleen 2017. “Women working longer: Labor market implications of providing family care.” In Women Working Longer: Increased Employment at Older Ages, Goldin, Claudia and Katz, Lawrence F., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S., Herbst, Daniel, Kuziemko, Ilyana, and Naidu, Suresh. 2018. Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: New evidence from survey data. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feler, Leo, and Senses, Mine Z.. 2017. “Trade shocks and the provision of local public goods.American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9 (4):101143.Google Scholar
Fort, Teresa C., Pierce, Justin R., and Schott, Peter K.. 2018. “New perspectives on the decline of US manufacturing employment.Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (2):4772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, Lynette M., Dobbins, Dionne R., Draper, Fitzgerald, and Michelle, McCready. 2017. Parents and the high cost of child care: 2017 report. Arlington, VA: Child Care Aware of America.Google Scholar
Gassman-Pines, Anna. 2011. “Low-income mothers’ nighttime and weekend work: Daily associations with child behavior, mother-child interactions and mood.Family Relations 60:1529. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00630.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassman-Pines, Anna, Gibson-Davis, Christina M., and Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans. 2015. “How economic downturns affect child development: An interdisciplinary perspective on pathways of influence.Child Development Perspectives 9:233238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gennetian, Lisa A., Rodrigues, Christopher, Hill, Heather D., and Morris, Pamela A.. 2018. “Income level and volatility by children’s race and Hispanic ethnicity.” Journal of Marriage and Family 81 (1):204229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genworth. 2018. “Cost of care survey 2018.” www.genworth.com/aging-and-you/finances/cost-of-care.htmlGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Sarah Jane, and Corley, Danielle. 2016. The cost of work-family policy inaction. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter, and Moffitt, Robert. 2009. “The rising instability of US earnings.Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (4):324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Stuart A. 2013. Rising demand for long-term services and supports for elderly people. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
Hardy, Bradley L. 2012. “Black female earnings and income volatility.The Review of Black Political Economy 39 (4):465475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Bradley L. 2017. “Income instability and the response of the safety net.Contemporary Economic Policy 35 (2):312330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henly, Julia R., and Lambert, Susan J.. 2014. “Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: Implications for employee work-life conflict.ILR Review 67 (3):9861016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henly, Julia R., Shaefer, H. L., and Waxman, E.. 2006. “Nonstandard work schedules: Employer- and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs.Social Service Review 80 (4):609634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Heather D. 2018. “Trends and divergences in childhood income dynamics, 1970–2010.” In Advances in child development and behavior, Benson, Janette B., ed., 179213. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Julia M., Parker, Kim, Graf, Nikki, and Livington, Gretchen. 2017. Americans widely support paid family and medical leave, but differ over specific policies. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Elisabeth, and Hacker, Jacob. 2008. The rising instability of American family incomes, 1969–2004. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2017. Paid family leave and sick days in the U.S.: Findings from the 2017 Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey. San Francisco, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
Kaye, H. Stephen, Harrington, Charlene, and LaPlante, Mitchell P.. 2010. “Long-term care: Who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much?Health Affairs 29 (1):1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knop, Brian. 2017. “Parents working nonstandard schedules: Who’s burning the midnight (and weekend) oil?” Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Orlando, FL. www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2017/demo/ncfr-poster.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koo, Kyong Hyun. 2016. “The evolution of earnings volatility during and after the Great Recession.Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 55 (4):705732.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay, Lewis, Evan, and Williams, Antje. 2017. Americans on federal poverty programs. College Park, MD: Program for Public Consultation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Lambert, Susan J., Fugiel, Peter J., and Henly, Julia R.. 2014. “Precarious work schedules among early-career employees in the US: A national snapshot.” Research Brief. Chicago: University of Chicago, Employment Instability, Family Well-Being, and Social Policy Network (EINet).Google Scholar
Laughlin, L. 2013. “Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring 2011.Current Population Reports, P70135. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Maestas, Nicole. 2018. The return to work and women’s employment decisions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Nicole, Messel, Matt, and Truskinovsky, Yulya. 2020. “Caregiving and Labor force participation: New evidence from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.” (No. WI20-12). Madison, WI: Center for Financial Security University of Wisconsin Madison Retirement and Disability Research Center.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Melissa. 2014. “Barriers to maintaining child care coverage: an analysis of states’ child care subsidy policies.” Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Public Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert A., and Zhang, Sisi. 2018. Income volatility and the PSID: Past research and new results. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommaerts, Corina. 2016. “Long-term care insurance and the family.” Unpublished, November. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Monte, Lindsay M., and Ellis, Renee R.. 2014. Fertility of women in the United States: 2012. In Population Characteristics. Washington, DC: Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Monto, Arnold S., Malosh, Ryan E., Petrie, Joshua G., Thompson, Mark G., and Ohmit, Suzanne E.. 2014. “Frequency of acute respiratory illnesses and circulation of respiratory viruses in households with children over 3 surveillance seasons.The Journal of infectious diseases 210 (11):17921799. DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiu327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morduch, Jonathan, and Siwicki, Julie. 2017. “In and out of poverty: Episodic poverty and income volatility in the US financial diaries.Social Service Review 91 (3):390421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morduch, Jonathan, and Schneider, Rachel. 2017. The financial diaries: How American families cope in a world of uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. 2015. Fact sheet: Provision of early care and education during non-standard hours. (OPRE Report No. 2015–44). Washington, DC: Office of Planning Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Rossin‐Slater, Maya, Ruhm, Christopher J., and Waldfogel, Jane. 2013. “The effects of California’s paid family leave program on mothers’ leave‐taking and subsequent labor market outcomes.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32 (2):224245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruhm, Christopher J. 2000. “Parental leave and child health.Journal of Health Economics 19 (6):931960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, Daniel, and Harknett, Kristen. 2016. “Schedule instability and unpredictability and worker and family health and wellbeing.” Washington Center for Equitable Growth Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert E. 2015. “The manufacturing footprint and the importance of US manufacturing jobs.” Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper 338.Google Scholar
Truskinovsky, Yulya. 2020. “The unintended consequences of child care subsidies on older women’s retirement security.” Journal of Human Resources (conditional acceptance).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Houtven, Courtney Harold, Coe, Norma B., and Skira, Meghan M.. 2013. “The effect of informal care on work and wages.Journal of Health Economics 32 (1):240252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldfogel, Jane. 1998. “Understanding the ‘family gap’ in pay for women with children.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1):137156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Wendy, Parker, Kim, and Taylor, Paul. 2013. Breadwinner moms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Weber-Raley, Lisa, and Smith, Erin. 2015. Caregiving in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Caregiving and the AARP Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce, Bloome, Deirdre, Sosnaud, Benjamin, and Tach, Laura. 2012. “Economic insecurity and social stratification.Annual Review of Sociology 38 (1):341359. DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Joan C., Lambert, Susan J., Kesavan, Saravanan, Fugiel, Peter J., Ospina, Lori Ann, Rapoport, Erin Devorah, Jarpe, Meghan, Bellisle, Dylan, Pandem, Pradeep, McCorkell, Lisa, and Adler-Milstein., Sarah 2018. “Schedule stability increases productivity and sales.” Berkeley: Work Life Law, University of California–Berkeley.Google Scholar
Women’s Bureau. 2016. Working mothers issue brief. Washington, DC: Women’s Bureau, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×