Abbell, M. (2004), Obtaining Evidence Abroad in Criminal Cases, New York.Google Scholar

Acquaviva, G. (2003), ‘Il Foreign Corrupt Practices Act statunitense e il dilemma della lotta alla corruzione internazionale: azione unilaterale o cooperazione multilaterale?’ in Sacerdoti, G. (ed.), Responsabilità d'impresa e strumenti internazionali anticorruzione, Milano, 167.Google Scholar

Aiolfi, G. and Ledergerber, Z. (2005), ‘Glossary of International Anti-Corruption Standards with Examples of National Legal Practice’ (paper prepared for the 6th General Meeting Anti-Corruption Network for Transitional Economies in Instanbul, 30–31 May 2005, available at: http://www.anticorruptionnet.org).Google Scholar

Aiolfi, G. and M. Pieth (2002), ‘How to Make a Convention Work: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Recommendation and Convention on Bribery as an Example of a New Horizon in International Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden, Boston, 349.Google Scholar

Aiolfi, G. and M. Pieth (2005), ‘International Aspects of Corporate Liability and Corruption’ in Tully, S. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK), Northhampton (USA), 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arlen, J. and Kraakman, R. (1997), ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’, New York University Law Review 72, 687.Google Scholar

Arnull, A. M., Dashwood, A. A.Ross, M. G. and Wyatt, D. A. (2000), Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Law, 4th edn, London.Google Scholar

Arsava, A. F. (1999), ‘Zypernkonflikt unter Berücksichtigung des Völkerrechts’ in Bundesministerium für Landesverteidigung (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch für internationale Sicherheitspolitik 1999, Wien (also available at: http://www.bmlv.gv.at>Publikationen>wissenschaftliche Publikationen>Autoren).Google Scholar

Arzt, G. (1990), ‘Erfolgsdelikt und Tätigkeitsdelikt’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 107, 168.Google Scholar

Ashworth, A. (2002), ‘Sentencing’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford, 1076.Google Scholar

Aust, A. (2000), The Modern Treaty Law and Practice, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Baker, E. (2004), ‘Guilty Pleas, Diversion and Consensual Disposition: England and Wales’ in Eser, A. and Rabenstein, C., Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, 381.Google Scholar

Balmelli, M. (1996), Die Bestechungstatbestände des schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches, Bern.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Ch. (1974), International Extradition and World Public Order, Leiden.Google Scholar

Beccaria, M. C. (1988), Über Verbrechen und Strafen (nach der Ausgabe von 1766 übersetzt und herausgegeben von W. Alff), Frankfurt a. M.

Beck, U. (1998), Was ist Globalisierung?, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar

Bell, R. E. (2001), ‘Discretion and Decision Making in Money Laundering Prosecutions’, Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol. 5, No. 1, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernasconi, P. (1995), ‘New Criminal Law Provisions Against the Corruption of Public Officials’, Multidisciplinary Group on Corruption (GMC), Council of Europe, 5.

Bernasconi, P. (ed.) (2000), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice (updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996), Naples.Google Scholar

Bertossa, C. A. (2003), Unternehmensstrafrecht - Strafprozess und Sanktionen, Bern.Google Scholar

Bertossa, B. L. (2004), ‘Mechanisms for Gathering Evidence Abroad’ in Asian Development Bank (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (key papers by speakers at the 4th Regional Conference of the ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur, 3–5 December 2003, online edn available at: http:/www.adb.org/>Publications>Controlling Corruption>Chapter 7).

Bill, A. (2004), Audit Committee Guide: A Source of Information for Audit Committees of Public Company Boards of Directors, 2nd edn, New York.Google Scholar

Bindschedler, R. L. (1996), ‘International Organisations, General Aspects’ in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 2, Amsterdam, 1289.Google Scholar

Black, J. (2001), ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, Current Legal Problems 54, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakesley, Ch. L. (1992), Terrorism, Drugs, International Law, and the Protection of Human Liberty: A Comparative Study of International Law, its Nature, Role, and Impact in Matters of Terrorism, Drug Trafficking, War, and Extradition, New York.Google Scholar

Blakesley, Ch. L. (1999), ‘Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn, New York, 33.Google Scholar

Bliss, J. C. and Spak, G. J. (1989), ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1988: Clarification or Evisceration?’, Law & Policy in International Business 20, 441.Google Scholar

Blokker, N. and S. Muller (1994), ‘Towards More Effective Supervision by International Organizations: Some Concluding Observations’ in Blokker, N. and Muller, S. (eds.), Towards More Effective Supervision by International Organizations. Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers, Vol. 1, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Boch, C. (2000), EC Law in the UK, London.Google Scholar

Bonvin, J. and Morrisson, C. (1998), L' organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDE), Paris.Google Scholar

Brown, H. L. (1999), ‘Parent-Subsidiary Liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’ in American Bar Association (ed.), The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: How to Comply under the New Amendments and the OECD Convention, Chicago, F 1–51.

Brownlie, I. (2003), Principles of Public International Law, 6th edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Brütsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2005), Hard, Soft and Private Legalities: The Increase, Variation and Differentiation of Law-Like Arrangements in International Relations (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar

Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft (2005), FCPA Newsletter, March, June and July edns (available at: www.cadwalader.com).

Cartier-Bresson, J. (2000), ‘The Causes and Consequences of Corruption: Economic Analyses and Lessons Learnt’ in OECD (ed.), No Longer Business as Usual, Paris, 11.Google Scholar

Cassani, U. (1996), ‘Die Anwendung des schweizerischen Strafrechts auf internationale Wirtschaftsdelikte (Art. 3–7 StGB)’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 114, 237.Google Scholar

Chavranski, H. (1997), L'OCDE au coeur des grands débats économiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Chiavario, M. (2002), ‘Private Parties: the Rights of the Defendant and the Victim’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 541.Google Scholar

Chilton, B. (2005), ‘Supreme Court strikes down Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ in Compliance Week: Columns and Editorials, January 2005 (available at: http://www.complianceweek.com).Google Scholar

Clough, J. (2002), ‘Sentencing the Corporate Offender: The Neglected Dimension of Corporate Criminal Liability’ in Clough, J. and Mulhern, C. (eds.), The Prosecution of Corporations, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Cockcroft, L. (1999), Implementation of the OECD Convention: The Conditions for Success (available at: http://www.transparency.org.uk>Papers by TI (UK) Members).

Coeurdray, M. (2003), Du dévoilement médiatique de la ‘corruption’ à la gestion déontologique des affaires (dissertation/thesis), Paris.

Coffee, J. C. (1981), ‘No Soul To Damn: No Body To Kick: An Unscandalised Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment’, Michigan Law Review 79, 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffee, J. C. (1999), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: An Introduction and Comparative Survey’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 9.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. A. (1996), ‘Theories of Punishment and Empirical Trends in Corporate Criminal Sanctions’, Managerial and Decision Economics 17, 399.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, G. F. (1995), The American System of Criminal Justice, 7th edn, Belmont.Google Scholar

Conseil de l'Europe (1990), Affaires juridiques, compétences extraterritoriales en matière pénale, Strasbourg.

Corr, C. F. and Lawler, J. (1999), ‘Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't? The OECD Convention and the Globalization of Anti-Bribery Measures’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 32, 1252.Google Scholar

Courtney, C. (2002), ‘Corruption in the Official Arms Trade’ in Transparency International (ed.), Policy Research Paper 001, Sutton (available at: http://www.transparency.org.uk>TI (UK) Papers and Newsletters).

Craig, P. and Búrca, G. (1995), EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cramer, P. (2001), commentary of § 311 in A. Schönke and H. Schröder (Hrsg.), Strafgesetzbuch, 26th edn, Munich, 2570.Google Scholar

Craufurd Smith, R. (1999), ‘Remedies for Breaches of EC Law in National Courts: Legal Variation and Selection’ in Craig, P. and Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, 287.Google Scholar

Crowe, R. (2005), ‘The Schengen Acquis in Police Cooperation: Implementation in an Enlarged Europe’, ERA-Forum, No. 3, Trier, 415.Google Scholar

Crutchfield George, B., Lacey, K. A. and Birmele, J. (1999), ‘On the Threshold of the Adoption of Global Anti-Bribery Legislation: A Critical Analysis of Current Domestic and International Efforts Toward the Reduction of Business Corruption’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 32, 1.Google Scholar

Cutler, S. (2004), ‘Tone at the Top: Getting it Right’, Speech by SEC Staff at the Second Annual General Counsel Roundtable, 3 December 2004 (available at: http://www.sec.gov>Speeches and Publications>2004/fourth quarter).

Daams, C. (2003), Criminal Asset Forfeiture: One of the Most Effective Weapons Against (Organised) Crime?, Basel.

Dahm, G., Delbrück, J. and Wolfrum, R. (1989), Völkerrecht, 2nd edn, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. E. (1999), ‘National Treaty Law and Practice: United States’ in Leigh, M., Blakeslee, M. R. and Ederington, L. B. (eds.), National Treaty Law and Practice (Austria, Chile, Japan, Netherlands and the US), Washington DC (available at: http://www.asil.org).Google Scholar

Davies, M. N. (2003), ‘The Role of Agents and Sales Representatives’ in Vincke, F. and Heimann, F. (eds.), Fighting Corruption, Paris, 57.Google Scholar

DeGeorge, R. T. (1987), Military Ethics: A Code of Ethics for Officers, Washington.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. (1994), ‘Die Strafbarkeit juristischer Personen nach dem neuen französischen Code Pénal’ in Schünemann, B. and González, C. S., Bausteine des europäischen Wirtschaftsstrafrechts, Madrid-Symposium für Klaus Tiedemann, Köln, Berlin, Bonn, München, 305.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. (1997), Corpus Juris: Introducing Penal Provisions for the Purpose of the Financial Interests of the European Union, Paris.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. (1998), Trois défis pour un droit mondial, Paris.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. (2002), Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. A. E. (eds.) (2000), The Implementation of Corpus Juris in the Member States, Vol. 1, Antwerp, Groningen, Oxford.Google Scholar

Deming, S. H. (2005), The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the New International Norms, Chicago.Google Scholar

Dietrich, O. (1998), ‘OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials in International Business Transactions’, Austrian Review of International & European Law 3, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distefano, G. (1994), ‘La pratique subséquente des états parties à un traité’, Annuaire français de droit international XL, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMento, J. F. C. and G. Geis (2005), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in the United States’ in Tully, S. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK), Northhampton (USA), 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, M. and McCorquodale, R. (1991), Cases and Materials on International Law, London.Google Scholar

Doering, K. (2004), Völkerrecht, 2nd edn, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Dommel, D. (1999), ‘Les défis de la corruption’ (working paper, available at: http://www.transparency.org>Research and Publications>Country Papers).

Douglas-Scott, S. (2002), Constitutional Law of the European Union, Harlow.Google Scholar

Ehrmann, M. (2002), ‘Procedures of Compliance Control in International Environmental Treaties’, Colorado Journal of International Law and Policy 13, 377.Google Scholar

Epping, V. (2004), ‘Völkerrechtssubjekte’ in Ipsen, K. ed., Völkerrecht, 4th edn, München.Google Scholar

Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.) (1999), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. (1993), Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. (1999), ‘The Basis for Criminal Responsibility of Collective Entities in Canada’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 153.Google Scholar

Fisse, B. (1991), ‘The Attribution of Criminal Liability to Corporations: A Statutory Model’, Sydney Law Review 13, 277.Google Scholar

Fisse, B. (1993), ‘Rethinking Criminal Responsibility in a Corporate Society: An Accountability Model’ in Grabosky, P. and Braithwaite, J. (eds.), Business Regulation and Australia's Future, Canberra, ch. 18.Google Scholar

Fisse, B. and Braithwaite, J. (1988), ‘The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability’, Sydney Law Review 11, 468.Google Scholar

Forti, G. (2000), ‘Remarks on the Role of Criminal Sanction in a Sustainable Prevention of Crimes in the Public Administration. The Italian Experience of Systemic Corruption’ in Bernasconi, P. (ed.), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice (updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996), Naples, 173.Google Scholar

Frowein, J. A. (1968), Das de facto Regime im Völkerrecht, Köln, Berlin.Google Scholar

Gareis, R. J. (1999), ‘The 1998 Amendments to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Comparative and Pragmatic Analysis of, and with, the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials’, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), A-1013.Google Scholar

Geradin, D. and D. Henry (2005), The EC Fining Policy for Violations of Competition Law: An Empirical Review of the Commission Decisional Practice and the Community Courts' Judgments, Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC), Working Paper 03/05.

Gilbert, G. (1991), Aspects of Extradition Law, Dordrecht, Boston, London.Google Scholar

Gilbert, G. (1996), ‘Crimes sans Frontières: Jurisdictional Problems in English law’ in Dugard, J. and Wyngaert, C. (eds.), International Criminal Law and Procedure, Aldershot, Brookfield (USA), Singapore, Sydney, 101.Google Scholar

Gilbert, G. (1998), Transnational Fugitive Offenders in International Law, Extradition and Other Mechanisms, The Hague, Boston, London.Google Scholar

Gilmore, W. C. (ed.) (1995), Mutual Assistance in Criminal and Business Regulatory Matters, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilmore, W. C. (2004), Dirty Money: The Evolution of International Measures to Counter Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, 3rd edn, Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Glaessner, G.-J. (2003), Sicherheit in Freiheit: Die Schutzfunktion des demokratischen Staates und die Freiheit der Bürger, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Global Witness (2004), Time for Transparency: Coming Clean on Oil, Mining and Gas Revenues, Washington.

Gobert, J. (1998), ‘Controlling Corporate Criminality: Penal Sanctions and Beyond’, Webjournal of Current Legal Issues2.Google Scholar

Gordon, G. (2000), The Criminal Law of Scotland, 3rd edn, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Guilmette, J.-H. (2004) [cited Guilmette 2004a], The Power of Peer Pressure – Development Co-operation Among Nations Using OECD and IDRC Network Approach (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar

Guilmette, J. H. (2004) [cited Guilmette 2004b], Peer Pressure Power: Development cooperation and networks - Making use of methods and know-how from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (available at: http://www.idrc.ca>search by full title).Google Scholar

Gurulé, J. and Guerra, S. (1998), The Law of Asset Forfeiture, Charlotteville.Google Scholar

Hafiez, M. (2004), ‘Mutual Legal Assistance and Repatriation of Proceeds – Pakistan's Experience’ in Asian Development Bank (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (key papers by speakers at the 4th Regional Conference of the ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur 3–5 December 2003, online edition available at: http://www.adb.org/>Publications>Controlling Corruption>Chapter7).

Hailbronner, K. (2004), ‘Der Staat und der Einzelne als Völkerrechtssubjekte’ in Vitzthum, W. (ed.), Völkerrecht, 3rd edn, Berlin, New York, 149.Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. (2005), ‘Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters in Ireland and the Proposed European Evidence Warrant’, ERA-Forum Special Issue, Trier, 53.Google Scholar

Haufler, V. (2001), A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy, Washington.Google Scholar

Hawley, S. (2003), Turning a Blind Eye: Corruption and the UK Export Credits Guarantee Department, Sturminster Newton.Google Scholar

Heimann, F. (2004), ‘The ICC Rules of Conduct and the OECD Convention’ in Vincke, F. and Heimann, F. (eds.), Fighting Corruption, Paris, 13.Google Scholar

Heimann, F. and C. Mohn (1999), ‘Die Rolle der Privatwirtschaft bei der Bekämpfung der Korruption’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (ed.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar

Heimann, F., Dell, G., Sng-Sachsenroeder, A. and Whittier, N. (2005), Transparency International Progress Report: Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, 21 January 2005 (available at: http://www.ipocafrica.org>Search by ‘TI Progress Report’).Google Scholar

Heine, G. (1995), Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Unternehmen, Baden-Baden.Google Scholar

Heine, G. (1999), ‘Sanctions in the Field of Corporate Criminal Liability’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 237.Google Scholar

Heine, G. (2000), Corporate Liability Rules in Civil Law Jurisdictions, (OECD Room Document [DAFFE/IME/BR (2000) 23], Paris).

Heine, G. (2001), ‘Europäische Entwicklungen bei der strafrechtlichen Verantwortlichkeit von Wirtschaftsunternehmen und deren Führungskräften’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 119, 22.Google Scholar

Heine, G. (2003), ‘Das kommende Unternehmensstrafrecht (Art. 100quater et seq.)’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 121, 24.Google Scholar

Heine, G., Huber, B. and Rose, T. O. (2003), Private Commercial Bribery – A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures, Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar

Heinze, C. (1997), Zur Frage der Vereinbarkeit der Aufnahme von Zypern in die Europäische Union mit dem Völkerrecht, dem Recht der EU und den Zypern-Verträgen von 1959/60, Kurzgutachten der Republik Türkei (available at: http://www.crh.camelot.de>Zypern>Veröffentlichungen zum Zypernkonflikt).

Henzelin, M. (2005), ‘ “Ne bis in idem”: un principe à géométrie variable’, Revue Pénale Suisse, Tome 123, 345.Google Scholar

Hillier, T. (1998), Sourcebook on Public International Law, London.Google Scholar

Hines, J. R. (1995), Forbidden Payment: Foreign Bribery and American Business After 1977 (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5266, available at: http://www.nber.org>Publications>Working Papers).

Hodgson Committee (1984), Profits of Crime and their Recovery: The Report of a Committee chaired by Sir Derek Hodgson, London.

Horn, F. (1988), Reservations and Interpretative Declarations to Multilateral Treaties, Amsterdam, Oxford, North-Holland.Google Scholar

Huber, B. (2002), ‘Sanctions Against Bribery Offences in Criminal Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden, Boston, 137.Google Scholar

Huet, A. and Koering-Joulin, R. (2005), Droit pénal international, 3rd edn, Paris.Google Scholar

Institute of Business Ethics, Codes of Conduct (available at: http://www.ibe.org.uk>Site Map>Codes of Conduct).

International Chamber of Commerce (2000), Fighting Bribery: A Corporate Practices Manual, London.

International Federation of Accountants (2005), Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance, and Ethics Pronouncements (available at: http://www.ifac.org).

Janis, M., Kay, R. and Bradley, A. (2000), European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Jean-Pierre, T. (2003), Taiwan Connection: Scandales et meurtres au coeur de la République, Paris.Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (2001), ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct, Self-Regulation in a Global Economy’, UN Research Institute for Social Development, 21.Google Scholar

Jescheck, H. H. and Weigend, T. (1996), Lehrbuch des Strafrechts: Allgemeiner Teil, 5th edn, Berlin.Google Scholar

Jung, H. (1979), ‘Die Inlandsteilnahme an ausländischer strafloser Haupttat. Regelungsgehalt und Problematik des § 9 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StGB’, Juristenzeitschrift 1979, 325.Google Scholar

Jung, H. (1986), ‘Legalität oder Opportunität im Strafverfahren?’ in Prütting, H., Recht und Gesetz im Dialog III, Köln, 55.Google Scholar

Kerse, C. and Khan, N. (2005), EC Antitrust Procedures, 5th edn, London.Google Scholar

Kilchling, M. (Hrsg.) (2002), Die Praxis der Gewinnabschöpfung in Europa, Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar

Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002), ‘Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15, No. 1, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kontorovich, E. (2004), ‘The Piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction's Hollow Foundation’, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, 183.Google Scholar

Kühne, H.-H. (2003), Strafprozeßrecht, 6th edn, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

LaFave, W. R. (2000), Criminal Law, 3rd edn, St. Paul (USA).Google Scholar

Langer, S. H. and J. Pelzman (2001), ‘An Analysis of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials’ in Fatemi, K. (ed.), International Public Policy and Regionalism at the Turn of the Century, Amsterdam, New York, 60.Google Scholar

Larguier, J. (1999), Procédure pénale, 17th edn, Paris.Google Scholar

Low, L. A. (2003) [cited Low 2003a], ‘The Global Legal Framework: The OECD, OAS and Council of Europe Antibribery Conventions: New International Standards and National Anti-Corruption Laws: Challenges for Effective Implementation and Enforcement’ (unpublished paper prepared for a Conference in Paris, April 2003).

Low, L. A. (2003) [cited 2003b], ‘Milestones in Mutual Evaluation: The Phase 2 Review of the United States under the OECD Anti Bribery Convention’, International Law Forum, Vol. 5, No. 2, 101.

Low, L. A. (2004), ‘Towards Universal International Anticorruption Standards: The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and other International Anticorruption Treaties: Too Much of a Good Thing?’ (presentation at the 2nd Annual Conference of the International Bar Association, International Chamber of Commerce, and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, The Awakening Giant of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Paris, 22-23 April 2004).

Low, L. A. (2005), ‘Enforcement of the FCPA in the United States: Trends and the Effects of International Standard’ (presentation at the 3rd Annual Conference of the International Bar Association, International Chamber of Commerce, and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, The Awakening Giant of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Paris, 4-6 May 2005).

Low, L. A. and Burton, M. L. (2000), ‘The OECD, OAS and Council of Europe Antibribery Conventions – A Comparison with the Corrupt Practices Act: New International Standards and their Implications’, The California International Practitioner, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1.Google Scholar

Low, L. A., G. Tillen and K. Abendschein (2003), ‘Country Report: The US Anti-Money Laundering System’ in Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (eds.), A Comparative Guide to Anti-Money Laundering: A Critical Analysis of Systems in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK and the USA, (study by the Basel Institute on Goveranance, commissioned by the Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz), Cheltenham (UK), Northhampton (USA), 346.Google Scholar

Magrini, P. (2003), ‘L'attuazione della Convenzione OCSE contro la corruzione negli Stati membri: il quadro comparato’ in Sacerdoti, G. (ed.), Responsabilità d'impresa e strumenti internazionali anticorruzione, Milano, 95.Google Scholar

Manacorda, S. (2004), ‘Investigation and Prosecution: Prosecution Authorities’ in Cullen, P. J. (ed.), Enlarging the Fight Against Fraud in the European Union (Academy of European Law Trier Series of Publication, Vol. 36), Cologne, 139.Google Scholar

Mauro, P. (1995), ‘Corruption and Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAdams, A. J. (2001), Judging the Past in Unified Germany, Cambridge.Google Scholar

McClean, D. (2002), International Co-operation in Civil and Criminal Matters, New York.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, D. (2000), ‘The OECD Agreement to Criminalize Bribery: A Negotiation Analytic Perspective’, International Negotiation 5, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, S. K. (1998), ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil Among Affiliated Companies in the European Community and in the U.S.: A Comparative Analysis of U.S., German and U.K. Veil-piercing Approaches’, American Business Law Journal 36, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitsilegas, V. (2003), Money Laundering Counter-Measures in the European Union: A New Paradigm of Security Governance versus Fundamental Legal Principles, The Hague, London, New York.Google Scholar

Möhrenschlager, M. (1999), ‘Developments on the International Level’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 89.Google Scholar

Moody-Stuart, G. (1997), Grand Corruption, 3rd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Moreillon, L. (ed.) (2004), Entraide internationale en matière pénale, Commentaire romand, Bâle, Genève, Munich.Google Scholar

Müller, P. (2003), commentary vor Art. 70 in Niggli, M. A. and Wiprächtiger, H., Basler Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch I, Art. 1–110 StGB, Basel, Genf, München, 1021.Google Scholar

Müller, J. P. and Wildhaber, L. (1982), Praxis des Völkerrechts, Bern.Google Scholar

OECD (ed.) (2000) [cited OECD 2000a], No Longer Business as Usual: Fighting Bribery and Corruption, Paris.

OECD, (2001) [cited OECD 2001a], Behind the Corporate Veil - Using Corporate Entities for Illicit Purposes, Paris.Google Scholar

OECD, (2003) [cited OECD 2003a], Peer Review, A Tool for Co-operation and Change, Paris.Google Scholar

Oehler, D. (1983), Internationales Strafrecht, 2nd edn, Köln, Berlin, Bonn, München.Google Scholar

Parker, J. S. (1996), ‘Doctrine for Destruction: The Case of Corporate Criminal Liability’, Managerial and Decision Economics 17, 381.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Passas, N. (1999), ‘Globalization, Criminogenic Asymmetries and Economic Crime’, European Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 1, No. 4, 399.Google Scholar

Perrodet, A. (2002) [cited Perrodet 2002a], ‘The Italian System’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 348.Google Scholar

Perrodet, A. (2002) [cited Perrodet 2002b], ‘The Public Prosecutor’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 415.Google Scholar

Pesquié, B. (2002), ‘The Belgian System’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 81.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1992), Bekämpfung der Geldwäscherei – Modellfall Schweiz?, Basel, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1996), ‘Die verjährungsrechtliche Einheit gemäss Art. 71 Abs. 2 StGB bei Bestechungsdelikten’, Basler Juristische Mitteilungen, 57.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1997) [cited Pieth 1997a], ‘International Cooperation to Combat Corruption’ in Elliott, K. A. (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy, Washington, 119.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1997) [cited Pieth 1997b], ‘Internationale Harmonisierung von Strafrecht als Antwort auf transnationale Wirtschaftskriminalität’, Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 109, 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (1999) [cited Pieth 1999a], ‘Die Strafbarkeit der aktiven Bestechung ausländischer Beamter’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P., Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M., 341.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1999) [cited Pieth 1999b], ‘International Efforts to Combat Corruption’ in American Bar Association (ed.), The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: How to Comply under the New Amendments and the OECD Convention, Chicago, E-1.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1999) [cited Pieth 1999c], ‘International Efforts to Combat Corruption’, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), A-1038.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2000) [cited Pieth 2000a], ‘From Ideal to Reality: Making the New Global Standard Stick’ in OECD (ed.), No Longer Business as Usual, Paris, 51.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2000) [cited Pieth 2000b], ‘ “Funktionale Äquivalenz”: Praktische Rechtsvergleichung und internationale Harmonisierung von Wirtschaftsstrafrecht’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht 119, 447.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2001), ‘Internationale Anstösse zur Einführung einer strafrechtlichen Unternehmenshaftung in der Schweiz’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 119, 1.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2003), ‘Die strafrechtliche Verantwortung des Unternehmens’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 121, 353.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2004), ‘Risikomanagement und Strafrecht: Organisationsversagen als Voraussetzung der Unternehmenshaftung, Risiko und Recht’ in Festgabe zum Schweizerischen Juristentag 2004, Basel, Bern, 597.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2006), ‘Korruption in internationalen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen’ in D. Dölling (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Korruptionseindämmung, München.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. and G. Aiolfi (2003) [cited Pieth and Aiolfi 2003a], ‘The Private Sector Becomes Active: The Wolfsberg Process’ in Clark, A. and Burell, P. (eds.), A Practitioner's Guide to International Money Laundering Law and Regulation, Surrey, 267.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (2003) [cited Pieth and Aiolfi 2003b], Anti-Money Laundering: Levelling the Playing Field (study by the Basel Institute on Governance, commissioned by the Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz), Basel.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (eds.) (2004), A Comparative Guide to Anti-Money Laundering: A Critical Analysis of Systems in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK and the USA (study by the Basel Institute on Governance, commissioned by the Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz), Cheltenham (UK), Northhampton (USA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (1999) (Hrsg.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. and J. Estermann, J. (2002), ‘Landesbericht Schweiz’ in Kilchling, M., Die Praxis der Gewinnabschöpfung in Europa, Freiburg i. Br., 371.Google Scholar

Pletscher, T. (1999), ‘Wie halten wir uns sauber? – Bekämpfung der Korruption aus Sicht der Wirtschaft’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P., Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M., 275.Google Scholar

Poncet, D. and P. Gully-Hart (1999), ‘Legal Framework of Extradition in Europe’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 277.Google Scholar

Popp, P. (2001), Grundzüge der internationalen Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen, Basel.Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. (1994), The Economics of Justice, Cambridge (USA).Google Scholar

Préfontaine, D. (1999), ‘Effective Criminal Sanctions Against Corporate Entities: Canada’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 277.Google Scholar

Price Waterhouse (1988), Effective Internal Accounting Controls for Non-Profit Organizations: A Guide for Directors and Management.

Prost, K. (1998), Breaking Down the Barriers: International Co-operation in Combating Transnational Crime (available at: http://www.oas.org/>Documents>Search by Title>MLA Resources).Google Scholar

Reuter, P. (1995), Introduction au droit des traités, 3rd edn, Geneva.Google Scholar

Rose-Ackermann, S. (1999), ‘Globale Wirtschaft und Korruption’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P., Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M., 40.Google Scholar

Rumpf, Ch. (2004), ‘Zur Rechtslage Zyperns: Grundlagen und Konfliktlinien’ (available at: http://www.tuerkei-recht.de).

Sacerdoti, G. (1999), ‘Das OECD-Überkommen 1997 über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P., Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M., 212.Google Scholar

Sacerdoti, G. (2000), ‘To Bribe or not to Bribe?’ in OECD (ed.), No Longer Business as Usual, Paris, 29.

Sacerdoti, G. (ed.) (2003), Responsabilità d'impresa e strumenti internazionali anticorruzione, Milano.Google Scholar

Salas, D. (2002), ‘The Role of the Judge’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 488.Google Scholar

Sands, P. (2004), Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sansonetti, R. (2001), ‘Die Problematik der Offshore-Finanzzentren und die Position der Schweiz’, Die Volkswirtschaft – Das Magazin für Wirtschaftspolitik 2, 40.Google Scholar

Savona, E. (2002), ‘Obstacles in Company Law to Anti-Money Laundering International Cooperation in European Union Member States’ in Pieth, M. (ed.), Financing Terrorism, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Schaupensteiner, W. J. (1999), ‘Korruption in Deutschland: Das Ende der Tabuisierung’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (Hrsg.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M., 131.Google Scholar

Schoenlaub, F. E. (1999), ‘International Bribery, Corruption and Fair Competition: Part 1’, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), A-1056.Google Scholar

Schubarth, M. (2002), ‘Das neue Recht der strafrechtlichen Verjährung’ inSchweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 120, 321.Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, I. and W. Hummer (2004), ‘Die Staaten’ in Neuhold, H., Hummer, W. and Schreuer, Ch., Österreichisches Handbuch des Völkerrechts, Vol. 1, 4th edn, Wien, 135.Google Scholar

Shaw, M. (2003), International Law, 5th edn, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shibahara, K. (1999), ‘Le droit japonais de la responsabilité pénale, en particulier la responsabilité pénale de la personne morale’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 39.Google Scholar

Sinclair, I. M. (1973), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Manchester.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. R. (2002), ‘Introduction’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 1.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. R. (2005), ‘An Academic Critique of the EU Acquis in Relation to Trans-Border Evidence Gathering’, ERA-Forum Special Issue, Trier, 28.Google Scholar

Spinellis, D. D. (1999), ‘Securing Evidence Abroad: A European Perspective’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 359.Google Scholar

Stefani, G., Levasseur, G. and Bouloc, B. (2000), Procédure pénale, 17th edn, Paris.Google Scholar

Stree, W. and D. Sternberg-Lieben (2001), commentary of §§ 78-79 in Schönke, A. and Schröder, H., Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 26th edn, Munich.Google Scholar

Swart, B. (1999), ‘The European Union and the Schengen Agreement’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 177.Google Scholar

Tarullo, D. K. (2004), ‘The Limits of Institutional Design: Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention’, Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 44, 665.Google Scholar

Tobler, C. (2005), Remedies and Sanctions in EC Non-Discrimination Law: Effective, Proportionate and Dissuasive National Sanctions and Remedies, with Particular Reference to Upper Limits on Compensation to Victims of Discrimination, Luxembourg(Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).Google Scholar

Transparency International (ed.) (2000), Overall Observations, Financial Transparency and Accounting Initiative: OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials (available at: http://www.transparency-usa.org>Publications).

Trechsel, S. (1997), Geldwäscherei: Prävention und Massnahmen zur Bekämpfung, Zürich.Google Scholar

Trepp, G. (1996), Swiss Connection, Zürich.Google Scholar

Tröndle, H. and Fischer, T. (2004), Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze, 52nd edn, Munich.Google Scholar

Tronnes, R. D. (2000), ‘Ensuring Uniformity in the Implementation of the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions’, George Washington International Law Review Vol. 33, 100.Google Scholar

Tulkens, F. (2002), ‘Negotiated Justice’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 641.Google Scholar

Tully, S. (ed.) (2005), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK), Northhampton (USA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

US Sentencing Commission (2004), Fifteen Years of Guidelines Sentencing (available at: http://www.ussc.gov).

US Department of Commerce International Trade Administration (2004), Addressing the Challenges of International Bribery and Fair Competition (available at: http://www.tcc.mac.doc.gov>Bribery Complaints and Reports>2004 Anti-Bribery Report).

Van den Wyngaert, Ch. (1993), ‘Belgium’ in Wyngaert, Ch. (ed.), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community, London, 1.Google Scholar

Van den Wyngaert, Ch. (1996), ‘Double Criminality as a Requirement to Jurisdiction’ in Dugard, J. and Wyngaert, Ch. (eds.), International Criminal Law and Procedure, Aldershot, 43.Google Scholar

Wyngaert, Ch. and Stessens, G. (1999), ‘The International Ne Bis In Idem Principle: Resolving Some of the Unanswered Questions’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wyngaert, Ch. (ed.) (2005), International Criminal Law, A Collection of International and European Instruments, 3rd edn, Leiden, Boston.Google Scholar

Vervaele, J. A. E. (2005), ‘The Transnational Ne Bis In Idem Principle in the EU: Mutual Recognition and Equivalent Protection of Human Rights’, Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 100-118 (online edn available at: http://www.utrechtlawreview.org>Archive).Google Scholar

Vincke, F. and Heimann, F. (2003), Fighting Corruption, Paris.Google Scholar

Von Hirsch, A. (1987), ‘The Sentencing Commission's Functions’ in Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A. and Tonry, M., The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, Boston, 3.Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A. (2005), Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A. and Tonry, M. (1987), The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, Boston.Google Scholar

Walther, S. (2004), ‘Communication over Confrontation: Modern Criminal Procedure in Transformation’ in Eser, A. and Rabenstein, C., Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, 367.Google Scholar

Warbrick, C. (2003), ‘States and Recognition in International Law’ in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, Oxford, 205.Google Scholar

Weinstein, M. J. and C. A. Trambley (2003), ‘Obtaining or Retaining Business under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: The Implications of U.S. v. Kay and SEC v. Mattson’ (presentation at the 2ndAnnual Conference of the International Bar Association, International Chamber of Commerce, and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, The Awakening Giant of Anti-corruption Enforcement in Paris, 24–25 April 2003).

Wells, C. (1999), ‘Developments in Corporate Liability in England and Wales and a New Offence of Corporate Killing – the English Law Commission's Proposals’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 119.Google Scholar

Wells, C. (2000), Criminal Responsibility of Legal Persons in Common Law Jurisdictions, (OECD Room Document [DAFFE/IME/BR (2000) 22], Paris).Google Scholar

Wells, C. (2001), Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd edn, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, C. (2005), ‘Corporate Criminal Responsibility’ in Tully, S. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK), Northhampton (USA), 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, J. T. (1999), Fraud Prevention: A Fistful of Dollars (available at: http://www.securitymanagement.com>Library>search by title).Google Scholar

Wise, E. M. (1999), ‘Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty to Prosecute or Extradite’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 15.Google Scholar

Wymeersch, E. (2001), Study of the Regulation and its Implementation in the EU Member States that Obstruct Anti-Money Laundering International Co-operation, Trento.Google Scholar

Zander, M. (1999), Cases and Materials on the English Legal System, 8th edn, London.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, R. (2004), La coopération judiciaire internationale en matière pénale, 2nd edn, Berne.Google Scholar

African Union 2003, African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption, 11 July 2003, available at: http://www.africa-union.org.

American Law Institute 1987, Restatement of the law, third, foreign relations law of United States.

BCBS CDD 2001, Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Customer due diligence for banks, October 2001.

Benelux Treaty 1962, Benelux Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 27 June 1962.

Botschaft 1993, Botschaft (Switzerland) 1993 über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes (Revision des Einziehungsrechts, Strafbarkeit der kriminellen Organisation, Melderecht des Financiers) vom 30. Juni 1993, BBl. 1993 III 277 (93.058).

Botschaft 1998, Botschaft (Switzerland) 1998 über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches (Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Einführung und Anwendung des Gesetzes) und des Militärstrafgesetzes sowie zu einem Bundesgesetz über das Jugendstrafrecht vom 21. September 1998 (98.038).

Botschaft 1999, Botschaft (Switzerland) 1999 über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes (Revision des Korruptionsstrafrechts) sowie über den Beitritt der Schweiz zum Übereinkommen über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr vom 19. April 1999 (99.026).

Bundesministerium für Justiz (Austria) 2004, Entwurf eines Bundesgesetzes über die Verantwortung von Verbänden für mit gerichtlicher Strafe bedrohte Handlungen (Verbandsverantwortlichkeitsgesetz [VbVG]), JMZ 318.017/0001-II2/2004.

Business Principles 2003 for Countering Bribery, An Initiative of Transparency International and Social Accountability International, June 2003, available at: http://www.transparency.org.

Circulaire 2004, Bulletin Officiel du Ministère de la Justice, No. 94, Circulaire de présentation des évaluations de la France par l'OCDE et le GRECO et fixant des orientations de politique pénale (CRIM 2004–06 G3/21-06-2004, NOR: JUSD0430119C, 21 juin 2004).

Conseil de L' Europe (1990), see reference in Books and Articles.

COE 1950, Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 5, 4 November 1950).

COE 1957, Council of Europe, European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 24, 13 December 1957).

COE 1959, Council of Europe, European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 30, 20 September 1959).

COE 1972, Council of Europe, European Convention on the Transfer of Proceedings in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 73, 15 May 1972).

COE 1974, Council of Europe, European Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes (ETS No. 82, 25 January 1974).

COE 1975, Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 86, 15 December 1975).

COE 1978a, Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 99, 17 March 1978).

COE 1978b, Council of Europe, Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 98, 17 March 1978).

COE 1983, Council of Europe, Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (ETS No. 122, 21 March 1983).

COE 1987, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R(87)18 concerning the Simplification of Criminal Justice (adopted 17 September 1987).

COE 1988, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R(88)18 concerning Liability of Enterprises having Legal Personality for Offences committed in the Exercise of their Activities (adopted 20 October 1988).

COE 1990, Council of Europe, Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime (ETS No. 141, 8 November 1990).

COE 1997, Council of Europe, Resolution (97)24 on the Twenty Guiding Principles for the Fight against Corruption (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 November 1997).

COE 1998, Council of Europe, Final Communiqué of the 102nd Session of the Comittee of Ministers (Strasbourg, 4–5 May 1998), available at: http://press.coe.int.

COE 1999a, Council of Europe, Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 173, 27 January 1999).

COE 1999b, Council of Europe, Civil Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 174, 4 November 1999).

COE 2000a, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation Rec(2000)19 on the Role of Public Prosecution in the Criminal Justice System (adopted 6 October 2000).

COE 2000b, Council of Europe, Explanatory Memorandum to Recommendation Rec(2000)19 (adopted 6 October 2000).

COE 2001, Council of Europe, Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 182, 8 November 2001).

COE 2003, Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 191, 15 May 2003).

COE 2005, Council of Europe, Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and the Financing of Terrorism (ETS No. 198, 16 May 2005).

Conseil de L' Europe (1990), see reference in Books and Articles.

CPS 2004, The Code for Crown Prosecutors (England and Wales), published November 2004, also available at: http://www.cps.gov.uk.

Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act 1996, Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, Pub.L.No. 104–114, 110 Stat. 785, 814-822.

Department of Commerce 2004, US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Adressing the Challenges of International Bribery and Fair Competition, the sixth Annual Report under Section 6 of the International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, July 2004.

Department of Justice 1999, US Principles of Federal Prosecution of Corporations, Washington, available at: http://www.usdoj.gov.

Department of Justice 2002, US Principles of Federal Prosecution, Washington, available at: http://www.usdoj.gov.

Department of Justice 2003, US Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organisations, Washington, available at: http://www.usdoj.gov.

Drug Trafficking Act 1994, United Kingdom Drug Trafficking Act 1994, chapter c. 37, 3 November 1994.

EEA 1996, The Economic Espionage Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. 90, chapter 19, Sec. 1831 et seq., 11 October 1996.

EU 1991, First Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (OJ L166, 28 June 1991, 77–83).

EU 1992, Treaty on European Union, Maastricht Treaty (OJ C191, 29 July 1992, 1).

EU 1995a, Convention on Simplified Extradition Procedure (OJ C078, 3 March 1995, 2–10).

EU 1995b, Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests (OJ C316, 27 November 1995, 49–57).

EU 1996a, Council Act of 27 September 1996, adopted on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, drawing up the Convention relating to Extradition between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C313, 23 October 1996, 11).

EU 1996b, Protocol drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests (OJ C313, 23 October 1996, 1–10).

EU 1997a, Convention drawn on the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union on the fight against Corruption involving Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of the European Union (OJ C195, 25 June 1997, 2–11).

EU 1997b, Protocol drawn on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Interpretation, by way of Preliminary Rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests (OJ C151, 20 May 1997, 2–14).

EU 1997c, Explanatory Report on the Second Protocol drawn on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests, text approved by the Council on 19 December 1997 (OJ C11, 15 January 1998, 8).

EU 1997d, Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and related Acts (OJ C340, 10 November 1997).

EU 1998a, Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines Imposed pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65(5) of the ECSC Treaty (OJ C9, 14 January 1998, 3).

EU 1998b, Joint Action of 22 December 1998, adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on Corruption in the Private Sector (OJ L358, 31 December 1998, 2–4).

EU 1999, European Commission Report of the European Antifraud Office (OJ C91, 31 March 1999, 8).

EU 2000, Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C197, 12 July 2000, 3).

EU 2001a, Council Act of 16 October 2001 establishing, in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, the Protocol to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C326, 21 November 2001, 1).

EU 2001b, Second Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (OJ L344, 28 December 2001, 76–82).

EU 2002a, Consolidated Version of the Treaty establishing the European Community (OJ C325, 24 December 2002, 33).

EU 2002b, Council Framework Decision on Combating Terrorism (OJ L164, 13 June 2002, 3).

EU 2002c, Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between Member States (OJ L190, 18 July 2002, 1).

EU 2002d, Council Regulation of 16 December 2002 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition laid down in Articles 82 and 83 of the Treaty (OJ L1, 4 January 2003, 1).

EU 2003a, Council Framework Decision on Combating Corruption in the Private Sector (OJ L192, 31 July 2003, 54).

EU 2003b, Protocol No. 10 on Cyprus (OJ L236, 23 September 2003, 955).

EU 2003c, Proposal for a Council Framework Decision to strengthen the Criminal-Law Framework for the Enforcement of the Law against Ship-Source Pollution, 2 May 2003 (COM (2003) 227 final).

EU 2003d, Council Regulation on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L001, 16 December 2002, 1).

EU 2004a, Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper on the Approximation, Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Criminal Sanctions in the European Union, 30 April 2004 (COM (2004) 334 final).

EU 2004b, Commission of the European Communities, Staff Working Paper: Annex to the Report from the Commission ‘Implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests and its Protocols: Article 10 of the Convention', 25 October 2004 (COM (2004) 709 final).

EU 2004c, Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (OJ C310, 16 December 2004).

EU 2005a, Third Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing (Ref. IP/05/682, 26 May 2005).

EU 2005b, Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the Fight against Organised Crime, 19 January 2005 (COM (2005) 6 final).

Eurojust Annual Report 2003 (The Hague, February 2004), 60 et seq.

FATF 40/1990, The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (29 July 1990).

FATF 40/1996, The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering 1990 (revised 28 June 1996).

FATF 40/2003, The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering 1990 (revised 20 June 2003).

FCPA 1977, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Pub.L.No. 95-213, 91 Stat. 1494).

FCPA 1988, The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act 1988, Pub.L.No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107 (3 August 1988).

FCPA 1998, International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, Pub.L.No. 105-366, 112 Stat. 3302 (10 November 1998).

Geneva Convention 1958, Geneva Convention on the High Seas of 29 April 1958, adopted 30 September 1962.

Geneva Protocol 1977, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1), (adopted 8 June 1977).

GRECO 1999, Resolution (99)5 establishing the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) (adopted 1 May 1999).

Harvard Research International Law 1935, Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime, American Journal of International Law 29, 435 (supp. 1935).Google Scholar

HCCH 1954, Hague Convention on Civil Procedure (concluded 1 March 1954, entered into force 12 April 1957).

HCCH 1965, Hague Convention on the Service abroad of Judical and Extrajudical Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (concluded 15 November 1965, entered into force 10 February 1969).

HCCH 1970, Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (concluded 18 March 1970).

House of Commons 2004, House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, The Work of the Export Credits Guarantee Department, Sixth Report of Session 2003–2004, Vol. 1, HC 506-I.

IAP 1999, International Association of Prosecutors, Standards of Professional Responsibility and Statement of the Essential Duties and Rights of Prosecutors (adopted 23 April 1999).

ICC 2005, International Chamber of Commerce, Rules of Conduct and Recommendations on Combating Extortion and Bribery in International Business Transactions (first adopted 1977, revised 2005).

Iran and Libya Sanctions Act 1996, Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-72, 110 Stat. 1541, 1543, 1550.

Law Commission (England and Wales) 1996, Legislating the Criminal Code: Involuntary Manslaughter, Report No. 237, London (HMSO).

Law Commission (England and Wales) 1998, Legislating the Criminal Code: Corruption, Report No. 248, London (HMSO), 106.

Law Reform Commission (Australia) 2003, Report 102 - Sentencing: Corporate Offenders.

OAS 1996, Inter-American Convention against Corruption (G.A/RES/1398(XXVI-O/96, 29 March 1996).

OECD 1960, Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (14 December 1960).

OECD 1992, Resolution of the Council concerning the participation of Non-Member Economies in the Work of Subsidiary Bodies of the Organisation (C(92)65/FINAL).

OECD 1994, Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 27 May 1994).

OECD 1996, Recommendation on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes of Foreign Public Officials (adopted 11 April 1996, C(96)27/FINAL).

OECD 1997a, Revised Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 23 May 1997).

OECD 1997b, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (adopted 21 November 1997, signed 17 December 1997).

OECD 1997c, Council Decision of 19 December 1997, (C(97)240/FINAL).

OECD 1998, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase1 (DAFFE/IME(98)17).

OECD 1999, Travaux Préparatoires of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), 1001 et seq., also (DAFFE/IME/BR(97)14).

OECD 2000a, see reference in Books and Articles.

OECD 2000b, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (first adopted 1976, revised 2000).

OECD 2000c, Resolution of the Council concerning the Participation of Non-Member Economies in the Work of Subsidiary Bodies of the Organisation, 25 September 2000 (C(96)64/REV2/FINAL).

OECD 2001a, see reference in Books and Articles.

OECD 2001b, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Text, Commentary and Clarifications, 31 October 2001 (DAFFE/IME/WPG(2000)15/FINAL).

OECD 2001c, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase 2 (DAFFE/IME(2001)3).

OECD 2001d, Notes by the Secretariat, The Liability of Legal Persons for Bribery Acts (DAFFE/IME/BR(2001)12).

OECD 2002, Update on the Implementation of the OECD Recommendation on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes to Foreign Public Officials in Countries Party to the Bribery Convention, (information as of January 2002).

OECD 2003a, see reference in Books and Articles.

OECD 2003b, Trade Directorate, Trade Commission, Action Statement on Bribery and Officially supported Export Credits, 20 February 2003 (TD/ECG(2000)15).

OECD 2004a, Resolution of the Council concerning the Participation of Non-Members in the Work of Subsidiary Bodies of the Organisation, 5 August 2004 (C(2004)132/FINAL).

OECD 2004b, Principles of Corporate Governance, endorsed by OECD Ministers in 1999 (reviewed in 2004).

OECD 2004c, Steps taken and planned Future Actions by Participating Countries to Ratify and Implement the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 12 November 2004 (DAFFE/IME/BR(2004)9/REV2).

OECD 2005a, Steps taken by State Parties to Implement and Enforce the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, Submissions as of December 2005, available at: http://www.oecd.org.

OECD 2005b, Trade Directorate, Trade Commission, Working Party on Export Credits and Credit Guarantees, Export Credits and Bribery: Review of Responses to the 2004 Revised Survey on Measures taken to Combat Bribery in Officially supported Export Credits, Situation as of 30 September 2005 (TD/ECG(2005)4/REV).

OECD 2006a, OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Phase 2 Monitoring Information Resources, Paris.

OECD 2006b, OECD WGB, The Mid-Term Study (forthcoming) (DAF/INV/BR/WD(2005)19/FINAL).

PACI 2005, Partnering against Corruption, Principles for Countering Bribery, An Initiative of the World Economic Forum in Partnership with Transparency International and the Basel Institute on Governance.

Patriot Act 2001, United States Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism, USA Patriot Act of 2001, 24 October 2001.

POCA 2002, United Kingdom Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (ch. 29, adopted 24 March 2003).

President's Commission 1984, President's Commission on Organized Crime, Interim Report to the President and the Attorney General, The Cash Connection: Organized Crime, Financial Institutions and Money Laundering 1984.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, Pub.L.No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745 (30 July 2002).

Schengen Agreement 1985, Agreement between the Governments of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the Gradual Abolition of Checks at their Common Borders (OJ 2000 L239 22 September 2000, 13).

Schengen Implementing Agreement 1990, Convention applying the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 (OJ 2000 L239, 29 June 1990).

Securities and Exchange Act 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 881 (6 June 1934).

Securities and Exchange Commission 2003, United States Securities and Exchange Commission 2003, Final Rule: Management's Reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 (14 August 2003).

Securities and Exchange Commission 2005, United States Staff Statement on Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, Division of Corporation Finance, Office of the Chief Accountant, 16 May 2005.

Sentencing Guidelines 1991, United States Sentencing Commission 1991, Guidelines Manual, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.

Sentencing Guidelines 2004, United States Sentencing Commission 2004, Revised Guidelines Manual, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.

Sentencing Guidelines 2005, United States Sentencing Commission 2005, Revised Guidelines Manual incorporated with new amendments, 1 November 2005, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.

The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act 2000, Pub.L.No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (25 April 2000).

TI and SAI 2002, Transparency International (TI) and Social Accountability International (SAI), Business Principles for Countering Bribery, 9 December 2002, available at: http://www.sa-intl.org.

Treadway Report 1987, United States Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, October 1987.

Turnbull Report 1999, Internal Control, Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code, England and Wales, September 1999.

UN MTE 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on Extradition (A/RES/45/116, 14 December 1990).

UN MTMA 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, (G.A/RES/45/117, 14 December 1990).

UN MTTP 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on the Transfer of Proceedings in Criminal Matters (A/RES/45/118, annex, 45 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49A) at 215, U.N. Doc. A/45/49, 14 December 1990).

UN MTTS 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on the Transfer of Supervision of Offenders Who Have Been Conditionally Sentenced or Conditionally Released (A/RES/45/119, 14 December 1990).

UN 1961, United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961 (adopted 30 March 1961).

UN 1966, United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (G.A/Res/2200A(XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316, 16 December 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171).

UN 1968, United Nations Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statuatory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, (G.A/RES/2391(XXIII), annex, 23 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 18) at 40, U.N. Doc. A/7218, 26 November 1968).

UN 1973, United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, (G.A/RES/3166(XXVIII), 14 December 1973).

UN 1974, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3237 (A/RES/3237(XXIX), 22 November 1974).

UN 1983, United Nations Security Council Resolution 541 (S/RES/541(1983), 18 November 1983).

UN 1988, United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (adopted on 19 December 1988).

UN 1990, United Nations Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August–7 September 1990.

UN 1996, United Nations Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions (A/RES/51/191, 16 December 1996).

UN 1997, United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations (A/RES/52/164, 15 December 1997).

UN 1999a, United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (A/RES/54/109, 9 December 1999).

UN 1999b, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (S/RES/1244(1999), 10 June 1999).

UN 2000, United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (G.A/RES/55/25, 15 November 2000).

UN 2002, United Nation Security Council Resolution 1410 (S/RES/1410(2002), 17 May 2002).

UN 2003, General Assembly Resolution (A/RES/58/422, 31 October 2003), Annex United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

United States Sentencing Commission 2004, see reference in Books and Articles.

Vienna Convention 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 (UKTS No. 58 (1980), Cmnd 7964).

Wolfsberg 2000, Global Anti-Money-Laundering Guidelines for Private Banking (30 October 2000, updated in 2002).

Wolfsberg 2002a, The Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Wolfsberg Statement (11 January 2002).

Wolfsberg 2002b, The Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles for Correspondent Banking (21 October 2002).

Wolfsberg 2002c, Anti-Money Laundering Principles on Private Banking (revised version May 2002).

Wolfsberg 2006a, Wolfsberg Statement, Guidance on a Risk-Based Approach for Managing Money Laundering Risks (forthcoming 2006).

Wolfsberg 2006b, Wolfsberg Guidance on Public Corruption (forthcoming 2006).

World Bank 2004a, Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers, May 2004, available at: http://www.worldbank.org.

World Bank 2004b, Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits, May 2004, available at: http://www.worldbank.org.