Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T17:05:43.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Media and Power in Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2019

Cherian George
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Baptist University
Gayathry Venkiteswaran
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Malaysia Campus

Summary

This study of Southeast Asian media and politics explores issues of global relevance pertaining to journalism's relationship with political power. It argues that the development of free, independent, and plural media has been complicated by trends towards commercialisation, digital platforms, and identity-based politics. These forces interact with state power in complex ways, opening up political space and pluralising discourse, but without necessarily producing structural change. The Element has sections on the democratic transitions of Indonesia, Myanmar and Malaysia; authoritarian resilience in Singapore; media ownership patterns in non-communist Southeast Asia; intolerance in Indonesia and Myanmar; and digital disruptions in Vietnam and Malaysia.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108665643
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 29 August 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Bibliography

Abbott, J. (2013). Introduction: Assessing the Social and Political Impact of the Internet and New Social Media in Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43(4), 579–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.785698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Jason P. (2011). Cacophony or Empowerment? Analysing the Impact of New Information Communication Technologies and New Social Media in Southeast AsiaJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 30(4), 331.Google Scholar
Albert, E. (2018). The Rohingya Crisis. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations. www.cfr.org/backgrounder/rohingya-crisisGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bagidikian, B. (2004). The New Media Monopoly. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T. and Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability. The American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonura, C. (2015). Political Polarization, Transition, and Civil Society in Thailand and Malaysia. Washington, DC: Middle East Institute. www.mei.edu/content/map/political-polarization-transition-and-civil-society-thailand-and-malaysia (accessed 20 July 2018)Google Scholar
Brooten, L. (2016). Burmese Media in Transition. International Journal of Communication 10, 182–99.Google Scholar
Bui, H. T. (2018). The new meaning of political participation in cyberspace: social media and collective action in Vietnam’s authoritarianism. In Hansson, E. and Weiss, M. L. (eds.). Political Participation in Asia: Defining and Deploying Political Space. London: Routledge, pp. 112–29.Google Scholar
Cain, G. (2014). Kill One to Warn One Hundred: the Politics of Press Censorship in Vietnam. The International Journal of Press/Politics 19(1), 85107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213508814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambodian Centre for Independent Media and Reporters Without Borders. (2017). Media Ownership Monitor: Cambodia. http://cambodia.mom-rsf.org (accessed 2 October 2018)Google Scholar
Campbell, C. (2017). World Press Trends 2017. Frankfurt, Germany: WAN-IFRA. anp.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/WAN-IFRA_WPT_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, N. (2011). The Concept of Participation. If They Have Access and Interact, Do They Really Participate? CM Communication Management Quarterly, 6(21), 1336.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. and Goetz, A. M. (2005). Democratizing Democracy: Feminist Perspectives. Democratization, 12(5), 783800. doi.org/10.1080/13510340500322181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, N. and Hepp, A. (2012). Comparing media cultures. In Esser, F. and Hanitzsch, T. (eds.). The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 249–61.Google Scholar
Dhakidae, D. (1991). The State, the Rise of Capital and the Fall of Political Journalism: Political Economy of Indonesian News Industry. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Dhyatmika, W. (2014). Who Owns the News in Indonesia? Nieman Reports. Fall 2014. https://niemanreports.org/articles/who-owns-the-news-in-indonesia/Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing Up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., Nenova, T. and Shleifer, A. (2003). Who Owns the Media? Journal of Law and Economics, vol. XLVI (October 2003), 341–81.Google Scholar
Downing, J. D. H. (2011). Media ownership, concentration, and control: the evolution of debate. In Wasko, J., Murdock, G. and Sousa, H. (eds.). The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Duong, M. (2017). Blogging Three Ways in Vietnam’s Political Blogosphere. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 39(2), 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G. (2014). Keeping it in the family. In Trust Ownership and the Future of News. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 99136.Google Scholar
Flew, T. (2016). National media regulation in an age of convergent media: beyond globalisation, neo-liberalism and internet freedom theories. In Flew, T. et al. (eds.). Global Media and National Policies: the Return of the State. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foa, R. S. and Mounk, Y. (2017). The Signs of Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 516.Google Scholar
Ford, M., Gillan, M. and Thein, H. (2016). From Cronyism to Oligarchy? Privatisation and Business Elites in Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(1), 1841.Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2017). Freedom of the Press 2017. Washington, DC: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press–2017Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2018a). Freedom on the Net 2018: Myanmar. Washington, DC: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/myanmarGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. (2018b). Freedom on the Net 2018: the Rise of Digital Authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/freedom-net-2018/rise-digital-authoritarianismGoogle Scholar
Garton Ash, T. (2016). Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
George, C. (2019). Asian Journalism. In Vos, T. P. and Hanusch, F. (eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
George, C. (2017). Singapore, Incomplete: Reflections on a First World Nation’s Arrested Political Development. Singapore: Woodsville News.Google Scholar
George, C. (2016). Hate Spin: the Manufacture of Religious Offense and Its Threat to Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
George, C. (2007). Consolidating Authoritarian Rule: Calibrated Coercion in Singapore. The Pacific Review 20(2), 127–45.Google Scholar
George, C. (2006). Contentious Journalism and the Internet: towards Democratic Discourse in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore and Seattle, WA: National University of Singapore Press and University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, E.T. (2018). Minister of Finance Incorporated: Ownership and Control of Corporate Malaysia. Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS). Palgrave Macmillan & Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, R. (2011). Internet Politics and State Media Control: Candidate Weblogs in Malaysia. Sociological Perspectives 54(3), 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadiz, V. (2013). The Rise of Capital and the Necessity of Political Economy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(2), 208–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadiz, V. and Robison, R. (2005). Neo-liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: the Indonesian Paradox. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), 220–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, S. (2018). Normalising Intolerance: Elections, Religion and Everyday Life in Indonesia. Centre for Indonesian Law, Islam and Society Policy Paper, University of Melbourne Law School.Google Scholar
Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist Disseminators, Detached Watchdogs, Critical Change Agents and Opportunist Facilitators: Professional Milieus, the Journalistic Field and Autonomy in 18 Countries. The International Communication Gazette 73(6), 477–94. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048511412279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, E. and Weiss, M. L. (2018). Conceptualizing political space and mobilization. In Hansson, E. and Weiss, M. L. (eds.). Political Participation in Asia: Defining and Deploying Political Space. London: Routledge, pp. 320.Google Scholar
Hew, W. W. (2018). Piety, Politics, and the Popularity of Felix Siauw. New Mandala. www.newmandala.org/piety-politics-popularity-felix-siauw/.Google Scholar
Houghton, T. J. and Nain, Z. (2015). ‘Watchdogs or lapdogs? Monitoring Malaysia’s media coverage of GE13’. In Saravanamuthu, J., Guan, L. H. and, Mohamed Osman, M. N. (eds.). Coalitions in Collision: Malaysia’s 13th General Elections.Petaling Jaya/Singapore: SIRD/ISEAS.Google Scholar
Hume, E. (2004). The Media Missionaries: American Support for Journalism Excellence and Press Freedom around the Globe. Miami, FL: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (2017). Buddhism and State Power in Myanmar. Brussels, Belgium: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
Jakarta Post. (2011, August 25). Indonesian Journalists Support Islamic Fundamentalism: Survey. Retrieved from www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/08/25/indonesian-journalists-support-islamic-fundamentalism-survey.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jansen, S. C. and Martin, B. (2003). Making Censorship Backfire. Counterpoise 7(3), 515.Google Scholar
Jomo, K. S. (2016). The Neoliberal Counter-revolution in Retreat? Third World Resurgence (310/311), 67.Google Scholar
Juniarto, D. (2018). The Muslim Cyber Army: What Is It and What Does It Want? Indonesia at Melbourne. http://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/the-muslim-cyber-army-what-is-it-and-what-does-it-want/.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. and Bellver, A. (2005). Transparenting Transparency: Initial Empirics and Policy Applications. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.808664Google Scholar
Kemp, S. (2018). The State of the Internet in Q4 2018. We Are Social. The Next Web (17 October) https://thenextweb.com/contributors/2018/10/17/q4-2018-internet-report-almost-4–2-billion-humans-are-online/Google Scholar
Klimkiewicz, B. (2009). Structural Media Pluralism and Ownership Revisited: the Case of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(3), 4362.Google Scholar
Kunkler, M. (2013). How pluralist democracy became the consensual discourse among secular and nonsecular Muslims in Indonesia. In Kunkler, M. and Stepan, A. (eds.). Democracy and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 5372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhdhir, L. (2015). Creating a Culture of Fear: The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Malaysia. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Lall, M. (2016). Understanding Reform in Myanmar: People and Society in the Wake of Military Rule. London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. (2006). Virtual Thailand: The Media and Cultural Politics in Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lim, M. (2012). The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia. Research Report. Tempe, AZ: Participatory Media Law at Arizona State University. www.public.asu.edu/~mlim4/files/Lim_IndoMediaOwnership_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Lowry, C., and Littlejohn, S. (2006). Dialogue and the Discourse of Peacebuilding in Maluku, Indonesia. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 23(4), 409–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansor, L. (2017, May 8). Media Prima Buys Rev Asia Unit in Landmark Deal. New Straits Times. www.nst.com.my/business/2017/05/237436/media-prima-buys-rev-asia-unit-landmark-deal (accessed 2 October 2018)Google Scholar
Marston, J. (1996). Cambodian news media in the UNTAC period and after. In Heder, S. and Ledgerwood, J. (Eds.). Propaganda, Politics and Violence in Cambodia: Democratic transition under United Nations peace-keeping (pp. 208–43). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Masduki. (2017). Media and Politics: Re-Thinking the Indonesian Broadcasting System. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 21(1), 1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maza, C. (2018, July 28). Cambodia Elections 2018: Democracy Died Long before People Cast Their Votes, Experts Say. Newsweek. www.newsweek.com/cambodia-elections-democracy-died-people-polls-1040387Google Scholar
McCargo, D. (2017). Mediatized Populisms: New Media, New Partisanship: Divided Virtual Politics In and Beyond Thailand. International Journal of Communication 11, 4138–57.Google Scholar
McCargo, D. (2003). Media and Politics in Pacific Asia. RoutledgeCurzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, R. (1998). Making Media Democratic. Boston Review (Summer). https://bostonreview.net/archives/BR23.3/mcchesney.html.Google Scholar
Media Development Investment Fund. (2018). An Unfavorable Business: Running Local Media in Myanmar’s Ethnic States and Regions. NY: Media Development Investment Fund. www.mdif.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/An-Unfavorable-Business-MDIF-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L., Márquez-Ramírez, M., Humanes, M. L., Sparks, C., Stepinska, A., … Wang, H. (2017). The Hybridization of Journalistic Cultures: a Comparative Study of Journalistic Role Performance. Journal of Communication 67(6), 944967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, A. K. (2001). Bound but not Gagged: Media Reform in Democratic Transitions. Comparative Political Studies 34(5), 493526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034005002.Google Scholar
Mishra, P. (2017). Age of Anger. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Morozov, E. (2012). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Myers, M. and Angaya Juma, L. (2018) Defending Independent Media: A Comprehensive Analysis of Aid Flows. Washington DC: Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA). www.cima.ned.org/publication/cmprehensive-analysis-media-aid-flows/.Google Scholar
Nain, Z. and Venkiteswaran, G. (2016). Local Media and Digital Frontiers: The Malaysian Conundrum. Media Development, 3/2016. World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
Nain, Z. and Wang, L. K. (2004). Ownership, control and the Malaysian media. In Thomas, P. N. and Nain, Z. (Eds.). Who Owns the Media?: Global Trends and Local Resistances. (249–270). Southbound, Zed Books and World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
Noam, E.M (2016). Who Owns the World’s Media? Media Concentration and Ownership around the World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. and Odugbemi, S. (2010). Evaluating media performance. In Norris, P. (ed.). Public Sentinel: News Media & Governance Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, pp. 329.Google Scholar
Nugroho, Y., Putri, D. and Laksmi, S. (2012). Mapping the Landscape of the Media Industry in Contemporary Indonesia. Research Report. Jakarta: Center for Innovation Policy and Governance and HIVOS Regional Office Southeast Asia.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. (2017). Intolerance in the Mainstream. Peace Review 29(2), 184–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2017.1308724.Google Scholar
Oster, J. (2015). Media Freedom as a Fundamental Right. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pascual, J. (2017). Press under Siege: Media Organizations as Targets of the State. Media Times. Manila: Centre for Media Freedom and Responsibility. http://mediatimes.cmfr-phil.org/press-under-siege-media-organizations-as-targets-of-the-state/ (accessed 29 September 2018).Google Scholar
Peruško, Z. (2013). What Went Wrong With Media Reforms in Post-Socialist Europe. Media Watch. Retrieved from bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?rad=658264Google Scholar
Pornwasin, A. (2017, June 26). Controversy over Regulation of OTT Content on Internet. The Nation. www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30319085 (accessed 2 October 2018).Google Scholar
Price, M. and Krug, P. (2000). The Enabling Environment for Free and Independent Media. Programme in Comparative Media Law & Policy, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Price, M., Rozumilowicz, B. & Verhulst, S. (Eds.). (2002). Media Reform: Democratizing the Media, Democratizing the State. Routledge.Google Scholar
Puddington, A. (2017). Breaking Down Democracy: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Rodan, G. (2004). Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London; New York: RoutledgeCurzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, A. (2009). Asia. In Norris, P. (ed.). Public Sentinel: News Media & Governance Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, pp. 353–75.Google Scholar
Rothman, P. (2015). The Politics of Media Development: The Importance of Engaging Government and Civil Society. Center for International Media Assistance, National Endowment for Democracy.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, A. (2017). In the Service of Power: Media Capture and the Threat to Democracy. National Endowment for Democracy and the Center for International Media Assistance.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, J. (2017). Media Ownership and Agenda Control: The hidden limits of the information age. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (2011). The Sociology of News. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Segura, M. & Waisbord, S.. (2016). Media Movements: Civil Society and Media Policy Reform in Latin America. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sen, K. and Hill, D. (2011) (Eds.), Politics and the Media in Twenty-First Century Indonesia: Decade of Democracy. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shin, D.C. (2015). Cultural Hybridization in East Asia: Exploring an Alternative to the Global Democratization Thesis. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25(1), 1030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2014.953009.Google Scholar
Siriyuvasak, U. (2001). Regulation, Reform and the Question of Democratizing the Broadcast Media in Thailand. Javnost-the Public, 8(2), 89107.Google Scholar
Splichal, S. (2004). Privatization: The cost of media democratization in East and Central Europe? In Thomas, P. N. and Nain, Z. (Eds.). Who Owns the Media?: Global Trends and Local Resistances (pp. 5168). Southbound, Zed Books and World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
Steele, J. (2018). Mediating Islam: Cosmopolitan Journalisms in Muslim Southeast Asia. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Steele, J. (2012). The Making of the 1999 Indonesian Press Law. Indonesia, 94, 122.Google Scholar
Steele, J. (2005). Wars Within: The Story of Tempo, an Independent Magazine in Soeharto’s Indonesia. Jakarta & Singapore: PT Equinox Publishing Indonesia and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sudibyo, A. and Patria, N. (2013). The Television Industry in Post-authoritarian Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(2), 257–75.Google Scholar
Tai, Q. (2014). China’s Media Censorship: a Dynamic and Diversified Regime. Journal of East Asian Studies 14(2), 185209.Google Scholar
Tapsell, R. (2018). New media, old rule in Malaysia. In Lopez, G. and Welsh, B. (eds.). Regime Resilience in Malaysia and Singapore. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre, pp. 129–43.Google Scholar
Tapsell, R. (2017). The political economy of digital media. In Jurriens, E. and Tapsell, R. (Eds.). Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and Divergence, pp. 5674. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
Tapsell, R. (2015). Indonesia’s Media Oligarchy and the ‘Jokowi Phenomenon’ in Indonesia, 99, 2950.Google Scholar
Tapsell, R. (2013). Negotiating Media ‘Balance’ in Malaysia’s 2013 General Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 32(2), 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapsell, R. (2010). Stopping the Flow. Inside Indonesia (Jul–Sep 2010). www.insideindonesia.org/stopping-the-flow.Google Scholar
The Edge Financial Daily. (2017, August 16). Astro May Face Pressure from Ansa. www.theedgemarkets.com/article/astro-may-face-pressure-ansa.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. N. and Nain, Z. (Eds.) (2014). Who Owns the Media?: Global Trends and Local Resistances. Southbound, Zed Books and World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2017). Corruption Perceptions Index 2016. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International.Google Scholar
Triyono, H. (2018). Don Bosco: Perintah Bang Surya, you bantu Jokowi. Beritagar (26 November 2018). https://beritagar.id/artikel/bincang/don-bosco-perintah-bang-surya-you-bantu-jokowi (accessed 2 May 2019).Google Scholar
Tunsarawuth, S. (2018). Thailand – ‘Reform’ Further Restricts Free Speech and Media. Annual Report. Southeast Asian Press Alliance. www.seapa.org/thailand-reform-further-restricts-free-speech-and-media/ (accessed 26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Turner, G. (2016). The nation-state and media globalisation: has the nation-state returned – or did it never leave? In Flew, T. et al. (Eds.). Global Media and National Policies: The Return of the State (Chapter 6). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
UNDP (2018). Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme. www.hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-indices-indicators-2018-statistical-update.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2018a).World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: 2017/2018 Global Report. Paris, France: UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/world-media-trends-2017.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2018b). UNESCO Observatory of Killed Journalists. https://en.unesco.org/themes/safety-journalists/observatory.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2008). Media Development Indicators: A Framework for Assessing Media Development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000163102Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2012). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank La Rue. A/HRC/20/17. www.refworld.org/docid/5008134b2.html.Google Scholar
Van Bruinessen, M. (2011). What Happened to the Smiling Face of Indonesian Islam? Muslim Intellectualism and the Conservative Turn in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.Google Scholar
Venkiteswaran, G., Thein, Yin Yadanar and Kyaw, Myint. (2019). Legal changes for media and expression: New reforms, old controls. In Brooten, L., McElhone, J. M. and Venkiteswaran, G. (eds.). Myanmar Media in Transition: Legacies, Challenges and Change. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, pp. 5994.Google Scholar
Voltmer, K. (2013). The Media in Transitional Democracies. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, M. (2014). New Media, New Activism: Trends and Trajectories in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. International Development Planning Review 36(1), 91109. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2014.6.Google Scholar
Weiss, M. L. and Hansson, E. (2017). Participation and space: Themes, patterns, and implications. In Hansson, E. and Weiss, M. L. (eds.). Political Participation in Asia: Defining and Deploying Political Space. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 206–11.Google Scholar
Whitehead, L. (2002). Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wijayanto, (2017). Fearing the Majority: Catholic Media in Muslim Indonesia. Media Asia 44(1), 3339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2017.1374319.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J. (2008). The Future of the Internet – and How to Stop It. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Media and Power in Southeast Asia
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Media and Power in Southeast Asia
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Media and Power in Southeast Asia
Available formats
×